https://www.theguardian.com/film/2016/may/24/jane-bond-gillian-anderson-next-007-twitter
Why can't women leave male culture alone and come up with their own characters? Why do they insist on hijacking and ruining everything that men enjoy?
This has got to stop.
>>74981315
The only surprise here is that this hasn't happened sooner. Bond is literally everything feminists hate.
Burn it with fire.
DON'T BULLY GILLIAN YOU FUCK
RRREEEEE
>>74981315
Jane Bond meets Goldenrod was already a porno.
Pretty good one, iirc. Amber Lynn was hotter back then.
>>74981315
Ok fine, we'll just start putting men in all the great classic female roles...
oh wait...
>>74981472
My only ray of sunshine is that the new Top Gear (the grand tour, not the god-awful BBC one) will be gloriously un-PC and make a lot of stupid people very angry
>>74981855
Here's hoping that Amazon noticed that un-PC helps make a show wildly popular in hundreds of countries all around the world.
>>74981855
>he new Top Gear (the grand tour, not the god-awful BBC one) will be gloriously un-PC and make a lot of stupid people very angry
pls Amazon is just another Jew enterprise and so are their original series.
Pretty sure Hiddleson will be the new Bond, didn't he get brought in to the studio for a chat.
>>74982286
Clarkson choose Amazon mostly because they promise to give him free hand.
Also, sir Sean Connery best Bond
![18208768-happy-african-corporate-worker-talking-on-cell-phone-in-modern-office-Stock-Photo[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/NDhahGs.jpg "18208768-happy-african-corporate-worker-talking-on-cell-phone-in-modern-office-Stock-Photo[1].jpg")
Yo it's ya boy Mr. Moneypenny
>>74981315
>female Bond
>she falls in love with an African or Muslim brit
God damnit.
I bet next Bond will be black.
Did they not learn their lesson by how much everyone fucking despises the feminist ghostbusters bullshit?
>>74981315
>Daniel Craig too old at 35
>Giggly Anderson with her fake ass british accent will be Jane Bond at age 71
Fucks sake
>>74982835
I bet next Bond movie is going to tank hard.
somewhere out there there's a fat greasy feminist having a uncontrollable orgasm over this.
>>74981315
>Gillian Anderson
Literally Who?
Keep this stupid bullshit to /tv/
Nobody gives a single fuck what some vagina jew wants to be
>>74982877
They never learn.
I haven't really thought this through but here's a question:
Has there ever been an activity, pastime, or hobby that started off as a thing for women and was then co-opted and joined by men?
Absolutely everything I can think of started off as something that men invented and enjoyed that women then adopted as their own.
Can anybody think of anything men do that women did first?
SCULLAY
>I saw a film called Jane Bond once. I don't think Gillian Anderson would have wanted to be in that
Sometimes I love the commenter's on the Guardian, their less irritating than the writers.
Honestly it'd be quite interesting to see a female James bond if they literally make her personality be 100% Bond - because it'd be interesting to see if a woman can actually pull off that kind of "masculine sophistication", ruthlessness and alphaness in a convincing manner despite being a woman.
She could be pretty badass, like if there was a Samus film.
....Of course that's just wishful thinking since they'd obviously ruin the entire money to insert bullshit messages and we'd end up with a female Bond that couldn't even do 5 pushups, let alone beat the shit out of, let's say, Jaws.
>>74983312
Cooking - traditionally femenine, but most high profile chefs are men. Oy vey.
>>74981315
What's wrong with you? Got your knickers in a twist over a woman wanting to play the Bond role? You're pathetic.
What will happen with Moneypenny?
>Inb4 lesbian feminists
>>74983404
I'm not arguing that they couldn't be a female spy movie if people want to watch it but why can't they come up with an original character?
Cooking works, good thinking
>what if Gillian Anderson was Bond?
I would gladly watch a film where Anderson not only saves the day, but has sex with half a dozen women along the way. That's what James Bond does, so...
This just in-Wonder Woman to be played by Terry Crews also known as Wonder Man.
>>74981315
>>>/tv/
or >>>/r9k/ for you woman hating virgins
i hope that next bond is white women and her love afair is black male ^__^
QUIT RUINING HER. FUCK!!!! DELETE.
In all seriousness, I hate how Hollywood literally only make remakes now because they can't come up with original ideas. The past 3 Bond movies blew not only because the plot was retarded, but they're not funny anymore. James Bond movies were cheeky and FUN to watch. Now, they're all serious mode
Pic related. Take me back to the 90s plz
>>74982689
>not MoneyDollar
YO ITS ME NIGGA CASH MONEY DOLLAR PAPER NJGGA WHAT UP BITCH YO FUCK POLICE WE UNDERGROUND NIGGA GET MONEY
>not Emily Blunt
ayyy
>>74982877
The reboot looks fine.
>>74981315
Jane Bond sounds like it could work. As long as she doesn't fuck up the stunts, action, and keeps the story badass, I think it could work.
>>74983666
Good point, I didn't think of that.
But to play the Devil's advocate I'll say, "Oh 007 is just a codename, anyone can be 007, we can just say old Bond retired. Heheheh." t. Schlomo
>>74983787
lel
I wonder how the fuck that'd work.
>>74983572
Moneypenny will become the new M.
>>74981315
How would you feel about Karen Gillian? She is British, tall, pretty, and has the physical chops.
>>74983935
faggot
They already act ashamed and are very reluctant to give Bond a gadget. Fuck you Q, you hipster faggot. Give him a fucking plastic pen that shoots bullets.
GILLIAN Is cool as fuck, i would not care as long as its not a nigger.
>>74981315
Leave Gillian alone guys she's an amazing, intelligent, and talented woman.
>>74981315
Nope. Sorry. Not happening. Enough is enough.
>>74983104
>Gillian Anderson
>literally who
You must be 18 to post on this site
>>74983935
typical narcissicistic self-promotion through controversy. i doubt this woman cares about silly bullshit like gender representation.
This is now a Scully thread. Post your best Scullys.
>>74981315
>>74981315
There is literally nothing wrong with this. It's art, you can explore new avenues, new ideas. Cultural and ideas don't belong to any particular group.
God you sound like the offspring of a comic book nerd upset about a change in background mixed with an Sjw obsessed with cultural appropriation.
>>74984057
>>74984162
Problem: women are underrepresented in Hollywood films
solution: shoehorn female actors into roles that were written for men
How does this make sense? There are plenty of talented women around to create new characters rather than trying to hijack old ones
She's so perfect
>>74984699
She is old now, though. Not saying she doesn't look fantastic for her age, but she really couldn't do the physical action required for a Bond movie. You realize that even with amazing care of her body, a woman has to deal with massive bone density loss as she ages?
I know you guys have much better shoppers than yours truly but here is the perfect response:
> The Jones Bridget's diary
> Staring Jean Claude Van Dame
Pic related, it's pronounced "bree-jay", like in French
That's something to explore further, sorry for my poor shop skills.
If we can have a Jane Bond why not a Jones Bridget?
>>74985648
Here is the original poster.
It is possible to make multiple variations of this, considering there were different posters of the original movie, the first sequel and the most recent one.
If you feel like spread and expand the idea.
Why not?
Every Bond that came after Moore has been a faggot anyways.
>>74984806
Oh, I agree completely. But if the trend pushes for this, perhaps we can at least make it a white woman instead of a black man, and perhaps make it someone actually good for the role. I like Gillian Anderson, but post menopause is not the time for an action role. She can be M, maybe.
>>74983935
