>be American
>Build stealth boat
>20 stories tall
>Stealth
When did we start letting blacks design our boats?
When you elected one as president.
>>74960681
thos
>>74960296
Ever been out on the open sea?
>>74960296
I think it works. Stealth means that it can't be detected by radars et similia. Even if it can be seen, how do you shoot at it with modern weaponry? A big invisible boat is actually a nice weapon.
>>74960296
Radar stealth probably. Its a big ocean. I'd bet navies rely on radar more than people standing around looking for boats.
>>74960681
MUFASA
>>74960909
Well, presumably in order to do anything militaristic, it has to shoot at you.
It's either within visual range or using a fire control radar. Either one betrays its stealth.
This is a repost, this is a sliding thread. Sage, report, move on.
>>74960957
This. What is this? The 18th century?
>>74961124
No.
>>74960296
You've made this exact thread before.
>>74960296
>get shilled for billions of dollars because its supposedly painted with special stealth jizz
>>74960296
>wooden destroyer
>2016
>>74960909
It's stealth only when it's radars are offline. Do you understand what's a stealt boat with radars on?
the real crazy thing about this fucker is that it has an insane power supply; enough to power a small city. get ready for energy weapons n' shit bois.
>>74961907
They're already testing laser weapons on ships.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0DbgNju2wE
>>74960296
>be ching
>capture seagulls
>seagulls usually go after ships and get fried by their radars
>implant tracking chips to them
>if a chip gets starts to get fried it will send his positions to the chings
>aim missiles to said area
>press button
>no more stealth ships
>>74960296
hahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhahhahah
>bitch as faggots be mad
>>74960296
our are better :^)
>>74962368
independence when?
>>74962586
they are so cool looking
>>74960296
>I don't understand naval warfare but I'll comment on it anyway
>>74960296
>Be me
>Navy commander for foreign country
>Sir are radars are detecting nothing but there is a giant boat coming our way that seems to have loud jungle beats and monkey noises coming from it.
>That, that nothing.
>Ok sir.
>>74962586
>manned by shitskins
thanks for giving this technology to the enemy
>>74962586
>independence when?
...when we throw off the shackles of the kikes/israelis, anon.
>>74962368
E__E__E
_R_R_R
_ _AAA
ERARARE
_ _AAA
_R_R_R
E__E__E
>>74962424
Do you know that zumwalt doesn't have that thing?
>>74962928
we wuz sailors
>>74963047
>zumwalt doesn't have that thing?
They have two reactors. They're ready to go, my russian friend.
>>74962928
>needing to get that close
What are missiles?
>>74963144
But ship doesn't have it, you know why?
![094652913[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/ICl8CFr.jpg "094652913[1].jpg")
>>74960296
>boat
That's clearly a ship you dumb faggot
>>74963032
nice flag
New Caledonia sounds like a medieval fiefdom
>>74960296
do you know what the stealth means?
for example the b-2 bomber has been designed to fly on such altitudes that it is impossible for satellites to detect it. it doesnt necessarily mean that its design should be ''stealth''
>>74962368
hello colony
>>74962586
Cuck boats
![Railgun_usnavy_2008[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/2ZIFidN.jpg "Railgun_usnavy_2008[1].jpg")
>>74963235
Because it's still in the prototype stage and rail wear is still a very real issue.
>The rails need to withstand enormous repulsive forces during shooting, and these forces will tend to push them apart and away from the projectile. As rail/projectile clearances increase, arcing develops, which causes rapid vaporization and extensive damage to the rail surfaces and the insulator surfaces. This limited some early research railguns to one shot per service interval.
>The inductance and resistance of the rails and power supply limit the efficiency of a railgun design. Currently different rail shapes and railgun configurations are being tested, most notably by the United States Navy, the Institute for Advanced Technology at the University of Texas at Austin, and BAE Systems.
>>74960296
They would not waste that much money on stealth ship design, if it wasnt stealthy, would they?
Got any decent tests on subjsect of detecting the ship?
>>74960296
>stealth boat
I don't see anything. Though, I did hear that stealth boats could be detected by retards, so..
>>74963509
They would, that's how military jews work.
Stealth usually refers to radar, satellites and other SIGINT and tracking tech in military terms.
It's also physically stealthier because of the smooth, sleek design and color that reflects the ocean well. The slanted design also helps against ballistics.
>>74963476
russians == BTFO
>>74960296
that things supposed to be immune to torpedo fire and asms
its big as shit because its supposed to counter with equally deadly force
>>74963476
The powerplant isn't nearly as much of a problem as storing the charge.
Railguns need a sudden burst of extreme amounts of energy, not a constant supply of moderate amounts of energy.
The real challenge lies in building capacitor banks.
>>74963742
The real challenge is the cost of 1 shot, it's ~400000$ now, and has a range of 150 miles, for that price you can shoot tomahawk missile on 1500 miles.
This camuflage will be a thing if visual detection was important
>>74963878
Don't think the cost of ammunition concerns the Americans.
>>74960296
it shows up as a fishing boat on radar
>>74960296
That's a destroyer?
It has the same displacement as a WW2 cruiser.
What makes it a DD?
>>74963953
It costs so much not cause of ammunition itself. You have to change barrel of weapon itself after 1 or 2 shots.
>>74963977
When radars are offline. Though ship without radars is a fishing boat.
>>74964123
...kek?
Is that true or just a rumor?
I would never mount a weapon on a warship which would be that intensive to maintain, total waste of money.
Not to mention that this is all a complete waste of money and it would've been wiser to construct regular warships and keep researching into symmetric warfare. Specializing in asymmetric warfare is borderline retarded.
>>74964224
I bet this thing glows like a christmas tree when it's broadcasting.
>>74963878
Where the fuck are you getting that number from. The big advantage of a railgun system is that it is significantly cheaper per shot than an equivalent missile.
All the cost estimates I've seen for the railgun we're currently developing have put it in the $50,000 range per shot
>>74964123
>Chief of Naval Research Admiral Matthew Klunder stated, "Barrel life has increased from tens of shots to over 400, with a program path to achieve 1000 shots."
>>74964224
proof russia cant into 5th gen
>>74960296
>he thinks size is main factor of sth being undetectable
Another day, another murka shitposts
>>74964535
Size is the main factor of having this dick detected in your sister's pussy.
>>74964292
>Is that true or just a rumor?
It's bullshit see >>74964342
>>74964342
That's how it supposed to work, I'm telling you how prototypes are working now.
>>74964347
Proof you are not even in amateur league of this discussion.
>>74962046
>Le laser weapons meme
>>74960296
>bait
it's for radar
>>74964602
>400 rounds fired / barrel
Pretty much what the battleships of the last century were armed to perform. Iirc the Bismarck's guns were rated to fire 300 times before having the barrels replaced.
Has the army released any information that quantifies effectiveness of the railgun against missile strikes?
Is its biggest selling factor that it cannot be stopped, whereas missiles can be?
![file[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/AyFD8aa.jpg "file[1].jpg")
>>74964620
The PAK FA has exposed fans on the front. Russia literally cannot into 5th gen stealth.
>That's how it supposed to work, I'm telling you how prototypes are working now.
I'm supposed to believe a nobody vatnik on /pol/ knows more about the Navy's railgun than the people developing it? lel
>>74960296
Seeing how shit is decided from over a hundred kilometers away now, whether it can be seen by radar, infrared and UV is a lot more important than how tall it is.
![5naCu4s[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/WclRETW.jpg "5naCu4s[1].jpg")
>>74964912
>>74964620
And for comparison what an actual 5th gen stealth fighter looks like from the front.
>>74964912
People who "develop" rail guns are only intrested in money they can milk from your government. It just like lazer guns they were developing from the 80s and still the best they can shoot with it is the tiny drone that flies in the straight line on the predictable tragectory in the hot clear weather. 26 years of "develompent" and such GRRREAT results!
>>74960681
Australia, you truly are the one destined to shitpost in Godhood
>>74962586
> Sweden did something cool.
Oh wait...
> Shitskins mutiny.
TROLOLOLOL
>>74960296
Isn't the biggest deal of "stealth" that it doesn't come up on radar?
>>74965741
Stop you make sence on /pol/ that mean your not a paid trol poster your trigered, cut you wifi, burn your hd, get cah, run for your life /pol/bro!!!!!!!!
>>74965996
they coming!!!
>>74964912
>The PAK FA has exposed fans on the front. Russia literally cannot into 5th gen stealth.
What about the J-20? Can that into stealth?
>>74965370
Starting to see why their government stripped them of all firearms.
Nigger inefficiency is the reason we can never re-build the Saturn 5 again, much less set up Moon colonies or Mars habitation facilities.
>>74960296
Got a picture if the boat?
>>74966219
Thats not true though. USA is building SLS rocket and that is as good as Saturn 5. Despite all this shit that happens in NASA about black asian latino histry months
The 1860s were centuries ahead of their time. Look at this stealth steam boat.
>>74966040
>>74964912
There is no such thing as "stealth." All it does is lower radar visibility. That is, reduce range of detection. In military jargon, "reducing the bubble." (The bubble being the imaginary dome surrounding the radar representing the detection range.)
So, the PAK FA has what you call "stealth." It is not as good as the F-22 at reducing the bubble, but it is better than nothing (and certainly better than the F-35.)
>>74962368
R A R E
A
R
E
>>74963238
That ship looks like one of those old Civil war era Ironclads.
>>74966662
I know what stealth means you condescending piece of shit and if you honestly believe that the PAK FA has a smaller RCS than the F-35 you are an honest to god retard.
The fact that the PAK FA has exposed turbine fans tells you a lot about the state of their military in regards to RCS reduction.
>>74968143
relax, armchair aircraft designer
This thread..... again. Is /pol/ just a massive shitposting board now?
>>74960681
fpbp
