>"We can't let these damn fags purrtend to git married! It's an insult to GAWD and JESUS CH-RIST!"
Do you republitards even take logic into account, or are you that deeply enslaved by your local cult? No wonder the whole world can't stand you.
>t**d
Ugh, stop using such ableist slurs, I'm reporting you for hate speech.
>>74830306
>fags
>committed relationship
AHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHA
>more Horse shit
fucking hell the shills are out of control tonight
>>74830306
>can have kids
>can have kids
>can't have kids
The reason the ones on the right can't marry is because they're Jewish. Go take your poster to a Jewish community.
>>74830306
No body gives 2 fucks about some fags getting married,what annoys people is that they want to get married in a church,a place where only traditional family values belong,and when the priests refuse to marry them they cry out "oppresion" and "homophobia"
They can get married in the face of the state,but not in the face of God
>>74830306
>logic
>marriage
>>74830306
Wow really makes you think
>>74830306
Holy shit talk "about damn... really makes you think!"
>>74830306
But you can't be divorced in the eyes of the lord, so take out the middle one.
>>74830306
Wouldn't mind gays if it wasn't for them being usually white. The world is grossly overpopulated and gays actually help quell population growth a bit, however gays are usually only in white countries meanwhile shitskins fuck like rabbits.
>>74830306
The argument is that its unchristian for gays to wed so why do it in a the standard church (a Christian place of worship) but typical screamers such as yourself demand to be the centre of attention and make a nonissue into what it is today
>>74830545
I'm pretty sure the state doesn't force churches to marry faggots. But yeah, they will cry out oppression when they get a request for a cake turned down by a Christian bakery.
>>74830306
Marriage exists for the sake of children. Faggots shouldn't be allowed near children.
>>74830545
Spot on, brother.
>>74830583
It does, it makes me think why OP hasn't gone and eaten a bullet yet for being a tremendous faggot.
>>74830306
I don't respect marriage as an institution, so I don't give a fuck who marries who, and I'm voting for Trump. Here's one for you, boys!
>>74830306
>slippery slop is a fallacy, they say
This shit is just "Well, you already went down this much, might as well keep sliding"
>>74830868
He's a Horseyfag and Horsey tells people that touching a gun makes you a fat ugly redneck whose opinions are all wrong
>>74830306
Anti-Christian!
>>74830545
So much this. I also dont understand why fags even want to be a part of the church. Thats like a jew saying "i wanna become a member of the nsdap!" Just stupid
>>74830306
I don't really understand the focus on banning gay marriage. It's not a big deal in terms of legislation and the state should not interfere with church business.
I'd like to see more focus on banning gay propaganda, as in Russia. Seems like a more head-on approach that even nonreligious people could get behind if done right.
>>74830306
Should /pol? support gay marriage sure its degenerate but look at the big picture....
Muslims really really hate gays
>It's a "horsey posters should be banned" episode
The first two marriage could very much work, the faggots not so much.
>>74831686
Muslims hating something doesn't make it automatically correct.
I'm sure muslims hate getting kicked in the nuts, would that mean getting kicked in the nuts is god's final gift to humanity?
>>74830461
Woah.
>>74830306
If that pic about fags was true they wouldn't be spreading AIDS at nigger rates.
The only reason for marriage is to create an environment in which to raise children.
Marriage is not necessarily required to do so, but a marriage type situation with a mother and a father is ideal.
There is no necessity to be married in order to have a healthy relationship with a significant other. So no requirement for gay marriage.
The only reason faggots ever wanted marriage in the first place is because they couldn't have it.
Giving gays marriage rights has opened up the flood gates of sexuality acceptance and made it so that people who accept homosexuals have to accept all forms of sexuality rather than acknowledge that they are actually forms of mental illness.
How long until we have a bisexual person demanding they be allowed to two people because of their sexuality. Polygamy will get support from the SJWs for this and Islam will agree, affluent men will probably agree too because they will want multiple wives. This expanded definition of marriage makes it lose meaning. Pretty soon you have groups instead of couples and whenever there is more than one man in the group fatherhood loses meaning as without testing nobody really knows who fathered the child. This means men will feel less responsible to protect them and less bonded with them. With a push for all sexualities to be accepted side by side with this it won't be long until pedophilia is accepted and with a lack of father figures to protect them children will be raped.
Long story short if you support gay marriage, you support child rape.
>>74832680
The rate at which faggots spread disease puts niggers to shame.
>>74830306
>point to the degeneracy that was warned would happen if marriage was changed and treated casually/anyone can get it and leave it easily
Yeah, that's not an argument, you're pointing to the effect and saying that since the effects are the norm, the cause doesn't matter. Tired of this meme.
Liberal attitudes towards relationships is destroying the west. This includes gay marriage.
Marriage should between a man and a gun.
>>74830461
Ok then genius
Fag gets gender reassignment surgery, legally changes sex to female. Now the fags can marry
>>74830306
>implying faggots live long enough to have a 20 year relationship and not succumb to the gay man's disease commonly known as AIDS
>>74830306
Dude tomorrow someone will decide to marry with hard drive so you will let them?
>>74834227
>still cant have kids
You're not very bright are you?
>>74834227
I don't know what kind of fucking magical sex-change surgery you guys have Down Under, but everywhere else, snipping off your peepee doesn't give you the ability to birth new humans.
>>74830306
What does a Lesbian bring to a second date?
>a U-Haul
What does a Gay man bring on a second date?
>What second date?
>>74834268
I fail to see any scenario where that could possibly harm you or anybody for that matter.
>>74834939
kk ill just put my harddrive as head of household for tax purposes and collect food stamps since our combined income with our SSD infants is only 75k a year. With 12 people and only one income it's tough times out here! Can't wait to get back my 12 deduction tax returns
>>74834227
this is some top quality ausposting
>>74830306
Get aids and die fag
>>74830461
Plenty of heterosexual couples can't or simply don't want to have kids. Should they be banned from marrying? Not sure why we'd want the first two couples reproducing anyway.
>>74830458
this
>""""""""""committed""""""""""
>20 years
>want
>we've
>for
>get
>implications
>>74830306
if you accepted all of our ideological conceits surrounding marriage including retaining virginity until marriage and not being promiscuous or adulterous the other 2 images would not be true either, the people who do shit like that are also liberals and we should ban all three examples, also you're a retard.
>>74830306
The first two are absolutely fucking degenerate and should be dealt with. The last one is a lie, the real picture of homo marriage is number two. Gays have the highest rate of divorces.
>>74830306
Marriage is a privilege, not a human right. It's religious and will always be.
If you're that eager to share your taxes with someone, you can already make a civil union.
>>74830306
>ILLEGAL
So gays get arrested for holding wedding ceremonies? I've never heard of that ever happening.
>>74830750
They do in Denmark and Sweden.
It's legal now, fuck are you still bitching about?
>>74830306
>Marriage is a religious ceremony
>religion is anti-homosex
>have the option of a civil partnership which is legally exactly the fucking same
>"wow bigots are you standing in the way of LOVE!?!?!?"
>>74830306
As an agnostic,I think that gays are not good for society. They are hypersexual and most are mentally ill. They should not raise kids because of these things
>>74837601
>Marriage is religious
Atheists can get married tho.
Remember how Americans legialized gay marriage only to find out that fags were sex fetishit that don't give a shit about marriage en masse, and it was all a huge distraction?
Good times.
>>74837817
And they can also get baptized, doesn't mean it's for atheists.
>>74830306
>>74837869
Baptism is exclusively religious though, a non-religious baptism wouldn't make any sense. Whereas a hefty proportion, probably the majority in a lot countries, of marriage ceremonies are already non-religious.
>>74837397
>Should they be banned from marrying?
Honestly? Yes.
Marriage really only exists to put affairs into order for the children sakes. Otherwise, two individuals could form an S-Corp or business partnership if they wanted similar legal and financial arrangements marriage provides.
>muh family leave
>muh committed relationship
>muh tax breaks
Meaningless. Any state recognition of a relationship between two people is pointless unless it serves the new citizenry that is created by that union.
I'd be completely onboard with new legislation that changed marriage from a voluntary partnership, into a mandatory one that is assigned by the state upon pregnancy.
I recognize that I'm no doubt in a deep minority on this.
>>74838097
it's a religious ceremony
atheists get married because it's the norm for straight couples to do so. It comes down to if the priest is okay with it, because if he is then go for it. The problem is that the religion these priests follow explicitly points out gay people as problems, while telling them to accept those of others faiths.
Which is more 'religious'? Bringing kids into and overpopulated world or adopting a kid who's already here who doesn't have a family
>>74830306
>We've ben in a committed relationship for 20 years and want to get married
Literally never happens.
Average number of sexual partners for faggots are in the thousands. 99% of faggot relationships are open relationships.
>>74838300
>overpopulated world
>this old lefty meme
Haven't seen this one in a while, that's for bringing it around again.
>>74838274
Marriage pre-dates religion, it has been hijacled by religion. It started as nothing more than a way of securing the reproductive capacities of a women to ensure the passing on of your estate to your progeny and not someone elses.
>>74838417
>the world is overpopulated goy! Just enjoy a hedonistic lifestyle! Marriage is for old republicans!
>due to low birth rates the population is falling! Don't worry goy, we'll import 10 billion niggers!
>>74830306
All three should be illegal. And would be if Republicans had their way.
>implying the first two isn't liberal politics
Slippery slope, and all that.
>>74830306
This comic is exactly true, we must tighten up divorce laws and ensure that marriage remains an institution producing and maintaining happy, stable families.
>>74830306
>implying all 3 of those shouldn't be illegal.
>>74838499
They've got us coming and going.
So liberals have weakened the institution of marriage for decades by making it easier to get married and divorced. Now they want to weaken it further with fag marriage. B-but the slippery slope isn't real goy.
>>74830306
Marriage by definition implies the union between a woman and a man, It's been always like that. Now, if they want to create a new sort of union that allows same sex union I'm ok with it, just name it diferent.
>>74830723
They really don't help control population. Gays are by and large men, and even at the higher estimate of them among the population, it doesn't decrease the number of available wombs. Anything that effects women, disease, famine, etc. is more likely to curb population growth because it takes out incubators. There's a reason you only need one bull on a ranch.
Overpopulation is a meme, anyway.
Evil homophobic, racist, sexist, xenophobic, heteronormative facts coming through. Out of the way you pleb faggots.
>>74830306
>strawman, strawman, strawman
>HEY LOOK I'VE GOT A POINT
These comics are all the same, you can't make a point arguing strawmen jesus.
Most people don't marry in casinos, most people don't divorce ever, most homosexual relationships are disfunctional and transitory.
But I guess then their point would sound utterly retarded.
>>74838499
It's consumerist and materialist lifestyles of the people who are here that make the world overpopulated, not the number of people.
>>74830306
I dream of some day witnessing your impaling, but maybe not because you'd probably like it.
>>74838932
>28% of homosexual men have had more than 1000 partners
kek
>>74830306
there's literally nothing wrong with homophobia
>We can't let those bigots have their own white institutions and allow ppl to deny gays from buying cakes! It's an insult to DEMOHCRUCY and SEKULAR PROHGRUSS! durrr ba hurrrr! [shits all over self]
If gay marriage destroys the church then I am all for it. Christians just need to die out already
>>74831686
Muslims hate the Western image of the effeminate queens. Closet homosexuality is rampant in the Middle East. In fact, I regard faggotry as mostly a Third World phenomenon.
Note that the Quran contains sex advice for imams on pederasty. And that the highest per-capita consumers of homosexual porn are Pakistanis.
If anything, it's something to hold against the Oriental hordes.
>>74830306
Fags are notoriously unfaithful. I read a study a while back, where literally none of the gay couples remained faithful over a 5 year period.
>>74830306
Have you met a republican?
They don't support the other two as well
>>74838234
>>muh family leave
>>muh committed relationship
>>muh tax breaks
muh equal rights
People who get married should not get special rights.
t. lonelyfag
>>74830306
The state gains nothing to justify giving the financial incentive to gays.
Normal couples produce children for the war machine and general infinite growth model.
>>74830306
>he still doesn't know marriage is literally for the sake of getting children
>he still thinks fags should get to marry despite not being able to ever have children
You'll take your Lebenspartnerschaft and fucking like it.
i thought the point of marriage was kids=future taxpayers and monogamy ensures they stay together to raise the kids and pass on useful knowledge? isnt that why people suck nowadays because parents have no idea and leave education up to the inept state?
pragmatically what use is a gay married couple? or a generation educated by the state except as pliable slave labor?
>>74830306
>Society turns on Christianity.
>Christianity declines, leaving a void.
>Void is filled by all sorts of degenerate behavior.
Be careful what you wish for
>>74830306
I never understood why civil partnerships isn't good enough. Marriage is a religious ceremony. If it's treated EXACTLY the same legally, then what's the problem? Why force yourselves into a religious thing which obviously doesn't want you?
>>74838932
>"this is NOT an attack"
>accuses the people it's not attacking of lies and conspiracy in the second half of the same fucking sentence
>>74830306
WHY ARE YOU SPAMMING HORSEY CARTOONS????????
>>74839753
>If it's treated EXACTLY the same legally
Usually, it isn't.
>Marriage is a religious ceremony
Then why is it regulated by law?
>>74838932
More facts.
>>74839950
Everything is governed by law. If you want to have the government involved in reallocating your assets to somebody else when it all ends, that's fine. You can do that with contract law, marriages are just contracts with special rules to account for pussy power.
The main legal issue involved in marriages is children.
>>74830461
>hetero couples are never infertile
>fags can't adopt
>>74840221
>Everything is governed by law
Yes, and so all laws must be governed by the Constitution and the Parliament. There are no Lords Temporal anymore with their own special ability to make rules.
Marriage is a legal issue, not a religious issue.
>The main legal issue involved in marriages is children.
Point to a marriage law that even mentions children in any way other than excluding them from being able to enter into a marriage.
The main legal issues involved in marriage is who can marriage and what a marriage entitles the married to. Children have virtually nothing to do with it.
>>74840550
Just so we're on the same page here.
Do you want to the right to have the traditional "white wedding" in a church just like a male-female couple - or do you just want the same legal recognition and regulation by signing a piece a paper?
I support the latter, I oppose the former.
>>74840873
I want identical legal status to married straight couples, down to the name, and I want institutions that receive public money to be required to facilitate the relevant pomp and ceremony.
Private institutions - truly private institutions - can do what they want.
>>74830306
Really? I thought marriage was an act of the divine to forever bind a man and a woman as one under god. You know, the entity that said men shall not lay with men on pain of being sent to hell? You fucking faggot, that's where you're going.
>>74830306
Fuck man you have been shot posting these liberal comics on several threads how much you gain for each slide you post?
>>74830306
I don't care that they get married. They should not be allowed to adopt though.
>>74830306
Same sex marriage serves no purpose but the for faggots to stroke their egos.
>>74834227
>>74830306
libtards need to stop being so islamaphobic by supporting gay marriage... gays in general... and feminist
its the current day and i cant honor kill a family member because they are gay... so intolerant liberal america for shame
>>74841064
> down to the name
This is where you meet the opposition. You're intruding into the religious element of marriage. If the civil unions don't offer the exact same legal recognition, then I'd agree that needs to change (even though the few breaks married people get is to encourage breeding).
But why can't you accept a "separate but equal" approach? Legally it can work. But freedom of religion is also a thing, and forcing religions to accept something they do not want because of muh equality just fucks with their rights.
>>74841125
that stopped being a thing when the goverment got involved
>>74830306
>committed relationship for 20 years
>look 30 at best
>>74830306
>>74841285
I'm against gay marriage, but you're retarded and don't know what you're talking about.
>>74830306
>implying I think you should be able to get married after only just meeting someone or after being divorced
Just because we already allow 2/3 types of degeneracy doesn't mean we should allow the third
>>74830545
Gay marriage has been allowed in denmark since 2011, churches still have full autonomy to decide who they want to host marriages for.
Tell those feeling entitled to muh dreamwedding to find a church that doesn't mind or to do it at the city centre like the rest.
>>74841491
>You're intruding into the religious element of marriage.
http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/ma196185/
If they don't want people to demand marriage then they shouldn't entitle the law regulating it the "Marriage Act".
Your entire dumb argument rests on this conception that marriage is simultaneously religious and legal, and it's not. Go ahead and read through the Marriage Act and see if you can find where it defines marriage as a religious institution. You can't. You can find where it entitles ministers of religion to solemnise marriage subject to their registration with the proper federal authorities, but you'll never find the part that states that marriage is a religious institution because no such part exists.
>but I feel like it is
Your feelings aren't law.
That's why "separate but equal" can get fucked. There's no reason for it other than you getting triggered because people you don't like exist and want things. Why compromise to protect your dumbshit feelings when you won't do the same for mine? And furthermore, why compromise when I'm right?
Marriage is a particular set of rights and entitlements existing between a man and a woman who have indicated through a process by law established that they desire enter into especial relations, and the state. Nothing more. On what basis do you object to changing "a man and a woman" into "two adults"? Your feelings?
>but you just pulled that definition out of your arse
Yes, I did, but it's the only one that adequately reflects marriage in practice today. Everything you're about to add to that definition is extraneous detail that you _desire_ to be true, but that isn't actually true in practice. Go ahead, prove me wrong.
>forcing religions ... just fucks with their rights.
So fucking what? Government exists to remove some rights in the pursuit of greater goods. Your right to do 140km/h in a 50km/h zone can get fucked because safe transit is more important.
>>74830807
I would argue that marriage exists for consolidation of resources for mutual benefit, and sometimes to further political peace.
A christian wedding is its own beast and should be governed by the church.
>>74842244
Not an argument.
>>74837505
>Gays have the highest rate of divorces.
Umm...
http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/research/census-lgbt-demographics-studies/relationship-data-2014/
http://www.canberratimes.com.au/act-news/samesex-divorce-rate-lower-than-heterosexual-couples-20140215-32t32.html
>Government has only one reason to be involved with marriage to begin with, and that is because stable families that produce more citizens are beneficial to both the government itself by way of producing more tax payers, and society as a whole
>To incentivize this behavior, tax benefits ought to go towards married people capable of producing children
>As homosexuals, by definition, cannot produce children, they ought get no benefits, save perhaps in the event that they adopt a child from an AMERICAN orphanage (no bringing in 3rd world shitskins to stroke your own ego as to how tolerant and progressive you are, our orphans come first)
>Get a separate legally recognized union apart from marriage that provides no bennies beyond hospital visits and some next of kin legal right stuff
Once you frame the argument as being under the basis of producing citizens deserving tax benefits, the libtard's argument falls to pieces. I've tried it and all they can do is try to say that marriage isn't about children and spew memes like "you just want marriage 0.98"
>>74831151
Teen rebellion, it really all boils down to doing the opposite as your parents and sometimes making public mockeries out of their values depending on how much you hate your parents.
>muh pure faggot marriage
YEah no.
There is a reason faggots get aids and all kinds of other diseases so quickly
>>74830306
Except it is legal for fags to get married.
What the fuck are you even talking about?
>>74830306
When a couple wants one of them to stick their dick in an easily tearable orifice caked in shit they lose all credibility.
>>74830306
>ctrl+f
>ID: 2Hiizina
>1 match
:^)
>>74842814
Producing more citizens is a bad thing.
A third of our jobs are going to be done by robots by 2060, and the people who get laid off are going to be eating tax dollars, not producing them.
If anything, the government ought to be disincentivizing large families.
>>74830545
I will never get married somewhere outside of a church.
>>74843805
Besides, beaker children have been a reality for a while now.
We are steadily outgrowing our need for the unrestrained sex drive to survive, yet nature hasn't caught up yet.
From what i see in animals, homosexuality is a facilitator for other males, that keeps a homosexual beta, to get laid with the females more. Somehow they love hanging around the homosexual beta, leaving the other male to have his pick when it's mating season.
This what i've seen in birds, not so studied on mammalian homosexuality
>>74844011
What will the priest say to you faggots ?
Do you homos accept each other as your lawfully husband ?
>>74844837
I'm okay with that.
>Committed 20 year gay relationship
We'll find actual proof of God before we find that.
>>74845292
Mine's been going on 5 years now, should be able to hold water seeing as i allow my partner to fuck around if he uses a rubber, bare strange would equal a break of trust to me.
Don't want them diseases.
>>74830306
We didn't want any of this shit either.
Marrying someone needed to be approve by the parents of each family and divorce was out of the question.
Now you shits want to make you cake and eat it too.
>>74846772
Impressive faglord, you managed to undermine your "argument" in the same sentence.
>>74847476
Not making an argument though, just a statement.
What's wrong here though, i trust my partner to be responsible enough to have safe sex, and i understand gays are promiscuous as all hell.
I may be a gay retard, but i have taken some steps to prepare for the future.
Might be erroneous though, we will see that when tested.
>>74848303
Yes, but how can you call it a relationship when you don't even have the fundamentals down?
Seems that you're just fuck-buddies at worst or friends with benefits at best.
>>74830306
>no Ben Garrison watermark
kys
>>74848504
Oh my relationship definitely leans heavily towards the platonic side, sex happens as it will.
I believe more people should select partners for platonic reasons rather than sexual, might bring stability back into marriages.
Also i am just in this thread for the sake of discussion, marriage interests me little personally.
>>74848913
>I believe more people should select partners for plat..
Because you're retarded. Can't think beyond your own desires.
What about the children?
>>74830306
I hate faggots!
>>74830306
I really don't care what you do in your house don't be offended when I don't go to your wedding
>>74849284
What about them, don't plan to have any.
You're right, i am selfish and as a selfish man i do not believe myself adequate for raising a child, weird uncle that has no place in the raising of the child at best.
Besides, our very own michael jackson, h. c. andersen managed to inspire and entertain children nationwide without molesting too many of them.
We should know the utility of the childless weirdo as danes.
>>74849970
Correct, but that same man did not attempt to get married with people so he could lead a promiscuous life.
Go do your thing, just stop trying to get society to acknowledge it.
>>74830306
Just because your degenerate hippie commune is okay with serial divorce and drunk impulse marriage, doesn't mean we are too. The world is not your hugbox.
>>74830306
That pic is retarded. The Catholic church won't allow any of the examples given.
>>74850235
Frankly i despise gay culture for the look at me attitude.
They should sit down and be happy for the gibs they already have, not whine for more and more gibs. Can't sustain yourself forever on another man's pocket, nor should anyone want to.
>>74830306
Its their religion, so please be more tolerant you bigoted piece of shit.
>>74830306
>20 year faithful gay couple
No such thing exists.
>>74830306
every act of degeneracy (including those mentioned in OP) has been fought against. each time they lost to the progressives and another rock from the foundation of America was removed.
>>74838932
>>74840161
>social science
>1980's
Any marriage that is not within the house of God by a man and a woman is not a real marriage. So even if two straight people get married by the court or outdoors, its not marriage. Marriage is a religious sacrament. I personally dont care if they want to get married by court. Its not like they are affecting my image of marriage in any way since they arent actually married.
I fully agree that the middle one should also be illegal
>>74852475
this.
If they're still together you can be 100% sure that they've fucked around with other people on the side either openly or secretly.
Fags are on the highest tier of degeneracy.
>>74853337
Christianity is mental retardation mixed with jew lies
marriage is defined as a tax break between a human and their partner
>>74853435
so you're anti trump thats a bold stance
>>74830306
First one is illegal BTW.
Can't get a marriage license while intoxicated.
>>74830306
I swear fags have never heard of civil partnerships or just pretend they don't exist.
>>74853578
You don't have to agree with every aspect of a candidate to support him
>>74853545
Give it to them. Just dont get married in the church. The state and government can view them as married but I wont. To me marriage has literally nothing to do with tax breaks. Its about unifying yourself with another person and promising to take care of that person until you die in front of both families and God.
>>74852475
>sweden
>telling people who is and isn't degenerate
>this thread has this many replies
It's legal, you b8 eaters. Sage and hide.
>>74830306
Marriage is a religious term that is solely between a man and a woman.
if gays want to get married, call it civil union, and I have no problem with it.
what i take offense to is that they want to get 'married" which is in defiance of the very meaning of the word
