APOLOGIZE
/POL/ LITERALLY BTFO
RT is shit, liberal progressive agenda, nothing new.
It's not out for another full month.
>>74668606
>Bill Murray
>>74668606
>implying these reviews won't come out of pure sympathy and capitulation to a movie that "oh so unfairly got bashed
This is all part of the plan.
>>74668606
>that description
kek
>>74668606
You just used paint to put the new movie's poster over the old movie's rating. You didn't even bother to cover the review where it says Bill Murray is the lead.
So lazy.
>>74668606
(((Murray)))
wow if it wasnt the current year i will suspect all those reviewers are leftwing progressives not wanting to be perceived as misoginistic pigs.
>>74668606
FRESH!
>>74668606
>>74668822
>certified fresh
>>74668606
There was me thinking that Rotten Tomatoes was usually pretty accurate. Dropped.
Fake:
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/ghostbusters/
This isn't even a good fake: The 2016 Ghostbusters film doesn't come out until July 15, how could 88% of the audience like it?
its fake
>>74668606
Im sorry
>>74668822
They're both pretty good films though
>>74668876
Vice City is such a fucking great game
bad fake. Try harder faggot.
>>74669476
That might be true, but they're being graded on political beliefs.
>>74668606
There's not a single transgender person in this film. How fucking sexist.
>>74669211
>>74669117
>>74668606
>>74668671
>>74668822
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/ghostbusters_2016/
fuck off its a fake
>>74669096
I want to punch this guy so bad
>>74668822
what a load of garbage
>one more reason to not listen to """critics"""
The kikes have upped their lies and propaganda, but they can't fool Ol' Jimmy "Empty my nine on the welfare line" Rofle
>>74668822
Weird seeing your last name in that
>>74668606
>people have said they wont go pay to see it
>they stay consistent and don't go
>they didn't go so they didn't rate
>literally everyone(>90% probably) who saw it went in with a bias that it has to be good or the SJWs would be wrong
>go home and talk about how great it was
>still only get 88% from audience
This is an obvious self selection bias and you're an idiot.
>>74669642
Slimer?
>>74669745
a
fucking
leaf
read the thread, you chink shit
>>74668822
This is the reason every news org and media platform is full diversity shill mode 24/7, if you don't the liberal hate machine will tear you down.
>>74668606
movie wont be out until july . im not apologizing for shit
Are these niggers for real?
>>74668606
All Female Ghostbusters can't be funny or good
>>74669875
How is Iceland?
>>74668606
its releases in july you idiots. thats the original movie
>>74668606
>88% liked it
>>74668606
It's likely a career-ending move by a critic to give this a bad review, it's literally seen as a hate-crime by their editors and publishers. Of course this got great reviews from the initial batch of specially picked and highly biased critics who got early access and permission to publish their reviews first.
It isn't real
Check before posting idiots
>>74668822
I thought "Spy" was funny. Melissa McCarthy isn't bad.
But the metric to judge whether or not something is good should have absolutely nothing to do with politics. I didn't like "Spy" because it was progressive, I liked it because I laughed.
"London Has Fallen" was fun as shit. Anyone who attacks its premise is deluded. If terrorists are going to try to kill the President, you bet your ass it's more than likely going to be Muslim ones.
>>74668606
Ok :( i am sorry that the movie is pure shit.
>>74671080
Yet so many fucking film critics despise objectivity in the face any film that opposes their political ideology.
>>74669646
>94% want to see
Fuck, why?
>>74672939
Feminism.
