How will she ever recover?
I am now a #RomneyZombie
>>74657777
That's it, I'm now a #Cruzmissle
>>74657777
>conservatives want open carry rights in all states
>refuse to allow guns into RNC events
Wow, it's almost like practical concerns should override ideology sometimes
>>74657777
she doesn't want to get rid of all guns
she wants to close loopholes such as the gun show loophole & provide background checks for when you get guns
>>74657970
Why is it so hard for you commies to distinguish private action from government action?
>>74658029
Oh thanks shill. We needed that clarification.
NOT.
>>74657777
stay retarded, Trumpfags
>>74657777
This is the final straw, I now have a #Bernia
>>74657970
>what are private events?
>>74658029
There is no "gun show loophole." It's not a loophole. It's that way by design and it should remain that way.
>>74658128
>guns okay for Hillary because she needs protection
>guns not okay for citizens who need protection
And you're calling other people retarded....
>>74658128
>>74657777
Liberal double think exposed
Also
Witnessed
Praise Kek
>>74658128
>Percentage of population
Literally says nothing about actual gun death rates. Niggers in Detriot/Chicago are killing themselves more than Cletus and the boys down in Alabama.
>>74658128
It's almost like places with more guns will have more gun related deaths.
Almost like a place with more cars will have more accidents.
>>74657777
1. Quads.....
2. Just wait until pic related becomes the weapon of choice for those in the know.
>pass me the rust remover
>>74657777
>Quads
I am now a #JebPleb
>>74658029
She wants "Australian style" gun control.
>>74658128
>>74658128
Why would anyone living in USA not own a gun?
>>74658344
no she doesnt
>>74657777
WITNESSED
>>74658128
>cali
>low gun death rate
>>74658233
>Australia
>>74658029
>gun show loopholes
>unicorns
What are things that don't exist
>>74658344
She wants to ban all guns regardless mate, no shows, no ranges no nothing
>>74657777
Make trump post
Get quads
It's a good day.
>>74658427
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_show_loophole
>>74658379
She straight up said that in her fuggin speech
Aus, england, ect are all "good examples to follow"
>>74658128
Quite honestly the dumbest thing I've seen today
>>74658403
Probably drowned out by all the awful drives crashing their cars into one another
That place is Boston-level shit driving
>>74658679
>England
Bin yer guns m8s :DD
why are you redditors even here? i thought you hated 4chan
>>74658679
source plz
>>74658405
>America
>>74658657
Even your link says outright that calling it a "loophole" is a "viewpoint" and not a matter of fact. Because it's not a fact. A "loophole" is an unintentional legal oversight that allows the spirit of a law to be circumvented or twisted. That is simply not the case with the private exemption. It was left there on purpose, by design, because it's a good idea, and the alternative is a terrible idea.
>>74658350>>74658348
Same reason Hitler was able to take Germanys guns, people are stupid my brother. My grandma makes some mean lefsa
>>74658766
I heard it on the radio, lemmie try and find the speech
>>74658128
>still using suicides to pad your numbers
Stay Jewish, kike.
>>74658128
>California
>New York
>Illinois
>low gun death rate
>Alaska
>Montana
>high gun death rate
fucking please
>>74658766
>You know, Australia’s a good example, Canada’s a good example, [and] the UK’s a good example. Why? Because each of them had mass killings, Australia had a huge mass killing about 20 or 25 years ago. Canada did as well, so did the UK. In reaction, they passed much stricter gun laws. In the Australian example, as I recall, that was a buyback program. The Australian government as part of trying to clamp down on the availability of…weapons offered a good price for buying hundreds of thousands of guns and basically clamped down going forward, in terms of having more of a background check approach–more of a permitting approach. -Hillary Clinton
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/10/16/hillary-clinton-australia-gun-ban-worth-looking-u-s/
>>74658403
If you don't own the gun you use to kill someone you don't get added to that metric. Or they could be using some other cause for those deaths, like "gang related violence."
>>74659006
where does she specifically say she wants to take all guns away
she just says she wants stricter gun laws and a background check
>>74658105
>>74658171
>SHALL. NOT. BE. INFRINGED.
>unless it's a private event, then it's fine
Nice to see exactly how far your courage goes, fuckers.
>>74658029
What part of "Shall not be infringed" do you not understand motherfucker
>>74659131
She praised the Australian buyback program, dipshit. Do you know what that was? That was when the Australian government required Australians to hand in their firearms so they could be destroyed.
>>74658766
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/10/16/hillary-clinton-australia-gun-ban-worth-looking-u-s/
http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/hillary-clinton-gun-buybacks_us_56216331e4b02f6a900c5d67
I dont have enough data to comb through speech footage.
>>74659211
It's almost like the Constitution is a set of limits on government action, and not on private action.
>>74658029
Bullshit.
She has said many times that she doesn't find the second amendment to be about the right to keep and bear arms.
She wants Australian gun laws.
How retarded do you have to be to not see that she wants a ban on gun ownership?
>>74659131
Don't be naive, dude.
>>74659211
I'm assuming you think people should be able to smoke cigarettes wherever they want as well.
>>74658029
Very obvious shill. Do you really think we're going to take you say seriously?
>>74659211
it's a private event. if you don't want to give in your gun then you can fuck right off. it's the person/group's right to do whatever they want.
it's called free will and freedom of association, dickweed
>>74657777
>>74658029
She also wants to hold gun manufacturers accountable for gun violence, and wants to ban "military and assault weapons." Do you shills even read her website?
>>74659402
Based swiss
>>74658128
These numbers don't seem accurate. First off, the "deaths due to injury by firearms" is disingenuous because we would prefer nobody getting killed; it doesn't matter what you get killed by. Secondly, the numbers in the second image are absurd. 20.0 per 100,000 die due to firearms in Montana? That's nonsense; that's third-world tier numbers and that happens in shitholes like DC or Detroit.
>>74657777
quads confirm...................I'm done with DRUMPF
Now I'm feeling the Hillfire Missile!
#HeLostMe
#ImWithHer
#FeelTheHill
>>74659577
>hold gun manufacturers accountable for gun violence
I saw that when I flicked through her website a while back.
Doesnt this create a precedent though? If I get hit by a drunk driver, I can sue jack daniels because thats how the driver got drunk or Ford because thats what the vehicle was.
And arent there lots of guns in America which feature parts made by completely different companies? Lots of people people their own ARs, who on earth do you sue?
>>74658350
Fucking this.
I'd guaranteed have at least a fucking shotgun, M1a and pistol and perhaps a concealed carry license if the state permitted it.
The only thing stopping me from getting a gun here is the ridiculous amount of waiting time involved, the cucked laws in which I can't use them for self defense and the fact that all shooting range are small as fuck.
>>74657777
he is using "crooked" so often, it almost seems like that's her firstname
>>74659266
Should have called the magazine a clip.
>>74660397
lots of people build their own ARs*
>"I want to ban guns, except the ones the bodyguards of my wife's sons use to protect him"
Every rich libtard ever.
>>74660497
That's the point. Hillary is already dishonest in a lot of people's minds, so that nickname brings it up every time.
>>74658128
nice
>>74660497
its not, must be her middle name
>>74660667
Every fuckin dictator ever lol
>>74660397
to your first point: no. Liberals only car about consistency with the prosecution of anyone involved in the production, sale, or ownership of firearms because they are pure evil. they don't give a fuck about anything else.
>>74658968
Kek
There's like 17 gun murders every weekend in Chicago alone.
>>74658029
Why should I need a background check to get something that is my right to own?
>>74660397
Yes it creates problems, its a ridiculous rule, yet there it is on her website
>>74658968
#Bearlivesmatter
>>74658180
Ok but what does that have to do with abolishing the 2nd amendment? Worst case scenario you can still own guns and buy guns in other ways.
>>74659266
>What part of "Shall not be infringed" do you not understand motherfucker
>>74658029
Hello Correct the Record
>>74657970
>allowed to carry your weapon with you in public where it isn't hurting anything except pinko's fee-fees
>the same as being allowed to carry your weapon into a private area where doing so would pose a massive security risk
>>74658128
>Texas
>16.8% gun ownership rate
fake and gay
>>74658826
Hitler made more laxed gun laws for the white Germans you dip.
>>74661154
Do you even know how gun control works? Are you blind or something?
Gun control works by chipping away gun ownership little by little. It might take 20 or 50 years but they are in for the long run, once you start to give them what you want, it will never stop.
In the end you have shit like in Scotland where they want to confiscate air rifles.
>>74660497
I wonder when he's going to get a nickname for Bill?
>Rapin' Bill
>Womanizing Dick
>Rapin' Dick
Due to the information ITT, I now #FeelTheRodham
>>74661382
Remember, Scott Adams says the nicknames have to fit them perfectly, like something you're already thinking about them but haven't realized it yet until he says it.
What word could work for Bill?
>>74658350
I don't need one
>>74660497
If you keep repeating something over and over it'll get engrained into people's memory and stick out more. The current generation is taught that things which stick out the most are either obviously true or obviously false depending on the implied narrative. It's subtle brainwashing and one of the reasons memes have become increasingly popular amongst the general public.
>>74658029
-the supreme court is wrong on the second amendment and we are going to change that.
Hillary Clinton
>>74657955
>> not allowed to have guns
>>74661471
wow we needed scott adams to tell us this?
>>74658657
Kek
Good job proving my point for me. You should look for a new job because you suck at shilling
>>74658427
Then there should be no opposition to banning them
>>74661580
He's explaining exactly what makes persuasion persuasion.
>>74661652
Why would we ban something that is made by design?
>>74657777
If the law that says americans can have guns is muted then all laws will be muted. Including tax law and general order. You do not want to fuck with that. Americans are rabbid
>>74658657
Private sales are not a loophole
>>74658487
Who told you that? Rush Limbaugh?
>>74661558
Memes are popular because thr general attention span is about 3 seconds. The public school system is basically a daycare
>>74661652
>Calling something a loophole that we intended from the beginning
>>74661652
Banning something doesn't sound very free.
Maybe you should go back to the USSR.
>>74658761
Everyone loves 4chan
>>74657777
ALL LUCKY SEVENS!!!!!!!
>>74658128
>leafposting
10/10 m8 I had a good laugh.
You guys are almost like a real country. Bunch of frozen cucks with a land overrun by towelheads and chinks.
>>74661344
My bad, I guess it was just the jews and non whites he took em from
>>74659211
Its the same law that allows me to shoot a armed assailant in my house. It's being able to own property and do what you please with it. Doesnt matter how badass you are. You walk in somewhere u dont own with a gun you have been told not to carry in that place and you are going to have a cereal bowl for a head...
I bet you are the same type of fuck that thinks you can sue a business if they dont cater to you.
>>74661558
>>74661918
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lp8qUeEHPZ0
>>74661343
I gave it the benefit of the doubt because I'm honestly not sure which shade of pink it is. Our gun ownership rate is actually only around 35%; plenty of states outdo us when it comes to gun ownership.
>>74658350
Two reasons:
1. They have a felony and cannot legally obtain one until they get their rights back (had a friend that had to do this). You can always have your significant other purchase a gun in the same home, you just can't take it anywhere legally.
2. They think guns are scary and don't want them around. This is common for a liberal socialist retards that can't comprehend gun safety or responsibility and believe that not having one is safer than actually owning one.
>>74658029
She belongs in a prison getting fisted by some silverback niggress
>>74662628
>Clintons
>not Clinton's
>>74662927
>doesn't know about Twitter's 140 character limit
>>74658029
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oC8kCEMaXGk
>>74658968
"Among states, Wyoming had the highest suicide rate (29.6), followed by Alaska (23.0), Montana (22.6)"
Also you have to figure that the graph is based around population density and the fact that suicides are counted. Fun fact: Alaska has one of the highest missing person rates in the country.
>>74663117
>takes into account suicides
Fucking hell, I should have known that.
>Alaska has one of the highest missing person rates in the country.
I guess only liberals would be surprised by that.
>>74661382
>Horny Bill
>Randy Bill
>>74661363
Slippery slope fallacy
>>74662628
>it's real
THE FUCKIN MADMAN
>>74663222
It's not a slippery slope m8; it's what happens in practice. We've seen it in European countries.
>>74663007
See what happens if you spend time outdoors, anon? You start severely missing out!
>>74658128
>the 5 most based states are darkest in the first map
>my state is a little bit lighter in the second map
Eh, I'd like to be among the highest deaths per cerpita, but what can you do? Guess I could go out and shoot a bunch of faggots, but that would only prove the gun grabbers right...
>>74658029
>liberals actually believe this
HOW THE F*** CAN ANYBODY SUPPORT HER?
As an American, have you no shame? You people are discussting! She should be President because its time for a woman? STUPID STUPID STUPID
>>74661186
"Like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited..." It is "... not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose." - Antonin Scalia
>>74663222
>doesn't know how common law work, gaffes apon gaffe where gun prohibitionist
Stated goals of gun bans.
Also this >74663331
>>74660414
>shotgun and m1a
>not an AR or AK
nogunz confirmed
>>74664419
Keyword here is secured, not granted which your right comes from.
Perfect tweet. She can't correct him without looking like a massive hypocrite and ruining her chances with gun owners. She'll also alienate Soros Shills Matter by insinuating that cops can be trusted with guns.
Coming soon: the media corrects him and subsequently ruins her reputation for her, mistakenly thinking that they will finally nail Trump to the wall.
>>74658029
suuuuuuuuuuuuuurrrrre she does
>>74661975
Scalia wrote in Heller, “We also recognize another important limitation on the right to keep and carry arms. Miller (an earlier case) said, as we have explained, that the sorts of weapons protected were those “in common use at the time”. We think that limitation is fairly supported by the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of ‘dangerous and unusual weapons.’ “
>>74661947
So the debate is just about what to call it?
>>74661743
Because the design is unreasonably dangerous?
>>74661017
Wow it's almost as if murder rates go up when you give people guns
>>74658029
That's it, I denounce donald trump. I now #ShillforHill
>>74663331
This isn't Europe. Why would you assume that the political atmosphere here would be the same as there? We have had an assault weapons ban in the US before. It did not lead to that end. So, slippery slope fallacy man. Slippery slope.
>>74664765
No one disputes that here.
>>74666423
This isn't Europe because we actively fight against gun regulations on the local and federal. The assault weapons ban expired, but fortunately we had the political climate to reject any continuation of those policies. We need to keep fighting to reject gun control policies and keep our liberties.
>>74665951
Wow, it's almost as if murder rates go up in populations of heavily concentrated blacks.
>>74665800
No the debate is why idiots think private sales should be regulated
>>74663222
That's a tenuous fallacy. Just because something *can* be a fallacy, doesn't mean it is. That, too, is a fallacy. The Anon you're quoting is reasoning lucidly, and his argument is historically proven; you're grasping at straws.
>>74665951
Except thats retarded wrong and everyone on this board is about to jump your shit for that one. Enjoy your graphs.
>>74664419
>not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever
yes it literally is
>and for whatever purpose.
this is probably what he meant
>>74666591
Wow it's almost as if a heavy concentration of armed people increases the odds of someone being shot.
>>74665951
This is false. Vermont has among the highest gun ownership rates in the country, but it has among the lowest murder rate in the country (something like 0.8-1.0 per 100,000). There is no correlation between the amount of guns and murder.
>>74666423
3/10, have a complimentary (You) for your effort.
>>74664610
We have had an assault weapons ban before it did not lead to an abolition of the 2nd amendment. You are also confusing states goals with preferred path to achieving goals. The goals are to impact gun violence and mass shootings.
>>74659211
>can call the President a fucking idiot and not be arrested
>call your boss a fucking idiot he fires you
Private persons/events/businesses do not equal government you fucking idiot
>>74666791
All right. Now take the population of Vermont and arrange it in a way that's similar to Chicago in terms of population density and see if the murder rates don't go up.
>>74659131
She's lying. Australia's "gun buyback program" was compulsory confiscation and destruction of the law-abiding citizenry's legal firearms. And WHO turned in their guns? Pro-tip: it did nothing about previously illegal firearms, and Australia has a major problem with gang shootings and bikers killing each other. In other words, nothing changed for criminals.
>>74666776
Wow its almost like niggers are the problem not guns
>>74667309
Wow it's almost as if guns made inner cities unsafe and made all the white people move elsewhere.
>>74658128
Oh wow, kinda expected nc to be a bit higher
>>74667211
No correlation.
>>74659131
http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?Article_ID=17847
>>74657777
This post has been sponsored by KEK! Praise KEK!
>>74667384
>The guns made inner cities unsafe
You need somebody to pull the trigger. They dont just start shooting on their own.
>>74663222
>fallacy
>>74667409
>not taking into account gun laws
>>74666668
Historical in a completely different environment. We have had an assault weapons ban in the US before, his slippery slope didn't happen. There's no reason to think it would.
>>74667550
Again, no correlation. There is literally nothing to support gun control arguments.
>>74667467
>not understanding how statistics work
>expecting 5 million guns to cause zero fatalities
>>74667384
Wow, it's almost as if the draconian, anti-gun laws drove whites away from cities where the only people that are "permitted" to carry guns are those who disregard laws, IE, largely non-whites.
Good job on getting rid of your useless long arms registry program, by the way. :^)
>>74667720
Five million guns can't do a damn thing on their own canacuck.
>>74659266
What part of "well regulated militia" do you not understand motherfucker?
She's surrounded by armed bodyguards because guns are legal. If guns were illegal, she wouldn't need armed bodyguards. Trump really doesn't think about things before he posts them.
>>74667720
So the guns just go off on their own and cause deaths then?
Those evil murder machines i have in my safe better not start going off and into kids.
>>74667701
other than guns being extremely easy to get, you mean?
>>74667790
What about it?
Everyone with a firearm is a militia
>>74658128
>including suicides in your data
>>74667580
The assault weapons ban was temporary and it came with a ton of funding for imprisonment and mass incarceration. And guess what? Locking them up works, crime has continuously gone down since the 90s. When the assault weapons ban expired, crime continued to go down anyway. Thanks to groups like the NRA; there was a strong pro gun sentiment in our local government as well as the federal one. The assault weapons ban managed to sneak through because of all the crime in the 90s, but people realized that it wasn't guns causing the problem. So the ban safely expired and we kept our rights from being eroded further. The assault weapons ban was a mistake and we should never repeat it. We were lucky it was temporary and came with effective legislation that actually reduced crime (i.e. mass incarceration). Doing it again is risky.
>>74667808
>>74657777
lmoa
>>74663222
and here we see the fallacy meme, which is in and of itself a fallacy funnily enough.
a meme i might add, started and popularized by idea channel, a highly liberal youtube channel.
good fucking job /pol/, your infested with this bullshit fallacy nonsense just as hard as the rest of the internet, proving that in fact, internet arguments COULD be made worse.
>>74667808
>if guns were illegal, the hundreds of millions of guns in this country would magically disappear and we'd all join hands and be happy together
>>74667790
>>74667808
>Merkel and Cameron don't have armed guards
>>74667725
Even Scalia believed there were limits to the 2nd amendment.“We also recognize another important limitation on the right to keep and carry arms. Miller (an earlier case) said, as we have explained, that the sorts of weapons protected were those “in common use at the time”. We think that limitation is fairly supported by the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of ‘dangerous and unusual weapons.’ “
>>74668591
Repeating rifles are in common civilian use at this time, and have been for decades. The notion that there is a fundamentally important distinction between semiautomatic and automatic repeating rifles is facetious, illiberal, and unconstitutional.
>>74668093
I'm not against the crime bill. I think if there were disadvantages to the assault weapons ban we would have seen them then or in the subsequent years. I don't pretend restrictions on the 2nd amendment are not without risk but I believe the risks are manageable and I think they are worth it.
>>74668591
"those in common use at the time"
So, cannons, warships, grenades, mortars, artillery, puckle guns and repeaters (girandoni air rifle) and the list goes on and on is all protected?
Hilarious you deny that the 'slippery slope' exists yet you advocate FOR it
>>74668591
SO LESS POWERFUL THAN A CANNON IS ALL A-OK
DO YOU EVEN HISTORY
>>74666661
Because selling a lethal weapon is worthy of scrutiny.
>>74668906
There is no evidence to support that gun control measures work to reduce crime.
>>74658128
>>74669235
So they should regulate the sales of pointy sticks then?
>>74669235
Should we regulate the selling of hammers or other bludgeons? Those are lethal.
>>74657777
Says the nigga who supported gun control
>Donald "Ban Assault Weapons" Trump
>>74669450
I'm actually willing to believe Trump changed his stance legit on this one. His sons are both gunfags and if anyone can change your mind, it's your family. He was never hardcore anti-gun anyway.
>>74658029
No, she wants to get rid of all guns. She wants gun manufacturers and sellers to be sued if they sell a gun legally to somebody who passes a background check, and the gun is then used in a crime. Effectively nobody would risk selling or making guns anymore if that happened.
>>74666713
He said in interviews that there could be limits on the 2nd amendment. In Heller he said, “We also recognize another important limitation on the right to keep and carry arms. Miller (an earlier case) said, as we have explained, that the sorts of weapons protected were those “in common use at the time”. We think that limitation is fairly supported by the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of ‘dangerous and unusual weapons.’ “
>>74659211
Private property is private you filthy commie.
>>74658128
You know, if you had two maps, one which read "Household Subaru ownership rates" and one which read "deaths due to injury by Subaru" I imagine there would be a very similar correlation.
>>74666713
>yes it literally is
[citation needed]
Let me guess, you're just some retard who doesn't understand anything about the actual Constitution or how our legal system works?
>>74669607
Who cares what a dead guy thought?
Obomba didn't even go to his funeral.
Didn't hesitate to go to some literally who's funeral just because she was a nigger though, all to talk about how evil and racist whitey is
>>74668591
>>74669607
Stop reposting the same shit.
>>74664419
The right exists with or without the Amendment, which is only there to shut down trolls.
>>74669700
So we agree that guns cause deaths.
>>74669909
So do niggers
Don't you want to have a gun to protect you and yours when whites are outnumbered?
>>74658296
>>74662539
>>74667309
>>74667577
>>74669753
>topic is gun control
>/pol/ still has to make it about white supremacism
good job guys.
>>74669909
Do pools cause death? You are more likely to drown if you own a pool than if you don't.
>>74669988
>it is white supremacy to think black people are inherently violent and lack self control
>>74657970
>a presidential candidate has the exact same risk of being assassinated as a random guy getting shot by another law abiding gun owner and both of these situations should be treated exactly the same
this is the same level of argument as someone saying a liberal politician should give away all of their money before they can raise taxes
>>74669988
The original topic wass actually the Clinton is a selfish hypocrite.
>>74670084
>it is white supremacy to use slurs to refer to black people because you don't think they are even "people"
yes it is
>>74658128
post the data comparing "unjustified gun homicides" to gun ownership
>ill give you a hint: it correlates with niggers, not legal gun owners
>>74661382
Crooked Dick
>>74658128
Why don't you post the violent crime rate in general, you fucking leaf?
>>74670201
[spoiler]I'm not white[/spoiler]
>>74669988
>thinking race isn't relevant
Guess which group kills more people than any other group by a landslide?
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/su6203a28.htm
>>74658029
She said she wants a gun control system styled after Australia and the UK, aka the biggest gun-grabbing of all time. Why didn't Auscucks rebelled will always baffle me.
>>74657777
Looks like I'm #basicforkasich now
>>74657777
he should start calling her Shillary
SHILLARY BTFO
>>74658029
Tip of the iceberg you faggot
>>74663222
>mission creep
>scope creep
The slippery slope is 'if we do X, then Y will happen'.
This scenario is 'If we do X now, then we can do X again later'.
>>74668882
Well the Constitution leaves it up to legislators to determine what is common use. If the Congress determines fully automatic rifles or so called assault weapons are not common use then they can specifically prohibit them and as Scalia writes in Heller, "We think that limitation is fairly supported by the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of 'dangerous and unusual weapons.'"
>>74669236
That's debatable.
>>74657970
The RNC didn't decide to ban guns from their events, the US Secret Service insists on it.
>>74671482
Show me some evidence.
>>74668923
Those weapons are not in common use.
>>74658029
$0.01 added
>>74669164
The legislative branch of government decides what is common use. Historically they have put that definition to weapons below assault rifles.
>>74658029
>>74658128
What is suicide
>>74658120
Kek
>>74667701
there is one form of gun control that would be extremely effective at reducing gun homicides..
Not letting black people have guns
>>74663222
Slippery Slope is acceptable if you can cite multiple examples of the trend happening in real life.
Ex. Giving small pox blankets to a village will result in the whole village being crippled and easy to conquer. And it happened multiple times.
That's it, I'm now a #FarageBarge
>>74658029
>>74669353
There are degrees of lethality. In this case a gun like an AR 15 would have been far more lethal. There are restrictions on machetes too btw.
>>74669412
Are kids blowing away their classmates with pointy sticks now?
>>74672167
>reducing gun homicides
Well yeah probably, but nigs are going to nig, so they'll just stab each other. It's better to just build more prisons, have harsher sentence, and lock them up. Keep up this policy and abortion and their crime rate should eventually go down to a reasonable level in like 100 years. The cheaper alternative, of course, would be just to ship them off to Africa or something.
>>74669447
I think the threat posed by guns especially assault rifles is more acute
>>74673055
Demonstrably false. More people were killed by bludgeons than rifles (note: not all rifles are assault rifles).
https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2011/crime-in-the-u.s.-2011/tables/expanded-homicide-data-table-8
>>74669753
Obviously you care, or why else bring up the fact Obama didn't go to his funeral?
>>74669853
But I don't want to :(
its just too late for you gus
>>74669855
Liken the right to health care exists without an amendment?
>>74662047
Underrated post.
>>74658128
More guns equals more gun related injuries
Are you going to tell us how living by the beach increases your chances of drowning next?
>>74671548
You wouldn't believe if I did. What's the point?
>>74672677
I can and have open carried a machete in fucking California.
>>74673923
If you showed me conclusive evidence that established that gun control measure can in fact reduce crime, I would reconsider my worldview.
>>74672279
Ok well we have had an assault weapons ban in this country before and that slippery slope did not happen so.... Its a slippery slope fallacy
>>74673361
Guns especially assault rifles not assault rifles exclusively
>>74674038
I have too. We were camping.
>>74674188
I wasn't prepared for that one. Touche
>>74674340
This is what you said.
>I think the threat posed by guns especially assault rifles is more acute
>especially assault rifles
Wrong. You face more risk from handguns than assault rifles. Most states already require a license to purchase a handgun and/or have a concealed weapon permit. What else do you want?
>>74657777
by winning in November. kek wills it
Reminder that even Russia now allows private gun ownership for self defense.
>>74674477
I used to carry one or something similar every day on my belt. Lived in a bad area but its legal.
>>74658029
>Found the faggot fucking liberal who has never bought a gun at a gunshow before
Holy fucking shit you retards need to stick to your art history fairy prancing
>>74674600
I wasn't sure about assault rifles so I included guns. I am grateful for what gun control we have so far but I would like to see a ban on assault rifles come back. I would like it to last so long that assault rifles already owned be come rare. I would like this because I believe that the less common they are the less likely they are to be used in an incident like Sandy hook or Virginia tech
>>74675171
The worst massacre was committed with 2 handguns. Nobody has beaten Cho's score to date.
>>74675171
>I would like it to last so long that assault rifles already owned be come rare.
Why? I've already demonstrated that assault rifles are a rarer murder weapon than fucking bludgeons. If you want to prevent deaths, shouldn't we regulate hammers more? Why not have an assault bludgeon ban?
>>74674874
I'm Texas you can't carry a knife over 7 inches
