Hillary Clinton released this tweet in response to Donald Trump's withering attack on gun control
HILLARY
WAT
ARE
YOU
DOING???
Hillary's campaign team has been bought by Trump.
It's the only explanation of her recent performance.
I don't understand what the diagram is trying to tell me...what's the percentage for the gun control supporters?
>>74569804
It's supposed to tell you that Clinton doesn't understand how a vent diagram works.
>>74569804
Not all gun owners are Americans i guess?
>>74569906
*venn diagram
>>74569906
i dont either can you explain to a leaf ?
>>74569563
WTF am I looking at?
>>74570030
>Canadian education
This is a puzzler. Gun owners aren't American? 10% of Americans are gun owners?
>>74570059
A tweet from someone who apparently has never been to elementary school
>the only persuader working for Hillary is a pro-Trumper working to sabotage her
lel
>>74569657
One can only hope..
So every 83% gun owning person who is 90% American is in favor of universal background checks
I don't see the issue here then hillary
>>74569563
Don't we already do background checks for gun ownership?
>>74569563
If this is real, then she and/or her PR team went full retard.
>>74570030
It's supposed to show 100% on both sides and the the percentage of people that overlap and agree in the middle.
>tweet
>democrat
her target audience has no idea how a venn diagram works, either.
>>74570030
the circles were a complete blunder. the text is what she wanted to convey: 90% of all americans and 83% of gun owners support universal background checks, whatever that is.
I think she's saying that Jamal should not be able to buy a gun off Tyrone without Tyrone being a licensed dealer who checks with the FBI to make sure that Jamal is not a criminal.
I'm for that too.
>>74569563
What the Fuck is 83% gun anyway
Like without a grip or some shit?
>>74569563
Pie graphs
How do they work?
>>74570225
It is, check her Twitter
You guys are making a big deal out of nothing. While that's not strictly how a venn diagram works, it still gets the point across just fine.
>>74569906
We learned how to make these in gradeschool, how does anybody not grasp the concept right away?
60% of the time it works every time
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjvQFtlNQ-M
>>74570305
If that's what Hillary is saying, then why would anyone disagree? Seems like a reasonable approach.
>>74569563
>Support universal background checks 83% of gun owners
Hillary confirmed for illiterate
>>74569563
HILLARY CLINTON IS A TRUMP PLANT.
SHE IS GETTING EVEN WITH THE DEMOCRATS FOR KEKING HER FOR KING NIGGER.
She got redpilled in 08 and wants to get Trump in there to cleanse our country
>>74570374
agree with this. it is funny though.
>>74569804
according the image somewhere around about 20 to 25% of people want the background checks
>>74570410
You obviously don't know any gun owners. They are the most hard-headed people you will ever encounter. They actually think the 2nd ammendment entitles them to carry anti-tank weapons into the bank.
>>74570305
That is literally how it already is
Niggers don't follow the law though
>>74569563
Wait wat
>>74570305
it isn't a true statement.
virtually no gun owners support "universal background checks," they support background checks as we currently have them.
background checks on private sales of firearms are a red line which not even king george tried to cross when he triggered the revolutionary war with a confiscation order. hillary has absolutely no chance of passing it, but it resonates great with the libfags.
a majority of gun owners want the ATF gone entirely -- no background checks. no databases. no FFL and SOT. the only faggots that like this shit are fudds who lock up their ammo and don't even own, let alone carry, a pistol.
>>74570305
>I think she's saying that Jamal should not be able to buy a gun off Tyrone without Tyrone being a licensed dealer who checks with the FBI to make sure that Jamal is not a criminal.
That's what the coincidentally Jewish "polling" firm basically asked when they came up with that 90% number.
The kikes then turned around and used those "yes" answers and insisted that meant those same people supported the end of private sales, full registration of all weapons, and more laws restricting the rights of Americans.
When a kike speaks, they're lying.
>>74570305
>>74570410
>>74570527
Why are you replying to yourself
>>74569928
>Not all gun owners are Americans i guess?
They're obviously Mexicans which means they-- OH.
WAIT.
#BuildItHigher :^)
>>74570527
You are full of shit and you know it. I am not going to respond further. You and your cowboy friends may have the final word. I'm off to tumblr.
>>74569563
I thought background checks already existed in the NICS or whatever form.
>>74570478
wait are beaver-ducks real things? I thought it was just a stupid thing from pokemon
>>74570585
what? I was arguing with that redneck.
>>74570478
Whoa...really makes you think, huh?
>>74570410
>>74570527
>>74570305
>Babby's First Troll
>>74569563
What's wrong with universal background checks?
>>74569954
>american education
>>74569563
So 17% of gun owners translates to the last 10% of the American population?
>>74570482
lol kek. She is member of all secret shadow organizations there are. If the country would be ver cleansed, she would be amongst the first to receive one way ticket to Gitmo.
Hillary is just a slime that changes her opinions according to what is trending on Twatter. Probably somebody told her this would be smart to post
>>74570601
>>74570652
Stop pretending to be dumb, it's embarrassing to watch.
>>74570584
almost.
the gun owners that support background checks at all mean they support jamal and tyrone having to go to an FFL to make the exchange, not tyrone being a licensed dealer. this is a minority position but "tyrone has to be a dealer" is a virtually nonexistent position.
>>74570652
>>74570601
>>74570527
>>74570410
What the fuck is going on
>>74570225
it's real
>>74570652
We have IDs here
>>74570527
Dumb shill, no sheckels for you
It's simple - 10% of americans and 17% of gun owners support gun grabbing.
>>74570641
...platypus?
Does she even know that in Switzerland there's also no universal background checks and that you can buy certain guns without any criminal records extract?
What would libs in the USA do if they knew that my country as less gun control than certain US states?
>>74570641
>wait are beaver-ducks real things? I thought it was just a stupid thing from pokemon
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Platypus
>>74570702
what's wrong is background checks achieve nothing already and we can prove it, so we're not paying for it anymore. we'll get them abolished before long.
>>74570714
... ah, I missed that part about Tyrone needing to be a dealer himself.
>>74570641
You don't know what a platypus is?
>>74569563
Pls b real
>>74570791
Speaking of which, is there gun violence in Switzerland? I don't hear about it at all
>>74569563
This bitch so dumb
>>74569563
Doesn't this diagram technically mean 83% of gun owners and 90% of Americans don't support background checks
>>74570873
There is but it's very rare.
Our gun homicide numbers is actually at an all time low and it's even lower than many other European countries with less guns and more gun control.
>>74570613
private sales are generally not regulated by the federal government. in some states, you must file transfer paperwork, even if you're just gifting a firearm to a family member. they want "universal" which means every single transaction involving firearms and ammo goes into a single central federal database, which is de facto firearms registration. under this system if a weapon was transferred to you, or someone even made it look like a weapon was transferred to you, and you don't have it, you've committed a crime.
it will not be tolerated.
>>74570791
To be fair, Switzerland is mostly white and has a tough-ass immigration policy last I heard.
>>74570641
I don't know what to make of you
>>74570652
....are you schizophrenic?
This NYTimes article is fucking hilarious
>Mrs. Clinton’s appearances in black churches, where she cited the grim statistics of gun violence and surrounded herself with families of victims, helped her win crucial African-American voters. She relentlessly criticized Mr. Sanders for his votes against gun control in the Senate.
>nigs can't stop shooting other nigs
>DEM BOYS DIN DU NUFFIN WE NEED MORE SOCIAL PROGAMS TO BAN DEM GUNS
>old white woman with hot sauce: "yes absolutely you are all such brilliant community leaders"
>>74569563
But everyone already has to do a NICS check and the "gun show loophole" is a myth.
>>74570527
>OpAYUsRf
even the ID says bad shill,
0 Pay youse are
>>74570148
>>74569657
This, or she just abuses them so badly that they want her to lose.
>>74570962
Yes, in other words, 7% of Americans don't own guns.
>>74570997
Proves again that there's a cultural aspect to the gun control thing
>Russia and China have strict gun control
>loads of gun-related violence anyway
>Japan has strict gun and swords ban
>virtually no violence
>>74570873
I think you're actually REQUIRED to own a gun in Switzerland. At least every household is supposed to have one. Plus everyone has to serve two years in the military (with some exceptions). When everyone owns and is trained to use a gun there is very little violence.
>>74570192
They want background checks for private sales.
>>74571341
Nah man, we are not required to own guns and not every household has one.
Serving in the army is only mandatory for males, but not many people go though.
>how i make diagram
>>74571453
Really? I've been lied to...
>>74571232
cultural aspect to peace, you mean.
the safest places are better correlated with nations featuring only one majority in:
- religion
- heritage
- language
- ethnicity
the more categories they hit, the better they do. it's why nationalism -- citizenship by nativity -- is more successful than any other method of creating a unified identity.
government can't secure these things, and in fact the immigration crisis is proof that a government's self-preservation system is to do the exact opposite, and ruin the majority culture.
Lel
>>74571232
Slavs are basically one step above cavemen and there are no niggers in Japan. Explains a lot.
Kek
This is what comes up when you look up Venn diagram
>>74570702
Waste of time and money. Closing the so-called "gun show loophole" (that is selling guns off the record) is completely unenforceable (we literally have more guns than people in the US), and it will accomplish nothing. In polls, people are usually for universal background checks because it sounds nice, but it'll accomplish nothing in practice.
>>74569563
The poll she is citing is pure propaganda. If you ask people if they support background checks, they will say "yes" because they assume you mean to check if the person buying a gun is a felon. If you ask people if they support the actual laws Hillary and co. propose, most say no.
The question which is usually cited for these numbers is similar to the one seen here: http://www.gallup.com/poll/1645/guns.aspx
>Would you favor or oppose a law which would require universal background checks for all gun purchased in the US using a centralized database across all 50 states?
86% favor, 12% oppose
What the question doesn't tell you is that such a database already exists for felons and that all authorized gun retailers are required to check the database before completing a sell. Hillary and co. won't tell you that either. They want to pretend the law doesn't exist so that you vote for them to introduce the law, when in reality they want to introduce other laws. They do the same thing with the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009, for example.
Examples of polls asking specifics:
(More from http://www.gallup.com/poll/1645/guns.aspx)
>Do you think there should or should not be a law that would ban the possession of handguns, except by the police and other authorized persons?
27% yes, 72% no
>Which party do you think can do a better job of reflecting your views about gun control?
44% Republican, 38% Democrat
>What is your overall opinion of the National Rifle Association, also known as the NRA
58% favorable, 35% unfavorable
>Do you think having a gun in the house makes it a safer place or a more dangerous place?
63% safer, 30% more dangerous
>If you have to choose, which approach to preventing future school shootings should the president and Congress focus on?
30% change laws on guns and ammunition, 65% change school security measures and mental health system
>>74569563
It just basically means that.
>90% of Americans support background checks
>83% of gun owners support background checks
>>74570478
>>74570339
Underrated
>Californians even pushed against shit after San Bernardino
>those numbers
yea no
>>74570478
Perfect example. Bravo.
>>74569563
Why is there a portion of the gun owners circle that isn't inside the Americans circle? Does she think non-Americans' opinions matter for deciding policy?
>>74571647
>but it'll accomplish nothing in practice.
the only thing that might help would be a test for crazy, which is not easy to do. while everyone who knew Holmes, Cho, Lanza, and Elliot knew they were fucked in the head, all but Lanza bought weapons legally; his mom, who apparently was fucked in the head thought it was a bright idea to take one of the most broken individuals who ever lived and buy him guns.
>>74571787
this
>>74570478
#PlatypusLivesMatter
>>74572064
how would her having broken a law to do that be different from her not having broken a law to do it? lanza would have the gun either way.
it's like you're not attached to reality and you live in some sort of dream where murder doesn't happen either, because of course it's against the law.
>>74569804
>what's the percentage for the gun control supporters?
17% of gun owners and 1% of all Americans .
>>74569563
Fucking Venn Diagrams, how do they work?
>>74572435
Sorry, 10% of all Americans.
>>74572509
Liberal arts major campaign staffers are apparently still trying to figure this out.
>>74572416
you can't read well. sigh.
>>74570702
Waste of time. Even in Canada private gun sales are completely private.
>Want to buy a illegal gun?
>Join a range
>Become bros with the old guys
>Acquire Luger or C96
Shouldn't the diagram be with "non gun owners" and "gun owners" Or are gun owners not Americans?
>>74569563
My sides
>>74571797
Good thing we already have background checks.
>>74572756
You can get a fucking gun on Craigslist here. It's really really easy.
>>74572756
Even in the UK it's hilariously easy to get an illegal gun
>Go to big city
>Find Achmed the "sporting goods" salesman at weekly market
>Acquire "airsoft" guns and "display" ammunition for a couple hundred pounds
The hardest way to get a gun, is the legal way.
You know, I always thought Hillary was shrewd, and at least when it came to politics was probably pretty damn sharp. But the more I see of her campaign this year, I'm ever more convinced that either she's been previously carried by more intelligent PR folks that have all mysteriously quit or something, or she's developing Alzheimer's. Her campaign has been hopelessly incompetent. By all rights this should have been an easy ride for her. The GOP was in chaos and her opponent was literally a socialist. Has she just been extraordinarily good/lucky at hiding he ineptitude, or is she coming down with some kind of brain disease?
>>74570478
Really makes you think. I guess I'm a #shillforhill now.
>>74573008
Yeah it's confusing me too. I always thought she was competent just corrupt.
>>74572819
And handgun registration.
>>74569906
*venn
min feite venn
>go to shooting range
>it's my first time
>old dude looks at me, "what a travesty"
>teaches me how to shoot
>gives me free gun on the condition I only shoot it at his range
>tell texan friends
>laugh at me when I tell them what kind of gun it is
>give it to /k/ friend because I'll never use that shit
>has now moved between 3 owners in less than a week
>>74573587
What kind of gun?
>>74569563
can someone explain to me in what dimension that diagram is supposed to make sense?
>>74570569
>tfw by american standards im a fudd
honestly if i was able to i would buy a handgun but the club commitment and red tape bs makes it tricky as fuck not to mention ASIO has it out for one of my friends so badly ive probably got a red flag next to my name too.
>>74573650
I don't remember tbqh, I think the brand was called Low Point or some shit. He said cops use it. It had some serious wear and tear though
>>74569563
We already have universal back ground checks via NICS
what the fuck could she possibly want more?
>>74573744
6th dimension, where the repitle jews are from
>>74573810
>Hi point
Good idea giving it away, it's nigger shit
>>74573008
>or is she coming down with some kind of brain disease?
Rumors about she collapsed and suffered a traumatic head injury, may have had a stroke, etc.
She barked like a dog, for fuck's sake. Something's wrong, but it's being covered up because somehow she still has the pull to make sure someone ends up dead by pointing at them.
>>74569563
>it's the "REAL gun owners are actually FOR gun control" meme
Are they really going to go all in on this narrative?
>>74573877
That's it, yea, High Point. I got ragged on pretty hard because I was pretty hyped about it, seeing as I'd never shot a gun before
>have you ever been made fun of for being a texan that doesn't know shit about guns?
>i have
>by a laotian refugee that can't even speak english
Fucking normies
>>74573776
A fudd generally thinks no one needs or has use for a pistol beyond a revolvor or a rifle beyond three or ten rounds max.
If you don't you just have the misfortune of not being able to readily get guns.
>>74569563
>Hillary Clinton is a literal retard
You mean President Clinton.
>>74570305
>>74570410
>>74570527
>>74570601
What are ID codes?
>>74570652
>When newfags don't know about ID's
Absolutely priceless. Probably some leftist faggot trying to spread misinformation by arguing with a "ignorant gun owner" on /pol/.
>See guys! Gun owners aren't logical!
Fucking pathetic.
But we already have background checks.
>>74574146
jesus christ that term would apply to tonnes of australian shooters, especially older ones that are part of gun clubs and *some* farmers, though i suppose farmers have an excuse to the extent that they might not even be keen on guns but have them as part of their occupation.
generally speaking younger gun collectors/enthusiasts actually have a desire to have looser gun laws but i think the buyback broke the spirits of so many gun owners they just resigned themselves to the fact that theyll never have anything beyond a centrefire bolt action, a .22 and maybe a double barrel shotgun.
Ill try and find the list but my dad had a list of all the things he had before the buyback. there were about 45 guns varying from lever action 30-30s to SLRs and 870s
>he had them leaning agains the wall with a chain through the trigger guards because he didnt have a big enough safe and no laws said he needed one at the time.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venn_diagram#List_of_people_who_do_not_know_how_to_use_Venn_Diagrams
>>74569563
It's like it has the appearance of a rational argument because it uses the form of a Venn diagram, but the diagram does not convey the meaning that a Venn diagram conveys, so the appearance of rational argument is just an illusion. This is how progressives work. They feel like they are smart because they wear glasses and dress like nerds, but the underlying substance of intelligence is not there. They're poseur intellectuals.
>>74570641
The males also carry venom in case of fights between each other.
So it's a beaver/duck/snake mix.
We already do NICS background checks for licensed sales. And requiring background checks for private sales would result in a de facto national gun registry, which is unconstitutional
>>74575082
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venn_diagram#List_of_people_who_do_not_know_how_to_use_Venn_Diagrams
topkek
>>74569563
What's she trying to say?
It looks like she's saying ~33% of Americans support it and ~28% of gun owners. How does that help her?
>>74575082
kek
>>74575082
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venn_diagram#List_of_people_who_do_not_know_how_to_use_Venn_Diagrams
Holy shit lmao, how recent is this?
>>74570410
SHILL ALERT SHILL ALERT
>>74569563
It reminds me of going from the food pyramid to the food plate. Our society is regressing at a very rapid pace. Too much lead in the toys.
>>74575531
My fucking sides.
God damn you fucking cunts, I love you all.
>>74570527
>>74570410
>>74570305
Oh shit reddit!
Someone make a Venn diagram that shows the intersection of "people running for president" and "people who understand Venn diagrams" and puts her in the latter side.
>>74575972
That would be 2 separate circles, not a Venn
![St6nPG6sUI77LNGYY7ty0dw3z9IZf01E5NQ5PJC74L4[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/97XcI5W.jpg "St6nPG6sUI77LNGYY7ty0dw3z9IZf01E5NQ5PJC74L4[1].jpg")
>>74569563
WE ALREADY HAVE BACKGROUND CHECKS REEEEEEEEEEEE
Someone make a Venn with people who like Shillary and the rest of Americans on the other side with a small overlap of ugly women.
>>74569563
Based on those stats, here's the diagram she should have made.
>>74576159
it seems diagrams are too hard for even the scholars of /pol/ to understand
>>74569563
>>74569657
I've personally come to conclude that the people working on her team hate her fucking guts and are quietly sabotaging from the inside.
Based on her treatment to the SS detail assigned for her in the past and how astronomically bad mistakes keep happening.
Who the fuck approved the Ghostbusters Ellen thing. Probably her staff.
>>74576586
Hurr, I fucked it up.
>>74576586
i still don't get what's she trying to prove or what her point is
but we already have background checks
>>74576586
>>74576758
Looks like a cutaway view of an eyeball
>>74576586
No even that doesn't work, because the circle for "support background checks" is entirely enclosed within "Americans". Since 90% of Americans supposedly support them, this diagram doesn't work.
For a Venn Diagram, the categories must be mutually exclusive. "Gun owners" are a subset of "Americans" so a Venn diagram doesn't work
>>74569563
They don't actually understand the concept of a Venn diagram!
![Micromancer-courtesy-frostedbutts.com_[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/lmXbFON.jpg "Micromancer-courtesy-frostedbutts.com_[1].jpg")
>>74576824
>muh gunshow "loophole"
>>74571177
Double dubs nailed it.
>>74570374
It really doesn't. It is confusing at first sight if you know what a Venn diagram is
>>74570703
That immediately corrected typo. Jump all over it like flies on shit though because you cant contribute anything else
>>74576586
Looks like a poster in the ophthalmologist's office
>>74576966
I had to correct it. This one is right. >>74576758
The "universe," or largest circle, is Americans. Within Americans there are two subsets: gun owners and supporters of background checks, and these subsets overlap.
>>74569563
What were they thinkeeeeeeeen?????
>>74577474
But the statistics say that only 90% of Americans support background checks, not 100%
So this diagram doesn't tell the whole story
You'd need a second diagram to relate that info
>>74577624
The Americans who do not support background checks are in the pink and red portions. The pink are non-gunowners, and the red are gunowners.
>>74577624
>>74577474
Oh wait no I see what you did
Yeah it works.
>>74575766
>eating fruits with your steak
people making these diagrams are fucking retarded
>>74570641
Not only are beaverducks real, they lay eggs, keep their young in a pouch after they hatch and are poisonous.
>>74570729
>there is no one "shilling for hill" this is clearly a well-funded republican lie
>>74575450
HAND ME YOUR DIAGRAMS, DONALD
>>74570374
I know what a Venn is and I'm completely fucking lost on this one.
Maybe I'm just stupid...
>>74569563
>90% = 90
>83% = 83
>assume gun owners are american and not taco gangs
>90-83=7
>7 = 7%
>7% of americans want background checks
I'm a fucking pleb, somebody double check this please, because this sounds as though a small minority, not even a 10th, want background checks.
![Rtc[1].gif](https://i.imgur.com/ZbCgPOi.gif "Rtc[1].gif")
>>74569563
Wow, there's so much support for her gun control laws.
How are the gun laws we currently have magically moving in the opposite direction every year?
How are opinion polls on the topic moving in the opposite direction every month?
Perhaps there is no support, unlike what she claims.
>>74575349
>Not realizing that all gun control is unconstitutional.
Wew lad. Universal background checks are a misleading Bullshit meme of an argument just like all modern gun control talking points. Assault rifles have been strictly regulated sence before they were even officially defined. Gun show loophole not a thing. All vendors who sell guns have to be licensed and have to perform a 4473 background check. Private sales are regulated by individual State laws. What they want is a ban on individual sale, but they don't call it that because only the bleeding heart liberals would go for it.
Muh dead children statistics. Includes dindu on dindu gang violence and considers 19 year old multiple conviction felons as children.
I whole heartedly believe Hillary will be the worst thing for gun rights and America in general in over a hundred years. How can anyone vote into the highest office in the land someone who is either flagrantly incompetent, wildly corrupt, but most likely both? That's why she aligns perfectly with gun control it's a corrupt deceitful institution based on taking away the right of law abiding tax paying citizens and it will never be satisfied.
>>74575082
Man you need to cite why. Add that image to the sources mayne!
>>74569563
The thing with that Venn diagram is that those 83% support the current measures, not new ones.
And I bet if you asked that same 83%, they'd tell you that NY, California, Chicago, Massachusetts and so on have ridiculous gun control laws.
>>74577882
They don't keep them in a pouch. When they are extremely young the mother tucks them into the crook of her tail for warmth. See >>2081569#
>>74572064
>>74572620
Hey, that faggot who was arguing with himself because he's a faggot and doesn't know /pol/ has ID's is back! How you doing faggot?
>>74576758
Actually it would be 83% of 90 million gun owners in the United States. The dark green circle should be pretty small.
>>74569804
Back to primary school with you you fucking dumbass
>>74570527
Shall not infringe, you commie faggot.
>>74569563
SHALL
when you see it...
>>74571439
which they can only enforce after someone has protected themselves from danger using an "illegal gun".
The communists dont ban guns, they make it impossible to use them, then they ban them.
>>74570030
In a venn diagram, each circle is the entirety of that group.
So there would be a "gun owner" cirlce INSIDE the "americans" circle, with another circle entirely inside the "americans' circle taking up 90% of it, with 17% of the gun owners circle being outside of that third circle but still in the "americans" circle.
>>74570410
>>74570527
>>74570305
Real shillarying, cointelpro or fucking reddit?!
I just don't know anymore, /pol/
>>74569563
I thought this was a diagram about non-Americans in America owning guns. WTF the fuck was she thinking?!
>>74570305
That's a lie though. Most people support background checks and reasonable gun control which we already have. Just like how they call everything that looks scary an assault rifle when they technically are not. Universal background checks is code for banning private sales.
>>74570305
>>74570410
>>74570527
>>74570601
Good thread.
>>74573776
>fudd
Fudd is a meme started by HKPro forum kids.
They had to come up with some defense of their plastic and sheet metal wonder-guns.
Something inside me tells me this is Hillary emulating Trump's penchant for inserting "typos" and "misspellings" to garner more attention.
I don't think it'll work. She looked like a confused old woman with health issues before. Now she really looks like a confused old woman with health issues.
>>74571549
Reply this to her tweet please. Be great.
>>74569563
so.. what? hillary is so dumb what the fuck. THESE PEOPLE ARE BEING PAID SALARIES FOR GODS SAKE
the idea is to take two groups, in this case gun owners and americans, and then demonstrate what they both have in common. but.. she's already defined the percentage of the group.. but.. each circle is supposed to have those that both agree and disagree with the premise of universal background checks.. MY BRAIN
>>74569563
>woman
>woman who can't do math
>woman who can't do math and want to be POTUS
>>74576758
That's a fucking eyeball. This ain't biology. /thread
All that diagram shows is that the vast minority of Americans and the vast minority of gun owners want the same thing. It just proves her own point wrong.
Besides, we already have a federal background check.
>>74569563
Only sissies listen to women.
