once again drumpf BTFO by the washington post
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2016/05/19/trump-wastes-no-time-in-blaming-terrorism-for-egyptair-crash/
Where do I sign up to be a writer for this shit dump?I could do much better.
>>74507137
>plane blew up
>muslims about
Seems pretty open and shut to me. These fuckers would be dancing on the streets if it was a Christian or even a Buddhist that had blown up the plane.
>>74507137
>>74507423
you don't understand
>even if trump is right, he is wrong
>even if hes right
>hes wrong
When you make factual statements your enemy wins
what does that even mean
TRUMP BTFO
LMAO KEKS
>>74507617
finally someone understands
>>74507137
So, Justin Trudeau has finally made his name change official?
>>74507137
>Even when he's right he's wrong
leave it to some poo in loo to come up with some shit like that
>>74507137
the cognitive dissonance is real
The Washington Compost lost any journalistic credibility it ever had decades ago.
>>74507137
>trump-wastes-no-time-in-blaming-terrorism-for-egyptair-crash/
What? Is it now socially unacceptable to blame terrorist acts on terrorism?
>>74507715
>>74507617
>>74507512
>Even if Trump was [factually] right about the EgyptAir disaster, he was [morally] wrong.
It's not hard, guys. I don't agree with the author, but if you've spoken English your whole life, you should be able to pick up on this.
It seems that Trudeau has taught you well
>>74507137
>Ishaan Tharoor
>>74507137
!
>>74508084
meant for
>>74507703
>>74507137
>Even if he's right
>He's wrong
"Journalism"
>>74507137
Are they ignoring that Hillary said the same thing?
Actually that's a good thing, when it does come out that it was terrorists Trump will be bolstered while Hillary will get jack shit
>>74508006
>stating a now well know fact
>morally wrong
>>74508006
>Facts are morally wrong
This is what Burgers actually believe.
>>74507137
>what's worse than refugee rape sprees is that evil right wing bigots expected it to happen
>If your enemy is right he is wrong
-J Trudeau
>>74508006
>morals
>not subjective
Fucking kill yourself.
>>74508006
>Facts are morally wrong
Think maybe that's ppls issue here faggot.
>>74507137
>You will never get paid to write shitpost clickbait by a major publication
>>74507137
This is going to exemplify the Trump Presidency.
"yeah, he was right about the muslims, the wall, and trade policies but he's still wrong."
>>74507998
>is it now
It has been for awhile anon
>>74507137
the post is right. if you blame your enemies they win
>>74507137
>Doesn't engage in the massive circlejerk of 'solidarity' after every terror attack
>Instead, wants to stop it happening again
And that makes him an asshole?
>>74508350
>morality is subjective
*tibs menora*
>>74507137
Where have I heard this before.
This is also relevant.
>>74508390
Sorry about the thumbnail.
>>74508006
>he doesn't get the point of the thread
>>74507998
WORKPLACE
VIOLENCE
If you get annihilated by your enemies, you win.
t. Trudeuche
if you do something about your problems, you lose
>>74508486
what chaos to the fly is normal for the spider faggot
>>74508006
Wew lad
This liberal delusion in the current year
>>74507998
If you criticize terrorists, it creates more terrorists.
>>74507137
Do the latest Calvinball rules apply to the plane deliverately sent through a Ukrainian war zone, which was politicized every hour for several weeks?
>>74507137
Trudeau tier logic.
>>74508615
lol what
>>74508659
>If theyre muslims, you lose
>>74508523
*retweeted
>>74507137
It's just like my animes!
>>74507137
> holy shit the titles real
>>74508464
>liberal is upset we aren't taking time expressing solidarity instead of pushing an agenda
I hope Trump makes the Day of the Rope a national holiday, so we can celebrate it every year.
>>74508499
kek just watched that yesterday
>"hurr durr how dare he talk about politics"
>during a politically motivated attack
absolutely retarded
>>74507137
God damn /pol/ how did our standards drop so low that we actually link to a clickbait article and not provide archive.is links anymore?
http://archive.is/MS9d7
>don't click it, archive it, no money/clicks for click bait shit.
>>74507137
What happened to the plane? Did it crash with no survivors? A lotta loyalty for a hired terrorist.
>>74508432
If you kill him you'll just be like him!
>>74507137
>https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2016/05/19/trump-wastes-no-time-in-blaming-terrorism-for-egyptair-crash/
>reading those comments
people are retarded
>>74507137
He may have been wrong to jump to conclusions.
But he wasn't wrong about the disaster. This is some advanced level of doublethink.
>>74507715
>>74508464
Anon, these faggots put on vigils and flag filters over Facebook instead of actually solving the problem. They don't care about terrorism and how it costs lives, they care about virtue signalling and not being "racist"
These cucks can burn for all I care.
>>74508523
I love that bitch.
>>74507137
>even though he was right, he was wrong
Serious question, is this bizarre pattern of thinking prevalent among leftists? I ask this because of a book I saw today in the bookstore.
Pic related.
>>74509090
That man is unbelievably bored.
He's probably just there to meet women.
>>74507137
This kind of shit is gonna put Trump in the White House.
BTFO
T
F
O
I think Milo is really getting under the skin of the Jewish Neocon Cabal. Jonah Goldberg and Brent Bozell both attacking him, I don't think he has ever gotten this much attention.
>>74508006
You are an embarrassment.
>>74508006
#NotAllMuslims
REEEEEEEEEEE!
>>74508006
>pointing out truths is morally wrong
welp that's it
were finally here gentlemen
>>74508123
Underrated post
>>74509328
When will the kikes realize that attacking that faggot only makes him stronger?
>Even if he is right, he is wrong
>>74508216
Please straya, go easy. We're trying to deport him, just give us time.
>>74508006
even if this made sense (which it doesn't), this writing is fucking terrible
>>74507137
because you're not allowed to speak the truth if it goes against the leftist agenda I guess?
>Jeff (((Bezos)))
>>74509190
Leftist don't actually think. They possess even less ability for forethought and analysis than even a nigger.
A nigger's logic is twisted and niggish, but makes some chaotic form of sense if you think about it like a wild animal might.
The liberal does not think. They operate entirely on emotions and repeating whatever Jewish propaganda they've been indoctrinated to. They are impossible to debate because debate requires thought. They have soundbytes and clever quotes pre-written. Should you force them to leave their script they simply kick and scream and accuse you of racism, bigotry, sexism, anti-semitism, and whatever other insults they can in a flailing hissing fit in order to disengage. Similar to a squid spitting ink or a sea cumber spitting out its own internal organs, it is a reflexive defense when cornered.
Liberal "debate" in college is learning how to bark out as many lies and half-truths as possible as fast as you can. They score points, and thus "winning" based on how many lies your opponent cannot rebuke in the same time frame. It is why kike media like Twitter is so popular- you can easily lie in 140 characters, but it takes paragraphs to explain why you're a liar.
Liberals have to be given guidebooks on "how to argue..." on subjects like gun control because they do not ever have their own opinions on anything. Those guidebooks also include explicit instructions to avoid anything related to fact and statistics, and to instead rely on lies and emotional pleas.
http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2013/08/foghorn/gun-control-advocates-playbook-leaked/
The liberal is literally a Jewish puppet. A golem. A creation with no soul that does nothing but obediently obey the orders of it's master without thought or reason.
>>74507715
What is happening here. What does it mean?
>>74507137
>washington post
>4/10 Uncharted 4
Fuck you in the ass
>>74508523
Savage.
>>74507137
Wait, wait. Why would the Muslims blow up their own plane? Who's feeding Trump his info? How do we know this one wasn't the Jews?
>>74508006
9/10 bait famalam, look at all those (you)s.
>>74507715
Is that ninjutsu?
>>74509876
This.
>>74509190
>I ask this because of a book I saw today in the bookstore.
It's right though. Left lost in 2000 and was out of power until 2008. But generally we keep winning culturally. Gay marriage, which was unthinkable in the 90's is never going to be revoked.
>>74510054
Muslims blowing each other up is nothing new.
>>74510055
I'm not sure why it was considered bait, I just elucidated the author's point (that I in no way agree with).
>>74510278
Yeah, congrats on eroding western civilization and paving the way for Islamic invasion, you fucking retards.
>>74510054
>Wait, wait. Why would the Muslims blow up their own plane?
EgyptAir. IS is fighting Egyptian government in the Sinai.
>>74510278
>is never going to be revoked
>what is Sharia law
>>74509090
Is that Adam from Workaholics?
>>74509949
>>74509949
>>74508523
I find this extremely relevant. You can literally apply it everytime a terrorist attack happens.
>>74510352
/pol/ is retarded
its a real shame that so many people unknowing have weak personalities & fall victim to the /pol/ hivemind
make no mistake these people are changed forever & its not a good thing
>>74510426
>Yeah, congrats on eroding western civilization and paving the way for Islamic invasion, you fucking retards.
Gay marriage = Islamic invasion?
Left is RIGHT about everything internally. The perfect politics would be Leftist internal + Right immigration. The left is just naive on Islam, that's all. It hits an ideological wall for them. They can't criticize Islam because that would be racist, and not being racist is their #1 concern. Not being racist is a valid virtue, but they're taking it too far. And generally are unaware how most of the world consist of violent, stupid bydlos.
The end goal should be full open boarders but after THEY have secularized and developed fully. That may take centures. We are nowhere near that level yet. Until then, we must limit immigration, especially that of Muslims.
>>74509090
>hilary.webm
>not hillarity.webm
one job
>>74508123
>>74507137
That is basically what every women says at the end of an argument if you beat her logic.
IM STILL RIGHT UGHHHHHHHHHH
>>74508006
Please tell me you're actually a Canadian at the border using American wifi.
t. justin trudeau
>>74507137
>hurrr drumpf
>hurr i can make puns therefore im right
>hurr circular logic
rule of thumb;
any newspaper, or news source, with "post" in the name, is liberal bullshit with no values.
>>74510717
Canada has a birth rate of 1.6.
A birth rate of 2.1 is required to maintain the population level you have right now.
Without immigration, your country will go extinct on it's own in just a few generations.
Increasing the number of faggots and feminists isn't going to help that, either!!
>>74508006
>>74510796
Unfortunately, Anon, this is why Trump hasn't already won. We've got plenty of citizens that have sold their souls to Canadia, or had their souls sold at a very early age.
>>74507715
thats sign language.
just look up basic translations and you'll have your answer. it isnt some cryptic code. prob something like make america great again or trump
>>74510911
>any newspaper, or news source, with "post" in the name, is liberal bullshit with no values.
New York Post endorsed Trump, faggot.
>>74510931
>what is demographic transition
>>74510931
>The birth rate will never ever change
>>74510931
This. Good going, liberalism.
This is why I'm a white nationalist.
>>74508523
Based
>>74510748
Then you should stop invalidating her personal experiences.
>trump's tweet blames terrorists for crash
>liberal says he's accusing muslim
So muslim = terrorists for lefties?
>>74510991
>>74510796
Seriously, did you tards even read the statement after the greentext in my thread, or are you just hopping on the reply bandwagon? I mean, I'm fine either way :^)
>>74511195
oh fuck please be baiting
>>74510931
That's not how replacement rates work and there are other ways besides opening borders to encourage the correct type of citizens reproducing.
>>74511079
How is it a good thing to demographically transition into extinction?
>>74511139
It's been downsliding for half a century, what do you think is going to increase it now?
>>74507137
>Even if he right, he is wrong.
That is some anime tier bullshit
Damn, thought I had the webm saved from last night
>>74511360
>extinction
>implying birth rates don't stabilize after enough people die off
And he wouldn't die even if you killed him
>>74508523
pic fucking related
>>74507137
He said what pretty much everyone was saying today.
>>74511263
I'm not
>>74509090
You sure that's not Adam Levine Kek
>>74511148
>This. Good going, liberalism.
Birth rates have nothing to do with nationalism. It's entirely socio-economic. Once people get comfortable lives, they don't have kids. The poorest, most irresponsible people have lots of kids. rich people consider it optional.
>>74510931
>Increasing the number of faggots and feminists isn't going to help that, either!!
Accepting gays ahs nothing to do with whether more are "created". The level of gays is pretty stable.
>A birth rate of 2.1 is required to maintain the population level you have right now.
>Without immigration, your country will go extinct on it's own in just a few generations.
Which is fine. It's needed. That's why you take only the best. Middle class, relatively secular people. And you sure as hell do not take Arab muslims.
I had a conversation with a Jordanian Pharmacist in Kitchener. He was ranting about how gays eat skin during sex. No clue what he was going on about. But these peopel are NUTS. And I'm seeing more Nijabs and Burkas around. If this keeps up I'm moving to BC.
>>74508006
Political correctness at it's finest
>>74510438
egypt also fucked the muslim bros president up the ass
>>74511470
>>implying birth rates don't stabilize after enough people die off
They might. But after massive population shrinkages. Which means massive ECONOMIC shrinkage. Do you want to be in permanent recession for 40 years?
>>74507998
If you anything except die to brown people, the terrorists win.
>>74508116
only a leaf...
>>74511470
South Korea and Japan have already begun to contract and the birth rates are not compensating.
>>74511263
Just jokes, friend. I should have made that more obvious.
>>74511549
so how are men "invalidating her personal experiences" by calling her out on her bullshit logic of "i may be wrong but im a woman therefore im right fuck you"
>>74510656
Or natural disaster, this is the perfect call out to every pseudo activist retard.
>>74511632
>Which means massive ECONOMIC shrinkage
it means shrinking your people to a sustainable economy, not one based in constant growth
it's what japan is trying to do
>>74507962
He is a disgrace to Poo in Loos everywhere.
>>74509437
Just after they realize that attacking Trump makes him stronger
>>74509090
Adam?
>>74508984
They are moderated by the WaPo I am sure.
Without the echo-chamber the libs wither and die.
>>74509876
great post, it is eerily accurate
>>74511375
New I could find it.
Whatever happened, it just didn't "CRASH"
>>74511533
under fucking rated.
sadly this is becoming the MO for the US as well.
nobody ever tries to fix problems anymore. we just bitch about it.
>>74511783
>it means shrinking your people to a sustainable economy, not one based in constant growth
>it's what japan is trying to do
Which means fucking recessions. Try telling that to people. They won't accept that.
>>74509090
>hilldog supporter is literal gibbering retard
makes sense
>>74507137
>linking clickbait articles
lurk more
>>74511533
soon
>>74510656
Social media virtue signaling will be the death of us all.
Nothing can be fixed because talking about what causes problems is hate speech, so they just all just stand around going THAT'S SO SAD, I AM SAD, LIKE THIS IF YOU ARE SAD, WE'RE SUCH GOOD PEOPLE and nothing ever gets better, only worse.
>>74511926
>muh imaginary rescessions
>>74508984
>When was the last time the KKK downed a jet liner?
>>74507137
Goddamn that headline's stupid.
>>74507137
>Newley bankrupt shilling agency
Yep totally BTFO
We are men of action, lies do not become us.
>>74511919
where is this webm vdeo from?
>>74512021
How the hell can you have massive economic shrinkage without it necessarily causing recessions?
There's fewer people to buy things. Demand is down. And down. And down. And down. Who buys the products if the population is shrinking?
Japan's growth has been economically stagnant for decades because they went too far the OTHER way. No immigration ever for any reason. They should bring over several million East and South East asians just to work to take care of the elderly.
>>74510278
>and was out of power until 2008.
Literally what ? The left has been firmly in power since at least the 60's defining by the american dichotomy
>>74511005
>>74509941
Naw, I asked around on twitter and found deaf people to translate, they said he was just signing "Young Living Essential Oils"
>>74509111
>9 11 1
>speaking the truth about muh terrism
Oh KEK
>>74508615
>>74512249
fewer people buying means fewer people selling
it's not like the new smaller pop needs to produce and provide at previous levels.
>muh immigrants muh old people
does japan have negative unemployment or something?
>>74507137
>Even if Trump was right, he was wrong
Journalism at its finest.
>>74511533
arabs on twitter after the bataclan attack had a bunch of shit trending about WHAT WILL THEY CHANGE THE COLORS ON THE EIFFEL TOWER TO NEXT
>>74509111
Those fucking digits
9-11-1
>>74510931
Low birthrates being bad it's the worst meme you can fall for.
Literally playing exactly in the jew's hands
>>74510691
Actually ur retarded......
The point is to realize that u know nothing..... Everything u think is true can be flipped on its side. No one know shit..... Expecially u who is trying to generalize the actions of pol like its on person
>>74510278
gay marriage was voted against in California as recently as 2008.
the nigger faggot communists occupy the courts though so they can force whatever they want. that is until people get sick of it and resort to other measures.
>>74512676
>gay marriage was voted against in California as recently as 2008.
The massive black turnout for Obama was heavily responsible for this because they still hate faggots
>>74511755
Shouldn't really be asking that question; personal experience, in that sense, is always invalid.
It's equivalent to saying, "Don't disagree with me."
Gay "marriage" isn't even real marriage. It's just two people getting a fake certificate to make them feel happy. Let them have their fake certificates.
>>74512676
Support for gay marriage is going up and up. Without the courts, it would just be a decade of it being accepted state by state.
>2008
A LOT has changed in just 8 years.
Right has lost on this issue and they should just concede.
>>74512828
i wouldn't say heavily, blacks are only 7% of california population. but they did turn out and probably voted yes on 8 at the same level as for on obama
>>74510911
>>74511068
Yeah anon, that lacked logic, try to stay sharp
>>74512958
You mock the entire institution of marriage because you're scared of standing up to faggots
>>74512971
is this a bait post?
california voted against gay marriage. let that sink in. the only reason gay marriage is 'accepted' is because the nigger faggot commie courts.
>>74512223
A Greek fisherman took it.
It's probably of the plane crashing.
>>74508499
FS/N is a well of knowledge
>>74512405
Yeah, I took ASL in high school & that seems to be correct.
>>74508115
I like that pic
>>74507137
If you let them win, you lose
>>74513215
Please explain to me when this very obvious trend is going to completely reverse itself and go back to 1996 levels.
>>74508006
1984 came a couple decades later than predicted but certainly is here now.
>>74512676
Young people don't vote.
>>74507137
good old doublethink
>>74509190
Read Death of the West by Pat Buchannan. He predicted all this shit, with incredible accuracy, 15 years ago. You'll find your answer.
>>74513559
because people don't want fag marriage. the only reason it exists is because of the courts, every time it gets voted on it fails.
>>74508523
Have this fucking beauty in return, you earned it
>>74507617
If you answer questions correctly, they win.
>>74511533
You get this instead. Rare Pepes where rare Pepes are due
We must be very careful not to prematurely blame terrorists for anything they haven't done, it might hurt terrorists feelings
>>74513891
Did you not look at his pic related?
>>74513629
The world, reality, is racist. Bad world.
>>74514078
Good
>>74507715
Deaf here, I know American Sign Language.
(probably cut off)Y SUNG LIVING
I can't decipher the last word. It starts with something like SIE or SE and ends with ILS or ILE
>>74507137
>american journalism
how do you want your country winston?
>>74514752
>>74514001
>>74508235
if you win, you are wrong
t. cucktruthough
xddd wher is tha cum bottles?
>>74508499
>>74508955
yeah, it's getting pathetic how many newfags don'tr archive their shit
>>74507137
> trump-wastes-no-time-in-blaming-terrorism
> blaming-terrorism
> blaming
CAN EVERYBODY STOP BLAMING TERRORISM!
YOUR ALL SO TERRORPHOBIC!
OMG!
>>74509876
saved
>>74511556
>Once people get comfortable lives, they don't have kids. The poorest, most irresponsible people have lots of kids. rich people consider it optional.
oh yeah it has nothing to do with jewish feminism encouraging women to hate men and prioritize shekels and slutting
>>74507137
>(((Ishaan Tharoor)))
Oh, dear.
>>74512008
>Social media virtue signaling will be the death of us all
women actually hate us, not all of them, but many
>>74508006
It's like it's Spring 2015 all over again.
>>74508523
NO MEMORIALS
they trigger the terrorists
http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/640779/Sweden-migrant-murder-memorial-banned
>>74507327
fpbp
>>74508464
This is the problem with these retards. It's better to make yourself feel good and click "like" on a we're sorry for the families. Instead of making sure it doesn't happen to other families in the future.
And they use it to bash trump instead of taking their own advice too.
>>74507137
>(((Washington Post)))
>>74511556
"POPULATION CONTROL
He was very active with population control groups, the population control movement, and population control was really the entry point into specifics following the introduction. He said the population is growing too fast. Numbers of people living at any one time on the planet must be limited or we will run out of space to live. We will outgrow our food supply and will pollute the world with our waste. "
>>74517089
"PERMISSION TO HAVE BABIES
People won't be allowed to have babies just because they want to or because they are careless. Most families would be limited to two. Some people would be allowed only one, however outstanding people might be selected and allowed to have three. But most people would be allowed to have only two babies. That's because the zero population growth rate is 2.1 children per completed family. So something like every 10th family might be allowed the privilege of the third baby. To me, up to this point, the words 'population control' primarily connoted limiting the number of babies to be born. But this remark about what people would be 'allowed' and then what followed, made it quite clear that when you hear 'population control' that means more than just controlling births. It means control of every endeavour of an entire world population; a much broader meaning to that term than I had ever attached to it before hearing this. As you listen and reflect back on some of the things you hear, you will begin to recognise how one aspect dovetails with other aspects in terms of controlling human endeavours.
REDIRECTING THE PURPOSE OF SEX
Well, from population control, the natural next step then was sex. He said sex must be separated from reproduction. Sex is too pleasurable, and the urges are too strong, to expect people to give it up. Chemicals in food and in the water supply to reduce the sex drive are not practical. The strategy then would be not to diminish sex activity, but to increase sex activity, but in such a way, that people won't be having babies. "
>>74517116
>>74517089
CONTRACEPTION UNIVERSALLY AVAILABLE TO ALL
The first consideration here was contraception. Contraception would be very strongly encouraged, and it would be connected closely in people's minds with sex. They would automatically think contraception when they were thinking or preparing for sex, and contraception would be made universally available. Contraceptives would be displayed much more prominently in drug stores, right up with the cigarettes and chewing gum. Out in the open rather than hidden under the counter where people would have to ask for them and maybe be embarrassed. This kind of openness was a way of suggesting that contraceptives are just as much a part of life as any other items sold in the store. Contraceptives would be advertised and also dispensed in the schools in association with sex education!
>>74517089
>>74517116
>>74517153
SEX EDUCATION AS A TOOL OF WORLD GOVERNMENT
The sex education was to get kids interested early, making the connection between sex and the need for contraception early in their lives, even before they became very active. At this point I was recalling some of my teachers, particularly in high school and found it totally unbelievable to think of them agreeing, much less participating in, and distributing of contraceptives to students. But, that only reflected my lack of understanding of how these people operate. That was before the school-based clinic programs got started. Many cities in the United States by this time have already set up school-based clinics, which are primarily contraception, birth control, population control clinics. The idea then is that the connection between sex and contraception introduced and reinforced in school would carry over into marriage. Indeed, if young people when they matured decided to get married, marriage itself would be diminished in importance. He indicated some recognition that most people probably would want to be married, but this certainly would not be any longer considered necessary for sexual activity.
>>74517089
>>74517116
>>74517153
>>74517217
TAX FUNDED ABORTION AS POPULATION CONTROL
No surprise then that the next item was abortion. And this, now back in 1969, four years before Roe vs. Wade, he said, "Abortion will no longer be a crime." Abortion will be accepted as normal, and would be paid for by taxes for people who could not pay for their own abortions. Contraceptives would be made available by tax money so that nobody would have to do without contraceptives. If school sex programs would lead to more pregnancies in children, that was really seen as no problem. Parents who think they are opposed to abortion on moral or religious grounds will change their minds when it is their own child who is pregnant. So this will help overcome opposition to abortion. Before long, only a few die-hards will still refuse to see abortion as acceptable, and they won't matter anymore.
>>74517246
>>74517217
>>74517153
>>74517116
>>74517089
ENCOURAGING HOMOSEXUALITY
"People will be given permission to be homosexual," that's the way it was stated. They won't have to hide it. In addition, elderly people will be encouraged to continue to have active sex lives into the very old ages, just as long as they can. Everyone will be given permission to have sex, to enjoy however they want. Anything goes. This is the way it was put. In addition, I remember thinking, "How arrogant for this individual, or whoever he represents, to feel that they can give or withhold permission for people to do things!" But that was the terminology that was used. In this regard, clothing was mentioned. Clothing styles would be made more stimulating and provocative. Back in 1969 was the time of the mini skirt, when those mini-skirts were very, very high and very revealing. He said, "It is not just the amount of skin that is exposed that makes clothing sexually seductive, but other, more subtle things are often suggestive." Things like movement, and the cut of clothing, and the kind of fabric, the positioning of accessories on the clothing. "If a woman has an attractive body, why should she not show it?" was one of the statements. There was no detail on what was meant by 'provocative clothing', but since that time if you watched the change in clothing styles, blue jeans are cut in a way that they're more tight-fitting in the crotch. They form wrinkles. Wrinkles are essentially arrows. Lines which direct one's vision to certain anatomic areas. This was around the time of the 'burn your bra' activity. He indicated that a lot of women should not go without a bra. They need a bra to be attractive, so instead of banning bras and burning them, bras would come back. But they would be thinner and softer allowing more natural movement.
>>74507137
>if you kill your enemies, they win
>>74517089
who?
>>74517089
>>74517116
>>74517153
>>74517217
>>74517246
It was not specifically stated, but certainly, a very thin bra is much more revealing of the nipple and what else is underneath, than the heavier bras that were in style up to that
FAMILIES TO DIMINISH IN IMPORTANCE
Families would be limited in size. We already alluded to not being allowed more than two children. Divorce would be made easier and more prevalent. Most people who marry will marry more than once. More people will not marry. Unmarried people would stay in hotels and even live together. That would be very common - nobody would even ask questions about it. It would be widely accepted as no different from married people being together. More women will work outside the home. More men will be transferred to other cities and in their jobs, more men would travel. Therefore, it would be harder for families to stay together. This would tend to make the marriage relationship less stable and, therefore, tend to make people less willing to have babies. The extended families would be smaller, and more remote. Travel would be easier, less expensive, for a while, so that people who did have to travel would feel they could get back to their families, not that they were abruptly being made remote from their families. But one of the net effects of easier divorce laws combined with the promotion of travel, and transferring families from one city to another, was to create instability in the families. If both husband and wife are working and one partner is transferred, the other one may not be easily transferred. Soon, either gives up his or her job and stays behind while the other leaves, or else gives up the job and risks not finding employment in the new location. Rather a diabolical approach to this whole thing!
>>74508615
what is clever to the newfag is cringe to the old ones
>>74508523
Liberals say the exact same thing whenever there is a mass shooting. It's indistinguishable from a pro gun-control tweet. The lack of self awareness in these posts is pretty astounding.
>Ishaan Tharoor
>>74507992
"Washington Compost" KEK
>>74508464
Honestly it was more likely a mossad hit than a terrorist attack, but that's how it'll be portrayed. Just another reason to keep this war on terror farce going strong
>>74511360
Let our population naturally stabilize and we can increase production through automation rather than importing shitskin slave labor. More room. Less stress less crime. Standard of living improves. Quality of life improves. We all get comfy and make more babies.
Or we can just keep ducking around with it artificially and make the world a worse place.
>>74510796
You're a fucking moron.
Re-read his post or go back to kindergarten
>>74510717
I'm a liberal. I voted for the NDP. I consistently disagree with my party, the Liberals and the Greens on many issues.
I own nine guns.
The first step to obtaining political maturity is developing an understanding that you can be wrong and you will be, often.
>>74508499
Actually it does tho
>>74511632
The population should decrease in line with automation, otherwise we'll be crippled by massive under employment.
>>74507137
WELP
I am now a #Cruzmissile
>>74507137
***Ishaan Tharoor***
(the * are bombs)
>>74511556
I have also noticed an increase in hijabs. BC will be no different.
>>74516307
wew lad
>>74508006
But liberals don't believe in morality.
So either they are wrong, or they are hypocrites.
>>74514001
>>74512651
I'm not sure whether this is irony or the result of FAS
>>74511926
You either do it or you don't. The current model of infinite growth is unsustainable. Better to just get it over with now.
>>74507137
>even if he was right he was wrong because words hurt :(
Do these people have brains or are the just amoebas floating over keyboards?
>>74507327
>implying the media wants to raise quality instead of dumbing it down even further
They are already going full retard, this is design, not an accident.
>>74507137
I used to support Donald Trump until I found out he was right but wrong. I am now #nevertrump.
>>74508840
what show is this?
Gay marriage shouldn't be legalized because the whole point of marriage is a social contract wherein the government provides benefits in exchange for an increase in the population. Since fags can't have kids, why should they receive marriage benefits? There's no way for them to pay back into the system with offspring.
>>74507137
Oh man, Washington Post. They aren't like Fox News for the left or anything
>>74518899
This has always bothered me, for all their dismissal of religion, personal responsibilities, social constructs etc., they are quick to talk about "rights" and "morals" when it suits them as if those were objectively existing realities instead of made up belief systems.
>>74519559
>what is adoption
>what is surrogates
>>74517294
>>74517246
>>74517217
>>74517153
>>74517116
>>74517089
Why arent all these brilliant plans to control human population working?
articles like these are literally why trump never stops gaining support though. the general public is so fucking tired of it.
>>74514161
are you fucking retarded? How many people voted for gay marriage?
>>74508840
>Trump is making anime real
>and he's not even president yet
Waifus soon, lads.
>>74519838
gays should not be adopting children, let alone frankensteining them into existence
Thank you, Washington Post. Without you, I'd never know that even when Trump is proven right, he's wrong.
>>74507137
>drumpf
Kys
>>74519813
The leftoid conception of "rights" is actually an attack on rights. It is crucial that inalienable, God-given, negative rights be few in number and represent the most important things. If everything is a right then freedom of speech competes with people's feelings and always loses. The Communist way of doing this goes, "there is no freedom without bread," that is, we are violating your rights, but to guarantee your survival, without which you have no rights anyway.
>>74508970
U U U U
>>74507137
>plane mysteriously disappears over the ocean
>reports say that it spun out of control and rapidly fell
>Trump puts two and two together because he's not a retard and says it was probably terrorists
>get mad at Trump because he's too judgemental
>>74511370
It can't be helped.