h-holy shit... hillary BTFO
>>74462611
If it wasn’t for the fact that the system is completely rigged, Bernie Sanders would actually win the nomination.
I'm sorry
>basically needs 100% of the delegates when he's actually projected to lose crushingly just to have a 50/50 chance to make it to june at which point he will be raped by superdelegates anyway
>WE'RE GONNA FUCKING MAKE IT BROTHERS!!!
>>74463727
>ameribeses
>>74462611
>Proportional delgates
Wow.... I'll all aboard the #BernieGurney
>>74462611
>Bernie winning California
>>74462611
The media says it's over because Hillary only needs like 80 delegates to get the nom
>>74463727
That's perfect. Trump tit stickers are on nice looking hooters, Boines are on a hambeast.
>>74462611
Including superdelegates, Bernie needs 89% of all remaining delegates.
All states in the Democratic primary process is proportional, there are no winner takes all.
>>74464338
Internal projections at /r/SandersForPresident have Bernie winning California 85 to 15.
>>74462611
There are no winner take all states in the Dem primaries. He has to convince the superdelegates to vote for him despite the fact that he lost by every conceivable metric, and the fact that he and his supporters were calling the very existence of superdelegates undemocratic two months ago.
>>74464338
>CBS
Yea but that leans towards Clint-
>SurveyUSA 57-38
Pic related
>>74464509
XD yea I bet!!
>>74463727
lol what a fat fuck
>>74464509
Even that's not enough. That nets Clinton 81 delegates which makes her win.
>>74462611
Can we just delete these threads?
>>74463727
Gah! Kill it!
>>74464786
What the fuck are you talking about?
>>74462611
Except the delegates are divide up based on the proportion of the vote.
You really think Bernie is going to get 100% of the vote?
People who think he can win don't understand how the system works and the reality of the political landscape.
I hope he gets BTFO there. I want delicious tears of outrage and the promise of beta cuck violence.
Is there any level of autism greater than that person on /pol/ who unironically thinks Bernie's a good candidate?
>>74463200
Is he even winning the popular vote?
>>74463200
>the system is completely rigged,
thats true but it's only worth so much, if people are out in force complaining and yelling about it they change their tune, especially when you start showing video evidence of rigging and crime
fuck Hillary, I think a Trump Sanders contest would be better for America
everyone call your rep and say so
>>74462611
Cali isn't winner take all you fucking twat
He might as well take it all the way, but its over, he never ever wins
>>74464939
No u
>>74464994
Id rather take you all the way ;)
>>74464786
>Clinton 81 delegates which makes her win.
that won't be decided until the supreme courts case about the vote rigging scandal has finished
>>74464856
My math is off actually. All 73 California superdelegates will go to clinton and with 15% of the vote she'll get roughly 71 delegates which is more than enough to win the nomination.
>>74465046
>implying
>>74463727
Jesus it's like they're tumors weighing her down against the bed
>>74464994
>he never ever wins
if enough normal people complain they'll have to switch tack and start littering Bernie with their crime syndicate henchmen
do it for fun, just to make the establishment sweat a little,
I want to see a Trump Sanders contest
because of the lulz
>>74465046
Is this what it feels like to be shitposted upon?
>>74462611
>look mom i posted it again!
>>74465147
>If enough people complain they'll have to switch back
>This is what bernouts actually believe
>>74465239
Don't blame it all on Berniefags, it's Cruz's entire argument too
>>74465400
What are you even talking about lmao unpledged delegates helped Cruz (see Colorado).
Ur cute tho ;)
Stick to boy loving and leave discussions for the adults
>>74462611
He's not going to win.
Most optimistic case, they average 55-45 for the rest of the contests.
That gets Sanders to within 100 pledged delegates, but he'll still be down about 400 superdelegates and about 2 million popular votes.
By every metric he'll have still lost fair and square.
>>74464953
He's several million votes behind.
But this is still somehow proof that democracy doesn't work in America
>>74463200
>>74464953
>Clinton: 12,989,134 votes
>Sanders: 9,957,889 votes
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/democratic_vote_count.html
>>74467767
Yes, but superdelegates significantly and unreasonably amplifies her lead. Plus, even if she wasn't leading by votes, shed still probably win via superduperdelegates.
>>74467767
>12,989,134
wonder how much those cost
>>74462611
every time Bernie wins a state, he gains a net 4 or 5 delegates over Hillary, because they are rewarded proportionately to the vote
he's have to get like 75% of the votes in California to make a dent in her lead, which is still over 200.
Obama led Hillary by 44 delegates at the end of the campaign in 2008.
CA delegates are apportioned proportionally, Bernie would need to win by absurd margins not to split them 55-45%
