Wait a fucking second... It just occurred to me... If women are equal to men, how come they weren't the ones in position to fight all the wars of ancient history and the men the ones who stayed at home to tend to the children? If women were so strong, how come the roles weren't in reverse? Has this been brought up in anti feminism threads before?
Well, that would be because they men and women aren't equal, and they're fucking idiots.
>>74446665
Too busy taking care of the future army ?
>>74446665
They were the primary victims of war. They lost their sons, their husbands, their fathers...
>>74446970
Yeah.. lemmy debunk that.
First i'll take your sister's toy.
Then i'll cut off your thumbs. But i'll write in history how you never lost a toy, and you were the great leader of the toys and such.
I don't give a shit about her feelings. She is NOT the greater victim. Don't keep pushing that meme.
I wonder how many of you actually fought in a war defending your country.
Today males are equal to today females because they have virtually the same capacities and social value.
>>74447173
That makes absolutely ZERO sense, leaf.
>>74447348
OP here. I'm a former marine actually. I fought in the 2010 spring offensive in marjah Afghanistan feb 2010- sept 2010. Does that answer your question?
>>74447173
It's a Shillary quote, stop posting while high, leaf.
>>74446970
Look at the reverse argument. The sons, husbands, and fathers that died in war all lost their mothers and daughters. They also lost their lives. What did the women keep?
>>74446665
A lot of men DID stay home instead of fighting in wars. The surname Smith is so popular in England because of this. While every man was out catching bullets for a paycheck, Smiths stayed home Jody as fuck.
>>74447348
Actuall, todays males are worth less.
