Hey lads give me some /pol/ approved reading besides Mein Kampf. I have a new Kindle on the way.
Ive added Disinformation by Pacepa and pic related to my wish list so far.
Anything by Nietzsche is good.
>>74431715
The Bible
>>74431715
Animal Farm should get you started.
>>74431902
Pretty sure he wants non-fiction Cletus
>>74431715
>buying a Kindle
We don't allow cucks here on /pol/. You'll have to go find another board
la dottrina del fascismo os great
>>74432109
Non-fiction is preferred yes but Orwell and works of fiction of that nature are all right.
Leviathan by Thomas Hobbes
>>74431715
My Awakening by David Duke is like eating a bucket will of red pills washed down with a gallon of red pill juice.
In addition to my "Breaking the Spell" by Nick Kollerstrom, read "The Plot Against the Church" by Maurice Pinay (a pseudonym for 12 red-pilled badasses), "Usury, A Scriptural, Ethical and Economic View" by Calvin Elliott, "Manifesto for the Abolition of Enslavement to Interest" by Gottfried Feder, "Human Accomplishment" by Charles Murray, and "The Biological Jew" by Eustance Mullins. If you want old school classic redpill you should also read "Isabella of Spain" by William Thomas Walsh, she's the one that booted all the kikes out.
I could list so many more but I don't want to overwhelm you. I just listed the creme de la creme and I know my shit.
I have to add to that list "Joan of Arc" by Mark Twain. He said it was better than all his other books combined, and he was probably right.
Enjoy, anon.
>>74431715
Might is right by Ragnar Redbeard
>>74432109
I don't really follow the bible as much as I used to. But the new testament is the story of the one man who outjewed the jews. That's at least worth a skim-through bud.
>>74431715
Balance it out with some commie bullshit so you don't inadvertently reveal your powerlevel among normies.
Something like, Prison Notebooks of Gramsci.
You want to learn what the enemy is thinking, as well as be able to segue into "progressivism" if the redpill you try to deliver ends up blowing your cover.
>>74431715
Vargsmål, I don't have an opiniok about it at the moment, but I liked it when I was 14.
1984, just skip the love part.
Any real history books so you know more about other countries.
Adios America by Ann Coulter
>>74431715
All Quiet on the Western Front
>>74433560
>went to the thrift store
>seen this book
>didn't know who she was but put down the book and picked up others
>the books were only 10 cents a piece
>tfw I have this stigma against modern books written by women
>I could have gotten that book for a dime
Adding these recommendations to my list as fast as I can on my phone thanks lads. Though not all of them are in eBook format so I'll have to get the physical copy. My job is boring and I have a 2 hour lunch so I'm looking forward to some quality reading.
>>74433551
Haha. I like it how right-wingers of all sorts like to co-opt 1984 to their cause, to present it as "a great critique on the left".
Sadly for you cunts, Orwell was a life long socialist and 1984 was in fact an attack on bolshevism for one, and on fascism masquerading as the left.
Too bad you have the reading comprehension of fruit flies.
America Alone (Critique on Islam and the modern left, reading now. Written in mid-2000s, predictions were all very accurate except for one about Russia's declining birth rate)
Death of the West (If you don't understand from the title you're actually retarded)
The Bible (Read it, don't buy into the atheist meme. Even if you're having problems spiritually, at least be a cultural Christian so you're not a disappointment to our ancestors and the foundation of our civilizations. I would recommend a Catholic or Orthodox Bible, if not KJV can work. Treat yourself to a nice ornate version, the Russians have some terrific binding. A study Bible is good but make sure it's an academic type, not a woman's study Bible or something like that. Always read for a guide and search online if you have any questions.)
Starship Troopers (Sci-Fi fiction with extremely conservative message and ethics.)
Stealing America (Written by Dinesh D'Souza, after he was released from imprisonment after writing a record-breaking documentary on Obama's corruption. His documentary was spot-on on every point)
Crime and Punishment (Coming-of-age story when it comes to sin, guilt, and eventual repentance and red-pilling of a lost soul)
The Divine Comedy (Landmark piece of poetry on spirituality and outlook, must add to one's collection. The ending is incredibly deep, read it and contemplate the meaning of life and existence. Read the entire thing anon and do yourself a favor. http://www.online-literature.com/dante/paradiso/33/ Read from "As the geometrician" until the end, takes just a minute. )
I can add more from my collection if anyone wants, I have ~50 or so good books for red-pilling whether it's political, social, or spiritual.
>>74434008
Did I say I am fascist?
>>74431715
Ride the Tiger by Evola
>>74431715
Nicholas Wade's Before the Dawn.
>>74435570
Did I say that? I said right wingers in general. Reading comprehension's a bitch.
>>74431715
This is a good.
Also anything by Thomas Sowell. Pay attention to "Black Redneck, White Liberal".
Umm for fun, look at Robert Heinlein stuff. Starship troopers is ok, but look at "Time Enough For Love" "Stranger in a Strange Land" "Cat who walks through walls", and some his collected short stories.
>>74432271
Kill yourself statist scum.
He should only read John Locke.
>>74431715
Start with the Greeks
Iliad
Odyssey
Plato
>>74434008
Is this like however lefty shit goes to shit. Whether in the real world or a fictional depiction in 1984, the left stridently yells, "That wasn't real Socialism!"
Incoming essential reading chart bombardment
>>74436838
>>74431715
I was really let down when I discovered a spelling mistake.
>>74436561
>Whether in the real world or a fictional depiction in 1984
Er... 1984 was a critique of authoritarianism, not "Socialism".
George Orwell was a Socialist, he fought for the Communists in the Spanish Civil War.
You silly cunt.
>>74436561
You really didn't get the concept of doublespeak/doublethink, didn't you?
> war is peace
> freedom is slavery
> ignorance is strength
And (English) Socialism is fascism. Simple as that. The first part of your post I could not understand. You should be shot for mangling the english language.
>>74431715
Also, does anyone think that books are that valuable these days?
I used to be an avid reader, but I don't have the time anymore.
Surely in this age of gifs the sparknotes version is enough, I mean we don't have that much time tbqh
This. And only this.
This is a good book only in that it shows the weakness and self-loathing of post-nationalist post-WW2 Japan.
A spoiled rich son of a diplomat wants to be an artist but is no good and is constantly in fear of being exposed as a fraud. So he turns to degenerate behavior and makes friends with communists in order to avoid responsibility. It ultimately ends with him becoming a cuck and tyring to kill himself.
Perfect for /pol/.
>>74437074
Socialism is inherently authoritarian, despite Orwell's and Chompsky's wishful thinking.
>>74436170
>Sadly for you cunts
yeah, you were talking to him shit for brains.
>>74437322
Nice lists so far but to any gullible /pol/acks this is satire
>>74432144
How is kindle cucked? Less cucked than a smartphone DESU
>>74437412
I imagine he's referring to Jeff Bezos
>>74436378
But there is a lot to be learned from this book. Also
>not reading all the great writings modern philosophy and politics are based on
>except shit tier fantasy a.k.a. Communism/socialism
>>74431715
Read some marx too, otherwise you'll go full "gas the kikes" and reveal your pwoer level against the normies
>>74437328
>Socialism is inherently authoritarian
Oh, really?
Pic related...
>>74437494
>John Kek(e)s
Deus Vult indeed.
turner diaries
>>74437119
Holy kek. How to not trust anyone 101
>>74437534
>Muh anarchism
You can't actually be anarchist and socialist. If someone decides to not be a part of the collective and you allow it, then you're simply anarchist rather than anarchist socialist. The reality of the situation, however, is that you won't allow that. You will force them to be part of the collective which is authoritarian. Besides that, you can't be anarchist and have a governing body that is a syndicate. It doesn't work that way. Socialism and any kind of libertarianism are mutually exclusive contrary to your fantasy.
Last purely political chart I have
>>74437693
>You can't actually be anarchist and socialist
Anarchism is Socialism: "All property is theft."
Anarchism 101.
> If someone decides to not be a part of the collective
They are free to do as they please. There is no hierarchy in Anarcho Syndicalism.
>>74437534
yes really.
This book red pilled me
>>74437894
>Road to Serfdom
Slippery Slope Fallacy, the book.
Top kek
>>74437829
>Anarchism is Socialism: "All property is theft."
If all property is theft, then why should the property be shared among the proles?
>They are free to do as they please
If they are free to do as they please, then you aren't socialist. How can you disperse their property (yeah, doesn't exist, whatever) among the proles fairly? If they are free to do as they please, then what is preventing them from executing capitalism?
>There is no hierarchy in Anarcho Syndicalism
>Group of people who decide how the collective is run
>Not a hierarchy
Lol. I bet you think the CNT was actually anarcho-syndicalist.
>>74437083
doublespeak/doublethink is just the redefinition of words to try to substite the emotional weight of a word or a phrase for an old one, to change people's emotional reaction to words. That is all.
>>74437074
I know Orwell was a socialist, but an inadvertent depiction of a dystopian socialist future is still a depiction of a dystopian socialist future.
It is like the left doesn't understand humanity or their motivations.
For a more recent depiction of a dystopian socialist future look at Venezuela.
Oh man how did a country wind up poor and their elites wind up wealthy under socialist rule?
Hmm.. must have been just another anomaly, like all other previous failure of "alleged" socialist regimes.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3192933/Hugo-Chavez-s-ambassador-daughter-Venezuela-s-richest-woman-according-new-report.html
>rights protection agencies
>private currency exchangable for a variety of commodities
also, there's a chapter where he comes up with a low tech version of Uber. it was written in 1968
>>74438039
>, then why should the property be shared among the proles?
It's not "shared". You already own it, and so does everyone else. If you attempt to monopolize a resourse, and deny others access, you have "stolen" it, effectively.
Anarchism 101.
>If they are free to do as they please, then you aren't socialist.
You have a strange idea of what "Socialism" is...
>Group of people who decide how the collective is run
"Membership" of a "group" is voluntary, you don't have to combine with anyone.
>>74437938
>Slippery Slope Fallacy, the book.
You never read it. Did you.l
>>74438290
>You already own it, and so does everyone else.
>and so does everyone else
Then you don't own it. Even then, I thought property was theft? If property is theft, then how can anyone one it, let alone everyone?
>You have a strange idea of what "Socialism" is...
It's the forcible redistribution of wealth from top to bottom in order to preserve "fairness." It's not voluntary, by any means.
>Membership" of a "group" is voluntary, you don't have to combine with anyone
So... I don't have to be a part of the collective? So you're not actually socialist, you're just libertarian.
>>74438269
>, but an inadvertent depiction of a dystopian socialist future is still a depiction of a dystopian socialist future.
You've totally missed the point of 1984.
TOTALLY.
1984 is based on double speak: "war is peace", "ignorance is strength", etc... Orwell was saying: people who call themselves Socialists are in fact "FASCIST"
Do you really not understand this? You silly cunt.
This does not mean Socialists are fascists, it means the rhetoric of socialism is being used by fascist to fool idiots - like you.
Do you realize you linked to the Daily Mail website? The Daily Mail supported Hitler in the 1930s...
>>74438423
>Then you don't own it.
Yes you do. You have an equal right to a resource, same as everyone else.
> I thought property was theft?
If you attempt to monopolize a resource you have stolen it from everyone. Understand?
Anarchism 101.
>It's the forcible redistribution of wealth from top to bottom
You have no idea what "Socialism" is.
>So... I don't have to be a part of the collective?
Under Socialism you are free to do what ever you like, as long as you don't break the Non Aggression Principle.
>>74431715
The Analects of Confucius (Confucius)
The Art of War (Sun Tzu)
Tao Te Ching (Lao Tzu)
Romance of the Three Kingdoms (Luo Guanzhong)
Water Margins (Shi Nai'an)
Really the best my civ has to offer mate.
>>74438590
Why do you not understand how socialism works? The only way it works is through force. And after that force is applied for a long enough time it fails. Because socialism doesn't work with large scale human civilization.
If no force is eve applied you will naturally see some humans with more and some with less, because while they may have equal rights are not equal as people. Some are more productive than others. And the more productive ones will make more for themselves.
If you use force to take away from the productive they stop being productive or leave. So the burden then falls on the those next less productive to make up the difference. Which causes them to stop being productive or leave.
Eventually it collapses because eventually socialism runs out of other people's money.
Even in a fictional universe this is true.
If you doubt me, name the current succesful socialist country that doesn't have wealth disparities and can continue without worry into the future.
You can't because it doesn't exist.
>>74438784
>Yes you do. You have an equal right to a resource, same as everyone else
Even if I actively worked for it and they did not? Is my labor not valued in the worker's paradise?
>If you attempt to monopolize a resource you have stolen it from everyone. Understand?
Surely private property is not the monopolization of a resource as you do not own all of that resource, only a part of it. In fact, not allowing private property is effectively giving the collective a monopoly over all resources above the individual. Paradoxical desu.
>You have no idea what "Socialism" is.
Then explain your cherry picked definition of socialism.
>Under Socialism you are free to do what ever you like, as long as you don't break the Non Aggression Principle.
You mean under libertarianism. I'm beginning to think it's actually you that doesn't understand Socialism.
>>74438938
>Singapore
>Civ
Han blz :DDDDD
>>74438784
If I invent a method for extracting, processing and utilizing a new resource why does everyone have equal right to the resource that wouldn't be accessible in the first place if not for me?
>>74439006
> Placing nationality above ethnicity
Chinese people don't do that. It'd explain why there are so many Chinese spies infiltrating the West, and the fact that Chinese aren't restricted from taking up military positions in America baffles us ťbh.
>>74439118
If you mix your tin of soup with a lake, it doesn't mean the lake is yours.
>>74439138
Come on man, Singaporeans don't think of themselves as Chinese completely. Othewise why would they even have their own army and sovereignty. You are more akin to how Americans see themselves as offshoots of Britain.
>>74439258
Argument by analogy is the weakest of all.
>>74438996
I've led you to water, but I can't make you drink.
We live in an information age where ignorance is a choice; it appears you've made your choice...
My advice to you is: Question your assumptions. And, read.
I have to work... bye.
>>74439411
>I have to work... bye.
By work I assume he means do something taxpayer funded that wouldn't exist if it had to actually find people spending their own money for his good or service.
>>74439411
So you don't actually have an argument and now you're leaving on airs of superiority like all leftists do when ideologically challenged. Bravo.
>work
To get private property, surely.
>>74439481
>To get private property, surely.
To live.
I have no other choice.
>>74439582
He returns! Only to cherry pick his obviously objective world view. Again, bravo.
>>74439118
If it weren't way past my bedtime I'd be debating alongside you. It was a good read so far, later Aussiebro
>>74439138
Yeah, I wish we in the West had a similar idea. In college my roommate was Indian, and we had an Arab, Brazilian, Nigerian, and more on the floor. The Indian hung out with Indians (and me), Arab hung out with Arabs, Brazilian hung out with Brazilians, and Nigerian hung out with Nigerians.
Only Whites and American Hispanics were hanging out with people outside their ethnicity extremely often. Not that associating with other colors is bad in itself, but it really is revealing. I can't explain how many times I would be sitting with a mixture of different American ethnics, and 10 feet away was a group of Arabs all plotting to bomb the nearest mall or something, who would never associate with us.
A part of me wishes that other Whites would be wary, or skeptical, of other ethnics. Not because they're bad, but because they're probably not from your heritage or ideology's tradition.
At the very least I would like to see Whites be more loyal to their "kind," and not walk around shamefully with guilt for a slave-owning ancestor of theirs who didn't exist.
My girlfriend is a first-generation American, and her parents are Catholic immigrants from Vietnam. Dad is an engineer, mom is a lab assistant. Their masses, weddings, parties, friends, etc., are all Catholic Vietnamese. It amazes me, and a part of me wishes I grew up in a largely homogenous society, or at least within a tightly-knit community.
Sorry but I often envy people in your situation, Singabro.
>>74431715
avoid reading only books on the same subject such as jews and redpill like most of the retards here do.
One book will not be enough to have an opinion on one subject, you'll have to read fascists as well as gommie cucks so don't fall for the "redpilled book" meme
>>74438938
what about the memoirs of lee kuan jew?
>>74431715
crucial
>>74437074
But he fought for the POUM which was a trotskyist anti Stalin party and he wrote about how the PCE(Spanish communist party) would boycott the POUM and the CNT
>>74431715
>>74439327
Not completely, but to a large extent, we identify with the Han race. As of now, we find it somewhat difficult to associate ourselves with mainlanders due to Commmunism's destruction of their Confucian values and culture. We find it significantly easier to interact with ROC (Taiwan) citizens who like us, have Confucian traits unscathed by the Cultural Revolution.
An actual Singaporean identity has not been formed. We still refer to ourselves as "Chinese Singaporean" or "Indian Singaporean". We have not proceeded to a state of affairs where we all call ourselves "Singaporean" all the time. If you'd like to draw a historical parallel, I'd say we're at pre-Civil War America levels of identity creation/erosion (depends on how you view it), with people identifying as "Swedish" or "Irish" instead of "American".
>>74439901
He has 5 different books I believe. I recommend "Hard Truths", followed by "From Third World To First". His power level regarding socialism and Islam are revealed completely, as well as his disdain for the kebab countries around us.
>>74437074
>>74437083
>>74434008
>Dude Orwell was a socialist, it's not like he wrote 1984 after realising how fucked the left is in Spain... s-so just d-don't check on wikipedia, whatever you do... yeah... don't believe them if they say otherwise.... Animal Farm? heh.. that's just a fairy tale for children also...
>>74441450
>An actual Singaporean identity has not been formed. We still refer to ourselves as "Chinese Singaporean" or "Indian Singaporean". We have not proceeded to a state of affairs where we all call ourselves "Singaporean" all the time. If you'd like to draw a historical parallel, I'd say we're at pre-Civil War America levels of identity creation/erosion (depends on how you view it), with people identifying as "Swedish" or "Irish" instead of "American"
Interesting. I appreciate the insight from an actual Chinese Singaporean. Prior the civil war, most Americans still didn't have a national identity, but it was rather than based on their ethnicity would be linked to their state they resided in.
What are the most important Confucian traits that you think mainland China has lost that you view as indispensable to the Han Chinese identity?
Don't Make The Black Kids Angry.
Currently looking for an epub of it. Hard to find.
>>74431715
Sex and Culture (Unwin J.D.)
The Universe Nextdoor (James W. Sire)
Mere Christianity (C.S. Lewis)
The Republic (Plato)
Where Black Rules White: A Journey Across and About Hati (Hesketh Prichard)
Mein Kampf is collectivist boot licker trash.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Lightning_and_the_Sun
>>74431715
Blood meridian is pretty gud.
The private memoirs and confessions of a justified sinner is also very good.
Rendezvous with Rama is good if you like some very light scifi.
Also, you should read the golden ass.
Try not to limit yourself to one genre, or only non-fic, or something like that.
A little variety will keep your brain from making too many false connections.
>>74441811
https://www.4shared.com/office/c4pTWCEQce/Colin_Flaherty_-_Dont_Make_the.html
4 u, anon
>>74441689
> What are the most important Confucian traits that you think mainland China has lost that you view as indispensable to the Han Chinese identity?
Holy shit, where do I even begin?
Humility would be a good start. As would be etiquette. All other Confucian societies are well-mannered, look at Japan, Korea, Taiwan and Singapore. I'm not even expecting the Mainlanders to know how to conduct a tea ceremony or bow at appropriate angles, all I want them to do is to stop spitting on sidewalks and shouting in public.
Honesty and human decency would be next. Poisoning milk powder meant for Han children with melamine for profit is despicable. All of this counterfeiting and swindling would come to an end had Confucianism be upheld.
Filial piety would be another thing. Confucians are supposed to revere their parents and show gratitude constantly to them. Nowadays in the Mainland we see also sorts of patricide cases and forms of abuse where elderly are abandoned by their offspring and left to die. These people need to be boiled to death like in ancient times.
There is simply so much cultural capital lost. If only the Nationalists won the civil war in 1949...
>>74431715
>I have a new Kindle on the way.
>supporting that shitty company who has this faggot as CEO
I cancelled my blamazon prime account as soon I heard this cuck speak in public. Fuck him and fuck his shitty company.
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/05/18/bezos-rebuts-trumps-attacks-im-very-comfortable-with-amazons-practices.html
http://archive.is/VpV4H
http://video.cnbc.com/gallery/?video=3000518803
https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/not-an-appropriate-way-for-a-presidential-candidate-to-behave-bezos-fires-back-at-donald-trump/2016/05/18/b72f5054-1d1a-11e6-8c7b-6931e66333e7_story.html
http://archive.is/LokBk
>>74442431
Wow. Score. Thank you.
>>74440312
epub link of this?
>>74431715
Decline of the West by Spengler
Homo Americanus: Child of the Post-Modern Age by Sunic
The Problem With Democracy by de Benoist
>>74441265
Savitri Devi KEK
>>74437149
Here you are on 4chan,but you're just too busy to read a book.
>>74433708
That's called being a misogynist, anon
>>74439411
>educated yourself
Said every leftist snowflake meme ideology having intellectual midget as they lose the argument
>>74441450
>He has 5 different books I believe. I recommend "Hard Truths", followed by "From Third World To First". His power level regarding socialism and Islam are revealed completely, as well as his disdain for the kebab countries around us.
LKY was based, I still look up his autobiography to reference when I need to gain more insight into a particular geopolitical issue of statecraft.
>>74431715
Brave New World, Animal Farm, 1984, Atlas Shrugged, The Fountainhead, and Anthem are all kind of essentials
>Thinking, Fast and Slow - Daniel Kahneman.
The author is an Israeli Jew but the book doesn't get into any kind of political hue about anything, and it revolves strictly around his life's work in cognitive research. Knowing your cognitive biases is top priority redpilled material in all areas of your life, from knowing how to identify propaganda and misleading statistics to many mistakes that people often make in entrepreneurship and finance. It's a very enlightening read.
>The Illuminatus Trilogy
>Quantum Psychology
>Everything is Under Control
These are good books which will pretty much teach you how to create conspiracy theories by example. The primary focus of the books is to crash your shit and make you question whether what you're reading is true, because it's a fusion of truths and untruths, kinda like satirical pieces in The Onion, but featuring different themes.
>>74431715
What the fuck is a point of a "wish list" anyways? Either buy the fucking thing or dont.
I can only see women being dumb enough to use such a useless feature.
>124 posts
>yet to link a library
https://mega.nz/#F!0F5GXTjS!oGdz8UP5JbcleNMy6YKLvg!QFZx2IaK
y'all welcome
>>74445694
bump for exposure
>>74431902
Cuck manual is better.
>>74431715
Good literature :Death of a salesman, Animal farm & Do androids dream of electric sheep
Le pol approved : Cuckran, 1984 & and anything that scares the reader into a state of perpetual self and societal hatred
>>74431715
Anything related to critical thinking, as you definitely need it
Homemade Burger Recipies
Is crippled America worth the read lads?
>>74448199
It's just his rambling put in words.
>>74447859
How is Martian Time Slip? Have kept it downloaded for long
>>74445694
Thanks
https://mega.nz/#F!B4dB2SzQ!h_pMC30v2a_y31iD0dy0sg
>>74433708
>I have this stigma against modern books written by women
Not just modern.
>>74443630
Like I give a fuck
Only posted it because of The Baron
The Way of Men by Jack Donovan is pretty dope, he has a lot of good articles on his site too.
>>74434008
So. We read it ironically.
>>74436336
I second Sowell.
Just bought 1984, pretty good. Brave New World is great too, it's crazy how ahead of its time it was.
>>74450112
Reccing this for an interesting read. Although if you go into it knowing he's gay, it comes off as a bit strange at times.
>>74431715
Atlas shrugged
>>74431715
Das Kapital... read it, understand it, use it against the communists
The Courage to Act by Ben Bernanke if you want a thourough understanding of the Federal Reserve and exactly what happened during the GFC.
Thomas Piketty for some serious red-pilling on income and capital inequality. The key with economics books is to be open minded and expand your horizons. If you stick to hardcore libertarian/conservative economists you're going to have a bad time and not properly understand the complexity of the area.
>>74445229
To remind yourself to buy it when it's it's cheap.
