Ok, /pol, some faggot tried to tell me that PeTA is an evil organization, and saying that they've done a lot of shady stuff. While I've taken a look into it a time or two, I haven't really found much that says they're a bad organization. Maybe I'm just a terrible faggot who can't research for shit, but could you red pill me on anything PeTA may have done that's considered "bad" by whatever moral standards you may (or may not) have?
>>74317468
They run pet shelters that prioritize euthanization instead of placing the animals in a new home. Is that enough?
SJWs for pets. Complain about animals dying in fictional entertainment like movies and video games.
Ecumenical
>>74317626
literally shoah
They kidnap pets so that they can euthanize them. They view pet owners as slave owners and that the pets are better off dead, so death is a gift.
http://imgur.com/o2JCYhj
>>74318043
This
They kidnapped a little girls chihuahua in my area and killed it.
They aren't going to kill mine.
>>74317468
so PeTA are trying to get their hooks into /pol/
> Nice logo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpekaGwZ-zU
Day of the rope won't just be for non-whites
>>74317468
People dislike PETA because PETA's existence reminds them of the fact that animals are killed for meat so it makes them feel guilty.
It stands for ethical
PETA means people for the ethical treatment of animals
>>74321313
>ethical
Top kek, PeTA has fought no-kill laws so that their shelters can kill all the animals they want.
>>74322122
I didn't say it was accurate retard fuck off dumb shit poster
>>74317468
1. They spend most of their funding on advertising, NOT caring for animals. The animals that are put in PETA shelters are almost always euthanized.
2. They fund (or used to fund, they aren't really relevant anymore) radical nutjobs like the "Animal Liberation Front", who commit arson against labs and attack scientists.