What does /pol/ think of Imperial Japan. Were they based at all?
micro penis people who make weird cartoons
>>74291379
http://freakonomics.com/2011/07/15/for-economic-growth-does-penis-size-matter-more-than-political-system/
They had great potential, before they went full total war. Instead I think they should have stayed neutral and tried to develop their economy instead of their military. Just keep the navy strong for defense.
>>74292217
Imagine where the US would be without all those nigger.
Only country that went full war with the US one on one.
Got to respect them for that.
>>74291245
>What does /pol/ think of Imperial Japan. Were they based at all?
Other than that business of attacking us, leading us to nuking them, they're okay.
If only they had the foresight to side with allies, maybe we could've helped them take over China by nuking key regions and wiping out Mao and he commies once and for all.
No. They dgaf about their people. They couldn't be more unlike the reich. Ally of desperation.
I like their old flag a hell of a lot more than their new one.
>>74293399
>Only country that went full war with the US one on one.
>one on one
Half our forces were in the European theater.
>>74295031
most of Japan's forces were tied up in China
plus burma/korea/philipines
>>74291245
Apologize for War crimes Japan, pay settlement to Korean and China government
>>74295201
So either way neither Japan or the US were one vs one
>>74295424
Appologise for war crimes US, pay settlement to the populations of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
>>74296001
What war crime? There was never a rule that said "No nukes" :^)
>>74296001
>Approximate deaths caused by Nagasaki and Hiroshima combined: 146,000~
>Approximate deaths caused by the Nanking Massacre alone: 400,000~
>>74291245
Should have stayed home.
>>74296001
Pic related, Korean Comfort women
>>74296390
>implying one is a war crime and the other is not because only half as many people died.
>The US needed to drop nukes on civilian population centres instead of more secluded military bases.
>justify using two instead of one, when really the US wanted to test a second design.
>implying the US would have stopped at two nukes if Japan had not surrendered.
>>74292217
Top kek.
>>74297188
>Implying the whole purpose of dropping the bombs wasn't to wave our dick at the Soviets
Japan was a bonus. Killing a shitload of birds with one stone, if you will.
>>74297686
And by god didn't you kill them efficiently. At no prior point in Earth's history has such a large number of people been put to death over such a short amount of time.
>>74296681
That's great, was us those fighters who abused those women you killed whilst nuking japan? Or innocent women and children?
