What are /pol/ thoughts on 'The Protocols of the Elders of Zion' (Russia, 1903)?
Seems like every theory on Zionist were formed from the ideas of this piece of Literature.
I don't know how to explain the protocols(jewish plans all laid out bare in the open for all to easily see the game) because it's meant to be a book of fiction with a message, like 1984.
And then the other story is that it's meant to be someone who was at a meeting and escaped with their life with all the details.
Just how do I explain the protocols to people??
>>74289983
It has fucked us in the ass for over a 100 years.
>>74290562
>I don't know how to explain the protocols
I've found a couple PDFs on the Protocols from different biased sources, but most say it's a hoax or forgery (jewish bias) or work of fiction. But if it was conceived in early 20th alot of the points they make are obvious happenings of today. Even Wiki says it was conceived in 1903. Along with Ford distributing in US before WWII.
>>74289983
Shameless Self-Bump
>>74291003
Yes I know that, but I think it's important to know where they came from, because that's the very question that's going to be on everybody's mind when you go to try and explain that book to them.
>>74291448
For sure. I haven't found one solid source for the conception date or author.
Unbiased Source: http://xroads.virginia.edu/~ma01/Kidd/thesis/pdf/protocols.pdf
>>74290730
Hahahahahaha
Top frekin kek right there.
>>74289983
Are there any significant differences between this and The International Jew published by Henry Ford? I haven't read either of them yet.
>>74291619
http?
I'm alright thanks.
>>74292443
What's wrong with http?
>>74292182
I'm not sure, but I need to look towards that series as well.
>>74292776
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S6ADSooKbIg
