If America started the war in the Middle East, why shouldn't we take in refugees?
>>74190427
Because you won it.
>>74190427
What a manly cock.
And no. Our coop is fucking full.
The arab spring is the main reason for the ongoing war in Syria and Iraq.
Also >>74190477
>>74190427
When you win a war you gets the spoils and that does not include dealing with the faggots.
>>74190427
Refugees are cheap labor and second class citizens. You have mexicans for that. Euro imperialists will have to settle for muslims as their under class.
>>74190427
Pretty sure Islam started the war in the Middle East, around 1400 years ago they started shit.
We didn't start the war in the middle east, Islam has been at war since it's creation. And we didn't even start the Iraq war, Israel and the Israel lobby did. Also, your logic is fucking retarded anyway
>>74190427
Because we don't want to
>>74190427
If the war is just, then there's nothing to do. It was a just war. If it's unjust, then the answer is to bring those who started it to justice.
>>74190427
The Middle East has been war ravaged since the very first civilization sprang up there. It never has been peaceful, it never will be peaceful.
Why would you fight a nation or culture just to replace yourself with them in your homeland? That doesn't make sense.
>>74190427
If you're at war with the Middle East, why would you take in military-aged Men?.
Did you take in german or japanese men during the 2. world war?, no you took them straight to internment camps
SO WHY THE FUCK DO WE HAVE THE OBLIGATION TO TAKE THE ENEMY IN?
>If the Carthaginians attacked the Romans in the Second Punic War, shouldn't they take refugees
