Why does the media defend Trump so much?
>>74184497
>Vox
>>74184497
that graph is total bullshit
>>74185474
Yeah?
>Clinton
>Sanders
?????????
What exactly is this based on?
>>74184497
wtf is this graph? -36% negative/6% positive? -36% of what?
>>74184497
This graph is garbage. I see very little negative coverage of Clinton, and Bernie barely gets coverage at all.
>>74185678
Read the article. It's pretty thorough and hard to counter.
http://www.vox.com/2016/4/15/11410160/hillary-clinton-media-bernie-sanders
>>74184497
Too much weed, dude.
Try and find one positive article about trump that isn't written by his staff.
>>74185742
i aint gonna click that shit site
>>74185818
You sound upset...
>>74185855
try to link one positive Trump article written by a mainstream news site
>>74185958
How about that CNN interview where he started off by crying like a bitch because people were being mean to him, and the reporter, rather than telling to fuck off and go be a nigger somewhere else, started asking him about the weather and how his day had been?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9I0NbF34cd8
>>74184497
>vox
To the trash it goes
>>74185742
It's total bull shit.
> Clinton gets more negative press
She's the queen of scandal, if she didn't break the law so often, or run a multi national money laundering ring, she wouldn't have those problems.
She did a horrible job as secretary of state.
It's almost impossible to find anything good she's done, even her own campaign struggles with it.
Her bad press is a result of her lawbreaking and horrible performance, not a media bias.
Countered.
>>74184497
>media evaluating media
>>74186176
Wow, that's terrible Does she also rape babies and eat orphans?
>>74184497
yeah right, the media doesnt protect clinton at all...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MkfTciQ_pS0
Had to show this to my Bernout father
Even he thinks it's bullshit
>>74186228
I see you are incapable of discussing this like an adult after your tissue paper argument was used to wipe my ass with.
>>74186309
Nice scientific evidence you got there.
>>74186228
Wouldn't put it past her 2bh.
>>74184497
If u say so
>>74184497
Becaus liberals like you
Enjoy being living Hippocrates
>>74184497
>Source: Crimson Hexagon
wtf is this shit?
>>74186228
i dunno is it good for the polls?
>>74186501
Nice post.
>>74186501
>>74184497
>Clinton
>Negative
Kek. Nice try, $hillary.
>>74184497
What a great source you have there.
in absolute terms trump's negative media time must be bigger than the summation of all the other's negative media time.
>>74186092
>>74185855
>>74185742
>>74186228
>>74186390
>>74186546
Hey shill. Read the article, the method is terrible science to begin with but this particular study was especially bad. Good luck finding a new job come november. Here's your (you)'s don't spend them all in one place
>>74185855
i'm upset that you're trying to source vox
at least post a screenshot so i dont have to give them views just to read their garbage article
>>74187016
>Hey shill. Read the article, the method is terrible science to begin with but this particular study was especially bad.
All right.
>>74187135
God I hate leafposters so much. It makes me wish for more Australians
>>74185717
>muh anecdote
>>74185511
galo sengen
Are you fucking kidding me
>>74187135
great.
>>74187798
you're
>Vox
The guys who labeled Obama's statement that ISIS is defeated "Truth" just TWO DAYS before the Paris massacre
Literally a Soros website, almost self-admitted.
Already branded borderline criminal in its propaganda by the Society of Professional Journalists
