Which one is superior?
UPS came from washington too
>>74175910
Washington should be Microsoft, not Starbucks.
>>74175711
Allsop is pretty much GOAT convinience store.
Texas also has big red, pretty much best soda pop state.
Institutional economics is where it's at. Thorsten Veblen was right, and has always been.
Corporate social responsibility, yay or nay?
>>74175711
Harley, cabelas and bobcat are the best
Austrian School
>Taco John's
>>74176112
of course
>>74175711
Economics major here. - Keynesian
>>74176112
>social responsibility,
No and absolutely no
ITs one thing to provide a service to your customers, but you also have to give your workers something to be proud of. It gets harder to do that when workers are rewarded less in favor of society at large.
>>74176257
>let's just throw money at the problem and hope no one notices the skyrocketing debt before its too late
>>74175711
I think there could have been better companies matched to states, like Target in minnesota instead of pillsbury
>>74176257
Economics major here as well. Have you guys been exposed to economic pluralism as a concept?
>>74175711
Austrian, because it's the only one based in reality.
>muh elastic money
>>74176257
you must have done an economics online course from socialism.net
>>74176343
T. Ignorant of recessions/depressions
>>74175711
>California
>Apple
>Not Intel or someone who's contributed to silicon valley more
No one, big companies are just a cancer.
>>74175711
>>74175711
>Taco Johns
>Sinclair
>Ginos
>McIlhennys
>Allsups
>Albertsons
>Whataver Missouri is
Literally what? Why are these amongst these other legitimate corporations?
Mississippi's economic powerhouse is guitar amps?
>>74175711
Americas dick has the right idea
>>74176362
No, must be some neo-Econ bs
>>74175711
Iowa, duh
>>74176365
University of Florida
>>74175711
>Pennsylvanian
>not WaWa
nigga, where the fuck are you from and how old is this map
>>74176576
Look at Virginia. This map was probably made a decade or two ago.
>>74176365
>Keynes
>socialist
pls
>>74176482
>neo-econ BS
It's a really interesting concept. Basically, it advocates for a form of economics based on a multitude of schools, refining economic policy by allowing it to be based on the strengths of economic schools. If each school is regarded as a tool, it's like using a swiss-knife instead of a hammer.
Texas' claim to fame is the drink I was hardcore addicted to until I realized soda was just this generation's version of cigarettes.
Sounds about right.
Was drinking a gallon a day before I quit, aka Texas-sized.
>>74175711
It sure would be nice if GM still made most of their auto parts here in the Midwest.
My Honda has more American made parts.
>>74176666
Interesting...
>>74176843
Check out a book called Economics: the user's guide by Ha-Joon Chang, would recommend 10 times out of 10.
>>74176364
>>74176147
how do both of you reconcile austrian economics with it's rejection of any form quantitative analysis?
>>74177428
You can't quantify the action of an individual. The economy isn't a machine, it's an organism
>>74178240
how would you then enact any form of quantitative economic policy?
>>74178915
You wouldn't, that's the point
>>74179872
and you honestly believe in today's day and age that that's a sound idea,given the size, scale and influence of MNC's?
>>74180091
I'm not totally opposed to regulating these companies as far as like child labor goes, but as far as quantitative regulation goes it's up to the companies to figure out their own figures and quotas
Corporatism is objectively superior.
Prove me wrong
(protip- you can't)
