What are your thoughts on this, /pol/?
>things that make you go "hmmm..."
>>74172833
the europeans expanded for trade, and in search of new routes to the indies
muslims were all "death to the infidel" from day 1
>>74172833
One brought civilization
The other "Believe, or be beheaded"
>>74172929
>up
scandinavians 2000 BC
>down
nigger today
>>74172833
It's pretty simple. People from Europe applaud their national conquests, while condemning foreign incursions onto their own soil. It's too bad people don't protect their countries from foreigners anymore. What point are you trying to make anyway?
>>74172929
>Nordic_meme
Can you dump the others you have in this thread pls
It's good for banting Swedecucks
>>74172929
>Ice cold, almost unliveable environment
vs
>Fruit rots on the trees, it's so overabundant
>before middle ages
vs
>today
>clean cut, straight boards
vs
>some branches covered in mud
It's all the same /s
>>74173059
>Scandinavians
>2000 BC
>>74173195
whatever the fuck they were called then
>>74172833
I don't remember invading anyone
>>74173195
AMEN :DDDDD
>>74172833
>German colonies not mentioned
Triggered
>>74173242
Finns ;)
>>74173428
snooze u lose friendo
>>74173611
>france getting all the table scraps
no wonder they're so rude to everyone all the time
>>74173814
>Haiti and Indochina, the only good colonies, both successfully revolted against Paris
>Algerians and other Africans now flood their cities
must feel bad
>>74174793
Indochina was a backwater back then, only good for trade with China
>>74172833
The argument was actually that Muslims did expand their religion through violence and also that in the past they were a threat to Europe at that time.
Nobody was against a people expanding per se you don't hear people complaining about Mongols expanding their empire in the past for example.
