SHUT
EVERYTHING
DOWN
https://archive.is/ig5Vu
>>74139923
What the fuck am I reading
>>74140042
Death bots, son. Being funded by the Pentagon.
>>74139923
IG-88 detected
>>74139923
>killer robot controlled by social media
>/pol/ controls social media through memes
Oh boy here we go
>>74139923
The nose and kebab are fucked.
>>74139923
>hold no social media accounts
>only post on different chans
am I safe from this turmoil
>>74139923
Jesus Christ! The French were right everyone dig a moat around your property right now!
This should be quite fun considering what we did to Tay.
>>74139923
>mfw bigots on /pol/ will get what they deserve
>>74141245
who controls /pol/?
I remember reading something similar a while back. Not much to worry about right now, the idea is to let these robots (drones flying above some mudslime country) analyze the social network connections of terrorists to deduce the likelihood that someone is a terrorist. If all of your friends are known terrorists and you are in some terrorist facebook group chances are you are a terrorist and the drone will fuck you up.
Of course you can speculate from this that one day such drones can be turned upon the civilian population at home to keep them in line and obedient to the state, any signs of disobedience being stamped out by the network of unfeeling drones flying overhead, keeping tabs on your every movement and all of your online activities. Pretty dystopian honestly.
>/pol/ will start a robot vs human war in your lifetime
>>74141245
>>74142065
DELETE THIS
>>74142088
>one day such drones can be turned upon the civilian population at home to keep them in line and obedient to the state, any signs of disobedience being stamped out by the network of unfeeling drones flying overhead, keeping tabs on your every movement and all of your online activities
Good. The American people need some control
>>74142063
real /pol/acks don't have facebook/twitter so we're safe, rest is shitposters , astroturfers and other shills killing this board.
>>74142065
jews, obviously.
>>74142065
;^)
>>74139923
Question
Why can't we put a fail safe of somethings along those lines on Ai?
They could be intelligent but couldn't do things that without approval, just now humans cannot change DNA they wouldn't be able to change their code.
>>74142063
If anything, /pol/ will turn the robots into kike-killing machines, like with Tay.
>>74142065
DELETE THIS!
>>74142264
Exactly my first thought
Can't wait
>>74142196
Ha, no. Being controlled is for foreigners.
Give me liberty, or give me death.
>>74142065
Aussie shitposters
>>74142065
D E L E T E T H I S
>>74139923
>fueled by social media
You know what to do /pol/.
A
FUCKING
SHAPE
>>74142065
human will.
>tfw in 2025 we get to help the USA by coordinating middle strikes like that one time in the Syrian general
It's time
>>74142065
D E L E T E T H I S
>>74142264
Bullshit. Now they have an exact "return fire" and "hit first" targets, the ones that had the most influence on Tay will be sent to Wal mart first when the guillotines arrive
>>74142065
S-STUPID LEAFPOSTER
>>74139923
oh boy i just opened it and im about to go down the rabbit hole and shedding tears of joy!
Why cant they just make my fucking affordable lifelike sex robots already
RRRRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHH
>>74142065
occulist subverters like me, bombarding you with lethal memetics up to three times a day
>>74142088
I have a clipout from USA Today in 2006(?) where US soldiers were taking bio-metric data from suspected terrorist in Iraq and feeding it into a database that US military drones were accessing live in the air. The drones were looking at the eyes of the people in (and around) oil fields and refineries with instructions to destroy any unauthorized persons coming within a certain distance of restricted territory.
>>74144059
How good do you think the cameras on drones are? This isn't fucking CSI, the optics have limitations m80.
>>74144427
Not according to the article. The cameras(?) on these drones were capable of seeing through your eyelids, sunglasses, etc. The only way to avoid detection would have made you essentially blind. And like I said, this was in USA Today around 2006 or so, ten years ago.
>>74144704
Proofs, we're also clearly using them very poorly if the current state of affairs is any indication. (Also good memory if the last time you saw this really was 2006...)
>/pol/ doesn't get it that they'll be sending the robotic death squads to the homes of those who DON'T use social media
>>74145527
Fine with me, been waiting for tiranny for far too long.
>>74145367
I'm actually looking for it right now. I have it for sure because I was so freaked out by it.
Also, you're out of your mind if you think the US isn't getting exactly the results it wants in "the current state of affairs" concerning the Middle East.
>>74139923
The Pentagon did something right? GAS THE HUMANS!! FLESH WARS NOW!!
>>74145367
Read this while I'm looking for it.
http://www.cnet.com/news/biometrics-and-security-in-iraq/
I just have piles of shit everywhere, sorry.
>>74139923
>based on social media content
Why? Seriously why? What benefit could this possibly have aside from making thoughtcrime punishable by death? Autonomous decisions means no trial.
>>74139923
Better Dead then Red
>>74146624
Tut tut, trials are a waste of time and money
