Is there anyone who DOES NOT smoke weed, but thinks it should be legalized anyway?
If so, why do they feel that way? I can't see anything good about legalizing yet another degenerate substance. It's bad enough we have nicotine and alcohol to deal with.
>>74133533
Only for medical purposes.
i dont do any drugs and i think that it should stay illegal so cops can bust degenerates and get money from them
Also, I'm tired of the arguments about "personal freedom and liberty", because American freedom has become rooted in degeneracy. We need some sort of fascist, right-wing moral revolution.
And pot smokers are generally not of the best gene stock. You can tell by their tattoos and promiscuous behavior as well.
I don't smoke weed and I never have (even though I had many opportunities to do so) and I think it should be legalized.
Notice I used the past tense, "had", when I said I had many opportunities to smoke weed, but didn't. You know why? Because I'm no longer in high school or university. I wouldn't even know where to start if I wanted to buy it now.
It's easier for kids to get weed than cigarettes. Let me repeat that: It's easier for kids to get weed than cigarettes. Schools are the easiest place to get weed, by far.
Secondly, if it's legal, you could grow it, you could buy it from the store, etc. without needing a dealer, who may or may not be a dangerous fellow.
No drug should be banned from medical use, the very idea of completely banning a drug is medically unethical, especially if those drugs have shown to be effective treatments for certain ailments.
I do not smoke weed.
Marijuana should be legalized. Mexican cartels make billions and billions of dollars off of a plant. People will find a way to smoke marijuana, regardless of whether it is legal or not. Thus, we should at least make money.
On a lesser note, I really do not think any governmental institution has the right to tell me what I can and cannot put in my body, so long as it doesn't cause me to hurt somebody. No one goes home after smoking a joint and beats their wife. Alcohol on the other hand...
>>74133609
>drugs are bad, cops are good
Spoiler alert cops smoke pot too
i think that it should be sold medicinally because i do not think it is fair to possibly kill people just because i don't think that they should be smoking a plant, as for street use of marijuana i think they should also legalize it because the people will get their hands on it anyways so why not let the government get the money instead of greasy Mexican cartels
Another thing... I have to place blame on the Jewish media for promoting the stoner culture, because that's where people get the idea to try it.
>>74133609
You know, didn't they pass a law saying people who are hard drug users can turn themselves in, but not to get convicted of a crime, but to get help? My point is, I think people who do drugs should get help. And yes, marijuana is a gateway drug.
>>74136049
It definitely is a gateway drug. Maybe not the only one, but it is, no doubt about it.
>>74133533
I don't smoke anything, do drugs, or drink. I smoked a bunch of weed/drank years ago. I think it should all be legal. If someone wants to kill themselves with drugs, no one should tell them they can't.
If someone wants ANYTHING they can get it, regardless of laws. So making laws like that is retarded.
Making it illegal has done nothing but make otherwise worthless degenerates wealthy because think it's worth the risk or they don't think they'll get caught.
A bigger deterrent from drugs would be when you're 8 and ask your parents why the guy over there is a mess and acting crazy, and they tell you "that's what happens when you do drugs" will scare you away from them better than someone sparking your curiosity by saying "trust me, drugs r bad"
I don't smoke weed but I think it should be legal, way worse things are legal. You can get piss drunk and be a complete cunt but you can get thrown in jail for smoking weed? Come on
>>74136365
Sick of the phrase 'gateway drug'. Certain people are predisposed to addiction and substance abuse. Marijuana is the easiest drug to obtain, therefore of course it's the first illicit drug anyone tries.. Most of the time.
>>74133533
>Is there anyone who DOES NOT smoke weed
Yes, everyone.
I remember you, you're such s dumbass.
>>74136698
This
I don't smoke weed, but support legalization because of the extra tax revenue it brings in.
I'm fine with legalizing drugs, as long as any government benefits require randomized drug tests
Let degenerates kill themselves, I don't want to fund them
>>74137226
Not that I have a problem with degenerates killing themselves, but the thing is, they don't kill themselves quickly enough and they haplessly breed before they die to create a future generation of addicts. It's a cycle. Eradicating substances (not just outlawing them) will break said cycle. I'm tired of seeing civilization live in a perpetual state of drugged-out mediocrity.
>>74133533
NOT
AN
ARGUMENT
>>74133594
People will just abuse the system and it will end up legalized anyway
>>74137635
shut up, dad
>>74137078
>Certain people are predisposed to addiction and drug abuse.
This is true in a sense that people who have addiction that runs in their family because addiction is hereditary. But I know people who have no type of addiction in their families and have become heroin addicts later in life because they smoked weed in high school and were looking for a different high. Also nowadays drug addiction usually starts out of boredom or curiosity. And a lot if drugs are so easy to obtain now it's ridiculous. It's in your backyard.
>>74137761
They set up the system for it to be abused. These "dispensaries" are designed like trendy Amsterdam hangouts. If pot really is medicine (and I'm not saying it doesn't have legitimate uses without the psychoactive elements to it), then why is stoner culture permeated into them?
>>74133880
...
You going to defend that that facist, "right-wing" government when it's YOU they think is a degenerate. See, some people on this site are bad, you're on this site to, according to YOUR OWN LOGIC that automatically makes you just as degenerate as everyone else here.
>>74135330
"Stoner culture" is a myth. People get the idea to try it because it's offered to them and they try it. It's nothing beyond that. You obviously have zero experience around people who actually do smoke weed. Most habitual smokers are quiet about it considering it's not-so-accepted in a lot of places.
And you're tired of arguments about personal freedom? I'm tired of arguments that amount to "STOP LIKING WHAT I DONT LIKE" which is all you have.
Legalization makes sense for everyone involved because it does not violate anyone's rights or put anyone in harms way.
> Most habitual smokers are quiet about it considering it's not-so-accepted in a lot of places.
Except for when they're on the Internet. Stoners love to rant about being left alone to smoke in privacy, then get on social media to post Vines of their bong rips.
As for the rest of what you posted, it sounds like you're trying to defend your drug usage.
Weed is for losers. Should it be legal? Probably not. Should people go to jail for it? Probably not. However, it should be noted that crime rates and traffic deaths have significantly gone up in states where "weed" was legalized. Weed breeds laziness and selfishness on a level only matched by socialism. Weed is for niggers, put that shit out right now.
>>74138257
>, it sounds like you're trying to defend your drug usage.
Yes, yes I am because I have a right to do it and to the pursuit of happiness which people like you clearly violate with emotional, illogical, straight up bias arguments.
Point on the doll where weed smokers hurt you Anon. You can't because you're not in any worse shape by anyone else smoking weed when you're not around. This does not negatively effect you at all.
>>74137980
I still say that they would have been heroin users regardless. If the weed wasn't there initially to get them high, than they would have tried heroin. Since it's so easy to get, right?
I understand the "It's *the current year*" argument is unpopular here, but it holds true in this case. In 2016, we're still having discussions of a '60s hippie anachronism that served as the catalyst for cultural Marxist thinking.
>>74138573
I know what negatively affects me and what doesn't. So I put my interests in what is negatively affecting the society around me and those who live in it.
>>74134051
>imblyn rich white alpha kids don't smoke weed
I also doubt many stoners smoke pot for recreation, 'cause I'm sure deep down they have some other problems/issues they're trying to avoid through doing drugs. Plus, I don't see smoking weed as being cool, not just because of how unhealthy and stupid it is, but because of how popular it is. It's so conformist. They're like sheep, and they typically buy into every "trendy" thing the media puts out.
I don't know if you've noticed but making it illegal hasn't really worked, lots of people still smoke weed it's just you've also got a massive black market with all the organized crime and hence violence that that entails, just look at what's happening on your southern border. The prohibitionists basically took something bad (recreational drug use) and made it even worse somehow, it's quite an achievement.
weed is cancer
>>74139303
I understand that, that's why I think we should do what some of these oriental nations do, where drug use/possession/smuggling/etc. is punishable by death. Gotta thin out the offal from the gene pool.
>>74137484
Welfare props up those drug babies. They wouldn't have shit without government support
>>74138080
dude shh. he didnt have friends and is looking for friends on this mongolian icefishing board. leave the autists alone, we'll round em up soon enough.
>>74137484
>Eradicating substances (not just outlawing them) will break said cycle
Hahahaha how in the fuck do you propose "eradicating" these substances? We've tried complete and utter illegality for half a century and it's been a total failure, where in the hell do you go from there? Are you on drugs right now?
>>74139429
> Chris Christie pic
So what does that have to do with anything? It's easier for someone to lose weight than to get off drugs. Of course, they would have to make an effort to do it. Most druggies show no interest in giving up their addictions.
In this thread:
People bitching about stoners because they were the ones who bullied them in high school.
Marijuana legalization is coming faster than a speeding bullet, hell it's already legal in my state. You all have really run out of things to complain about, haven't you?
>>74139508
No, I'm not on drugs, but I'm sure you are.
>>74139545
This thread is about marijuana, which is extremely easy to quit due to it not being addictive at all. Go make a separate drug thread if you want to complain about "druggies".
>>74138609
Heroin is more prevalent now than it ever was. I never said it was easy to get before. I've already had 2 friends die from it recently, both mid twenties. One of them had a history of addiction in their family, so I won't talk about him, and the other had no history of addiction in their family at all. He was a huge stoner who later on fucked around with pills, and would go thru people's medicine cabinets. He kept his addiction to himself and never got help unfortunately, and I do believe honestly, in my heart that it was from him first smoking weed and drinking a lot. He was searching for a different high and did a lot of other drugs other than heroin. And he was one of the nicest, happiest people you'd ever meet. I'm not saying weed is bad. I think it should definitely be legalized. But I do believe it can lead to different drugs because people react differently to weed, so they go on that search for a different high.
>>74139545
generalizations mean a weak argument.
just admit you are simply a sad lonely angry """"""man""""""
How are you different than a sjw?
>people doing things hurts my feelies
>>74133533
I don't smoke; I have been high, it was dis-interesting, so I never went back.
Why do I think it should be legal? Because of general purpose nihilism.
>>74139392
What if I told you drug use still exists in those nations too?
Also good luck getting people in your country to accept death penalty for drug use when executing people for per-meditated murder is considered a controversial idea, once again: are you on fuckig drugs right now?
>>74139590
Thanks for proving my next point how stoners are self-righteous and prone to making false generalizations.
I don't smoke weed, but I think it should be legal. If people want to do it, I don't care.
Banning the consumption of any substance is pure paternalist overreach and should never be accepted
>>74133533
I used to smoke
I have several mental issues where I get delusions and get very afraid. Like- middle of the night, I'm scared of the dark, holding my pee because I'm afraid to move because 'things' will get me. I see shapes and figures in the dark, and constantly 'think' I see or hear things. I was using a growing amount of weed to calm myself and cope with my depression from how isolated I have become.
I found out that weed makes that kind of shit worse and stopped smoking and I'm on actual meds for it now and its been helping.
It was hard to stop at first, but after a month or so it actually gets nice to not 'have' to smoke before doing anything. Not that I ever left the house except for work and to get more weed.
That said, I think it should be legal, but there needs to be more openness about the risks and side effects.
It should be legalized because:
1. No one farms anymore. Growing pot is a "gateway drug" to running a successful agribusiness.
2. Pot is no more or less harmful than alcohol or cigarettes. If that level of self-harm is acceptable in modern society, marijuana should be too.
3. The ban was politically-motivated and had no basis in fact.
4. It would decrease the criminal population in the US by at LEAST 30%, or a couple million people
>>74139729
>he calls others self righteous
>while putting none of the blame on his own useless self for society's downfalls
>>74139665
Then why haven't you quit?
>>74139772
You can't expect to reason with these people, anon.
>>74133533
Hey u Fuck tardy go get your term paper material on your own time. We'renot your personal writers writers you lazy fuck.
>>74139631
Then why do you keep on saying such absolutely ridiculous things?
>>74139704
*pre-meditated murder
>>74139590
>>74139693
>>74139704
> are too ashamed to admit to their drug addictions
>>74139816
b b b b ut he's making false claims
>on 4 chan of all places
>>74139937
>>74139793
I smoked marijuana one time 6 months ago. Got high as shit with some friends. I don't have the shakes or the addiction symptoms or whatever else stupid shit you believe.
Face it, there is nothing wrong with marijuana, and just because you were the loner kid in school who never had any friends so therefore have never had anyone to offer it to you doesn't exactly put you in a position to decide what is "degenerate".
>>74139937
>too ashamed of their shitty arguments to ever actually address the criticisms
Explain to me how you're going to get people to accept the state killing people for using drugs when the state killing people for fucking murder and rape is a controversial idea, explain how exactly you're going to "eradicate" drugs?
>>74139937
>too ashamed to admit he really just wants friends
>too autistic to go about it any other way than shitpost
>>74133533
I smoke weed and i dont think it should be legalised.
The reason being is that people cant control themselves. If you smoke a joint once or twice a week thats fine, but what you see is people are completely dependent on the shit to escape/kill time and have no motivation and are dopey as fuck.
medicinal marijuana on the other hand is well studied and has proved beneficial to many. So in the regard it should be allowed.
The potheads on here sure get defensive, don't they? They must really be addicted.
>>74133533
used too long ago. should be legal as any other and prescribed/controlled by medical professionals.
it gets legalized less young ones will do it, and if they are curious doctors can put em on a ride for a while. better that way it would be young jedi
>>74140091
I doubt you have very many friends yourself with your self-righteous attitude.
>>74140095
Don't have to defend pot to realize you're no different than a socialist.
>the government should take care of it because i ate too many cheetos
>>74133533
Donald trump doesn't smoke weed and will be legalizing it across the board medically and leave recreational use up to the states.
Stfu.
I can legally smoke weed in my home state of California
Feelsgooodman.jpg
>>74140016
Actually, I had a friend who I easily could have smoked weed with, but I turned it down. Trust me, if I wanted to try something, I would have done it by now. Don't assume that lack of opportunity is the root of someone's dislikes. I think you have some residual damage from that pot you tried. Must have been some potent stuff.
>>74140279
Source?
>>74140095
>post retarded shit
>how retarded your shit is gets pointed out
>"lol you're being defensive"
You ever going to answer this post m8? >>74140060
>>74140312
> "home state of CA"
> Mexican flag
I know, "what's the difference?"
>>74133533
all weed smokers are degenerates if anything we should kill anyone that smokes weed
>>74140279
He won't.
>>74140378
>source
Don't be a shitter. Hop on ye old Google or YouTube and search words like "trump" and "marijuana" and "legalization"
>>74140060
We could do anything if we invested more into science instead of degenerate media industries.
Me. Never smoked, never will. But I support legalization because:
- keeping it illegal causes too much crime.
- ...which overflows the judicial system and the penal system.
- it's no worse than cigs or booze, both of which are already legal.
>>74140583
I mean he said he would in the 90s and then he just said as much on at one of his rallies. I don't know if he CAN or if it will just be like what happened in Canada but saying "he wont" is pretty shit b8 without reasoning.
>>74140669
Holy shit you are on drugs, nice troll thread m8.
You stoners can argue with me all you want, but you won't change my mind (and I certainly can't change yours), so why don't we just make a deal, you stop posting your love of weed on the Internet and we'll stop bitching about it? After all, it's a private and personal activity, and you've said it yourselves.
>>74140754
You don't have much faith in human potential, do you?
>>74133533
It's less harmful than tobacco and alcohol and I'd rather be taxing the potheads to fund education or infrastructure or some shit
Kinda like how Georgie runs their college scholarship program through their lottery system. Might as well get some use out of the degenerates.
>>74140312
>legally smoke
>CA
Naw.
>>74140595
>>74140378
I decided to dig it up.
https://youtu.be/PWIQhDbs1g8
Are there any statistics on wrecks/deaths/etc before and after weed was legalized?
>>74133533
>>74133880
>>74134051
>>74136365
>>74135330
>>74137484
You've obviously made up your mind. I'm not sure why you made this thread.
>>74140852
>It's less harmful than tobacco and alcohol
Bad argument, 2bh
smokin a fuckton of it
legalize it NOW
>>74141064
Probably the same reason why stoners make pro-weed threads.
>>74136698
>If someone wants to kill themselves with drugs, no one should tell them they can't.
What if they kill someone in a wreck?
>>74133533
I think weed is absolutely retarded just as cigarettes are. That being said, weed does have medicinal uses. While I'd love to ban that shit I also don't like the idea of the government telling me what I can and can't do. Ban smoking around kids and make the fuckers stand 100 feet away from buildings and not this bullshit 15 rule in Illinois.
>>74141137
> look at this badass
>>74141216
You mean like the tens of thousands of deaths/injuries from drunk driving yearly?
When are we going to ban alcohol anyways?
Kappa.
>>74141291
Yeah, when are we? Forget about trying to legalize weed, we should be trying to get rid of the drugs we already legally have.
>>74141291
Yes. That is exactly my point. Quit jumping on the alcohol subject on everyone.
>>74141425
over my dead body.
>>74137078
>really really long rant.
I really hate that Bullshit with that phrase. It's not the drug that has anything to do with what you do after that. It's the people who influence you into trying other things. I grew up in one of the most meth infested part of the country. I'm sure I could have walked into any yard stuck my finger in the dirt and found some. But, I was lucky enough to grow up with people (parents included) who discourage the use of drugs but be either dismissive or indifferent to weed because it's something alot of people do at one point and it's harmless if done responsibly. Noone just acknowledges it because it's not legalized.
But, if I would have grown up poorer or in a worse part of town there's a chance someone could have put a glass bulb in my hand and gave offered me meth. And that's what happens to alot of people and the cycle continues. Over and over.
>tl;Dr it's not the drug that's the issue it's the people.
>>74141213
Because they are currently affected by unjust laws. What you are preaching has been in trial for the last fifty years.
>>74141462
The only way.
>>74138825
> So I put my interests in what is negatively affecting the society around me and those who live in it.
And it's not negatively effecting society in anyway either. That's the point. No one's being harmed. Even the "it makes some people lazy" yeah well you don't have a right or you're not entitled to demand productivity out of other's around you either. You don't pull this shit with alcohol which definitely makes people unproductive.
>>74139268
I don't get this shit at all. At all. You have an entire website here with people who don't fit that mold in the lest. You're just making shit up right now. Weed's always been a counter-culture thing too, which implies it's something for non-conformists in a way. The only reason it's becoming so prevalent is because it's a good thing in general and more and more people are seeing that. Which makes it harder to generalize those people because the sample size becomes more varied at that point like drinkers.
>cause I'm sure deep down they have some other problems/issues they're trying to avoid through doing drugs.
Once you grow up and have adult issues, you'll understand why stressing yourself out completely all the time with no release is actually more harmful than using weed to worry less about the never ending problems in life. You can calm down and tackle them easier as well. And that's for some people, not everyone. It's a not a magic cure all so complete legalization would not look too different than what you have today, only less people in jail and out working and being productive. And people with chronic illness would become more productive members of society too if weed helps them.
It's a win/win for everyone. Too bad they refuse too see it.
>>74141917
What is the point of that picture
> Weed's always been a counter-culture thing too, which implies it's something for non-conformists in a way.
It was non-conformist 50 years ago. So were tattoos. Good luck finding someone today who doesn't smoke weed or have tats.
>>74141832
so be it.
>>74133533
I don't smoke weed at all but I think the idea of banning a plant is fucking retarded. I cannot see any reason for it other than what benefits the state and I believe the state should work for the people not the other way around. The idea of banning a fucking plant especially one as harmless as weed but also mushrooms, LSD and all the other 'hard' drugs that come from natural sources is repugnant over-reach.
I don't do any illegal drugs, by the way, they're not for me at least the ones I tried when I did try them, but I do drink.
>>74141917
>you'll understand why stressing yourself out completely all the time with no release is actually more harmful than using weed to worry less about the never ending problems in life.
This shit is just retarded. You can enjoy weed without having to come up with all these "dude it's good for u lmao!" excuses.
>>74142122
I know 3 of them out of my friend circle not including myself. Then again I don't live in the city so maybe I have it easy.
>>74142249
actions of people trippin are less destructive/or none at all, then those who are drunk of their ass. bureaucrat needs to justify his incomes and contracts
should be legalized as a luxury commodity
that way drug dealers are forced to lower their prices to the point that they won't make a profit
>>74142444
I tend to find that a bad argument in honesty. I've seen people tripping and I've had some mad experiences on LSD when I was younger (only took it twice). If there was a place where 100s of people go at the weekend, in fact many of these places spread all over a city, and they all took loads of psychedelics, I think their actions would be way worse than a drunkard.
It's stupid people in stupid situations that are responsible for it not the drug. Still doesn't mean that would ever happen, or that even if it did it's a good reason to make it illegal. 'Preventionary' laws are fucking retarded, ones that are only laws in order to stop you breaking another law. It's why guns should be legal while murder still isn't, and alcohol should be legal while being a drunk cunt breaking things isn't, and weed should be legal but acting a cunt and robbing someone shouldn't be.
>>74142730
well articulated. i do support
>>74140095
>>74140371
>They must really be addicted.
> I think you have some residual damage from that pot you tried. Must have been some potent stuff.
We have this thread every day. You guys use this same tactic every fucking time. Antagonizing! Is that it? Once you don't get your thread of people agreeing with you, you resort to calling everyone a dumb addict. You're an addict! You're addicted to shit posting. You can't stop yourself form shit posting. This thread is going to die and you're going to make another one, with the same "arguments" where you antagonize people into responses.
If I was actually high right now, I wouldn't even be paying attention to you because you're wasting everyone's time, including you're own.
>>74140787
>you stop posting your love of weed on the Internet and we'll stop bitching about it?
Stop shitposting, how about that? This is what you're doing. You're the one that brought weed up in the first place, you started this thread, you asked people's opinions about weed and then turn around and say you're annoyed with people talking about weed.
THEN.
WHY.
DID.
*************YOU**************
BRING.
IT.
UP?!?!
It's the same shit with transgender bathrooms. Trannies and leftists won't shut up about getting their own bathroom and when they do, people oppose it and the opposers are labeled "obsessed with where other people are going to the bathroom" where they aren't the ones who brought the topic up in the first place. You're doing the same thing, you're bringing this upon yourself.
Someone else tell me I'm not the only person who see this right?
>>74142271
>You can enjoy weed without having to come up with all these "dude it's good for u lmao!" excuses.
Did you read what that was a reply TO? That sentence didn't come out of nowhere.
>>74141966
It's Spider-Man smoking weed with MARY JANE which is also a nick name for weed.
>>74143579
That must be you in that picture.
dude lmao a leaf
>>74133533
Yes. Prohibition doesn't work, unless you have such severe penalties (death or close) that no one want's to take the risk (even then, some do).
Legalize it, regulate and tax is like alcohol and tobacco are. Makes money, deals a massive blow to gangs and addresses a lot of the problems it causes by being illegal.
>>74143961
> Prohibition doesn't work, unless you have such severe penalties (death or close) that no one want's to take the risk (even then, some do).
Which is what we need.
>>74144054
Even for medicinal use? My mother died of cancer and it helped better than all the narcotics she was prescribed towards the end.
Muh sad personal story, I know, but it does change your mind a bit.
>>74143961
Seems like stoners even exist in Japan.
>>74133533
As a none user the more people smoking pot means a higher earning potential for me. The more people that drop out of college and work dead end jobs the better off I am because of competition in my field. The only problem is if the welfare state becomes too large. Then they become a tax burden on me. So the whole shift in society accepting self induced retardation is a hard issue for me to decide on.
Pot kills.
http://www.surenews.com/crime/pittsburgh-man-allegedly-killed-his-girlfriend-for-spending-his-weed-money-on-diapers/
>>74144303
>Pot kills.
>Retards kill
FTFY.
>>74140092
Bwhahahahaha, you sell/cultivate the shit right?
I don't subscribe to the degenerate meme so I don't really give a fuck
>banning natural medicine
no
i took cbd oil when i broke my ribcage and it hurt everyday
then the cops came took my plants and put me behind bars for 7 years
>>74144214
There are smokers, but I'm basing this on having grown up in Canada. Getting busted with weed here is like getting busted with coke, heroin and assault guns in Canada.
>>74136049
>>74136365
Its less that people that smoke pot go on to do a bunch of different drugs and more that the people that do all the other drugs ALSO smoke pot
>>74144887
There's a difference?
>>74133533
police can't stop it or even reduce it significantly and where law enforcement fails economics are more likely to do a better job.
Leaglizing it'll probably come with a shit ton of caveats i.e. no smoking in public places, and likely landlords dictating on allowing use in places like condos or apartments. Entire apartments reeking like skunk are fucking terrible to live in.
All in all there seems to be no real downside (for canada at least) legalizing, and taxing weed. It'll cut down police money wasteage (although they're real good at finding ways to justify budget regardless), and likely put a huge dent in the profitability of weed as an illicit black market good.
>>74143819
Do you use Steam?
>>74144552
That sucks, sorry bro. Did you use it when you got out?
>>74133533
I don't see anything wrong with smoking weed, I've met people from all over the spectrum of smoking, some that use sativa as a study aid, some that use it to treat illnesses, and some that use it to help sleep, the only group that I've met that use it as a degeneracy will just wait their life on it and have no effect on me so I say legalize let the retards smoke themselves to a pathetic life
>>74133533
I don't smoke and I think it should be legalized, because I'm pretty sure that people who don't smoke won't change their minds suddenly after it's legalized, also weed being illegal has never stopped anyone who wants to smoke from blazing it.
>>74145400
yes
thankfully i didnt get caught again
>tfw mobile internet so slow
>>74133533
I smoke it when it's handed to me, which is like three times a year at concerts. I don't give a shit if it's leglaized or not, though I don't see any good reason to keep it illegal.
Anyone else want to chime in?
Me, but along with that I should be able to discriminate them and isolate myself from the consequences of their bad habits.
>>74147600
Absolutely.
weed
>>74133533
Legalise it completely.
Weed is awesome, and anyone who disagrees would only ever have sex twice, in the missionary position, for the sole purpose of procreation.
>>74133533
Tbh I think that it's pretty overrated, but I dont see a point to keep it illegal. Yeah it can make you into a stoner but same with alcohol, it can make you a alcoholic(what's way more bad for you and the society)
>>74133533
i dont smoke weed and i think it should be legal.
It should be legal because of personal freedoms
>>74153132
Why do I get the idea that most people aren't content with having freedom unless weed is involved?
>>74133533
I'm indifferent, drugs are not the problem. If it were legal but heavily regulated it would probably be better than it is now.
>>74153585
I'd like to believe that, but I don't think us Americans can handle a freedom like weed legalization. We tend to be excessive with just about everything.
>>74133533
why do people only care about weed when we don't even have the right to masturbate in public?
>>74154444
People seem to care more about the freedoms they wish they had than they do about the freedoms they already have.
