explain why this isn't the best system of all
It's just feudalism
>>74132490
>Implies a coercive monopoly is a free market.
>>74132490
the NAP seems pretty legit
Someone is going to overpower you and just take all of your shit. You literally don't think another country is just going to say "Hey we can get some resources over in Ancap land, let's fucking invade" or some gang "sheet lets gonna rob some dem out der, aint no cops dawg".
I'd rather just give 20% of it away so that the state can have a military and police while living a comfortable life.
>>74132436
Because Anarchy is fucking stupid. It doesnt work and its for people mad that they are poor.
>>74132436
the people who tend to want anarchy tend to be the first kinds of people who would die should such a system take effect.
>>74133837
This.
Same as the faggots who want the zombie apocalypse or some shit.
>>74132436
Move to south Africa. Sorry, no offence to the white south africans, you tried.
Try playing rust without dying first.
>>74133717
>>74133684
>>74133837
>>74133870
Not an argument.
>>74132436
It most certainly is.
>>74132436
>anarcho capitalism
well meme'd, fellow fallout 4 fan, well meme'd!
*tips fedora*
*checks pip boy*
*inhales vape pen*
*masturbates to cartoons*
*cries loudly*
Anarchy is for niggers
>>74134049
Ok, then explain how an ANCAP society would defend itself against large invaders and crime syndicates?
>>74132436
Somalia is doing great, right?
Flag thread?
child prostitution
vulnerable to foreign invaders
>guys, why are you forming a militia? We agreed to be anarcho-capitalist! I don't want to be part of your theocracy! That goes against the agreement we had to be anarcho-capitalist! Why would you kill me and think you can get away with it you darned militia?!
>>74134172
Why would a nation invade a place that cannot be ruled? No tax system, no invasion. There would be no way to break even financially.
>>74134531
you impose a tax system
you coerce them to be apart of your government
>>74134531
You ever hear of subjugation ?
>>74134531
Why not? A more organized nation could just easily take the land and convert all of its inhabitants simply because of a well organized military.
>>74134509
Same reason I would not due business with a religious cult. Every incentive is in place to stop business.
>>74134531
>Cant be ruled
>Wont be invaded
Fuck you for being this stupid, how many goddamn times have countries invaded one another and occupied even when total control was not possible. Go fuck yourself.
>>74134688
same reason as what? that post makes no sense.
>>74134612
>>74134634
How would one ever implement such a system. Keep in mind that everyone is against you and is in violation of every rule.
>>74134809
army rolls in
knocks on peoples door
"pay taxes or we kill your family"
"b-but, I can't be governed!"
kills you
goes to the next house
Acap is a great idea in theory but the execution of it could be dangerous and have devastating consequences today.
>>74134809
Do you even history?
Bomb houses, totally siege towns, and other basic scorched earth tactics.
You do this, people will submit to an invading force real quick.
>>74134735
Uh oh, another Butt-hurt socialist. Always so emotional.
>>74134869
Yeah I'm certain their won't be any resistance up to that point.
>>74134924
Because of all of those capitalist societies in collapse.
>>74134995
A war of attrition cannot be won without depriving others ruled by that state of essentially everything. The ancapistan would just have to outlast that army. Shouldn't be too hard when their standard of living is falling constantly.
Pic always related
>>74134049
Not an argument
>>74132436
Lmao at all socialists ITT
Their only argument is monopoly and it is mathematically proofed that monopoly is impossible without government intervention
>>74135015
I really can't help you
>>74135223
If it is voluntary, what is the problem? Also who would send their kids to school where people sell heroine to the children? Seems unprofitable.
>>74135223
How is this different from any modern country?
>>74132436
In such condition there is no place for industry, because the fruit thereof is uncertain, and consequently, not culture of the earth, no navigation, nor the use of commodities that may be imported by sea, no commodious building, no instruments of moving and removing such things as require much force, no knowledge of the face of the earth, no account of time, no arts, no letters, no society, and which is worst of all, continual fear and danger of violent death, and the life of man, solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.
>>74132490
No m8. Free markets, private property and wage labour are a cornerstone of Capitalism. Read Marx, even if he spouts bullshit most of the time, he is good at defining Capitalism.
>>74135341
>>74135345
>>74132436
>Commie gun
>>74132436
>Anarcho capitalism
>anarchy
>capitalism
This is... what.
>>74135212
It would be easy because "Ancapistan" wouldn't have a fucking standard army.
All these government bootlickers that hate freedom and having money.
BAKA
>>74135603
Why would a country attack/occupy Ancapistan?
If it depends on where this Ancapistan is, and/or how big it is, we can think about a few scenarios:
>one Ancapistan in the middle of Congo
>New York becomes Ancapistan
>Antarctica has several Ancapistans in it
>random German village becomes Ancapistan
>entire Canadian territory can be described as Ancapistan
>one island in Micronesia becomes Ancapistan
>a couple Ancapistans in the Amazon Rainforest, but you don't know where exactly they are
Feel free to come up with more scenarios. Just make sure to answer the main question: why would a country attack or occupy an Ancapistan?
>>74135015
Not even a socialist you stupid faggot. Try harder to either make an argument or fuck off ya cunt.
>>74135975
>Why would you invade
I want your resources and land.
>>74135975
Resources and better geographical position? The same reason anyone invades.
Foreign invasion is actually the second concern. The honest truth is that mafia-like organizations are going to practically run this country anyway, even if they would luck out and manage to not be invaded.
>>74136152
What if Ancapistan is so small their territory isn't worth annexing and its economy is entirely service-based?
You gonna demolish the buildings and take the scrap metal back to your capital?
>>74136311
Idk the soviet union scrapped entire areas of countries after WW2 to repair and add onto their industrial sectors.
>>74136311
>You gonna demolish the buildings and take the scrap metal back to your capital?
You somehow imply this is weird.
>>74136267
>governments aren't mafia-like organizations
lmao
What if striking a deal with the locals and building a military base/seaport are cheaper than a full-blown invasion and occupation?
>>74136423
>>74136436
So you're saying acting like the Soviet Union is good or even remotely acceptable?
>>74136537
>So you're saying acting like the Soviet Union is good or even remotely acceptable?
>acceptable
Do you have brain damage?
>>74136596
Probably, but the free market will fix it.
>>74136311
So were basically talking about a society that's would have to be the size of a village?
>>74136469
Ok, they are. But I'd rather have a modern government than fucking John Gotti controlling my town. Not every leader bases decisions factoring in cost.
Power comes from the barrel of a gun.
>>74136537
Did we say it was good or acceptable? So you're resorting to trying to put words in other peoples mouth because you can't think of something to continue your stupid rant?
The problem with anarchy is you think everyone is just going to work together, that isn't going to happen. It will be either like this, >>74136267
or a possible invasion.
>Why would they invade muh anarcho country
Idk probably the same reason people have for fucking centuries. The strongest will take control, it always happens and will continue to happen. It isn't this fucking hard to understand.
>>74136469
>My mafia style government is alright since he mafia style governments today do it
Alright.
>>74136816
>So were basically talking about a society that's would have to be the size of a village?
It would grow up to its optimum size.
If it grows into a big city and no neighboring country has invaded it yet, it's probably because it's better for the neighboring countries to have a free-market zone next to it.
>Not every leader bases decisions factoring in cost.
Because in a statist society they don't have to, since all expenses are covered by the taxpayers.
>Power comes from the barrel of a gun.
Hopefully not the same guns you used when trying to beat sandniggers into submission.
>>74136987
>Did we say it was good or acceptable?
So you agree that invading Ancapistan should not be tolerated?
>The strongest will take control, it always happens and will continue to happen. It isn't this fucking hard to understand.
Fun fact: Ancapistan would essentially be a tax heaven for politicians and big bankers and businessmen. I wonder what would happen if someone wanted to take their little paradise away...
>>74137046
Your mafia wants to take guns away because muh children.
My mafia will gladly sell me any piece I need.
Your mafia charges you for security, but has no obligation to provide you any.
My mafia charges me for security, and will look weak if it doesn't, making competing mafias salivate.
In your mafia-controlled society, people don't know they're ruled by a mafia.
In my mafia-controlled society, everyone knows damn well we're ruled by a mafia. They wouldn't even try to hide it.
>>74137710
>Afghanastan
Yeah we should have stayed out.
>Muh paradise, what will they do
A war just like every time. We have established this like 4 fucking times.
>Your mafia and my mafia
Same thing, the strong don't require the weak to give them what they want or need their permission to do what they want to. Literally just as delusional as the Nazi and soviet fags who think their system is the right one. Same shit different name. Oh yeah your paradise will rock, OH it will be perfect. Yeah just like all the commie fags say about their utopia. Grow the fuck up.
these threads are the most autistic on 4chan outside of /r9k/ 2bh
You basically admitted that the best outcome of your system that it will revert into a similar order that we currently have.
>>74138208
No one did so
>>74132436
because it's not National Socialism
go watch TGSNT kiddo
>>74138270
It is literally socialism and socialism never worked
>>74132436
sick-ass logo I'm in
>>74138242
He did.>>74137710
>>74138048
>A war just like every time.
Wars are politically and economically expensive.
Besides, why aren't countries invading each other all the time? Why is it that in school we study the periods of war, conflict and crisis, and not the periods of peace?
Why isn't anyone invading Somalia right now? Or Congo? Fuck, Congo has a bunch of mineral reserves that could turn that shithole into a local superpower. I doubt the United States would have a problem seizing Congo. Yet, they don't. Why?
>the strong don't require the weak to give them what they want or need their permission to do what they want to.
Uh, oh. We have a badass over here.
Don't complain when a nigger breaks into your house, gets shot, and you get arrested for racism. After all, the government is stronger than you.
Shit, sorry. The government doesn't allow you to have firearms. I guess you will just have to beat him up with a broom or something.
>>74138208
The main difference is that the citizens of Ancapistan do not recognize the existence of a state, and will immediately defend themselves against anyone trying to steal their production. Meanwhile, the citizens of America gladly pay up, believing "that's the cost of living in a civilized society".
It's hard to build a state when everyone shoots back, or when nobody buys your statist bullshit.
>>74137710
>Fun fact: Ancapistan would essentially be a tax heaven for politicians and big bankers and businessmen. I wonder what would happen if someone wanted to take their little paradise away...
>implying they wouldn't get a new one
>implying better ones don't already exist
The need for non-ancap countries isn't a mark in ancapistan's favor. At least the Soviets could build their own computers.
>>74138677
>Brazilian monkey telling other people about what would make a good state.
You don't ask a drunk how to get sober.
>>74138578
Where?
>>74138729
>implying they wouldn't get a new one
How they would get a new one?
>>74138889
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tax_haven#List_of_tax_havens_and_countries_of_financial_secrecy
Did you skip that day in Yeshiva?
>>74138677
>and will immediately defend themselves against anyone trying to steal their production
> I see a successful restaurant in ancapistan
> Hmm, I could take all of their money
>Wait they have a shotgun, oh shit
>Wait I can get my friends and 10 aks, no way some shlub with a shotgun is going to beat that
> Do this to five more business.
> Everyone leaves because the fucking economy is shit and everyone is stealing
But hey at least we don't have no gobement
>>74138348
Corporatism. And point of national socialism was never maximizing hedonism. It was focused on preserving and strengthening race while guaranteeing its wellbeing (not by welfare handouts, mind you),
Different goals. Libertarian policies and values are murderous to nation. Look up birth rates of S-Korea and Singapore.
I guess it could work in society like Ferengis where women are property.
>>74138729
Good thing anarcho-capitalism makes a moral argument, not a technical or utilitarian one.
>>74138813
Not an argument.
>>74138270
>>74138348
>NatSoc ever being close to marxism
Are you retarded?
>>74132436
ancaps have no defence from outside forces ie an opposing states military or asemtric terrorism
>>74138977
>Good thing anarcho-capitalism makes a moral argument, not a technical or utilitarian one.
That's largely because it can't. You simply will never appeal to pragmatic adults, deal with it :^)
Maybe you can hand out flyers at commie colleges.
>>74138977
>Not an argument.
It is nonetheless true. Not a counter-argument.
>>74133684
>someone will overpower you and take your shit
Like the government? The irony is so thick lad
>>74138965
>I see a successful restaurant in ancapistan
>Hmm, I could take all of their money
>Wait they have a shotgun, oh shit
>Wait I can get my friends and 10 aks, no way some shlub with a shotgun is going to beat that
>Realize that the restaurant has bought insurance against raiders
>Alarm goes off
>Insurance company dispatches as many guards as needed
>Private sector is more efficient than the public sector
>They arrive faster than the police from developed countries
>Get shot and die
>Next day business as usual
>>74139151
>throws morals in the garbage can
>calls himself an adult
The government likes people like you.
>>74139134
Iceland has no standing army.
We should invade it for its resources and geographical position.
>>74139184
>>Alarm goes off
>>Insurance company dispatches as many guards as needed
I take it you've never heard the pro-gun argument about this.
"When seconds count, the police are only minutes away"
>>74139229
>The government likes people like you.
That's because I'm not a low-IQ monkey so I'm productive enough to steal a higher percentage of taxes from :^)
>>74139067
>National Socialism
>Socialism
Are you retarded?
>>74138973
It funny that you mentioned those two countries as they are nazi-like countries. Corporatism is the same as central-planning
>>74138960
Do you even read links that you post?
>>74139255
>>74139301
Open a history book you freedom nigger. Hitler absolutely hated marxism.
>>74135015
army rolls in
"Pay taxes or we kill family."
"B-but I cant be governed"
Resist with a gun
Army kills the sole rebel because they dont want to make a group large enough to resist successfully.
Each lone fighter who dies contributes to killing off all the able bodied men.
>>74139255
they only have fish but it could be done fairly easily
>>74139184
Unless your guards are literally monitoring the site you're most likely dead.
And before you bring up this point, hypothetically this can happen in a society with a government, but the fear of prison would probably discourage a hell of a lot more people.
>>74139490
>freedom nigger
I'm stealing that.
>>74139513
Universal armament as a precaution against tyranny is not a theory or an experiment, it kept England's Glorious Revolution bloodless.
>>74135498
Anarchy is no government, no police no taxes that kind of stuff.
Capitilism is trading one thing for another.
Anarchism is inherently capitilist
TL;DR You dont need a government to barter.
>>74139490
Open a history book you cuck. Nazi Germany was not any different from USSR.
>>74139662
>Nazi Germany was not any different from USSR
It's okay anon.
>>74139638
Anarchy has no means of enforcing people trade instead of marauding or collectivizing.
TL;DR you should claim English citizenship because your granddad's sentence expired.
>>74139717
Name me 3 differencies
>>74139797
Glorious Aryan race
Magical Teutonic Krupp steel
Bavarian beer
>>74139797
>>74139892
nazis weren't all starving
>>74135015
>Yeah I'm certain their won't be any resistance up to that point.
yea there will be, in graveyards
>>74139740
I was just explaining the pure definitions, I acknowledge it would never happen. I just dont like """"""anarchists""""""" who have no idea what the idea of anarchy is.
>>74139892
proof: pic related
I got the order wrong. Sorry, senpai.
>>74136537
>moral objectivity
Literally child tier.
UPB is a failure.
>>74139797
>Germany wasn't a classless society
>Having a business was possible
>Nationalism
Also >>74139996
>>74140158
http://www.acronymfinder.com/UPB.html
>>74139892
>Glorious Aryan race
I have never knew that Indians and Iranians were a majority in Germany
>Magical Teutonic Krupp steel
>Bavarian beer
Not a difference
It'd be a great system. I'd go to Walmart and my grocery list would look like:
- extra sharp cheddar
- lemon bars
- steak
- a fucking prostitute
and I'd pay with my sister, who I brought in on a chain.
>>74139621
yeah that's working so well for the mudskins huh? Those guns sure keep them safe from the drones. Good luck taking on a modern army with your peashooters.
>>74140191
>Germany wasn't a classless society
>Having a business was possible
>Nationalism
So in USSR
>>74139996
They were during post-war era.
>>74139269
>the people dining in the restaurant are unarmed, for some reason
>in a region prone to raider attacks, the restaurant only has one guard, for some reason
You have no idea what it is like to be an anarchist and having to respond to these absurd scenarios the statists put up as some form of counter-argument against a free society.
I really don't give a shit about how people will handle such raider problems. Or the defense problems. Or the roads problems. Governments/states cannot be morally justified.
>but without the slaves, who will pick the cotton?
I don't give a shit. Slavery is immoral.
Imagine you travel back in time and talk to a slave-owning farmer. You tell him that slavery is immoral, and he asks you how are people going to pick cotton without slaves, or how will the industry adapt, or how will the entire chain of production work without slave labor.
You tell him that there will be these huge chariots that weigh several tons and don't need any horses to move, and they will drive around the crops and automatically harvest them as they drive over them. Then, the next morning, you will climb into another of these chariots and will drive around your field, and the chariot will sow them. Also, the entire process from wheat to flour will be automated, not a single person or animal needed to grind them, needing only a couple people to push a few buttons and occasionally call a repair guy in case things go wrong. Oh, and only one percent of the total population will be farmers. But don't worry, they will be several orders of magnitude more productive than you are. All done without slaves.
You would get called crazy, an utopian, a madman.
The fact is that the free market is unpredictable. I do not know, and I don't pretend to know, how people will deal with those problems. Different people in different places will come up with different solutions. I am not a central planner. I am not a dictator.
>>74132436
Because where would you get your chicken tendies from?
>>74132436
Roads
>>74132436
Society is too stupid to survive without structure.
Besides, do you think you would benefit from niggers raiding your house every 2 weeks and having a much lower standard of life?
I'm pretty sure buying a trailer & collecting NEETbucks is all the anarchy you could ask for.
>>74140359
UH OH STATIST ALERT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V2YawHq-Zeg
>>74140242
https://www.amazon.com/Universally-Preferable-Behaviour-Rational-Secular-ebook/dp/B004Z81ZD4
It was addressed at all the stefbots
>>74140418
>They were during post-war era.
exept when they stopped starving because they unfucked their shit? what does that have to do with anything
it's like saying modern germany is a failed state because their country was a rubble pile in 1946
>>74140444
>>but without the slaves, who will pick the cotton?
>I don't give a shit. Slavery is immoral.
>Imagine you travel back in time and talk to a slave-owning farmer. You tell him that slavery is immoral, and he asks you how are people going to pick cotton without slaves, or how will the industry adapt, or how will the entire chain of production work without slave labor.
The same niggers, except now we don't have to hire as many or pay for their housing :^)
>>74140444
>You tell him that there will be these huge chariots that weigh several tons and don't need any horses to move, and they will drive around the crops and automatically harvest them as they drive over them. Then, the next morning, you will climb into another of these chariots and will drive around your field, and the chariot will sow them. Also, the entire process from wheat to flour will be automated, not a single person or animal needed to grind them, needing only a couple people to push a few buttons and occasionally call a repair guy in case things go wrong. Oh, and only one percent of the total population will be farmers. But don't worry, they will be several orders of magnitude more productive than you are. All done without slaves.
Then he asks you who would pick the cotton TODAY?
>>74140670
Then I ask him if he's deaf or smt senpai
>>74140418
What are you trying to say here? I'm not sure if you are trolling or actually retarded.
>>74140627
>Implying that war and post-war starving was not a direct consequence of nazis in power
>>74140627
Carry on then.
>>74140772
>implying your wife's son isn't a direct consequence of me giving her a good long bareback fucking
>>74140718
Then he'd shoot you for being on his land and infringing on his property rights and self-determination.
Not sustainable. Unlike in any form of society that does have government, there are no systems in place to ensure its continued existence, so government will inevitably be imposed on an anarchist society either from within or without.
>>74132436
Lack of a system does not constitute a system
>>74140752
Those are not differences, dumbass
>>74140444
>literally trying to confiscate someone else's property because of your feels
Not a very ancap thing for you to do senpai.
>>74140849
Not an argument
>>74132436
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=37CEsB3NK5w
If you have an hour this would explain why
>>74140983
if you aren't going to post one i don't see why i should
>>74133684
Try 50-60%
>>74134095
Fucking kek, thank you. FO4 sucked monkey balls
>>74141040
Memes are not arguments
>>74134192
Love how all the anarchists aren't responding to this, well played friend.
I like to think of it this way
Did humanity not start out in anarchy and end up here? That's why anarchy will never work. Because it didn't fucking work in the first place.
>>74132436
Explain why it is.
>>74141177
at least i have memes, i'm not sure what you're posting at all since it's sure not arguments either
it's the half hearted raving of a cuck who insists his ideology will for sure work, we just need literally everyone on the planet to agree with his beliefs
>>74132436
Power vacuum waiting to be filled with some big, despotic cock.
>>74134809
The strength of one unified nation trumps the strength of multiple independent groups of people
Why do you think Native Americans couldn't stop European expansion in the Americas? Why do you think Africans couldn't stop European in Africa?
Come on bro, history proves anarchy ineffective...
>>74140359
Obviously it is since they haven't lost.
>>74141177
That's just what someone without a valid counter-meme would say.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=glzXtLvloVo
Also this
>>74141427
The burden of meme falls on you to meme it first.
>>74141535
>>74141696
thx I was looking for that, saved.
>>74141158
>>74132436
>explain why this isn't the best system of all
It doesn't exist; only system that exist are best.
C-c-c-checkm8
>>74134192
>failed socialist state
>anarchist
Kek
>>74139797
> respect for private property
> free trade
> belief in race, family, religion ect.
>>74143445
> respect for private property
So in USSR to a certain extent
> free trade
I don't think that you understand what this stands for
> belief in race, family, religion ect.
So in USSR
>>74134531
What a retarded answer.
For one, you're dodging a question with another question.
Two--to answer your question--they wouldn't need a tax system to be able to extract resources from the populace, you fucking retard. They could literally waltz in on a demilitarized non-nation with their powerful military and do whatever the fuck they want. Set up taxes, not set up taxes, take over private corporations and their earned profits, etc.
>There would be no way to break even financially
Get a load of this goy
>>74134809
Have you ever heard of occupying forces taking over profitable enterprises?
Yeah.
I mean, in your so called anarcho-capitalist utopia, there'd be plenty o' trees to pick fruit from.
>>74143163
>market forces didn't lead to the results libertarians espouse
>>74143754
This is wrong.
Nazi Germany had a much larger private share of the economy than the USSR, and the main economic council of the state even coordinated with business factories. For example, the Allach porcelain factory outside of Munich where they made those cool SS figurines they gave to each member-- that was state-private cooperation.
You clearly have no idea what corporatism in the fascist sense is.
OH WAIT >>74139301
You're the retard who thinks NS is the same as communism.
This goy.
>>74133684
>I'd rather just give 20% of it away so that the state can have a military and police while living a comfortable life.
And then that state makes it 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60% and above just to keep itself going and since you gave them 20% from the start they have the means to fund the military and police to make it possible.
And then the system collapses under its own weight, like it always does.
How can you have anarchy at all without just being taken over by another country?
How can your anarchic society not just be a void no-man's land annexed by a neighboring state?
Without a state to enforce policy and ideology, how do you keep your anarcho-capitalist society an anarcho-capitalist society? What stops it from transforming into a completely different system?
When the commonly mentioned disadvantages of an anarcho-capitalist society appear, whether you see them as disadvantages or not, how do you prevent people from revolting? Without a centralized military, what stops militias from establishing states or other anarchist systems?
What this really all amounts to is, realistically, how is it conceivable for an anarcho-capitalist society to function as it is, uninterrupted for an extended span of time?
>>74132436
Not an argument
>>74145158
It is an illusion because corporations were technically owned by private capital, but in reality by government
>>74132436
Because every organized group will take it down in no time.
>>74140938
Well, you have absolutely no idea what the USSR was like. Marxism is quite a disease.
>>74146342
I literally lived in the USSR
>>74146447
>t. 97 year old slavic diaper filler
>>74146494
>Cucnadian education
USSR collapsed 25 years ago
>>74146568
>Reading ability
We're comparing USSR to Nazi Germany. If i'm not as retarded as you are, nazi germany stopped existing in 1945, right?
Government collapse would be interesting and it may even turn out well in the end.
Who knows who will be the rulers next though? You're taking a real chance.
>>74133684
>Someone is going to overpower you and just take all of your shit
What stops them from doing that already? There are hundreds of stronger countries than the country I live in, for example, and I don't see them knocking at the gates.
>>74146771
in that situation i would just say ok. and i would come back and kill them all while they slept.
>>74145131
Market forces can't fix socialist messes in short term. Besides, by the time market begins to work, new socialists will appear in Somalia, they're already trying to tax back people.
If Venezuela tomorrow became the most capitalist country in the world, all the poverty and crime inherited from their socialist policies would also be capitalism fault?
>>74146869
i teleport behind u
>>74146869
*unsheathes katana*
I'd slaughter them like vermin.
*teleports behind them and slaughters them*
Welcome to ancapistan.
>>74147061
>its a hologram
>>74146771
>lolbertarians will defend this
>>74143445
>free trade
>Suspends gold standard
>takes on public projects like autobahns
>Protectionism
>price control
>capital controls
>production controls
>huge deficits
Hitler was as much for free market as current Venezuela's leaders.
>>74132436
It is the best system
If EVERYBODY follows it
As you know, it isn't feasible to have a continent, let alone the whole world reject government
So until then Switzerland style democracy is the best we can manage.
>>74132436
Anarcho-capitalism is not the best system because it is metastable. The slightest disagreement between my neighbor and I can catalyze a nation-wide civil war.
>stop playing music at 3 AM
>no
>ok, I'll pay my private military to attack your home
>ok, I'll pay my private military to fight your private military
At least our current government can maintain some sort of stability. I don't have be constantly paranoid about my home being pillaged by criminals.
>mfw ancaps actually think that monopolization and business mergers combined with artificial price deflation wouldn't ultimately lead to feudalism anyway
>>74133837
>>74133870
kek so true
>>74132436
because it fails fundamentally to mediate the conflicts in society
anarchists face the same problems with internal divisions as all groups on the pollitican spectrum, exept they lack the insulation factors of conformity, unity, administrative due process and respect for the law
basically if anarchists ever had some kind of political majority, they would be unable to resolve their issues with OTHER anarchists asside from a might makes right approach
like another anon said, you would just end up with feudalism or an industrial revolution society
companies would monopolize vital resources to control pries, force conformity in the supply chain to create guilds (like supermarket brand foods)
simply locking people out of society would become a real option as personal/commercial freedom was favored over human and social rights, and many groups would become extraordinarily marginalized almost immediately
>>74133976
But desu, here the government is faster on your ass than on the criminals.
The problem remains that the legal system sees all participants as having equal rights. But with nepotism and bureaucratic incompetency + corruption, the law is favorable of the dindu with nothing to lose.
They get to walk the next day, even if they are found in possession of automatic weapons, whilst a white will have a 4 year court battle ahead of him for shooting an invading kaffir from the wrong angle.
If it was anarchistic, there would be some form of frontier justice out here in the rural areas for us farmers. However that only happens in the townships, where mobs get to necklace a crook and the police aren't bothered to sift through the hordes of people that participated.
http://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/News/tensions-high-in-parys-as-farmers-appear-in-court-for-killing-two-men-20160112
>>74132436
i'm not a low functioning autist.
>>74132436
The best system of all would eventually be implemented sometime in human history, in order for it to be compared in practice to other systems.
Ancap was never Implemented
Thus, ancap is not the best system.
>>74132436
Well, the flag is yucky for a start...
>>74146771
>not having automatic weapons
>not screaming MOLON LABE
