Is the fact that the highest works of culture can only be produced by an unfettered aristocracy the ultimate redpill?
A true aristocrat is basically the idealized NEET on the left.
When one doesn't have to worry about washing their clothes, or preparing their meals, or working 40 hours a week, one can dedicate themselves to higher pursuits. It's not a middle class welder who's producing the next Hamlet, it's the son of a billionaire who was educated at Oxford and can dedicate all his time to literature while living in the Swiss Alps.
Would the acceptance of this truth enable us to revive Western culture?
>>73951460
>>73951460
Who is this dick dehydrator?
>no camel toe
nice thread homo
>>73951460
alright plato, slow your left wing roll there
>>73951799
>>73951829
Advocating for an aristocracy is basically the most right wing thing you can do desu senpai
>>73951460
I want to fuck that
>>73951940
scientific fascism when?
but muh proletariat
>>73951799
Heidi harper
>>73951940
no an aristocracy implies there's someone who "knows what's best for everyone"
>in other words some leftist prick who wants to force his morality on people who just want to be left the fuck alone
>>73953403
>no an aristocracy implies there's someone who "knows what's best for everyone"
Which can certainly be the case.
