Will "pedophile equality" and "pedophile acceptance" and "pedophile rights" seriously become genuine and legitimate civil rights causes during our lifetimes or is that just a slippery slope argument used by overly paranoid homophobes?
>>73906960
No, it will come to surface at some point.
While part of me says that people will outright reject it, depending on if things keep going the way they are, that may change. People will do anything and everything if they think they can get away with it.
What fucking mad man could possibly allow men to have sex with children?
How could anyone defend that?
>>73906960
It will be pushed. It might be one of the few degenerate things women (with children that is) would be opposed against
>>73907392
Lefties believe morals are arbitrary preferences (to be read: "subjective")
Anything goes
>>73906960
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/02/25/young-swedish-liberals-want-legalise-incest-necrophilia/
>>73906960
pedophile rights? there's no such thing. to imply pedophiles need special rights is to explicitly state that children can magically become someone else's property just because they want to fuck them.
The real issue is and should be, should minors have legal ownership over themselves and be able to consent to all forms of contracts? The answer is: this will never happen because it's an important mechanism to deny young people their rights and create permanent slaves among the general population. If minors find themselves with the ability to consent, then its suddenly illegal for the state to force them into 12 years of mandatory schooling, which is the corner stone of modern brain washing.
Polly marrage is next.
Anything that destroys while strait men is the agenda
>>73906960
Not gonna happen.
Even people before us, thousand years ago shamed people that married or fucked kids.
There's a long history of people persecuting pedos.
It's very interesting, our ancestors weren't fuck ups as most want to push.
When there were areas or times where child relationships were allowed, it would've either been out of breeding purposes or someone being rich but people still frowned upon it. And that's why history always repeats and shows how once it is allowed = gets stopped every time
Unless you are mudslim, since those fucks dont care about history.
>>73906960
no.
gay/trans etc have no victim. pedophilia has a clear victim
We're already starting to see people try to push for it. I think polygamy will come first because the UK Green party has already begun talks about legalizing polygamous marriages, then probably bestiality because it's likely easier to justify than pedophilia.
>>73907392
pic related
He wasn't alone, either. He was just pushing too hard, too soon.
The far left will definitely start pushing it (as Salon already has), but there's no way normal people will ever get on board. The minute the SJWs start pushing for pedo acceptance is the minute they lose all credibility to the general public.
>>73907893
This. Its probably going to be poly rights 2bh
>>73908612
>as Salon already has
I don't know if I want source or not.
I had this discussion with my wife, and we concluded that it would probably wouldn't happen. The difference between homosexuality and pedophilia is a matter of consent. You would have to push the legal age of consent down to zero, and there is no way to prove that someone that young is consenting. Although the idea of consent is abstract, I don't think any science or argument will support pedophilia.
>>73908682
https://archive.is/Y9Ybw
ITT: idiots who don't understand the concept of consent.
>>73907392
because their logic is flawed. How can they think that it is natural to be attracted to the same sex but not natural to be attracted to children. So in order to not look dumb they will have to say it is natural to be attracted to children and allow it.
>>73909628
if she asks for the dick its consent retard. telll her about the dick she'll want the dick. stupid bait.
>>73909171
On the contrary, the argument to support pedophilia has been used for years. It's just a matter of society slowly moving towards it. Because here's the rationale:
Nihilism assumed
Age of consent is arbitrary and not based on any hard science
Consent is a social construct
Pedophilia occurs in nature
Nothing morally objectionable about it because morality is subjective
This is the same method used to justify homosexuality and transgenderism. It's only a matter of time before pedophilia is pushed under the same pretense. While it has more of a public taboo right now, it isn't really much more taboo than homosexuality was in the 80's and 90's. It is something we will face in the coming 2 decades.
>>73909171
Age of consent laws vary dramatically around the world and even within the US. It's an arbitrary number that gets teenagers thrown in prison and listed on sex offender registries for sexting each other. AoC laws were originally implemented to preserve women's value as chattel for marriage, so 3rd-wave feminists will definitely get on board to smash this oppressive tool of the patriarchy. Pedo rights are inevitable unless something is done to shut SJWs down permanently.
>>73906960
>slippery slope
Fedora tipping neckbeard leftists use that term to sound smart, but if anybody thinks that people don't get more degenerate as more opportunities arise, they are retarded.
>>73906960
It will never happen the way gay right and nigger rights have.
Why?
Because it only benefits straight white males.
>>73910112
>it only benefits straight white males.
No. It's actually more likely that the age of consent will increase due to children needing 'extra protection from sexual predators'.
Anyone who tries to go against it or disagrees will be labeled a paedophile and forced to sign the sex offender register for life
>>73906960
oh CAWD!
www.churchofcawd.com
>>73907392
It will happen in little steps which each seem harmless. Do you actually want me to sketch out what they will be? It's demoralizing to dwell on, but they're going to try it and they're going to succeed if we don't find a way to stop them?
>>73909803
>consent is a social construct
so is law. so is morality. what?
>pedophilia occurs in nature
so does rape. is that gonna be legalized soon too?
>nothing morally objectionable about it because morality is subjective
yeah the thing is law (supposedly) upholds whatever general social ideas of morality exist. until people think it isnt wrong to potentially ruin a child's reproductive organs and leave him/her emotionally damaged for life, pedophilia will remain illegal.
>it isn't really much more taboo than homosexuality was in the 80's and 90's
kek. you could be a homosexual and have gay sex in the 80s and 90s. it's still very illegal and socially unacceptable to have sex with kids. there's no castro district for pedophiles
the general trend in recent (past 300 years) has been increasing ages of consent. it's certainly not as socially acceptable to marry a 13 year old as it once was.
>>73911381
sketch it out
>>73906960
People have been cracking down on pedophiles too hard in recent years, and because of that you will see a considerable push back. Several websites have banned drawn images and fictional text portraying children sexually. Other countries count it as CP, though I think in reality fictional stuff is used more as supporting evidence in more serious cases.
Fact of the matter is that you can not fix pedophiles. They are into whatever they are into. Some may grow out of it, but like most paraphilias it is not something that goes away with reason alone.
Ultimately I think that as long as people are allowed to produce, publish, and sell fictional works drawn from the imaginations then pedos will have all the rights they deserve.
>>73908597
Foucault and postmodernism are the reason why we are now up to our necks into degenerate shit
>>73909171
Being able to consent or not is the wrong way to go about it because it's hard to really know. I think the best argument you can put forward for the age of consent laws is that parents are their children's legal guardians until the age of 18, and as such have a duty to protect them from harmful sexual encounters. Age of consent laws give them necessary legal leverage to protect their children.
Pedophilia was accepted in the 70s sexual liberation movement to a large extent. Guess which ideology suppressed the natural rights of children and ruined it? Feminism.
>>73912059
It must be nice to only be up to your neck.
>>73906960
While I'm not one to buy into slippery slope arguments easily, yes I can see it happening.
>>73913734
We need to protect our chilluns from these incredibly dangerous monsters.
>>73911448
>sketch it out
First there will be sexualization of children. This will start as a "common sense" move to decriminalize nude pictures and so on. That will quickly make it hard to draw any clear line, either in terms of "too obscene" or "too young", enforcement will drop off, and we will see vastly more sexualized imagery of the young.
That will be paired with a claim that we need to be "realistic" about young "adults'" sex lives, which statistically don't exist except in the ghetto. Young adult books, movies, and TV will become more and more explicit for younger and younger ages.
As part of a broader push to reduce sexual assault to mere assault, statutory rape will be interpreted much more narrowly. Sexual touching no longer will count as touch. We will be assured at first that this is all 15 year olds with 17 year old boyfriends (this is going on in actual policy debates, right now), even though the statistics say otherwise.
Simultaneously there will be a push to normalize actual pedophilia, the mental disease. First it will be "they're not evil, they're sick". We'll be told we need to be less punitive and treat their disease, in order to protect children more effectively. Then we'll be told we need to treat them with respect and dignity - again, to protect the children! (Think of the same gambit with the Muslims: "You need to let them into your country or else they'll blow you up because they feel disrespected.")
Once we treat pedophiles as normal people with an unfortunate medical issue, we'll start to get the "love is love" arguments.
Do you see how this is going to go down, or do I have to walk you through the gross parts?
>>73914278
Walk us through the gross parts, please.
>>73914278
Nothing wrong with any of this, and much of it is already happening in more intelligent circles, and obviously here. Also, pedophilia is a sexual orientation not a mental disease.
If research into the subject wasn't taboo there would probably be plausible theories detailing pedophilia's positive impact on the species through increased childhood survival rates.
>>73915410
Welcome to /pol/, kike
>>73907392
Muhammed did, and so could others.
>>73906960
L O R N E
O
R
N
E
>>73906960
It isn't a slippery slope, it's the end goal.
>>73906960
The elite are heavily into it. Just look at how any pedowood thread is attacked by shills.
So,yeah, it's definitely on the table. Give it twenty-thirty years.
Pedophilia is more of a fetish/preference than anything IMO.
People needs to know that there are way more pedos in this world than they may think. Pedophilia will never go away like most moralfags want. Not now and never.
>>73913734
Kek this dude got busted again awhile back.
>>73906960
No, as long as feminists and socialists are allowed in government pedophilia will continue to be demonized. They hate the purest sort of love(man and his young daughter) and hate girls being married young. They're not going to reverse on this.
>>73907392
Sex between a man and a little girl is good, if it's in a proper relationship(if it's just in the family or within marriage). How could it be bad?
>>73917103
> They hate the purest sort of love(man and his young daughter)
Go back to /b/ faggot.
>>73916252
I'm a fine Aryan man.
I think I should actually welcome if you don't realize pedos have been posting on /pol/ forever, newfriend. You should blame the French for pedophile acceptance rather than Juden.
>>73917103
>hate girls being married young
How come they love Islam so much, then?
>>73907645
Very well reasoned post, anon.
Maybe US schools wouldn't be so low ranking in global standings if they taught more math and science and less progressive bullshit.
>>73917103
wait until she's 18 you sick fuck
>>73906960
Yes, I guarantee you it will happen within the next 5 years as well, especially as Islam becomes more accepted.
>>73906960
Any mention of a slippery slope is completely out the window at this point.
>>73914278
This is all complete bullshit. If anything, the laws against the stuff you mentioned will just be enforced even more harshly. Especially if a white male is involved and the 'child victim' is female.
You only have to go out and ask any random person in the street what they think of 'pedophiles' and they will all make it clear how disgusting they are and deserve to be killed, also bearing in mind that a great deal of Americans believe that a man having consensual sex with a 17 year is equivalent to the raping of a small child
Even if something like child pornography was decriminalized or the penalties for possession were made less harsh, there would be so much outrage that the lawmakers would be targeted by vigilantes and the laws would either need to be set back or made even tougher than before.
>>73906960
It will be next. It's all part of creeping sharia. The Saudis will eventually rule America under sharia law.
>>73917248
It ia a very special type of love that is shared between a man and his daughter.
>>73917463
If we didn't have niggers and spics dragging the scores down we'd rank much better.
>>73917563
Why? Why should there have to be this period of waiting until she's an arbitrary age? Girls are made for taking dick, she should start good and early.
>>73908612
I agree, but normal people aren't the ones in charge.
>>73909171
>consent
They won't care, because kids are 'deciding' for themselves (aka being manipulated and brainwashed).
Soon.
>>73917707
17 year old*
>>73917808
>Why? Why should there have to be this period of waiting until she's an arbitrary age?
because the rest of humanity says so you subhuman
>>73917707
People were the same about gays and trannys 60 years ago too, all the communist jew needs is time for him to continue the subversion.
>>73906960
They will eventually, will probably argue that children consent just like they consent to playing on the playground / wanting dessert.
>>73907392
>how could anyone defend that
Well, if there were ever a way to accurately predict which kids would grow up to become pedophiles without previois molestation, then I'd say alright.
But there isn't.
>>73906960
No. Parents won't allow that at least until things get far more degenerate.
It starts with accepting gays as normal and not mentally ill. Then trannies get the same treatment as gays.
The next step is normalising polygamy, after the family unit is completely broken down and becomes a sex orgy where noone really knows who fathered whom, then pedophilia will begin to be normalised.
Fathers are the number one preventative measure against pedophilia.
>>73907392
I'm alright with treating sex with a post pubescent kid as different than pre-pubescent. At the risk of it being the same as 18 (an 'artificial' setting) I'm down for it being lowered to 16. I don't find teenage girls attractive at all unless they had great stonkin tits and even then they are teenagers and fucking insufferable.
But will never tolerate or condone or accept true pedophilia, not pedastery but pre-pubescent. I know they will use the "Well sex isn't just for procreation so how can you object to sex before they are able to reproduce"?
Fucking babyfuckers jesus christ.
>>73907827
Depends on the culture. Remember coming across something saying for the Germanics of the migration era the usual age was 13-14 for the boy and girl. Which tends to be the normal case elsewhere.
Then of course you get Muhammad. :^)
No, it wont, ever.
THe only way they could get away with minimum backlash (which would still be huge) is if they only abused like orphins or something.
Parents of the world are the ternal nemisis of the pedophile, and the pedophile will not win this.
>>73918013
Da Joos don't want pedophile acceptance for the same reason they don't want people homeschooling: they want complete control over the minds of children. Childhood agency is suppressed for state control.
>>73906960
I just want to say that Boston sucks nigger dick.
>>73906960
Yes leftists have been pushing for pedo acceptance for decades. They have intensified their campaign over the past 10 years
>>73907392
what fucking mad man could possibly allow men to cut off his penis and pretend he's born a women?
There. You can't debate this shit whatever you say. Using your logic, pedophiles Are really oppressed by society
>>73918424
Also feminists are promoting the sexualisation of children and "teen sexuality"
>>73918135
>The next step is normalising polygamy, after the family unit is completely broken down
How does polygamy lead to the complete dissolution of the family unit? The ones fighting for polygamy are fucking FLDS. You're not making sense.
>Fathers are the number one preventative measure against pedophilia
It's usually the father who is diddling the girl.
>>73908597
I have one of his books. I actually like the guy.
Also don't forget that NAMBLA used to campaign alongside mainstream pro gay organisations in the 70s.
>>73918405
>>73918405
YOU LOOKING AT THE GOAT
I've discussed pedo acceptance with some pedo's (well they didnät say they were... but really, who else would advocate it?)
I'm for pedo's - whom never touched anyone to be able to get like council and shit like that.
Pedo's corrupting children has crossed a line.
I'd fucking kill them myself.
>>73906960
wut
>>73906960
I used to be convinced that it was just a meme, but then that pedophile apologist at Nintendo had tons of support from the left and it's honestly not any more ridiculous than the "non-binary gender" bullshit they keep spouting
>>73918267
>I don't find teenage girls attractive at all
Unlikely.
>>73918665
Into the fucking 90s. They just didn't get pride of place. NAMBLA pushed itself as a solution to the AIDS crisis during the 80s.
>>73918677
>be me
>be 7
>babysitter be 20 or something
>makes me sleep in her bed
>best memory of my life
>>73916888
To me a man who likes to suck cocks sounds more like a fetish. Why don't you turbo liberals go ahead and prove they're not?
>>73918325
Are you retarded? All jews are not the same, the vile communist ones you're talking about want nothing less than total subversion and forced equality because they drank their own Kool aid.
It's gotten to the point where the zionists in Israel are panicking because their own kin are stabbing them in the back.
>>73918666
No, just some guy that can swing a bat extremely well and knows three words in English.
>>73918886
So what? Did she suck your dick or what?
>>73918886
Nice.
>>73918875
Well pedophilia is very common among homosexuals. As a matter of fact almost 50% of faggots were abused as kids. So my guess is they will try to make "pedo rights" into a "gay rights" issue.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?uid=11501300&cmd=showdetailview&indexed=google
In research with 942 nonclinical adult participants, gay men and lesbian women reported a significantly higher rate of childhood molestation than did heterosexual men and women. Forty-six percent of the homosexual men in contrast to 7% of the heterosexual men reported homosexual molestation.
>>73906960
it already has started to become an issue, progressives will ruin the world the slippery slope is real
>>73919028
You need another one?
Go away blacksox
>protect the children
Why? So the arrogant little shits can tell me I'm too old to be on 4chan, an OVER 18 website?
Get fucked, kids.
Let's get down to brass tax here folks,
Jojo, Bribri, or prime fully functional Ryry
The choice is yours?
>>73907392
The same ones who would allow men in the same bathrooms as young girls.
Because you can't discriminate. This is how 'they are'. Its natural. Its in nature'. Their brains are wired like this. Its not their fault. Its genetic.
just apply what they did with homosexuality, then with Gender Identity Disorder..always the same arguments that win.
Its coming. And in our lifetime. Unless we say NO
>>73906960
CAREFUL WITH THAT MEME MAGIC FUCKER!!!
>>73907645
transgender rights? There's no such thing, to imply that transgenders need special rights...
>>73918923
Communism is state control, in order to indoctrinate children into an ideology like that you need government run schools. Giving kids the agency of sex also means they have agency to not go to school and to think for themselves; this is anathema to statism and enforced ideology.
>>73906960
Once libshits run out of bad ideas to 'progressive virtue' signal with the march of the age of consent down to 12 or 13 is going to happen and it will happen really fast.
Probably as fast as this whole trans-rights issue that went from a non-topic to center stage acceptance over the course of 3 years.
>>73906960
>Will "pedophile equality" and "pedophile acceptance" and "pedophile rights" seriously become genuine and legitimate civil rights causes during our lifetimes
The short answer is: yes.
The long answer is: kind of. Most people conflate having sex with a 16 year old as "pedophilia." Having sex with prepubescent children i.e. actual pedophilia, will not be legal in our lifetimes. Having sex with someone aged 13+ will more than likely become legal, possible with a requirement that there cannot be too great of an age disparity, i.e. 20 and 14 is okay, 45 and 13 is not.
>>73906960
Where can I read this man's chatlog?
>>73918540
>It's usually the stepfather* who is diddling the girl.
/fixed
No. The leftie madness hits a roadblock there and that's usually when people start waking up.
Then the pendulum swings to the right and the cycle continues.
The cycle can never be broken.
>>73919193
Poor teddy, never got a ring. Next, you brown skinned Limey.
>>73918011
Not for long.
>>73919258
Not sure who the other two you're referring to are(Brighton Sharbino, maybe) so I'll have to go with Ryry.
>>73919271
>who would allow men in the same bathrooms as young girls.
This is stupid because 1) a parent can take their opposite sex child in the bathroom with them so girls can go in the men's room and 2) bathrooms have stalls with doors, why is this an issue?
>>73920003
Yeah, somtimes step-daddy but usually it's her real daddy.
>>73907392
The same mad men that thing children can decide their gender before they're even 10
The same mad men that overrule the fathers rights, and reinforce the child's rights, making it illegal to overturn that child's decision
If a kid can not only consent to, but initiate, something that major at >10 years of age, and sex is such a normal everyday thing in our society, it doesn't seem like a huge push.
>>73920463
>Yeah, somtimes step-daddy but usually it's her real daddy.
>usually it's her real daddy.
I remember some study crushing this view.
>>73906960
This is how it will happen (and it will be presented as a child's rights issue): age of consent will become a core issue for transgender advocates due to the (small) but rising population of young children "transitioning." The question for society is, "if a child can consent to such a life-changing decision as gender reassignment then what is the purpose of age of consent laws?"
When we arrive at this point, people will either say enough is enough and the madness will end. If it continues on then age of consent laws will be drastically lowered or abolished and stewardship of minors will rest with the courts. Thus the destruction of the family that began in the 60's will be complete.
>>73920187
It is sad he never got a ring. I ain;t a limey, Syracuse econ major that got a great job over here.
>>73910112
Most paedophiles are gay
>>73920604
>I remember some study crushing this view
Can you reference it?
>>73920657
>age of consent laws will be drastically lowered or abolished
The AoC should be abolished. The State shouldn't have the authority to say when and with who a girl is allowed to do sex, that's for her father to decide.
>>73920962
>Can you reference it?
Wish I could.
The gist of it was that feminists have pushed the "fathers rape their daughters"line. Turned out the studies that supported that conclusion didn't differentiate on biological father vs non-biological.
>>73920880
Proofs?
And whats wrong with being gay?
>>73921402
>whats wrong with being gay?
Fags are mentally ill vile disgusting abominations literal filth
No because jews want those sweet children all to themselves
>>73921637
Pay debts.
Spain has superior olive oil for rubbing on boys wrestling anyway.
>>73919585
>Having sex with someone aged 13+ will more than likely become legal
It's more realistic and likely that people who find themselves attracted to children will be somewhat tolerated, provided they never act on their feelings and seek some kind of psychological help.
Then again, if you haven't committed a crime, no one can really label you a paedo unless you actually tell them you are one
One day there might even be a way to scan peoples brains to determine whether they're attracted to children or not. They'll probably begin testing in it the U.S to weed out the 'undesirables' of the population. Essentially, some kind of 'illegal thought' detecting system
>>73922079
They will have a lot of weeding out to do >>73918819.
>>73921287
Hm, step-daddy isn't really good like true father/daughter love. Though he could stay with her forever so it could be better than if he was her real dad.
>>73921402
>what's wrong with being gay
Lots.
Kill yourself fag.
>>73918665
Jesus fuck. How many of them are there?
>>73920657
>When we arrive at this point, people will either say enough is enough and the madness will end.
This transgender bullshit should have been the turning point. Trans is obviously a mental illness at best yet people are seriously talking about it as a civil right. We're past the point of no return
>>73922383
Boylovers founded civilization. What have you people done? You wrote one good book. Cute.
>>73907392
The same fucking mad men that want to molest and fuck children?
Ever thought of that?
You guys are interested, y'all can go to pedo chats or forums on TOR and talk to other pedos. Some Interesting stories there.
>>73906960
>>73922771
>fags founded civilization
Maybe in your fantasy world.
>>73922771
>tfw Putin will never hold you tight and pinch your nipples
The only pedos that will be accepted are gay pedos who like little boys and arabs who marry little girls.
The leftist feminist groups only target straight white males. They leave the gays and the pakis alone.
>>73924099
The Gayreeks were the founders of Western Civilization, the only one that matters.
>>73925361
Feminists actually have started placing gay men into the category of muh patriarchy.
>>73922188
Doesn't really mean anything
Starting from tomorrow the government could launch a new project that they claim allows them to 'bring to justice' those who are sexually attracted to minors and it would be fully backed and supported by the public.
First they test it on random prisoners and then move on to people who are interested in working with children to check for any potential illegal thoughts.
Finally they begin testing it on people considered to be 'creepy' or who just happen to frequently visit places where children often are.
>>73926089
Great so being associated and talking children is now a bad thing.
every time something shitty happens to me I just watch this and feel great again.
https://youtu.be/1tUE3J63JN8
when he says
>I didn't want to sleep with a 14 yo!!1!
>I wanted to go to college and get a job
I just start laughing
>>73926676
Only if you fail the pedo test
>>73924509
I'd rather be the Tsar
>>73906960
Doubtful.
But 'polygamy' or multiple marriages sanctioned by the state will become a reality in the next 10 years.
There are no legitimate arguments against it that were not used against same sex marriage, and we saw how that worked out.
Why in the fuck is there no cure for paraphilias yet?
Holy shit man, why is sexuality this much of a complicated issue, god damn it
Just make everyone straight, or find a way to do that.
People are actually trying to develop child robots to have intercourse with pedos as treatment and keep them away from children
I mean I guess if it works well enough to keep his urges at bay that's fine and all
But why is making people with paraphilia normal again so fucking complicated.
Fuck this world
>>73926089
Let's be real.
Only ugly men would be subject to this.
If I've learned one thing, its that anything is possible. Look at where we've came from and where we are now in terms of morality. This to pedo shit wouldn't be as big of a shift at all. Especially with immigrants flooding Europe.
>>73906960
Yes, in the next 2-3 years
>>73927186
Nobody's pushing for polygamy, though. Even Muslims and Mormons don't seem to want it that much.
>>73906960
Most likely under 18 will be demanded it will most likely be puberty and over. So 13 or 14 will be ok at some point in the eyes if the left. Beaners marry at 15.
>>73929127
That's because the main church has become compromising and heretical, bowing to temporal pressure. Government says "you can't do this" and "you shouldn't say that" and they say "okay". That's why the only true Mormons are the fundamentalists like the FLDS who are fighting the legal fight for polygamy.
>>73906960
Redpill on The Jungle Book 2016?
>>73906960
Yup, some of the more extreme virtue signalling cunts have already declared paedos a protected identity
like Nicholas "Sarah" Nyberg. Games SJWs literally defend this paedophile
The vast silent majority of Americans disapprove of transgender bathrooms. What you see now is more of a nightmare that we will come out of. Obama is a psychopath who hates blacks but likes Muslims and gays. He has done nothing for the black community and arguably made it harder on them. Black people have idiotically chose a man based on his skin color without realizing who he is. Many black people are waking up to this and trying to figure within themselves whether or not does the color of skin matter.
>>73919346
>False equivalence: the post: the experience
>>73906960
LORNE ARMSTRONG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>73915410
If you think it's normal to want to have sex with toddlers, I have bad news for you.
>>73930095
If toddlers don't want to get fucked, they shouldn't crawl around wiggling their asses at everyone.
>>73914278
But is it a sexual orientation or a mental disease?
>>73906960
Of course. Liberals don't even have an end goal, all they see is wrongs needing to be righted (regardless whether or not they truly believe in what they're fighting for), if there's nothing left to be righted their entire purpose (if you can call it that) completely falls apart. In about 50 or 60 years (assuming humanity even lasts that long) you'll see them being /pol/ 2.0, making right everything they so brilliantly fucked up in the first place. Just take a look at the Mizzou thing, they were quoting MLK while protesting for black only spaces. They're, literally, unironically and legitimately retarded.
>>73930095
>If you think it's normal to want to have sex with toddlers
What's wrong with wanting to sex a hot girl?
>>73930655
Homosexuality used to be considered a mental illness.
>>73930959
I know, I was asking about pedophilia.
>>73931101
And I was saying that there's nothing stopping them from making pedophilia a sexual orientation, too.
>>73930425
>>73930896
If this isn't bait, neither of you should be here.
>>73906960
It will. The media puppets are just waiting for their masters to give the signal of what the next big kike idea is. We don't know where pedophilia is on that list, but it's coming.
IF ONLY
THERE WAS A CURE
>>73907392
Muhammed
Islam, liberalism, judaism, y'know, mental disabilities.
>>73920463
>a parent can take their opposite sex child in the bathroom with them so girls can go in the men's room
>Adult, who is reponsible to have a child and IS protecting said probably very young child is the same as a grown ass nigga going into the girl's bathroom while in drag
>>73931689
>>73919346
you didn't read past the first sentence did you? go sit in the corner.
>>73930095
Ok whats the bad news?
>>73906960 Yes. #FreeJared
>>73931864
If you ever get a son and he ends up being a pedo, remind yourself of that post
>>73931411
Not bait. Little girls are sexy so how can it be wrong to want to sex them?
>>73931825
The other day I was pissing at the urinal and this cute little girl comes in with her dad. And she didn't even close the door when she went in the stall so I saw her in the mirror when I was washing my hands. In the women's bathroom they're all stalls so, if everyone uses the doors, no one can see anyone.
So, I'm not sure what point you're trying to make.
>>73931516
I think bestiality is up next. The youth are being conditioned to find horses sexy by >>>/mlp/, and even if they weren't a mare's ability to ruin your shit if she doesn't like what you're doing seems like it would make the consent issue an easier sell than it would be with children. Also, there's a lot of veganism shilling going on that encourages a breakdown of traditional relationships between men and animals.
>>73906960
It's highly unlikely that sex with children is going to become acceptable in the next few decades. The longstanding trend has been that the taboo against sex with children has grown stricter over time, as our society's gotten more permissive in other ways.
That's distinct from the possibility that we might be more to sympathetic to people who are attracted to children but don't fuck them (analogous to Christians saying they're okay with celibate gays).
Frankly, the fact that this is so commonly believed on this board is kind of bizarre (not that the posters on this board tend to be particularly insightful).
>>73934444
>4444
Well, I guess that settles it. Thanks, Mexico.
VR and Robots will save pedos
>>73910112
>pedo
>straight
I got some bad news Igor
>>73935073
Child sex VR programs and loli robots are of questionable legality in many places under existing laws, and will certainly be criminalized explicitly as soon as they're real.
>>73906960
Oh cawd!
>>73934444
>The longstanding trend has been that the taboo against sex with children has grown stricter over time
It seems more erratic to me. It was gaining acceptance in the 70s in many places, and was close to being normal for a while in more liberal countries, especially Sweden. That's not long ago. It's not hard to revamp those arguments and movements once people become more sympathetic to pedos.
>>73935369
That may change if they're proven to reduce pedos craving for the real thing
Keep them out of jail
They don't harm real people
Save your tax money
No reason to not allow it
>>73935925
>it normalizes their sexualized view of children and whets their appetite for the real thing
>they can use it to convince real children that adult/child sex is normal and OK
>it's wrong
These may or may not be good reasons, but they're reasons that are convincing to lawmakers in the real world.
>>73907532
Relative is the way they frame it.
>>73907893
exactly this.
sorry, pedos lurking in this thread. Nobody is on your side. Kill yourselves
The argument is based entirely on false equivalence, putting statutory rape on the same level as consensual sex between two people.
However, mainstream legality isn't an issue to a lot of people. People were still buttfucking/smashing clam when homosexuality was illegal (legitimately illegal, not frowned upon) and people were - are - buggering kids when/while it's illegal.
>>73936385
You could use those same arguments against drawings, but those are still legal in many places
>>73906960
>is that just a slippery slope argument used by overly paranoid homophobes?
this was proven wrong long ago. Slipery slope applies to these types of laws that govern how we live our lives and how much freedom we have, people are going to want more and more freedom as evidenced by history.
>>73936801
And illegal in many others, e.g. the United Kingdom.
>>73934182
>bestiality
idk bestiality feels pretty niche right now. Even if there was a movement for it, no government or politicians would ever support having sex animals.
>>73907392
What fucking mad man could possibly allow children to "change" their sex?
How could anyone defend that?
-everyone, 10 years ago
not anymore of course
>>73937050
It feels niche right now, but as >>73937132 points out, tranny rights felt pretty niche a decade ago. All it takes is the right push to start the snowball rolling unstoppably down the mountain of public opinion. Regardless of whether it's bestiality, pedophilia, or whatever, something will come next, because too many people have made careers out of being professionally offended to allow the momentum of social justice warriorism to peter out now.
>>73936971
Everything is illegal here. Even adult pornography that contains something considered to be too 'extreme'
>>73936385
The thing is lad
If the simulation is better than the real thing, if we ever reach that point, what good argument would any pedo have to ditch the fake for the real?
It would be all about how it's implemented, but if the pedo is dumb enough to ditch something good and risk going to jail, he VERY LIKELY would've gone to jail without it anyway, since he'd be too retarded to be outside of it anyway.
If there is no medical/psychiatric cure for it, this may as well be the only solution that could save them. If implemented right, keep them out of jail but under some sort of observation, keeping a lot of people out of jail could mean tax dollars going somewhere else.
>>73906960
It already is.
>>73937822
I might as well that this implementation could go way beyond just pedos and extend to sex workers as well
This type of shit could put human sex workers to an outdated state like cars did with horses
This means less human trafficking
I could go on and on about the implementations of robotics and VR for this type of therapy
The benefits would be too obvious and too big for lawmakers be able to stop it
Lest people start growing feelings for robots that is
>>73907392
You don't start out by saying that adults can have sex with children. Push certain ideas little by little: pedophiles are not monsters, children like kisses and hugs, etc. Heck, hit 'em with the ol' "the mind isn't fully developed until age 25" and see how that goes.
>>73938003
Damn it, are there any jobs robots won't steal? Ted Kaczynski was right. SMASH THE STOCKING FRAMES INDUSTRIAL COUNTERREVOLUTION NOW
>>73906960
it's the logical next step
however it seems to be mostly a male issue, so unless we see a dramatic shift to men being the victims then it will probably never happen
hate saying never though, liberals could have an agenda to push that requires it
>>73906960
I actually am not a homophobe and I still think the way society perceive pedophiles is wrong. the whole "argument" with gay people is that they are born that way or that they didn't choose who they are attracted to. While Pedophile do not "choose" to be attracted to children. The whole problem with pedophelia is that children are unaware and are not in a position to fully understand and accept having sexual contacts with an adult. Now not all pedophiles are rapist and a pedophile is completely aware that its morally wrong to have sexual contacts with a kid. So in my book there is no problem with pedophiles as long as they don't commit a crime, just like everyone else.
>>73938465
>mostly a male issue
There are plenty of women out there gagging for shota cocks.
>>73906960
Pedophile acceptance and pedophile rights, probably. Not sure about equality though. I wouldn't consider a man to be equal to me if he's incapable of appreciating the beauty of little girls. I consider them dysfunctional.
>>73937822
>what good argument would any pedo have to ditch the fake for the real?
The fact that it's fake. That's like asking why people eat meat when palatable imitations exist.
>>73906960
Most definitely. Soon it'll be alright for your 40 year old neighbor to bang your 8 year old daughter because she naively said 'Alright' without being physically or mentally prepared for such an event.
Pedophilia is already pushed in the media. It's blatant too, you seriously can't miss it. Watch any TV show and there'll be at least one pedo reference that is intended for everyone to roar out in laughter as if it's completely acceptable and hilarious that little boys and girls get molested.
Sad times.
>>73941222
If the fake is as good as the real thing, or almost as good then that's enough.
If palatable imitations tasted good or about just as good as real meat, you'd take it
Because real meat would get you in jail.
Get it?
>>73938337
Yeah robots don't need to be perfect in their job
They just, in an average, need to be better at it than people are
That's not really impossible
>>73941314
>Watch any TV show and there'll be at least one pedo reference that is intended for everyone to roar out in laughter as if it's completely acceptable and hilarious that little boys and girls get molested.
What? In what show has this ever happened? What world are you living in?
>>73942295
There's plenty of evidence linking meat consumption to heart disease, cancer, etc. and people eat it anyway. The CDC put out a report recently saying that processed meat is as bad for you as cigarettes, and people responded to that report by not changing their diets at all. People are terrible at weighing future consequences against present pleasures.
>>73906960
lol that guy was one of my favorites as far as crying - check out Maurice Wollen if you can find him - I think he's actually actively gone and got his pictures/video taken down of his arrest.
To Catch A Predator was some of the best trolling ever.
>>73943054
That's not a good analogy nor an argument lad.
>>73910514
Does she still work at Nintendo? And were there more tweets than that one or did she just tweet that, realize she made a mistake, and then deleted everything?
I wish there was more info on female pedos. I find them intriguing. Do they find male children a safer target than adult men?
>>73943054
I'd like to add
If there was a simulation/robot/VR just as good, if not potentially better than having intercourse with an actual child, paedophilia can actually be kept at bay
Think about it, assuming human skin or the tech to mimic humans ever get to a good point
Then pedos could customize their robot to act any way they want
Potentially, the robot can be everything the paedo could ever wish as far as partner would go
The robot wouldn't age, and there's a chance the pedo might connect with the robot in a way he could never connect with a child, depending on how much AI evolves
I mean, yeah he could go after a real child
But it's about making it such that he wouldn't want to, wouldn't be worth the risk, and just blatantly stupid.
There's no way to re-wire pedos to make them straight again, this is possibly the best way to keep them away from children (by their own wish) and out of jail where money put in taxes and predator shit could go somewhere else
Same thing for human trafficking.
It would just become obsolete.
>>73942699
You must be trolling, or you don't watch enough television. Honestly that's probably for the better.
>>73906960
>or is that just a slippery slope argument used by overly paranoid homophobes?
I used to think this. But now its actually fucking happening.
I honestly don't even have a problem with homo or trans people themselves. But I can't help but think I got duped when I believed this slippery slope wouldn't happen as a result.
>>73944218
No, she eventually got sacked, and yes, she made dozens of tweets about child pornography and child sexual agency, in addition to writing her thesis on why Japan should have looser CP laws.
>>73944331
>There's no way to re-wire pedos to make them straight again
You could probably manage it with enough brain surgery. We can rewire lab rats to do just about anything we want them to, and anything we can do to a rat, we can do to a person, if the IRB approves it.
>>73921637
Bugchasers represent a disgusting but small portion of the gay population. Any non-mentally ill person, gay or otherwise, knows to stay away from them.
>>73925805
Mostly white gays because we're not oppressed enough and we're over-represented in media and industry. Flamers/camp gays used to be BFFs with those cunts but now they're reviled for 'appropriating black women's culture.' The only males allowed to be in SJW social groups are those with special snowflake sexualities, ethnic minorities regardless of sexuality, and self-flagellating white heterosexual men who have to constantly affirm their allegiance to the SJW cause.
There was a big kerfuffle recently in Great Britain because one of the major gay organizations over there released a 'friendly suggestion' that white gay men should not be given positions as representatives of local/campus LGBT groups and that those positions be given to trannies and beans instead, even if they keep getting the positions because the trannies and beans aren't applying for them. LGBT groups are a fucking cesspool and should be avoided and ignored by everyone, as should the "gay community" at large.
>>73944939
If she's referring to 2D pizza, then those standards are fairly loose to begin with, aren't they? I'm not too familiar with their 3DCP laws.
>>73906960
the slippery slope is real bro
watch out or it will get you
>>73907392
God wills it.
>>73909772
Mental incompetence is not consent
>>73945795
I'm not going to waste my time reading the whole thing, but she appears to specifically mean 3DPD.
https://issuu.com/honorsreview/docs/volumeiv/33
>>73944604
Just give an example. Seemd like you're making shit up.
>>73945795
They recently bowed to international pressure and made possession illegal. Shit sucks.
>>73906960
>will this logical fallacy happen?
>>73944836
>But I can't help but think I got duped
That's because you got duped.
I honestly never understood where this leftists supports pedos meme came from. It's clear that a lot of people genuinely think it's true and I just can't imagine why.
Leftist communities, especially feminist ones, are insanely hostile against pedos. Go to any mainstream feminist article or community talking about pedos and the comments are always dripping with venom against them. Or just ask any feminist about anime and watch them talk about how problematic and horrible they think Japan is because of lolicon.
Only a tiny, tiny minority of bleeding hearts support pedophilia, and the chances of pedo-acceptance gaining any real kind of traction is pretty much nil.
>>73946154
To name one; American Dad. Obviously an Adult Swim shows, but pedo references are truly everywhere on TV these days, and it's not even discreet. Sure, people could argue against it for some reason or another, but it simply shouldn't be put out there to begin with.
Dunno, maybe it's just me, but I can't even get a small grin off of the stuff. Thoroughly turns me off and seems more like slow conditioning. Can't wrap my mind around why it'd ever be acceptable, in any way, shape, or form, let alone humorous.
>>73943347
He's definitely the most pathetic predator to have appeared on the show: https://youtu.be/Zaa7fH1_QHU
>>73947988
Hell, what about Nickelodeon?
It's literally targeted to children. We don't notice this stuff when we are kids watching it.
pic very related
>>73948210
To follow up on my post, some more.
>>73948287
Another.
>>73906960
I expect it. Only a matter of time.
>>73907893
/thread
>>73948326
One more.
>>73906960
At least pedophiles have biology and the variable age of consent in different countries to defend their bullshit. Homos and Trannys have nothing.
>>73947876
Because actual leftists, such as Michel Foucalt, have openly promoted pedo tolerance in the past, and because it strikes people as a logical projection of their perpetual outrage on behalf of ever-more-niche sexual minorities.
>>73947988
>Obviously an Adult Swim show
It's spelt [adult swim]. And they don't produce McFarlane shows, they jusy air episodes that are in syndication.
>American Dad
Do you mean the episode with Steve's "wrestling coach"? I don't remember that one very well. Wasn't the joke with him that they're all completely unappealing and also dumbasses because they didn't notice what was happening? And he was the baf guy, Stan almost kilked him. And they're high-schoolers, not pedo.
Better example would be the old guy from Family Guy but since he pervs on Chris all the time it suffers from the same problem.
>>73948433
What? I don't know where you're coming from with this one.
That was a good episode
>>73907392
It's basic human nature and biology, we'd be returning to our roots :^)
>>73927201
Brains are a bunch of complicated bullshit and we only understand the most rudimentary of their functions.
>>73937772
How long until you're only allowed missionary sex for the purpose of procreation?
>>73948904
Britons can't procreate because lying back and thinking of England is inappropriately nationalistic and potentially offensive to Muslims.
>>73948718
I think that gif is about Dan "Get in the Van" Schneider and his foot fetish.
>>73920463
.... i fucking hate being attracted tho this
sauce please
>>73918530
I can almost agree with this, but there is a difference between experimenting with your sexuality behind closed doors, and flopping your tits out while wearing a ladybug costume in front of everyone, just because it happens to be the end of October.
>>73949074
>>73906960
The "it's just like gay marriage" argument falls flat when the whole point of gay marriage is it's "two consenting adults". A more reasonable slippery slope would've been polygamy.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UVC-1d5ib50&index=22&list=PLDF03FD71FE7D634E
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ygrd29-_O3I
>>73948724
This issue (of pedos) is nothing new actually
"(Roman Emperor) Tiberius was an unabashed pedophile who raped countless infants, toddlers and young boys well into his seventies.."
>>73949165
lol, Are those comments for real?!
>>73948718
>Do you mean the episode with Steve's "wrestling coach"?
No, not that one specifically.
There are blatant references on more than a few episodes(I did a marathon with the entire show recently). I couldn't point you to which ones, but American Dad is littered with it. Go ahead and sit down and watch through it sometime. You don't even have to fully be paying attention because it's all stated so clearly.
But, I'm already getting the impression that you're a defender of the stuff... so. I think our conversation ends here, as I've no interest in debating pedo's who do mental gymnastics to justify it all. In the event you're not though, seriously, I urge you to watch through the entire show if/when you ever get the chance to.
But yeah, a better example would have been Family Guy, you're right.
>>73918530
I have a big problem with those halloween costumes for that age...completely inappropriate
It will never happen.
Only Jews and a few good goyim are allowed to be pedophiles.
Stopping muslim men from raping 9 year old girls in the name of muhummad is ABSOLUTELY HAREM and even worse: islamophobia.
Pedophilia is less than a decade away
>>73906960
You don't understand how this works OP
They won't approach the subject like that, any more than they'd sell gay marriage as "faggot equality".
They will construct a whole barrage of manipulative, pleasant sounding language to justify it. They'll push deceptive social research and scientific studies, and come up with whole schools of thought to build walls around their ideology.
Right now they're literally getting the public to accept them teaching their children that a man mutilating his body for his perverse sexual fetish is the most normal thing in the world. They prescribe puberty blocking drugs and hormones to children because they're parents are convinced they're the wrong gender.
This is the Bolshevik program. And yes, as ubelievable as it sounds to you right now, it WILL happen. Just as people 20 years ago couldn't imagine of transsexuals given free access to women's bathrooms
>>73906960
There actually was a push for it in the 1970s and 1980s. Then it died.
I think there will be some sort of movement for 'toleration' i.e. not saying "I want to lynch all pedos", but I'm really doubtful any pedo acceptance would gain serious traction
>>73950053
>>73906960
At most, it would be a lowering of the AoC to 14-16.
But never pedo-acceptance. There is no way.
>>73949489
If you can marathon that inane crap and watch Nickelodeon just to find pedo jokes I think you're more messed up than us my friend.
>>73949747
hahaha that hat tho
>>73950195
>30 years ago
>"Women rights will never be accepted, there is no way."
>20 years ago
>"Gay marriage will never be accepted, there is no way."
>10 years ago
>"Transgenders will never be accepted, there is no way."
>Current year
>???
You guys are all understanding this the wrong way round. The reason pedo acceptance and a lowered AoC will never happen is not because it's just so terribly immoral. It's because that would lower the value of the grown woman's vagina. Feminism has made women extremely good at commodifying their cunts for personal gain and for manipulation. They don't want the competition from younger women.
>>73950421
Yeah, I kind of thought that in my own mind as I was typing it. We'll see, but pedophilia may be a bridge too far for most people.
>>73950515
I sort of agree with this.
Say if pedo rights came about, what would stop a bunch of creeps importing third-world lolis for their private harems?
Would progressives really be satisfied with this?
>>73950677
Human trafficking laws.
>>73950515
If feminists are so good at commodifying their cunts for personal gain, how come they're all so fat?
