>It helps to spread international norms and promotes peace.

citation needed

It helps to spread anglo induced marxism i.e. the degradation of norms and values. If anything a catalysis for civil war.

>>73884884
this is not star trek

>>73885009
This

>>73884934

http://www.jstor.org/stable/3183256?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=sn:0015-7228&searchText=AND&searchText=year:2001&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicResults%3FQuery%3Dsn%253A0015-7228%2BAND%2Byear%253A2001%26amp%3Bymod%3DYour%2Binbound%2Blink%2Bdid%2Bnot%2Bhave%2Ban%2Bexact%2Bmatch%2Bin%2Bour%2Bdatabase.%2BBut%2Bbased%2Bon%2Bthe%2Belements%2Bwe%2Bcould%2Bmatch%252C%2Bwe%2Bhave%2Breturned%2Bthe%2Bfollowing%2Bresults.%26amp%3Bsi%3D26&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

>>73884884
>help spread international norms
If it spread norms like protections for labor and good regulation that would be great, reality is it shatters labor markets and creates insane regulatory structures meant to give large multinationals a huge advantage over home grown business, so in effect you end up with a cheap labor pool coupled with exploitive corporations abusing them for cheap manufacturing or whatever.

>promotes peace
Top kek my friend. Just ask Latin America how globalism promotes world peace, there is literally a training ground in the US called the school of the americas that trains butchers and terrorists who are inserted into south and Central America as enforcers for globalism and American puppet governments. """"Globalism"""" is one of the most destabilizing forces on earth because it gives corporations a profit motive to ruin other nations, which gets them to influence government, which results in shit like the Iraq war, or the dozens of coups the US has participated in, etc.

>>73885408
>reality is it shatters labor markets and creates insane regulatory structures meant to give large multinationals a huge advantage over home grown business

From the article above:

Nonsense. If you listen to antiglobalists, we live in a world of "Disneyfication" and "Coca-Colonization" in which giant companies simultaneously trample over their smaller commercial rivals and turn national governments into helpless lackeys. They are wrong on both counts. The proportion of output from big companies has declined, not increased. Globalization radically shifts the balance of advantage from incumbents to challengers. Incumbents could once protect themselves behind lofty barriers such as the high cost of capital, the difficulty of acquiring new technology, or the importance of close relationships with national governments. Globalization reduces the importance of all these things. Lower barriers make capital easier to raise, technology easier to buy, markets easier to reach, and ties with national governments ever less important. You no longer have to be a multinational to have the reach of one.

By all rights, Motorola Inc. ought to be the undisputed ruler of the wireless world. The company was the first to mass-produce car phones. It also sits in the heart of the world's biggest market for them. But it has been humbled by Nokia Corp., a relatively small company from Finland that only a decade ago was more interested in bathroom tissue than mobile phones. Nokia's only weapons were better phones and better management. Against these, mere size proved a puny defense-which helps explain why giants such as AT&T Corp. and General Motors Corp. (GM) now look so vulnerable.

[1/2]

>>73885408
>>73885867

The idea that companies are now more important than governments is equally misleading. Far from get- ting smaller, governments in most Western countries remain colossal, consuming more than 40 percent of Western Europe's gross domestic product (GDP), for example. They continue to expand their influence over corporate behavior through regulatory policy. Bill Gates rapidly discovered that a rather obscure Justice Department antitrust lawyer, Joel Klein, was a much more fearsome opponent than any mere company. Jack Welch, the face of American Big Business, met his Waterloo in Belgium when the similarly anonymous bureaucrats of the European Commission blocked what would have been the biggest merger in history, that between General Electric and Honeywell.

As for the oft-quoted "statistics" about so many companies being bigger than countries-the idea that GM is as big as Denmark-these compare sales figures with GDP. Since GDP measures value added, the correct corporate comparison is profits. As Martin Wolf of the Financial Times has pointed out, GM then slides from being as large as the 23rd biggest country to the 55th, about the same size as a basket case like Ukraine.

[2/2]

>>73884884
you can get away with pissing in a swimming pool every now and again, but once you decide to piss in the pool exclusively it ceases to be a swimming pool and becomes a toilet.

>>73884884
>On what basis do you people consider globalization bad?
The rest of the world doesn't have my interests in mind nor do that have interests in common with me when they make decisions. Do you make any decisions in your daily life intended to make a positive impact on anywhere other than your immediate vicinity?

No, you don't.

>>73884884
>It helps to spread international norms

Why is this good?

>and promotes peace.

No. Nationalism and coexistence promotes peace.

>>73884884
>It helps to spread international norms
As decided upon by a cabal of kikes.

>and promotes peace.
Through the destruction of nations and their peoples?