Why do pampered inbreds live so long?
>>73879104
>they can afford a 6th heart transplant
Why do so many countries have her face on their money? And why do they love her, defend her, and get upset when you insult her?
cucks i tell u
thats my theory
>>73879104
Don't you dare insult her royal majesty you filthy mongrel.
>>73879972
want to cummy in mummy
>>73879104
you tell me
>>73879348
We have pride in our nations. We have tangible reasons to be proud. Rather than just being told to be proud of some abstract and non-existent "freedoms", dispensed by the negro you voted for.
>>73879255
first answer is always right
What happens when she dies?
Does bongistan implode?
They're not even Anglo
They're descended of German Kings of Hannover
Get cucked UK
>>73879104
Access to medicine the common folk don't even know exists.
>>73882376
well part german part scott and scotts evolved from potatoes sooo shes like 1 pair of raybands away from being in U2
>>73882376
>having pride in cultural heritage
>cuck
thanks for the kek m8
>>73882376
Partially Hannovarian.
>>73882065
Probably a week of mourning, then the Prince of Wales will step up, and we'll get to see a coronation in 3d UltraHD.
>>73882489
dumping her beautiful majesty
>>73882065
Elizabeth II is very well liked and popular. Her heir, Prince Charles is absolutely insufferable. So they'll likely be a few years of anti-monarchy sentiments again before the old nut kicks the bucket and William takes over
>>73882530
>>73879104
>literally has a nigger head of state
WEW LAD
>>73882536
Drivel. The Prince of Wales cares passionately about his country.
>>73882552
>>73882536
>Prince Charles is absolutely insufferable.
Depends what trashy magazines you're reading, old boy. He's quite popular now, especially since the letter leaks show how much he cares.
>>73882376
They're not German. The Royal Family descends from the Scottish House of Stuart via the House of Hanover. The Hanoverians inherited the British throne through their ancestor, Sophia Dorothea of Pfalz, who was the granddaughter of James Stuart VI of Scotland. It is not the case that the British Royal Family is German; it is that the Hanoverians were Scottish.
Further, the Queen's mother (Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother) was herself a Scot, the daughter of the Earl of Strathmore. Her surname was Bowes-Lyon. Look at the Coat of Arms of Scotland. See the red lion? That's where her surname comes from. She belonged to the most ancient family in Scotland and was a direct descendant of Robert the Bruce, the old kings of Pictland and the Scottish kings of Dal Riada, including Kenneth McAlpin, the the first High King of Alba. Prince Philip, meanwhile, is a member of the Greek branch of the Danish Royal Family and not German in the least.
This means that the Queen herself is three-quarters Scottish and that even her so-called "German" side is of Scottish descent. Her great-great-grandfather, Prince Albert, *was* German but you should consider that this makes her, at most, 1/16th German. You'd have to be American to believe that having one German great-great-grandfather makes you a German.
>>73882376
>Get cucked UK
>>73882536
That's bullshit Amerilard, Prince Charles cares more about England than the people in power.
>>73882686
Exactly. I loved how the lefty Guardian readers were getting all excited about those 'black spider' letters; they couldn't have shown him in a better light. He was writing about issues like agriculture and healthy eating in schools. I cannot bear republicans, petulant little teenagers.
>>73879348
Cucktales and the Queen is the rich duck
>>73882822
>>73882536
>Herp derp I hate Charles he's nasty and mean.
Despite the fact that his Prince's Trust has saved tens of thousands of kids and teenagers from becoming NEETS, and homeless, even people I know, and it's really good.
Despite the fact that his Duchy Originals charity not only maintains traditional farming methods in the countryside, but also sells a massive range of foods you can find in any supermarket, and is all made in Britain. It shows farmers how to use traditional pesticides and herbicides which protect our wildlife and countryside, and all profits go into important things such as protecting hedgerows and trees.
Despite the fact he's one of the only "establishment" people who admits we're overpopulated, and lobbies the government to slow down immigration and population growth.
Despite the fact that he intervenes which some people hate in the home office, stopping them granting planning permission to giant blue green and pink disgusting modern plastic buildings, next to love old traditional stone buildings and destroying our heritage. He advises the architects on how to design buildings in keeping with our heritage and culture, so they look nice.
Really, Charles has done more for the good of this country than our Queen ever has. Be objective.
>>73882862
Gotta love cultureless Americans getting all butthurt over our monarchy. Bless them, they'll never understand. Enjoy your Hollywood values and non-history!
>>73882560
>>73879104
Reptoids can live up to several hundred years.
>>73882947
>>73879104
Well, kings used to have pretty good genes, you got to be the king by being the most intelligent, bravest and strongest.
>>73883000
>>73883020
>>73881978
>We have tangible reasons to be proud.
yeha such as cost of living?
"A packet of cigarettes could soon cost $40 in Australia"
Tell me this isn't real: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lèse-majesté
You guys cucked? It's illegal to speak your mind?
>>73883086
>>73882921
Just look at this old cuck.
I don't get it britbongs. If there's nobility and you're not nobility you're sort of subhumans. I'd be pissed af. Yet you peasants worship them. Bunch of cucks if you ask me.
>>73882947
Cheeky when England literally invented itself a glorious history narrative to hide the fact that they are weak jews that rely on backstabbing their allies.
>>73882921
>>73882812
I like Charles, I'm personally excited to have a King again. I just don't think he'll be well received since the left is still assblasted by his earlier life, in the classic liberal fashion of "Look at what he said/did 30 years ago, what a bigot!"
>>73883097
>You guys cucked? It's illegal to speak your mind?
>muh freedums
>don't tell me what to do dad!
Oh, Americans. When will they learn?
>>73882822
I was ambivalent about him prior to those, but now i have quite a bit of hope for Charles III.
>>73883097
>"A packet of cigarettes could soon cost $40 in Australia"
I hope so. Degenerate bastards should pay more. Hope they hit alcohol next. I don't mind paying more for wine if it stops the bogans somewhat.
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lèse-majesté
Doesn't apply in the Commonwealth. Did you not read that page?
>>73883143
>If there's nobility and you're not nobility you're sort of subhumans.
Not how it works. Do you consider all your government officials to be ubermensch?
>>73883044
Wow. Stunning. Just what a proper lady and real woman should look like.
Dont mind the haters, most of them are low-IQ Mexishit beaners.
>>73883220
>>73883168
>in the classic liberal fashion of "Look at what he said/did 30 years ago, what a bigot!"
Ayup. The republican push is going to be hellish, no matter how good He is.
>>73883159
What are you referring to here?
>>73883282
Love the photos of them together. Found an old print in a map/antique store of them somewhere, and it's just the most loving look between them.
>>73883482
>>73883242
>Not how it works. Do you consider all your government officials to be ubermensch?
Government positions aren't hereditary. Can't earn yourself 'noble blood'. To me this royalty thing is similar to Indian caste thing. Same looking people but some are somehow above the rest by birthright. Feels kind of barbaric, for the lack of a better word. Alien shit.
>>73883519
Thats real, raw, natural beauty. She could give these turbo sluts today with pounds of make-up, shapely clothes and fake tits a major run for their money.
>>73882754
Yes but isn't Philip, though commonly regarded as Greek, a Glucksburg, which wikipaedia describes as 'Dano-German' and through his mother a Battenburg which is also German, making William more German than his mother?
>>73883168
Which is hilarious since most on the left are against 'old fashioned morality' like monogamy. Not when a royal does it though!
>>73879104
Don't you dare knock Her Majesty, Yank. Or I'll be forced to have a quite word with you.
She not only represents my country, she IS the country.
I'm ex British Army (nine years in the light infantry). The following is a sacred oath that every soldier, sailor, marine or airman must swear:
>I (your name), swear by Almighty God that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, her heirs and successors and that I will as in duty bound honestly and faithfully defend Her Majesty, her heirs and successors in person, crown and dignity against all enemies and will observe and obey all orders of Her Majesty, her heirs and successors and of the generals and officers set over me.
There is no mention of country, because the Monarch is the country. I don't think Americans understand this fact. The oath I made has no expiry date. It is an oath before God. I am bound to protect Her Majesty.
You Americans have a President as your head of state. I'm not knocking your system, but we bongs have Constitutional Monarchy; it's our system and it's worked for thousands of years. Watch the link, mate:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lW9Uudkx42g
Our Queen gives us stability, tradition, honour and dignity. She is loved by the British people.
>>73883000
is he staring at her royal tits?
>>73881978
>dispensed by the negro you voted for
we're taught your first queen also negro @ 5:35
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nySOKjkENOQ
>>73883635
>Government positions aren't hereditary.
So? They're still in a position which the majority of people will never attain.
>Same looking people but some are somehow above the rest by birthright.
So how life works?
>Feels kind of barbaric, for the lack of a better word.
Which is ironic, because it specifically isn't. It's meritocracy, just the other way around to what people are a used to.
>>73883749
You mean Prince Charles? Because William would have that halved thanks to Diana. And then Prince George again by the Duchess of Cambridge.
>>73883874
You have my utmost sympathy, bro. For all our faults, at least Australia doesn't have that craziness yet.
>>73879104
>>73879104
Because unlike /pol/tards try to say, cousin marriage produce healthy offspring
>>73879104
Regardless of why or how she got the job, she's not bad at it, so we like her.
If she was shit at it, and ultimately humiliating, we wouldn't have her.
>All these Brits having pride in their country
Godspeed, UK. I'm glad you guys are proud of your culture, and defend your monarch.
>>73883878
>So? They're still in a position which the majority of people will never attain.
Whoever isn't capable of attaining it is not worthy of it.
How do you attain noble title though? You can't just earn it. If it is even possible nowadays it's granted by a monarch on a personal whim.
Nobility isn't a real tangible thing as well. Their blood is the same as ours. But they are still somehow 'noble' and we're not. Seems like arbitrary barbaric traditions to me. Just the same level of absurd as wild nigger witchcraft beliefs. It's disgusting.
>It's meritocracy,
Nah. If you take the throne by force or subterfuge, it is. If you're born into it, it's not.
>>73884394
>Whoever isn't capable of attaining it is not worthy of it.
Glad we agree.
>You can't just earn it
You can if you're good enough. Baronets still get handed out.
>Their blood is the same as ours.
Their genes are probably better, though.
>But they are still somehow 'noble' and we're not.
Speak for yourself. One doesn't need a Duchy or a title to be noble in deed. They're organisational structures, and it's just a shame we don't use them anymore. Instead we succumb to Jewish media telling us we choose the knife in our back.
>barbaric
Pretty certain you're using the wrong word there, my Tall Poppy Syndrome suffering friend.
>Nah. If you take the throne by force or subterfuge, it is. If you're born into it, it's not.
So a lifetime of training for the gig, with the most incentive to do well at it isn't meritocratic?
>>73883878
Yes charles of course. Prince George is a jew.
>you will never get to hang out and banter with the Queen
Why even live?
>>73883924
>guilty on all counts
>>73883848
Wasn't attractive then, isn't attractive now. The royal family looks like twelve generations worth of inbreeding, first cousins at least.
>>73884686
>Their genes are probably better, though.
That's where you're losing me. It's true they may or may not be healthier or taller or more handsome (british royalty are actually hideous). But how that makes them 'better'? Every human being is a human. Some are rich, some are beautiful, some are lucky and privileged but nothing makes them magically 'better'. No human being is magically above another similar looking human by birthright. Not to God, not to sane man. You're deluding yourself. Just like those Indian crazy niggers who think that some people are warriors, some are priests, cow is holy and priests are above warriors.
>>73884686
>So a lifetime of training for the gig, with the most incentive to do well at it isn't meritocratic?
No. If they take a prince and raise him to be king and teach him shit doesn't mean he was qualified to be chosen for the princedom based on his merit. He was born into it.
>>73885412
>(british royalty are actually hideous)
I dunno dude. If i were to turn for anyone, it would probably be Prince Henry.
>But how that makes them 'better'?
Because that's how better works. They're better bred, they have better education, they have access to better medicines, they have better everything.
>Every human being is a human.
But that doesn't make them equal.
>No human being is magically above another similar looking human by birthright
Yea, they are. God didn't make us all clones, old boy. He gave us opportunity, and the strongest survived, evolved, and dominated. Your idea of plebs being equal to the nobility is based on hope, not fact.
>Just like those Indian crazy niggers who think that some people are warriors, some are priests, cow is holy and priests are above warriors.
The cow thing is crazy, yes, but the rest are fine. The people in those castes are bred for that job. That's how they excel at it. They don't become delusional and romantic about what they might or might not be. They just do it. For the good of all.
>If they take a prince and raise him to be king and teach him shit doesn't mean he was qualified to be chosen for the princedom based on his merit. He was born into it.
He still then has the merits to be there. He would literally be the perfect person for the job. It's a blessing and a curse, if you think people need the freedom to fuck up. But for an efficient society, it's ideal.
>>73883848
>I'm not knocking your system
No worries mate. I've seen the display of reverence towards your queen once or twice in the past. Since it takes some getting used to I couldn't tell if it was fake. One time I wanted to nudge you guys in the arm, "hey you can cut out the act; they're gone!" But hey if that's your thing. Now I know you guys are serious about your queen.
>you will never be landed gentry in Edwardian England
>will never attend balls and parties hosted by the King and Queen
Why live, senpai?
>>73886362
Those would be good points. If they bred humans for specific positions.
We're talking about people willingly worshiping a human because he/she is possibly better qualified for a job. What?
The crown. The palaces. The throne. The 'Your Majesty'. Isn't this monarchy thing is an absurd backwards ritual? What Darwinist purpose does it serve? It's plain cuckdom, when there are noblemen there must be lowly commoners.
>>73879104
Wake up go to work. Australia is already drunk Friday night shit posting. I love this world.
>>73886810
Still can, apart from the Edwardian bit. Plenty of soirees thrown by the monarchy, and nothing stopping you from being good enough to get landed.
>>73886999
>Those would be good points. If they bred humans for specific positions.
Like they did in India?
>We're talking about people willingly worshiping a human because he/she is possibly better qualified for a job. What?
First of all, no one is worshiping them. Secondly, they are going to be better qualified. Who else would be in that position? And more to the point, why should that not be an option? Are petty populist squabbles better to you?
>The crown. The palaces. The throne. The 'Your Majesty'. Isn't this monarchy thing is an absurd backwards ritual?
Not really. All governments have such rituals. It's a matter of tradition and respect.
>when there are noblemen there must be lowly commoners.
Only the people like you are lowly, since you don't understand the system. It's not fighting against you. It's not to blame for you being inept and poor.
>>73879104
Why are Americans always so salty about our royal family?
Jealous they don't have their own historical lineage dating back over 1000 years? Sad!
>>73887376
It's like when you break up with someone, and don't want to see them doing well, or see them with anyone else.
>>73887246
>Only the people like you are lowly
No you dirty peasant. You are a servant. A subject.
I'm just a dude. Like any other dude. Theoretically on paper my government has acknowledged my equal worth against any other citizen. I'm not expected to bow to anyone or use specific honorary style of office when addressing a very rich bitch who was born into royalty and 'better' genetics. Which, honestly, isn't impressive. They look retarded and inbred. Don't know of their accomplishments much I'll admit. But Charles is being a giant cuck around Saudis, that much I know.
Point is, you're someone's subject. You could have been my servant, had I been born a price. Think about it. I'd be trained to appear gracious about it, but trust me I would feel vastly superior to you if they called me king of England and shit.
>>73887246
Well, the quality of people invited to those soirees are pretty depressing desu. Also being a Burger I would have to establish some considerable amount of charity of civic duty to get even a knighthood, which after Elton John isn't even that great of an honor.
>>73879104
They don't fall for the exercise meme.
Britbongs are so butthurt since the world is laughing at their new Muslim mayor. I can't wait until Mohammad takes over the monarchy.
>>73887858
servant ≠subject
Subject isn't a negative or "lower" term. It simply means you are a citizen or connected to the Queen. Someone who is not a subject would be a foreigner or another nations Royalty.
Its like saying that being a citizen of a nation makes you subservient to it >inb4 ancaps and libertarians agree with that
>>73887858
Are you a Marine on MSG? I'm only asking because a close friend of mine did a year where you are in 2007, and your command of the English language is excellent.
>>73887376
Because every time something happens with these fucktards the news has to spend 10 minutes reporting on it
We're already full of celebrities that contribute nothing, like the kardashians. We don't need an old hag and her brood to waste more of our time
>>73882530
>this is a 10/10 in the united cuckdom
>>73887858
>No you dirty peasant. You are a servant. A subject.
Peasant and servant? No. Subject? Yes. Just like you.
>I'm not expected to bow to anyone or use specific honorary style of office when addressing a very rich bitch who was born into royalty and 'better' genetics.
You are, though. If you were to do anything in politics or meet your Khan Nazarbayev.
>Don't know of their accomplishments much I'll admit.
Don't worry, nothing you've said fooled me into thinking you were knowledgeable on the subject at all.
>You could have been my servant, had I been born a price
And if that had happened, i'm guessing you wouldn't be gracious enough to rescind your position? I, however, would carry out my station with propriety (as you would hopefully do too, being the best person for that job), not bitch like a whiny little pissant who thinks the world is out to get him.
>>73887930
>Well, the quality of people invited to those soirees are pretty depressing desu.
Well yea. But the point is that it *could* happen.
>which after Elton John isn't even that great of an honor.
Tell me about it. Parliament needs to be guillotined.
All I'm going to say is that its a shame Harry will never get to sit on the throne. Now theres a lad i wouldnt mind having a pint with.
>>73888331
That's why there needs to be some facility for him to make an Archduchy of Australia. The place is practically made for him.
Alex Jones say these inbreds are descended from Dracula.
>>73888289
>>73888408
They are, from the Prince of Wales onward. Prince Phillips ancestry includes that fun tidbit (not sure how exactly, though.
>>73879104
Funniest thing is that bitch aint even the queen. She's the queen reagent.
>>73888662
By God i hope you were trolling...
SHE WILL DIE TONIGHT BUT ONLY IF YOU RELY "GOD KILL THE QUEEN"
>>73888585
Vald Tepes does he mean? I thought that guy was based for impaling thousands of kebab? Help me understand please.
P.S. I am not a fan of the royalty. I think Abbot is more legit than the "queen"
>>73888858
Yea, that's the one, sorry. But it's not that remarkable to be related to people from that far back, given the number of descendants they spawn.
>>73888790
GOD KILL THE QUEEN
>>73889009
You're right. Once you go back 500 years your ancestors have doubled in number at least 20 times. Numbers can get astronomical going back further than that
>>73889111
Exactly. Good for Assassin's Creed stories and genealogists, but ends up meaning very little to people claiming pedigree.
>>73888760
eh? her husband died. she is no longer THE queen, shes the queen reagent. It not talked about because the royal family is pretty much a shitshow when in comes to succession after GEORGE VI died leaving no male heir.
>>73879104
because they eat the finest foods, get the finest medicine by the best doctors,
More importantly they don't carry the burden of a broken heart and depression and worry.
Wait a few years when the poverty stricken brits start the fight back and overthrow government and abolish the monarchy, they will all be dead by the time they're 75 because they will have to survive in the real world (if they havent fled the country).
>>73880001
>>73879104
by ingesting baby blood and organs; replacing your blood and organs with baby blood and organs; bathing in soothing baby skin lampshade light; using baby oil; ritually throwing some babies around
>>73889459
>her husband died
Prince Phillip is alive and well.
>shes the queen reagent
I agree. But i think you're trying to wrongly use the term "Queen Consort."
>the royal family is pretty much a shitshow when in comes to succession after GEORGE VI
Well no, it passed directly to HM Elizabeth II with no fuss.
So you were trolling, yes?
>>73889556
>More importantly they don't carry the burden of a broken heart and depression and worry.
Yes, they are indeed androids created by Tony Stark. That's why that whole Diana thing was nothing at all. Losing a mother means nothing when you're a prince.
>start the fight back and overthrow government and abolish the monarchy
They tried that, but everyone came to their senses.
>>73889720
That's about right. You shouldn't let them know that you know on a public forum though. You could get suicided.
>>73889735
why would you have broken heart over a successful assassination?
>>73889889
The 8 and 6 yr old princes assassinated their own mother?
>>73883143
>cuck
>got a belt of live rounds and a sword ready to cut your ass into ass dices
>cuck
>>73889556
You're right. Their health is robust because they use the high quality products and services.
>>73882489
KHALEESI
Butthurt murifats call us cucks but will still worship celebrities
>>73889720
true!