>fucking gay for each other in the first few debates
>Trump needs the youth vote
>Republicans and Libertarians scrambling for a third party candidate
Tell me why this wouldn't be the best combination.
>>73703506
>choosing a manlet
>>73703506
Bernie supporter here, I'd vote for it
Why wouldn't he choose a likable woman minority in the establishment?
>>73703555
>VICE-president
He's not picked to surpass him, just carry his sword and shield.
>>73703506
Rand's a shill. No forgiveness after he betrayed his father in 2012 to endorse Mitt Romney.
http://reason.com/blog/2016/05/06/rand-paul-will-endorse-donald-trump-the
>>73703637
welcome to the winning team, we'll get that cage off your dingling soon enough
>>73703506
Its pretty obvious at this point, if you're keeping track & doing research, that Trump is going to pick Chris Christie or Corey Lewandowski.
Now Im not saying those are good picks, Im just saying those are the choices now.
Screenshot this post & you will know I was right.
>>73703506
>Tell me why this wouldn't be the best combination.
Because Rand is a white male. He brings essentially nothing to the ticket.
He needs a brown/black woman. That would stop the following:
a) Hillary playing the woman card
b) Trump being called a racist
Which are two of his biggest problems right now.
>>73703637
Aykm faggit
>>73704310
Kill yourself
Pandering is transparent as fuck
>>73704310
Picking a token minority wouldn't do shit.
The real reason he wouldn't pick Rand is that he's more useful as a senator
>>73704212
p r a r e
r
a
r
e
>>73704212
CONSIDERABLY UNCOMMON
>>73704212
STFU OBAMA
>>73704310
A FUCKING LEA... well shit.
Does it have to be black though?
What if Trump gets a Muslim?
>>73704310
But the people most likely to listen to those points are minorities and women, which hillary will almost certainly have in her pocket already. By choosing rand, he can grab a lot of support from independent voters who decide the election.
