What would be so bad about a 3% inmigrant policy?
That means each year you'd only accept the number of inmigrants that makes 3% of the newborns of your country.
Why does no party makes it that way?
You can claim you are for diversity but also national identity and to not use inmigrants to lower wages.
Why would people be agaits it?
>>73701239
Because I want 0% darkies around me.
What's so hard to understand about that?
>>73701443
They will come from other nations, not just brownies.
>>73701239
I agree with a policy like this. But imagine the outrage!
>>73701239
> and to not use inmigrants to lower wages.
You do know thats the only reason for immigration, right?
Do you think we let them in because we feel sorry for them or something?
No immigrants
Immigration just lowers wages and destroys social cohesion.
>>73701239
refugees have a human right to asylum
3% a year?
ppl don't have to wait and risk death just because it makes some ppl uncomfortable
>>73701600
No but you could use that to make workers vote you and say the socialist party are againts the peple they say they defend.
>>73701239
You shouldn't take in immigrants just to take them in. If you want immigrants who will assimilate than you have to set standards.
>>73701239
that was an idea I proposed to a local party. A cap at 3-4% of population with an immigration background and a 1 child policy for immigrants.
That way if your total population increases you can allow in more immigrants, while if it decreases you can repatriate some of them
>>73701809
>refugees have a right to asylum
no, they dont
>>73701809
Syrian wars is a proxy war between Iran and Saudi Arabia and USA and Russia and it's those countries the onese that should be held responsible.
If we follow that example countries would think twice before stating bombing places because they would be the ones paying for it.
>>73701600
Some immigrants can fill shortages for particular jobs. Not all immigration is bad.
>>73701685
Only mass migration does any of this. If you keep the numbers reasonable, there's no issue.
>>73701239
I wouldn't mind this if the immigrants were 2.9% European and 0.1% East Asian
>>73701928
you should contact the un cause they must have made a mistake
>>73701239
3% growth rate means a doubling time of roughly 24 years you utter dingus. Do you people have absolutely no concept of math or what percent over time leads to? Seriously, you would need to downscale you values by multiple orders of magnitude. THIS is why people shouldn't have a say in government, damn fools can't even do basic arithmetic.
>>73701915
>1 child policy for immigrants.
This is never going to fly. Just restrict immigration further if they're having too many kids.
>>73701953
I agree
other wise they will do whatever they want and everyone else pays
>>73702084
I don't remember any referendum anywhere where people signed that.
>>73702145
Can you not read? He said 3% of that year's native new borns not total population.
>>73702145
>3% growth rate means a doubling time of roughly 24 years you utter dingus.
what?
3% of the newborns of each year, not 3% of the population.
>>73701239
The problem isn't the number of immigrants, but the quality. The US was just fine taking in loads of micks, krauts, and wops in the 19th century even if the micks are a little substandard. However, taking in loads of North Africans, Arabs, or Brazilians just wouldn't work.
The man in your image, Korwin-Mikke, agrees. If people want to come to a country to be productive citizens, good. If they want to come for welfare or to conquer you, not good.
>>73701574
>not just brownies
That still means some brownies, which I don't want.
From your OP it seems that you think countries are obliged to at least pretend they want multiculturalism. They aren't, you can say no to that shit.
There's a small natural flow of skilled workers coming here from other European countries. Anything above that is forced shit we don't need.
>>73702208
they didn't tell you?
oh my
http://rsq.oxfordjournals.org/content/27/3/53.abstract
>>73701928
"human rights" means white genocide no joke
>>73702433
Let's be realistic here for a second.
>>73701239
Why not restrict immigration to highly educated, utterly intergratable, Europeans?
Oh and fuck Korwin, the faggot supports child pornography and selling state property to the jews
>>73702463
>>73702465
I'd withdraw of human rights chart the first day in office.
>>73702500
You're not going to get anyone on here to be realistic. They actually believe they'll be able to write laws that specifically exclude brown people forever just because they feel like it.
I got a better idea, how bout stop making refugees?
Immigration is a two sided coin. A lot depends on where the immigrants come from. In the UK we have had waves of European immigrants (Poles and Romanians) who work fucking hard and also have hot women. I'm 46 and I had a 23 year old Romanian girlfriend last year who was fit as fuck. I get my car washed by the Poles at the hand car wash for £5. Most brits would rather stay in bed and claim benefits than work in that kind of jobs. The Romanian whores are also fitter than the UK ones and charge less too. I don't want Snack bar Muslims or Africans so much, but I'm happy with Europeans and Asians who work fucking hard and contribute
>>73701239
Immigration should be done on a case by case basis. We are living in ruined economies with massive unemployment (10,51 millions in France alone), so the only way for a migrant to come in should be if he has at the very least an engineering degree or some doctorate and fills a position that the employer will have to prove that no one else in the country could fulfill. Ie, there would be like 10 migrants entering the country every year, and they would all be white.
Why would people be against it? Because they have been brainwashed to be good socialists, and a good socialist wants to see his country invaded by millions of brown and black bulls.
>>73702260
>>73702297
In America this would mean we would receive roughly 125000 people per year, given the current birth rates. In just eight years you've allowed a million immigrants in, this value increases because any children they have would now, legally, be qualified as "native born". This only leads to more immigrants in the long run. You need a policy that reduces immigrant flow, that just incentives the first generation to fuck like rabbits. Unless you're about to tell me countries will begin only allowing in immigrants of specific (i.e. European) backgrounds, and yeah, fuck you and your fantasy system.
>>73702541
>supports child pornography
No, he just thinks the state shouldn't detain you for having some images on the computer.
I really don't get why is legal to have a folder of dead children and illegal to have one with nude ones.
Pedophiles that abuse children would continue to be jailed in ideal corbyn's country
>>73702769
Even Trump's proposed immigration reforms, which lets admit aren't even clear, are as restrictive as this. It's actually just your system that is fantasy. If you want to continue the hundreds of thousands of illigals getting into the country and prefer that to qualified legal immigrants, then that's on you.
>>73703045
*aren't
>>73702924
its entirely a muh feels issue. only the most women/jew run countries make laws like that because they are eternally terrified
>>73701239
3%...if only...
How about 200% of all newborn in your country?
>>73702769
But you are a european country, shouldn't be hard to do that.
Even mexicans have european blood.
>>73702769
>>73703119
>>73703127
3% of the 3% to be non european
How about that?
>>73703206
Might as well have none at all. No one is going to go for racially motivated selection. Just make the requirements stringent and less non-whites shill get it.
priorities priorities
>>73701443
FPBP
>>73701239
Why 3% and not 0%?
A once sided immigration policy is genocidal.
>>73702500
What do you mean, realistic?
The reality is that the migrants coming towards Europe now would never acquire citizenship or even a residence permit through normal means. Why would we let them in then?
Nobody stops them from trying to move here through the proper channels, without making up bullshit claims about their refugee status. Why hasn't any one of them tried that?
whites have been doing genocide all over the planet for 100's of years, all the sudden whites are worried? boo fucking hoo
>>73703723
and it's not like all whites think we should stop or anything, right?
>>73703723
"whites" have not. european elite have and they are perfectly willing to genocide european poors just as they were genociding shitskin poors because borders go two ways, if they can break them down on us they can walk over to the other side and control that too. its the same game as it always has been, genociding the poors and you only like it now because you are indoctrinated with racial hatred for white people
>>73703723
>says the child of a Maoist enjoying Canadian wealth
>>73704001
king leopold never set foot in congo, yet 10 million ppl got killed. someone did it
>>73704135
other blacks mostly
>>73701239
what would you with the extra ?
>>73703340
>Spend 30 billion a year to end world hunger
>Poor people are now 20 billion
>Biggest hunger in galactic history.
>World collapses
it's like the whites of Zimbabwe whining about white genocide
>>73703723
Bullshit, there were more white people in the world on percentage before the so called imperialism.
>>73704165
Leopold did nuffin ring he WUZ just tryna bild sum monuments 4 his country na im sayin? We need mo money 4 da Union
>>73703340
>Erradicate hunger
>3rd world countries use the food surplus to breed like rabbits
>World hunger is back and now we have 10 billion people instead of 7
amazing idea
>>73704366
Implying blacks lived there before.
>>73701239
It's not as good as 0% policy
>>73704178
>>73704205
T. aids skrillex
>>73701239
1. Better 0% than 3%
2. It's a shit because that only delay the mongrelization of Europe, but will happen eventually, becase, yes not all immigrants will be brown, but the most of them will.
The only thing we have to do is increase the natives birth rates, giving mothers more money for having children, campaigns pro-birth, etc.
>>73704420
then the best part
>mass death
>>73703340
Malthusian Catastrophe. Your creating even more suffering for the future.
The only thing we have to do is increase the natives birth rates
you gonna have millions of kids?
in case you haven't noticed birth rates in all developed countries are dropping and have been for years
I think it's because ppl don't wanna bring kids into this nightmare world
>>73704505
lol
>>73704788
people have got smart enough to say eh fuck having a litter and hoping one makes it big and instead investing their money and time into one or two kids.
How about not having any reitremnt fund if you don't have 2 kids?
Also you wouldn't have the right vote or be a politician if you didn't had two sons.
>>73704885
look at japan, even if ppl get married they might not have kids
there was a time cover floating around on here talking about not having kids
>>73701600
>thats the only reason for immigration
Topkek
>>73704994
why not just beat them until they do?
>>73704505
viable
>>73705105
it's too fucking hard/ expencive and there's little hope of a bright future for them
>>73701239
>That means each year you'd only accept the number of inmigrants that makes 3% of the newborns of your country.
If you can get the EU to agree with that I'm completely fine with it. Liberals can't complain because we are actively taking them in. If they want more then all they have to do is make more (white) baby's.
That would put a halt to the womyn career bitching and take away their argument about decline in birth rate.
3% of anual births in the Netherlands would be 4600-6300.
>>73705444
Glad someone agrees.
I didn't read the time story but I did read about the japanese when the stories started coming out about 5 years ago
>>73701239
> whats wrong with my idiotic scheme?
such a policy would be POINTLESSLY CONVOLUTED
a society has to be able to plan, an immigration policy that changes every year based on a random metric like "births" which can swing wildly from year to year is retarded.
no party "makes it that way" because it's STUPID.
immigration should be dependant on
1 : a sponsor
2 : proving you are an asset to the target country
3 : the utter assurance that if you fuck up, you will be deported.
arbitrary quotas are a political tool, nothing more.
What about immigrant numbers must equal last years emigrant numbers within 1% for each country. So if 1000 people went to country X last year then 1000 people from country X can come in this year.
>>73701809
> right to asylum
canadian logic.
so you gonna open canada's doors to america's negroes when welfare and gibsmedat dries up and the negro race starts looking for a new home?
8 million american street niggers shuffling across the border, seeking asylum from the evil racist patriarchy in the US...
canada would be so enriched by their presence, surely you can find room in your hearts to take in those poor desperate refugees who have nowhere else to go for a free ride.
no?
i didnt think so
>>73702541
>the faggot supports child pornography
Proofs?
>selling state property to the jews
Private ownership > state ownership.
Only strategic sectors of economy should be owned by the state.
>>73705914
I think the biggest threat to whites are other whites
>>73701239
>Why would people be agaits it?
It solves nothing as the main issue is a mass influx of african and muslim welfare tourists that you have no control over.
The only viable solution is securing EU borders.
>>73705683
So Germany will take 1.500.000+/- 1% anually?
Evn if that somehow includes family reunification that would be 15 mil in a decade
The Netherlands in 12 years.
You would have to build houses stores, schools, hospitals etc for 1.5 milion people every year
Thats Phoenix Arizona, you would have to build Phoenix Arizona every year
>>73701809
>refugees have a human right to asylum
Yeah, in this particular case, in Turkey.
>>73701953
isis/isil/daesh is a proxy war between iran and saudi arabia
no, not really.
a militant semi-marxist insurgency trying to establish a theocratic state in sandland is NOTHING NEW
it has happened many times in history.
you think ibn saud became the king of all arabia because he got the most votes in the prettiest camel pageant?
fuck no!
he murdered a shitload of sandniggers until the remaining dune coons acquiesced , in the grand tradition of mohammed (piss be upon him)
> isis/isil/daesh ios a proxy war between US and russia
NOT EVEN CLOSE
syria has been in the russian camp since the 60's when papa assad first created his mohammedan-marxist hereditary monarchy
isis/isil/daesh is threatening to kick over his turdcastle and subjugate the people the assad dynasty has grown accustomed to subjugating.
russia says Nyet to daesh's schemes, while the US says Nyet to both daesh AND assad.
the US is NOT funding daesh
daesh is NOT a cia/mossad stalking horse
daesh is 100% a raghead insurgency, nobody else cares enough about ragheads to start a war in syria far from the oil fields.
if the cia or mossad REALLY wanted syria's shit rather unproductive low grade oil fields, we would simply TAKE it.
kinda like you lefty twats claim we "stole" iraq's oil, even though the US didnt get a drop of it, and was NEVER compensated for the expense of liberating the camel jockeys from their tin pot dictator of the week.
frankly, sandland is entirely run by dune coon despots, and as long as they keep their shit in sandland, nobody cares what they do to each other.
they are a nuisance, and a menace mostly to themselves, so the rest of the world just watches them tear themselves apart
>>73707061
>daesh
>daesh
>daesh
We have had this discussion over and over again.
ITS ISIS
>>73706072
> I think the biggest threat to whites are other whites
i agree
whites who openly advocate for the destruction of white societies through the importation of foreigners are the biggest threat.
i am looking right at you canada.
>>73701239
Lindybeige made a good video chellenging politicians to state what NUMBER of immigrants per year is OK/tollerable.
Me for Poland (ca. 38 mln): 1000 per annum and 100 000 per 100 years.
>>73707457
> isis
nope.
i will call those camel jockeys what i want. their self-identification is less important to me than the SJW "mayonnaise is a gender" squad
bruce jenner is still a dude, no matter how many artificial hormones he doses himself with, nor whether he has his balls cut off.
daesh is daesh because they hate that name, so fuck em.
>>73707818
actually I was thinking of nuclear weapons
most of which are pointed at white countries from white countries
>>73708389
maybe whites are generally just genocide idiots
>>73708207
>because they hate that name
Or that is what your liberal media wants you to bellieve.
>>73708389
>>73708545
> nukes
really????
no white country has ever been nuked
US nukes are NOT pointed at any "white" countries
if you want to sweat some nukes, talk to russia.
>>73708837
yeah I'm just going to pretend you're sane
>>73701239
Immigration should be capped at half the birth rate of native couples. If White cucks want their precious shitskins then they'd have to stop race mixing and make white babies
>>73708726
they ARE "islamic" but they are not a "state"
they are bandits murderers and thieves, nothing more
the press and barry seotoro calls them isis/isil, and since those faggots are always looking to appease any moslem barbarians, i choose the opposite course.
i dont speak raghead, and dont read dune-runes, so i have to go by what their foes call them, which is Daesh.
they have expressed distaste fro that name, so that's the one i prefer.
or sometimes Goat Fuckers.
>>73708545
>Who is Robert Mugabe
Leaf this place, and never return.
>>73708975
running for your life? yeah sorry, see, we aren't screwing that much these days so you're just gonna have to die
>>73709133
what the hell were all those white ppl doing there in the first place?
oh yeah, free land
>>73701239
Why would I want to claim to be for diversity? Fucking kike shill, gtfo.
>>73708837
> no counter-arguments presented.
> no evidence provided
> implies opposition must be crazy
name a white country that has been nuked
name a white country currently targeted by US ICMBs
name a white country that is being threatened by the US in any way
it should be easy for a wise and well educated canadian to refute my claims, after all i am only a burgerclap, and thus have an education roughly equivalent to an illiterate congolese turd farmer.
surely the glorious canadian education system has provided you with the knowledge and eloquence needed to dismiss the arguments of a mere american....
>>73701239
The immigration rate for any given year should be capped at the total births of the previous year.
>>73701239
Why can't we ban immigration from incompatible cultures, such as Somalia and Pakistani, and from people who are coming here purely to leech, like the Afghans with their 7 kids and a begging bowl. That would be beautiful, and ensure we only ever got productive people as only European diaspora and based Asians like the Japanese would ever get in.
>>73709126
>i dont speak raghead, and dont read dune-runes,
So you're basically relying on what the media told you.
