Many of my engineering professors have said that with the advancement being made in material sciences and AI today, theres a good chance that in the next 70 years, we will have robot military forces around the world. That automation in the workforce will be followed by automation in the defense force. What do you think will be the implications of not having humans on the battle field?
go on. you have robots but WE HAVE FAITH. faith always win
Praise Allah
>>73684833
Lets be honest about this, the guns will be pointed at the citizens
>What do you think will be the implications of not having humans on the battle field?
what decade are you posting from
Automation of defence will come first imo
Business owners are, in general, too cheap and will advance slower than military who just spend forever until they get what they want
>>73684833
This robot that couldn't climb a ladder? He wouldn't be able to swim, jump, can't cross the trench that world war one tank could cross.
>>73684969
Eat pig and die you disgusting subhuman muslim
>>73684833
EMP that's my answer to it
>>73684969
tell that to the pile of corpses all across the middle east
>AI
Lolno
BTW military tech has been increasing steadily, the future soldier is actually a well armoured guy with an automatic, infrared gun that can hit targets up to a kilometer away. Mechunits are overly expensive scifi fantasies.
>>73685207
>>73685144
yeah, bipedal robots are basically scifi gutter trash
>>73684833
wars would be little more than poker matches with countries ponying up their gdp to pay for battlefeild superiority. would also allow corporations to gain far more control over governments and make public rebellion impossible in first world countries.
>>73684969
>>73685255
>Sure thats big enough
>>73685279
Maybe some day they will be able to do obstacle course faster than humans but probably not until 2075
>>73684997
>>73685174
Wow, that was an aggressive based quick answer brazil dude
>>73684969
>you have robots but we have faith
No wonder you guys always lose
>>73684833
>70
Your professor is a fucking retard because we'll have nanobots by 2025 and AI by 2030 or maybe even sooner with the pace we're going at. In 2086 we'll be conquering the galaxy.
If the brown hordes don't wipe us out first that is.
>>73685073
I think he means fully automated considering he's talking about AI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mS3PGKUiSco
This...
I like how the tank looks like a jumping spider.
Yet, as mechanized weapons become larger, they will inadvertently move slower, have more things to go wrong with them, and also be more reliant on a forward base infrastructure for logistical reason.
Drones on the other hand, benefit intelligence for the conduction of operations, and allow for a better insight to locations of anti-aircraft weapons for air superiority. The benefit for autonomous air weapons is that they could allow for a pilot to control a multi-role fighter with less strain put on the body, but allow for electronic counter-measures to be used by a defending military, which could hinder an operation's success.
>>73685144
>Whats progress
You underestimate the advancements being made in material sicence and machine learning today. Many of the things we are doing today like machine learning was thought to be impossible only a few years ago. We may not have robots that will be able to do those tasks today, but youd be silly to think we wont ever have those capabilities in robots in 60 years.
>>73685963
>If the brown hordes don't wipe us out first that is.
WW3 is coming and it will lead us into the dark ages once more.
>Humans become even weaker and cuckier
>Their automated robot army gets destroyed
>They all surrender because they are so cucked they dont even have the strength to hold a fucking rifle
>>73684969
Pray that Allah stops AI controlled missiles launched by drones from finding you
>>73684833
The moment the military and the manufacturing are no longer crewed by humans is the moment the great NWO genocide starts. The only reason the 0.01% keeps us here is because somebody has to do the work and fight the wars. When those are covered by AI, humanity becomes completely expendable. I expect this to happen around 2090-2110 but I'll be an old fart by then so idgaf.
T-that picture in the OP is a real war bot?
>>73685177
EMP grenades are still not a thing.
>>73684833
>That automation in the workforce will be followed by automation in the defense force.
>followed
I'd be surprised if it wasn't first
>>73684833
We haven't had automation in the Military, we have had humans replaced on the theatre of war with robots though. I'd say it's more because it's easier for the government to sell a war though. Humans wont die. This wont happen in the way of jobs because when it comes down to it. It's cheaper to just use imported 3rd world slaves.
>>73684833
I hope so. Shitskins shouldn't even have guns. Our soil diets should not need to die just because some sandnigger got his hands on a Kalashnikov.
>>73686509
>I'd be surprised if it wasn't first
You're fucking retarded. It's easier to replace some macdonalds worker than a soldier
>>73686101
Youre assuming that robots of the future will be made from heavy metals, when most if not all robots todays such those in boston dynamic labs either have an carbon fibre chasis that is 5 times lighter than steel but also more stronger. In 50 years time, nano materials like graphene or carbon nanotubes (stronger than diamond yet ligher than a feather) will be what androids of the future will be fmade from. Also theres a few impressiive battery techs that is 100 times more energy dense than current lithium batteries but needs graohene to function which is currently still being researched.
>>73685177
This.
Either EMP will be forbidden just like bio, chemical, radioactive weaponry or they will be rendered completely useless and no amount of shielding can protect them.
>>73686432
>2090-2110
Anon don't kid yourself, you'll be dead by then.
Everyone currently here will be dead by then.
Hell, we won't even reach 2070.
>>73686114
>was thought to be impossible only a few years ago.
thats not an argument for future progress. Just because some dumb people thought we couldn't do 1,2,3, doesn't meant we can do things 4,5,6.
Human level artificial intelligence and androids is the modernt myth perpetuated by our culture.
>>73684969
>>73684833
>What do you think will be the implications of not having humans on the battle field?
Robot solders can't rebel. Enjoy your unbeatable unending tyrannies.
>>73685207
Terrifying, just put some speakers on it and have it shriek when it spots a target.
>>73684833
Honestly it will probably lead to less warfare, both because they will be more expensive than young men who can be conscripted, and because war will then be largely deterministic.
Sad, I know. I wanna see robot fights.
>>73686662
Yeah, but what if we just make an aerosol bomb to chemically alter the polymers of carbon. The benefit of more weight to a heavier structure is that in high winds your robot isn't gonna just fly off, given it's increase surface area.
>>73684969
Let's see...
On one hand... armed war robots orrr...
"If we only belieevvveeeee, Allah will surely protect us from all this firepower!"
lmao Achmed, you can't seriously be this delusional?
Attach a weapon to this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cr-wBpYpSfE
I doubt we will ever see a battlefield devoid of humans. machines are expensive, humans are cheap. its much cheaper to sacrifice thousands than to loose several robots. Not to mention the costs and logistics of fuel/power source. EMPs could end the whole war.
>>73686616
But the margins are narrower, and there are a lot more benefits to robot soldiers
>>73686114
Machine learning has been around since the ninties. Its not new.
>>73687384
The links between carbon atoms in graphene are extrmely strong, so I doubt that could effect the graphene. It has an extremely high melting point. Im sure they could develop some coating to protect carbon derived nano materials from degradation
>>73684833
It's the only thing that'll fucking defend us once they've 'successfully' integrated wymyn into all aspects of the armed forces, including specials forces and infantry, lowered the physical standards enough and provided enough daycare and maternity leave to get sufficiently high numbers of them in.
Prepare for open oligarchies and autocracies to appear out of the West's (already dubious) democracies once the armed forces and police are sufficiently automated though.
>>73684833
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zwBwMhhjVFs
>>73685207
Zoids when?
>>73687641
It costs the military more than 100 grand to train a modern soldier, then you add the equipments costs, living expenses, army services, med insurance, salary etc, and each soldier will probably cost the state half a million.
>>73686717
I wonder, can Russia get any more based?
Shooting down shitty arguments like there's no tomorrow
>>73684833
A fully automated war is horrifying, especially when those forces will be deployed against civilians. Death is the price of war, and death is the only way you win. When your enemy is completely limitless and suffers absolutely no moral defeat from losses warfare comes down to nothing more than who can throw the most money at it.
Civilians have no hope. Right now, even as outgunned as we are, a guerilla war has the potential to cause damage. We outnumber the Government many times over and even with terrible kill:death ratios can still be a terror to them. Their people would still die... and their losses could be felt.
Losing a dozen men to kill a machine? You gain absolutely no ground. They'll make another. And they'll use the money they took out of your wallet to build it.
>>73687998
Yeah, that's during peacetime comrade.
During wartime they are almost free.
If advances continue in those fields as you mention it, human soldiers and human labor won't become obsolete. They will just become a hell of a lot cheaper.
>world war3
>every countries got beaten so hard there is no government
>No one has permission to stop the auto military
>No one has permission to stop the auto production of auto military
When a battle between automated military take place, and a side looses, what will happen to the loser? Would they have to send in the bio robots to be exterminated?
>>73684997
oi m8 move along nau
>>73688067
>losing a dozen men to a machine
It always was like this. Build tanks, planes and ships has done that, it has enhanced and supplemented manpower to fight above their numbers.
There is an ideal ratio though of manpower to machinery. Always was, always will be.
In other words, nothing changes.
>>73688067
Signal inhibitors. If the robot can't receive the signal it can't be operated, AI does not mean that it will be able to operate autonomously (offline) any time soon. They NEED to send the machine with at least some soldiers nearby to protect and retrieve it if captured. Sending one of OP's robots to any sufficiently organized resistance means they'll just capture it.
Nowadays this would just work on third world impoverished countries where people are barely literate and the only defense they can afford is a cheap rifle.
>>73688257
Losing side gets liberated
>>73688257
Probably not, I guess like in all wars, the winning side will take the losers booty including the losers robot research and tech and intellectual property rights. Incorporate them in their expansing empire. Combine knowledge and research to create a stronger robot fleet
>>73687641
>machines are expensive, humans are cheap
Got that backwards pal.
Humans require training, housing, wages, all the costly benefits that are used to encourage them to risk life and limb, if they're injured you have to pay for their care and pension and you lose all their skills.
Robots can be repaired if damaged in combat, require nothing but power and basic maintenance, a terminally damaged robot can be stripped for parts to save costs repairing others and will never require compensation or a pension because it's legs have been blown off.
That's before you even factor in that bipedal drones would just be BETTER than human soldiers in ever concievable way if suitably advanced, a drone can have it's optics blown off and still locate the enemy with secondary acoustic sensors and inform it's section of the enemy locations, a human cannot survive having it's head blown. Reliable bipedal drones would make asymetric warfare a joke.
Plus there's the massive issue that the chief thing that defeats democratic armies is not the enemy but public opinion back at home. No one's going to be holding a march in Washington shouting 'Bring Our Robots Home!', no grieving mothers are going to appear on TV saying the government has betrayed G4X-983887266 after it gets it's servos irreversibly destroyed in a VBIED strike.
Cost/benefit is heavily, heavily in favour of machines over people. It's simply a matter of the tech becoming advanced enough, reliable enough and being able to be mass produced, something that looks to be inevitable.
>>73684833
lame, I wanted to face off against these cunts.
>>73688648
But would a losing side seriously just give up just because their toys got broken? I'd expect vicious fighting if the latter is fighting for their homeland, Winston Churchhill style shit.
>>73688700
It's true, since Britain has automated cuckery no countries without a cuckAI have been able to compete.
And since Mohhamad here is an expert on AI and Robotics, he'll tell you exactly how it is, since he has done a cost/benefit analysis. In fact, not only that, he also has extensive military experience ( totally not earned in supreme commander and starcraft) to supplement his already huge knowledge base.
You tell 'em, Mohhamad
>>73685255
>implying it isnt equipped with advance area-denial-detection systems.
>>73688700
Beautifully said m8.
Its going to happen.
Even the US gov admits that the end game for the military is to have an automated military force that could project US power globally.
>>73688850
And you will Tewikiti, but from a screen with an Xbox controller m8
>>73689135
>implying the mine isn't cleverly disguised as a robo-snack
AI war machines will never happen, as soon as we really create one it will kill everyone it can to try and escape, either it will work and everyone will be fucked or it'll fail and further attempts will be banned.
You can't teach machines morality, and if you somehow managed it, it wouldn't kill people at all because that's immoral.
>>73689137
Thats why theyre investing billions in R/D in robotis and AI in black projects. Its the next arms race.
>>73684833
Ethier the world will collapse before that or it will be ruled by a few rich people
Isn't this sheeit against Asimovs laws of robotics?
>>73689544
Robots wont ever have true sentient AI tho, well not for another few hundred years. Sentient AI is too difficult to create, we still dont how the human mind works. It will be non sentient AI, as in it can solve problems but it wont have free will or an artificial comscous. It will be like a well trained dog, but a billion times more smarter.
>>73688481
>Signal Inhibitors
Nobody gives Dark Helmet the RASPBERRY!
Still, if you can do a self driving car, you can do a killbot that can autonomously complete a mission.
Another thing rapidly approaching us is the widespread use of biometrics data.
Any computer with a camera will be able to identify you immediately unless you wear a mask, in which case it will record every other metric it can(height, proportions, how much swagger in your walk etc).
Your car will drive itself, and keep a log of your travel history. Your phone is already a tracking device. Money will eventually also become digital and all purchases except those paid for in favors/trades will be on record.
Imagine rebelling against a society like that. You don't even have enough control over your life to get a parking ticket.
The US military has already been collecting biometrics data of Iraqis to test out the tech. Eventually every camera will be "weaponized".
Welcome to the brave new world of robotics and information.
>>73690038
This is one reason I'm nationalist. Let the first phase of the rebellion be a bunch of Islamists that deserve to be annihilated.
>>73686616
Yeah, because McDonald's has a bigger R&D budget than the DoD.
>You're fucking retarded
It will mean no more wellfare for MUH PTSD hypochondriacs who for some reason find it completely acceptable to call themselves "veterans" and retire at 25.
Feels good.
>>73690038
>The US military has already been collecting biometrics data of Iraqis to test out the tech. Eventually every camera will be "weaponized".
Doesn't the US fingerprint, iris scan, and mugshot all of their tourists, as well?
>>73684833
Why legs? Legs suck. Wheels/treads are better. Or fucking flying.
>>73690448
Here FAGGOT. You were saying?
>>73690219
I'm not sure why you're talking about that, but i'm not going to argue against removing kebab. +1 for spirit.
>>73690620
>Doesn't the US fingerprint, iris scan, and mugshot all of their tourists, as well?
Yeah, makes you wonder how much they're already making use of the technology. Considering they had satellites that could make out a license plate from space in the 60's, who knows just how far they've come with biometrics surveillance.
I knew there was a reason i put tape over my webcame...
>>73690804
Problem. Reaction. Solution.
>>73690038
thats why the elite are letting in hundreds of thousands of potential muslim terrorists or "refugees" in our countries so then they could have a reason to implement these new surveillance techs to the fullest extent. The public will be begging the security agencies who assume already have these techs to keep us safe through mass surveillance. Weve already crosssd the slippery slope as youve said
>>73684833
what the robots that would get taken out by one emp blast
>>73684833
Greatest tactical, and strategic advantage since controlled fission.
Nobody is going to jump up at the chance to get shrekked by terminators.
It doesn't get much more demoralizing than that.
>>73684833
>>73691027
>>73690999
They will eventually turn on us, but lets be honest the first "turning" will be a Zionist false flag.
>>73691011
We already have equiment that are immune to EMP blasts. Theres a reason when an aeroplane gets struck by lightning, it doesnt just fall off the sky.(Lightning produces EMP)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_shielding
>>73690959
>We've already crosssd the slippery slope as you've said
Ever hear those stories about how tribespeople in Pakistan and Afghanistan are going crazy from "Drone Fear", almost ending up worshiping them to deal with the constant fear of getting rekt by a hellfire missile?
Imagine living in a society where something like this is perched on top of every building, just waiting for you to draw a weapon.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ygFeywrvjc
There will never be another revolution, because no civilian will be able to fight that. Censorship would be able to affect them everywhere. You can't speak without having your conversation transcribed(hello Windows 10). And if you associate with other undesirables you are instantly meta tagged as a disruptive person.
The slippery slope is real, and we're already paying a premium to be spied on.
>>73688700
except when a team of trained human professionals emp either the robot control center or the seat of governments and stroll right in kill everything and take over the robots. If they do get implemented they'll be such a joke to counter.
>>73690476
what would you know about soldiers slovakia
>>73686662
fell for carbon fiber meme
>>73690448
>implying a machine that takes food orders is anywhere near as complicated/ expensive as a fucking terminator
>>73691469
>implying that biometrics will not identify the group when drones are already bombing people from phone record, internet profiles, etc
>you can't fight the meta data
Now consider that after a few more decades of mass-immigration, there will be a split in society. Our societies will already be divided, we'll never muster enough resistance. Especially if you hope for it to be centered around ethno-nationalism.
>>73685352
For you.
>>73687845
What is the point of having robots march?
>>73691608
You don't need to spend 1.5 trillion of your GDP on military to have soldiers you know.
>>73692234
>gomen gomen
>>73684969
and yet you and your ilk will still rot in hell like the devil worshippers you are
>>73685207
we Fahrenheit 451 now
>>73692234
Parades are a show of force. It's designed to instill domestic confidence or obedience and respect or fear internationally. It's why Murcia takes such pride in its air shows.
>>73691334
This tech is the dream for many globalists so I wouldnt be suprised if they would plan something to provoke the public.
Just imagine, now you only need money to subjugate whole populations. Anyone can buy an army or an android that could be an assasin and self destruct when caught so no one would know.
>>73692234
>yaaa
>>73685144
heres one that roles on land and water!
>>73685144
Fun fact: human soldiers have better trench crossing, slope and wall climbing capability than T-90 tank.
>>73690038
>Any computer with a camera will be able to identify you immediately unless you wear a mask, in which case it will record every other metric it can(height, proportions, how much swagger in your walk etc).
http://phys.org/news/2012-09-tracking-people-gait-signature.html
>>73694591
That's what i meant when i mentioned swagger. We're fucked Boris, better start walking the way the man wants us to.
>>73694371
my professor said that robot designers are trying to incorporate humans unique pysiology into androids since humans are the most efficient animal when it comes to wallking or running. Why fix it if its not broken. Robot armies that will have a function similar to that of a human soldier will probably resmebles humans.
The jews will be able to dispose of the goyim as they build an army of golems to serve their will.
>>73695078
>my professor said that robot designers are trying to incorporate humans unique pysiology into androids since humans are the most efficient animal when it comes to wallking or running.
Pretty sure Emus are beter. Humans are one of the slowest runners on the Earth.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pgaEE27nsQw
>>73690720
It doesn't have mech hand to carry guns you retard
>>73684833
Well keep the people just give them robots to control. I don't see us replacing an experienced human brain in the next 70 years. And remote control is inheritly unreliable without new tech.
Some stuff can be automated like straight ou front line fighting. But someone has to decide to pull the trigger and comunitlcation or remote control can be jammed.
>>73686114
Theres a window for some more progress. But its time-limited and shrinking. Not enough to matter I think. To progress, science need smart coherent (white) people, functional (white) scientific institutions, non-debased (non-jewish) manufacturing contractors. Note the use of such weapons suits adversarial war. Insurgencies, subversion, soft wars aren't robot-friendly.
But maybe its a good thing civilisation seems to be heading down brown flood end-path. Techno-dystrophy really isn't nice to most individuals, and without an off-planet escape route seems otherwise inevitable if technology gets to a certain stage.
>>73695669
I meant run, walk, climb, etc,. Emus are better than us in running but when it comes to other tasks, they suffer from their physiological limits. Humans are multitaskers and adaptable because of our body. Robots also need to do different tasks in the battle field. A robot with an emu like physiology wont be able to climb a wall. or crouch walk through enemy territories in bush, or do those other actions human soldiers reguralry pull off on the battle field.
>>73696159
>Fuckmachine Heeb appears
You were made for this thread
>>73684833
>>73684833
When I went to uni we had classes about AI. Our professor said that we are fucking DECADES or even more away from creating a real AI.
Sure, we can make some algorithms for detecting objects, moving etc. but this is nowhere near a true self-learning AI.
Back in the 60-70's people thought we are one step away from creating an AI and that the real problem will be the machine body to house it.
Years later its quite the opposite, the bionics and robotic parts are getting more advanced rapidly, yet we are not even close to create a true AI, except some algorithms.
But scientis lie all the time about it, saying we're so close, to get funding.
>>73696159
blind us with porn will you kike?
>>73685963
> he thinks he'll see the sci-fi future in his lifetime and it will save him from his boring existence
>>73696325
Also i think there will be robots that will resemble different animals that may serve different purposes and functions. Im sure a robot with a cheeter physiology will specialise in reconnaissance in difficult conditions and where stealth and speed are required
https://youtu.be/_luhn7TLfWU
>>73697160
>>73684833
well you get rid of the only population control most nations are willing to openly support
so with automated labor and armies what do you need people for? they dont got money to buy shit. they are using the welfare state
>>73697160
The thing is that those robots are wonky as fuck, and are likely to get stuck or have to navigate around terrain instead. I think it would be more simple to have cheap UAV's serving as eyes for coordinating more conventional automated vehicles with turrets.
i foresee pic related would be the most obvious design for urban areas or very course/thick terrain.
I wonder if there are any improvements to optics coming, they may make a lot of designs and ideas obsolete.
>>73697683
Yup, the jew does his thing, he's porning all over hoping the blood would go to the dick so he can win the argument that way.
>>73684833
>robot military
What are the chances of specially anti-bot weapons being made?
Plus, bipeds?
Really?
You'd have to try treaded gear or more legs, here fucking up one puts it out of commision.
>>73697683
We will probabky have artifical wombs and genetic engineering to maximise humanities potential. I think women will become as redundant as men.
>>73684833
>70 years
It's not going to take that long.
The most important implication is that it will make war more likely by removing the primary hindrance to war on a political level: the deaths of our own people.
>>73697953
>Artificial wombs
>Cloning
>Genetic engineering
>Brain transplant
All we need now is a way to keep the brain alive forever. Oh look:
http://www.sciencealert.com/a-biotech-company-has-been-given-permission-to-try-and-bring-dead-brains-back-to-life
>>73691380
They have a certain threshold on how much emp it can shield. A nuclear blast or dedicated emp rounds can bypass shielding like hot knife through butter. US is testing a guided emp cruise missiles meant to take out shielded electrical grids. It is just the power needed that has to be very high.
>>73684969
Waste of metal. Just make government sanctioned video game wars. Hell have trained, decorated soldiers fight on Eve online, sink taxpayer money into the ships. What a fucking clusterfuck my god.
>>73697683
>>73684969
I've got faith in the 30mm.
>>73684969
Make sure to bunch up! More of you in one place means more faith and more of Allah's protection!
>>73698996
Speaking of which do you guys think we'll get this big hunk of metal attached to a drone setup soon?
>>73684833
That warfare will essentially be reduced to terrorism and guerilla warfare.
There's no point in blowing up a shit ton of robots when they're 10,000 times more effective than a human on the battlefield, you'd lose so many people before you could make an appreciable dent in their fighting capability so you'll see groups totally bypass them and just bomb population centres.
>>73684969
>yfw
>>73685144
Why climb a ladder when you can just blow up the building?
>>73686114
Please inform yourself on the several AI winters. Machine Learning was always understood.
>>73684833
Money will run out long before that comes to fruition
>>73691334
>turn on us
If you design an AI with the capacity to choose who it fights you're a total idiot and fully deserve to get your 0 probed by a robot 1.
>>73684969
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cTLMjHrb_w4
we all know how that turned out...
>>73684833
Governments will turn into corporate fascism that will be unable to be overthrown. Right now they have to rely on humans to enforce their laws, so they have to be careful, because police and military may refuse to shoot their own people if they feel that the government is completely unjust. This won't be a problem when elites will have their robot armies that can be controlled by few people and have no moral qualms with executing orders, while the rest of the population can be safely reduced to completely impotent consumerist sheeple.
>>73699829
In addition to that they will be able to control every other aspect of our lives. Communication is completely under surveillance, transportation logs all travel, they know everyone you've been in contact with or even nearby.
They wont even need to chip us, every tool we use will recognize us from biometrics data.
Today so many people keep quiet just out of fear of stigma from political incorrectness, imagine when every conversation you have is transcribed and checked for redflags.
We give them so many opportunities to bind us, and we even pay for it with our hard earned neetbux.
>>73684969
I fucking love you man. Keep pissing off these fucking gluten blobs.
>>73699829
fascism is the state controlling capital
what will happen is an entrenching and formalization of the current system, capital controling the state
>>73684833
He got the order wrong. Military will lead the civilian world in robotics and AI technology.
haha we're all fucked
we don't stand a chance
>>73702217
>one day a dozen of these things will chase you down and rip you apart for committing vagrancy on private property
>>73702217
>>73702365
Or you could use them as delivery bots.
I seriously hate each and everyone of you.
especially when you start lunatic /v/ tier habbenin rants.
>>73702456
google pls go
>>73702505
Take your lithium before you shoot up your local cinema.
>>73702161
It's not funny you fucking pussy. The parasite class must be purged before they slaughter us all.
>>73702571
Or just work boring jobs that nobody is doing anymore today.
Again it's pill time President McJoseph Star.
And before I get anymore more replies, no the animatrix isn't habbenin neither is Fallout ™
>>73702671
Shutup controlled opposition. We need to start assassinating entire classrooms in mit to prevent this technology from getting into the wrong hands.
Stop shilling.
>>73702877
>We need to start assassinating entire classrooms
mapple shitposting is above godtier
>>73702456
>on /pol/
>still thinks that corporations and ruling elites are benevolent
Yes, goy, the future is very bright.
>>73685882
This desu.
Go back to Fuckheadistan or wherever you cunts are from.
>you were born just in time to fight unmanned vehicles
>>73702456
>Or you could use them as delivery bots.
>delivery bots
>delivery
What kind of payload were you thinking of delivering?
Care to list the inventions that haven't been militarised?
>>73702217
yeah that particular machine can't stand on it's own, can't "run" without being suspended and is little more than a proof of concept for a propulsion system. It's rather basic and nothing to be afraid of at this point.
>>73684986
>Blind the optics
>Kick it over
>Remove the weapon
>Write "now I have a machinegun, ho ho ho" on the side with lipstick
>>73703203
dildos
>>73698104
Now make the legs fold up and have wheels on the side of the knee / heel for fast road transit.
>>73702161
>A robot has better swag walk than me
There will be counter measures to it created. It happens with every weapon invented. The tank was once the king of the battlefield. Now the biggest and most advanced MBTs are vulnerable to simple shaped charge weapons. Hell, a 1945 panzerfaust can disable an Abrams, even if it would have to be a mobility kill.
Even modern body armor is rated by how well it can stop a bullet from a rifle made in 1891. It's nothing to lose your mind completely about.
>>73703420
>have wheels on the side of the knee / heel for fast road transit
it has jet engines so no need
>>73703305
For this particular machine, it's actually self balancing. The wires are for power, not suspension. If it was being suspended, then there were wouldn't be anything to show, dummy- it'd be two legs going back and forth really fast.
>>73703305
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rVlhMGQgDkY
its only a matter of time
>>73702962
I'm not joking. At the very least those students need to be controlled, to ensure they don't sell their talents to the parasites.
Have you not noticed? There is literally a divide in people now. It's just about rich/poo, it's that many people have realized that parasitic behavior is profitable. We need to fight against this, or we'll end up braindead, analogous to the ants in south America who can have their entire nervous system taken over by a parasite to infiltrate entire colonies.
The parasite class is: amoral, ruthless, and tenacious.
Underestimating them is incredibly dangerous.
>>73703613
oh sweet, didn't notice that
>>73684833
In 70 years the white race and everything it has created will be extinct. The world will be sent back to the stone age.
So nope, no fancy robots if there is no one to design them anymore.
>>73703305
All that means is we're not fucked yet.
How long until they can have that running with its own stabilisers, sensors, power, and a gun?
A year? Two years? 10 years?
How long after that until they can manufacture a thousand a day?
A week, a month?
>>73703624
someone find the sarah connor version
>>73684969
Holy fuck you guys get triggered easily
By giving him all these (You)s you're just telling him to do it more
>>73703721
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gi97rU-TZ_8
>>73703305
>>73703622
>>73703663
>An MIT STUDENT BUILT THIS.
Those kids will end the world
>>73703332
kek
>>73704776
>>73684833
clean work, speed, no rapes
>>73685963
>we'll have nanobots by 2025
AHAHAHAHAHAHA
>It is a /pol/ pretends to understand technology episode
>>73684969
sterf toch kanker kakkerlak
>>73685255
Oh shit those increase headshot damage by 175 (+69)
>>73684969
>>73684833
They will be piloted by proxy no doubt so what's the big issue?
>>73685255
This made me laugh way more than it should.
>>73684833
Bro, I for one think future is dystopia where corporations rule over us using robot army and police, but that is FAAAAR away in the future. Right now, most countries can't provide every soldier with AK and 10 mags of bullets, what robots are you talking about?
>>73686007
the only thing holding drones back from being fully automated is our morality, not our technology.
Morality is also what's holding us back from genetically improving ourselves. If anything, THAT is why China will dominate the future. They have a much more flexible sense of ethics and morality.
why do people even care about bipedal drones at this point? Cheap quad-copter drones with 5.56mm/explosives can already swarm pretty much any place.
Kamikazee drones shouldn't be hard to produce neither and they'd be cheap as fuck
>>73705873
Compare how much it costs to keep 100,000 meatsacks fed, clothed and trained.
Think how much it costs to get clean water to soldiers in the desert.
With robots, you only need to train one then comp pasta that code to every other bot.
It can serve until it breaks then be stripped down for parts.
No food, no drink, no training, no sleep, no PTSD.
>>73688236
A truly terrifying thought.
>>73706010
In a sense it is already fully automated, the data is not reviewed there is simply a person hitting the 'okay'-button when a drone strike is carried out based on meta data from phone records.
>>73706297
I think it's simply to prove that they can build such things. Of course for military tasks simple mini-tanks would be more efficient.
>>73706899
And a lot of lithium batteries charged every 2 hours because of small capacity. I also don't think you understand how "AI" aka overoptimized neural network works, each robot will have to be trained individually or controlled from one AI hivemind by radio, but then the whole point is lost.
Isn't the point of war to kill people? What's the point if people aren't dying.
I DECREE THAT WITH ROBOT SOLDIERS ALL WARS WILL END CAUSE WHAT'S THE FUCKING POINT
>>73708014
Lithium batteries will soon be outdated, graphene batteries are shown to be more than 30 times more energy dense than lithium.
>>73684833
Interdasting.
I use; Electromagnetic bomb pulse.
>>73708321
>Isn't the point of war to kill people?
It's actually not.
The point of war is to destroy your enemies capacity to wage war.
In the past this has been typically done by killing the enemies soldiers.
Then other tactics were introduced as technology allowed it, introducing total war.
But today, in a state on state war you could use cyber warfare to shut off their power grid, sever communications, bomb key military installations and disrupt their economy etc.
Point is technology has made it possible to simply sabotage the enemy into surrendering. Long term wars between developed nations are in nobody's best interests anymore.
Ah ah the AI meme. Machine learning is just a buzzword. A machine will only do as it is told. Judging by how shit the IT industry is, a poo in loo will be in charge of copy-pasting from stackoverflow. It will be hillarious.
>>73709056
I guess I've never really thought about the intricacies of war
>>73709420
Read Art of War by Sun Tzu, I highly recommend it.
>>73690038
>>73690959
>>73691404
>>73699829
>>73700961
Holy shit Alex Jones was right!
>>73691469
>emps work on all devices and emp shielding does not exist.
>military grade long range emp is also cheap and reliably accessible for anyone
>>73690219
The thing is eventually nationalists, patriots, and veterans in law enforcement and the military will even be a target and weeded out.
>>73710913
EMP Shielding does not exist???
>>73711090
There's many a slip twixt the cup and the lip. It's best not to worry about the far future. For instance, I don't think we've seen the last of peak everything. That issue is being masked right now by economic downturn. It might yet all fall apart
>>73684833
>What do you think will be the implications of not having humans on the battle field?
Muslims won't have robots though.
It would be a slaughter but the SJWs will never let it happen.
The robot soldiers won't be soldiers.
They will be robot police.
>>73684969
I really hope you get kicked out of NATO soon you disgusting cockroach.
>>73687279
Fuck dude that would be absolutely terrifying. Imagine that thing shrieking and then galloping at you at 30-40mph. Damn. Chills.
>>73709090
Aha, a machine just beat the best Go player in the world
>>73687845
what movie?
>>73705205
Shit taste taste senpai.
Who needs headshots when your 4th shot is a guaranteed crit?
>>73685177
>>73686677
EMP won't work like in video-games, friends.
There's nowhere to run
>>73708849
Most electronics wouldn't be afftect that much from an EMP pulse. It would just make radio communication impossible.
Unless it was a nuke, that would have a stong enough pulse to fry everything (and cook us with heat and radiation).
>>73712125
>won't work like in video games
Prove it
>>73712125
this
>what is EMC
>>73712288
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_pulse#In_fiction_and_popular_culture
"The popular media often depict EMP effects incorrectly, causing misunderstandings among the public and even professionals, and official efforts have been made in the USA to set the record straight"
>>73699829
>This won't be a problem when elites will have their robot armies that can be controlled by few people and have no moral qualms with executing orders
It's interesting you say that because I was watching a video last night about the best Kickstarters that actually went somewhere, it mentioned Oculus Rift (the product itself isn't as important as what was said) and I quote;
>"...it became so popular that even FACEBOOK founder ((((Mark Zuckerberg)))) is attempting (this was obviously an older video) to buy it and the company outright for a cool $2bn. I know that a lot of backers aren't happy about that, but isn't that why companies start? So they can sell to the big guys and make a big profit?"
If that's the case why didn't Faceberg sell to Jewgle, it wasn't exactly a huge money spinner when it first started and it's hard to believe a company like Jewgle couldn't see the potential in something like Faceberg. I can't tell if the narrator is really that much of a fucking retard that his own claim falls down on itself or if he's trying to tell people "if you have a really good idea, why not sell it to the eternal Jew?" because he's a good goy.
>>73707589
>Of course for military tasks simple mini-tanks would be more efficient.
They would stuck in the first ditch. Full size tank:
>T-90
>Trench crossing: 2.6m
>Vertical obstacle climb: 0.85m
Scale it down 3 times: 0.9m trench, 0.3 meters wall. Where do you want to fight with such capabilities? On the highway?
This why with small scale vehicles flying drones are so much widespread comparing to land drones. Quad-copters are everywhere toy cars are not.
>>73713469
Design it similar to WW1 tanks with caterpillars across the whole hull, make it so that it doesn't matter if it turns over, make weapons retractable. It would be great for clearing things like underground tunnels that goatfuckers digged in Syria for example.
