>/pol/tard neckbeards unironically believe that anything made by women (Comedy, Inventions, Science, Literature, etc) is inherently inferior to what men create
>Ironically, every single misogynist /pol/weenie was created by a woman
Care to explain this small discrepancy, you woman-hating pieces of shit?
NICE.
/pol BTFO!
Everything you love was made by a man, WHICH WAS MADE BY A WOMAN!
>>73675054
Sauce amigo?
>>73675054
Hey look it's a Mexican intellectual
>>73675198
I don't have any at the moment, but I can post additional qts if you aren't a woman hating manbaby
>>73675279
Cool meme
>>73675054
>was created by a woman
Yeah, conception is a woman-only activity.
>mexican intellectuals
kek
hehe... that would be "jaja" in beanerland right?
>>73675054
I would love to avoid eye contact with her across the bar
>>73675417
>Reply
more
>>73675054
Obviously a qt, but her knees are fucking terrifying, exorcist-tier shit.
>>73675054
what a shithole she must live in
>>73675599
>Yeah, conception is a woman-only activity.
Your comment doesn't negate the original statement, how could you consider the creations of women to be subpar, even you can't even imitate them?
>>mexican intellectuals
nice meme
>>73675683
>>73675054
We all hate our miserable selves too.
>>73675792
It's somewhere in the US, apparently, look at the sign in the mirror.
>>73675054
>mexican intellectual
In the bin.
>>73675054
BUILD
>>73675054
>mexican
>chicken scratches on mirror
>shitty paint job
never change mexico. keep telling yourself you're a hard worker too, it's funny
>>73676155
Back to 8.chan you Nazi fetishist pedo piece of shit.
>>73676212
see
>>73676142
>>73676313
>mexican intellectual crying on a Tibetan tapestry trading forum
Top kek
>>73675054
Women can't even give birth without a man.
Can women do ANYTHING without a man to help them?
>>73676464
well shit i didn't thought /fit/ was that 'intellectual'
>>73676464
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-511391/Death-father-British-scientists-discover-turn-womens-bone-marrow-sperm.html
Bible belt neckbeard misogynists BTFO
>>73675054
>>73676622
what kind of twisted logic are you even pulling to equate the bible belt with neckbeards.
the neckbeards are the godless atheists and maybe some Christians-in-name-only
>implying /pol/ is one person
>implying /pol/ hates women
>implying /pol/ is "muh-soggy-knees"
sage
>>73675054
>/pol/tard neckbeards unironically believe that anything made by women (Comedy, Inventions, Science, Literature, etc) is inherently inferior to what men create
Wow, I didn't know I believed that! Thanks for filling me in!
>>73675054
I see you assume hatred can only be built through emotional experiences, and not factual data and statistics.
I can assure you the majority of europeans browsing /pol/ never interacted with a nigger from the usa, yet hate is found in spade.
In the same way, no fatistanian interacted with a gypsy, yet...
Are you are woman yourself ?
You seem like the type of person needing an emotional reason to adopt or reject a specific or aspects of a worldview.
No offense.
sage this shit to the mooon
>>73676622
Guess what gender invented that technique?
>>73675054
We agree with you beaner bro. We just think women should stick to what they're good at.
>>73676692
>what kind of twisted logic are you even pulling to equate the bible belt with neckbeards.
I'm strictly referring to the neckbeards on /pol/, which naturally gravitate towards religion for nationalist or authentic interest purposes.
Those who are nationalists are inherently misogynists because they invariable seek to shoehorn the roles of women and their capacity into society. The ones who are authentically interested in religion treat women like shit because the book says so.
>the neckbeards are the godless atheists and maybe some Christians-in-name-only
Not on /pol/, clearly.
>>73676632
All that women need is a little bit of guidance, you're citing these studies as if they were absolute truth without taking into account the context in which women have developed themselves.
Perhaps these women think that it is ok to swap IQ for a perfect dress size or bigger breasts because society has hammered down propaganda and gender roles on their minds since they have a memory, it is foolish to think that man has had no effect on women considering they've been second class citizens for 1900+ years.
>>73676464
>>73677228
IQ's predictive power is so strong dismissing it when talking about population is beyond laughable.
But ok, IQ doesn't take into account physical traits, it can be argued away in some frameworks.
g can't.
The artificial womb is coming. The end of the ancestral parasite is at hand.
Prepare accordingly, fellows. Raising boys cost money, save up.
>>73677228
I agree that women need encouragement to do the things that men do. But don't just instantly assume that some facts are false when presented with sources.
>>73677228
>Those who are nationalists are inherently misogynists because they invariable seek to shoehorn the roles of women and their capacity into society.
You obviously agree with us though, whether you admit it or not. Your OP gives it away.
The best thing women can do is produce and raise children.
>>73675054
I don't think anyone thinks they're "inherently" inferior, it's more like there's an undeniable pattern of all their creations being inferior when unbiasedly observing them
>>73675054
All the parts of my personality that I hate were created by women. They are the things I have in common with my mother, my school teachers, the influential women who shaped our culture.
Everything I like about myself comes from my father, or the masculine side of our increasingly feminized culture.
>>73675054
Yeah who got inseminated by a man. I don't have time to discuss the chicken and the egg with you Paco
>Ironically, every single misogynist /pol/weenie was created by a woman
With help from a man.
Also, a child raised by a single mother tends to be worse than having both parents or even a single father.
Single Fathers are better at parenting than single mothers.
>>73677504
It is fair to note though that having both parent is better than a single father.
But, maybe the mother's role can be approximated enough by gynoids to have the statistics align with married couples.
If not, well, still better than current single mother situation.
>>73675054
/pol is a satire board get with the program cunt
>>73675054
>Ironically, every single misogynist /pol/weenie was created by a woman
Wrong. They were made by a collaboration of a man and a woman. Nobody doubts that women can achieve something with the help of men.
>>73675054
Yes, congratulations. Women's specialty is in creating people, men's specialty is in creating everything else.
>>73676464
Have their best orgasms?
>>73675054
Go back to your momma Italy
>>73675054
What if children birthed from men are superior?
I haven't heard this one before. It's painful granted, but a woman giving birth is no more a genius invention than a man shooting sperm from his balls, get it together.
>>73679792
t.lonely cunt
