Who would be a worse Commander-in-Chief?
>>73638965
Nice bait retard
retarded faggot
Knowing Republicans and their lust for dead foreign bodies, Trump probably.
>>73638965
A picture of a vase?
I don't get it.
>french flag
>>73640442
>Clinton's aren't just as bad
>>73640442
>'cause Obama definitely did not start wars in Syria and Libya
>>73638965
>worse
What exactly would qualify that?
Hillary has a very hawkish record. She'll stack the bodies up high.
>>73640442
The Republican establishment don't want Trump because he doesn't agree with their methods. That is one of their methods he doesn't agree with.
And the word you're looking for is 'Neocon'. Which Hillary is also.
>>73640442
Trump isn't globalist
>>73638965
>>73640442
AH SHEEEIT TRUMP BTFO
I AM A CLINTORIS NOW
>>73640568
Lmao
Hillary would be worse in terms of her policies.
But Trump would be worse in terms of people chimping out and possibly starting a race war.
Clinton would get people killed because she is incompetent and corrupt.
Trump would get people killed over strong-arm foreign/domestic policies.
>>73640442
Then why did Democrat Obama destabilize Libya and Syria? Not to mention the countless civilians killed by his drone strikes.
>>73640442
It is true that I lust for dead foreign bodies.
>>73638965