>A Harvard Law professor is telling his fellow liberals that the culture wars are over and the victorious Left should treat conservative Christians the way the allies treated Germany and Japan after World War II, offering no quarter or clemency.
>offering no quarter or clemency
>offering no quarter or clemency
>WHY DO THEY PERSECUTE ME?
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/05/10/harvard-prof-urges-liberals-treat-evangelical-christians-like-nazis/
>>73598615
Yes, Christians are nazi and they're the only people who'll accept you /pol/.
>>73598615
I'm doing ctrl+F on "nazi" and "clemency" in the original blogpost that the article discusses, but can't find anything.
>>73599109
Stop using proxy Sweden!
>>73598615
They know they're losing the culture wars now that Trump's steamrolling all their bullshit, but all they can do is become more shrill.
Time's running out for leftism.
>>73598615
can we confirm this guy is jewish? any links?
>>73598615
"Being nice didn't work after the civil war"
How clueless is this fucker? He thinks the north was nice?
Anyone want to baptize him in the elbe?
Wait, how are Christians a problem?
Other than occasionally being obnoxious hypocrites, they're a great people with good core values for the most part? Treat them like the "war criminals" of WWII? What the fuck?
I haven't met a single Christian or Catholic person that was "bad" or a "Nazi". Not a fan of religion, but I'll take a Christian over a fucking Muslim or Jew. Those two are actually dangerous.
>>73598615
this shop is just art
>>73600219
Yeah, look at him.
>>73600432
This. So much common sense in this post.
It takes a Jew or a Muslim in a white society ever to concoct something as blatantly false as the article in the OP. Shame on these people.
>>73600219
His daughter is Catholic, he's also ridiculed Orthodox Jews quite badly
Honestly I'm glad that they feel comfortable making statements like this in public. The fight is very much not over and things like this will force the fence sitters to realize how vile the liberal establishment really is.
>>73598615
love the clickbait title, its Evangelical Christians who are lambasted and I have no problem with that
>>73600641
Wikipedia says he's a socialist with some controversial views, and according to this article he's a nonobservant jew.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/05/us/05beliefs.html
OP's greentext isn't a very accurate summary of his blog post though, it's exaggerating his words quite a lot.
>>73600641
Oh my mistake, he is a fucking Jew. His cunt daughter admitted it.
I literally fucking hate Jews. Ah, the days when Christians would fucking kill them. Then of course, the Nazis tried to finish the job forever but failed.
>>73598615
Jews are going to be gassed again. It's literally inevitable.
>>73598615
The kikes # got posted
6 1 7- 4 9 6- 4 4 5 1
>>73600350
He's a demokkkrat. Did he forget who was behind slavery? Or KKK? Or Jim Crow? Fuck these bastards
>>73598765
Fucking evil kikes gas them all
Aren't most chriatians liberal?
>>73601442
liberal and christian are oxymoronic, like liberal and hindu or liberal and islam. now poo in loo pajeet
>>73601431
arent they just fucking vile. i understand why hitler did what he did now
XXI century holocaust when?
>>73598615
We should target all idiots who believe in Abrahamic myths.
Jews
Christians
Muslims
all need to go.
>>73601442
POO
why kikes can be legally racists and evil?
>>73598615
fucking kike
>>73601557
*tips fedora*
>>73601531
>>73601533
Now
>>73598615
I'm not religious, but I will pretend to be if it means I get to fuck up lefty kikes
>>73601503
No, most white people are christian, being liberal or right winged doesn't change that.
>>73598615
In these cases I support them. Evangelics are scum who need to be eradicated.
>>73601557
nice picture for ants faggot ,
>>73601274
>again
>>73601807
I can read it you blind fuck.
>>73600219
See all of the stupid shit he is saying and no one is raising an eyebrow?
That means he's a jew
>>73601634
A commie kike literally coined the term racist. Who do you think runs the anti white/anti european/anti christian dogma? Look up what happened in Hellstorm in Germany after WW2 to see the real extent of the evil in the pit of the Jews heart
>>73598615
He actually thinks that they've won. Holy shit, dude. The real fight hasn't even begun yet.
>>73598615
>culture wars are over
oh boy they haven't even seen a war yet. Give us two generations to thin out our numbers and radicalize, then you'll see a war.
>>73598615
>>73598615
>evangelical
Fuck em
>>73599109
are you literally retarded and/or swedish
>>73602020
2020 confirmed for culture war
>>73601281
Should I call? What should I say?
>>73601771
liberalism is a religion itself
>>73602155
I'm talking about the blog post that the Breitbart article is referring to. "No quarter or clemency" is how Breitbart words Tushnet's opinion, but that phrase doesn't actually appear in the dude's blog post.
>>73598615
>culture wars are over
>liberals won
>270 million firearms in USA
>republicans and independents own 78% of a firearms
Listen up kike, the wars haven't started, and when they do, we'll treat you like the Germans treated the jews.
>>73598615
P-Professor, are we allowed to do the same with Orthodox Jews or Wahhabi Muslims?
>>73598615
>kike thinks the war is over
topkek
>>73598615
Sometimes I can't help but imagine how fucked this world is when shitposting becomes prophecy.
>>73601233
>the Nazis tried to finish the job forever but failed.
>the Holocaust never happened, Nazis dindu nuffin
NatSocs need to pick one of the above and only one. That said, it's true that a disproportionately high percentage of vicious ideologues on the American left are Jewish.
>>73598615
>A Harvard Law professor is telling his fellow liberals that the culture wars are over
If you have to announce it...
>>73603782
i just want them gone. is that ok?
>>73600219
Wiki says he's Jewish n his father's side.
Also
>He stirred controversy when, in 2016, he was caught visiting the famous homosexual DC area brothel, Banana Slings
top keks
This is racist, because spics are Christians and they are brown people.
>>73598615
Evangelicals deserve it, though.
>>73598615
Treat me like a Nazi, I'll treat you like a jew.
>>73598615
>the Jew will cry out in pain as he stabs you in the back
>>73601713
link?
>>73601274
>>73598615
>Christians being persecuted in America
Press x to doubt.
>>73598615
I don't care.
If anyone wishes to earn my care they can.
Perhaps one day people will understand what's really going on. What the final end game agenda is going to be. But when that day comes it will already be too late. Fellow Christians should prepare for the troubles ahead, don't panic just prepare. Isolate yourselves with trusted family, maybe friends who have become family as well. Band together and fight as one body. A terrible time is upon us fellow brothers and sisters in Christ. We must be on guard. Christ returns bringing the sword not peace, make sure to get your own sword also.
God bless and God speed.
>>73601759
If Hitler's grave lies in Argentina, I wonder what he thought as the 90's diversity shit started to happen.
>>73604732
Honestly, I wish the end game would come faster. By the time there is any real war going I may not even be alive to fight anymore.
Christians really have had their time and it's over. I'm not going to insult them just for being christians and not pushing their views on other people, but if they talk down to people like gays and people who have pre-marital sex they need to shut the fuck up and know their place. Their death cult is crazy at this point in history. Keep it to yourself.
>>73601233
>Einsatzgruppe
>Russian uniforms and weapons
>>73604991
>Christianity
>death cult
nice bait.
>>73600432
Same here my man.
/thread
>>73604616
you actually think that's a quote from Rahm Emmanuel?
i'm pretty sure the original quote came from Goebbels.
>>73605122
It's almost entirely based around the idea of true life after death, it's a death cult. I don't know why you faggots refuse to admit this.
>As author and commentator Ryan Anderson observes, Tushnet depicts the “losers” of the American culture wars—meaning primarily Orthodox Jews, Roman Catholics and Evangelical Christians—as “the functional equivalent of racists and Nazis.”
What a load of lies. Orthodox Jews are fine.
>>73598615
whait. don't evangelicals love the jews and israel?
>>73603713
>And this time, there will be nobody to stop us
This is the part that makes me tingly. Who's left? The fucking Antifas? University professors? College kids? There's no one left to fight back when the Right rises.
>>73602578
"interpretive reading" is an foreign concept to you as well, apparently
>>73605256
A death cult is something that actively promotes violence.
You dumb fuck.
>>73604991
>Christians really have had their time and it's over.
if i had a nickel for every time some deluded atheist has prematurely declared the end of Christianity...
>I'm not going to insult them just for being christians and not pushing their views on other people,
how incredibly nice of you. it's not at all like that is what is expected in civil societies. you're really going the extra mile out of sheer magnanimous altruism
>but if they talk down to people like gays and people who have pre-marital sex they need to shut the fuck up and know their place.
would that be because ALL moral judgements are passe? or simply the ones that YOU declare to be passe? may others offer their opinion too, sir?
>they need to shut the fuck up and know their place
so glad the time of those "intolerant" Christians is over, eh???
> Their death cult is crazy at this point in history.
death cult! yeah! that's *exactly* how i would describe them, and i should know! errr..... i meant you - YOU should know, sir! i am sorry; i will go back to my place and shut the fuck up.
>Keep it to yourself.
yessir. may we have more of your wisdom, while we all rightly keep silent?
fuck off.
>>73598615
Kill him
>>73604896
Be careful for what you wish for friend
>>73605171
It sounds very much like the Goebbels quote, which is why I was wondering if that guy actually said it. Thanks for the name tho.
>>73603782
its almost like pol isnt one person
>>73602882
Sick get and sick post
>>73605800
I wish me simply wishing for it would do it. I can't imagine leaving my children behind in a world like this.
>>73605443
A death cult is a cult based around death. Christianity is a death cult.
>>73602882
Wow man you really are edgy as fuck. Keep saying shit like that and see how well it works out for you.
>>73606338
"Air Israel, please clear the runway"
>>73606482
>A death cult is a cult based around death. Christianity is a death cult.
Athiests don't have children, Christians do. Christians raise families and are the bedrock of a decent society.
>"death cult"
>christians
pick one fuckface
>>73606482
>A death cult is a cult based around death. Christianity is a death cult.
if we WERE "based on death," perhaps you'd be correct.
we are actually based on THE RESURRECTION, so perhaps you might want to call us a "resurrection cult."
but, i guess that wouldn't be needlessly inflammatory enough
>>73598615
The way the German people were treated by the Allied powers was disgusting and no one should use it as an example of how to behave.
>>73606611
>only Christians have children
>this is what christcucks actually believe
Do you have any frame of reference for reality or do you stay shut in your house all day?
>>73606687
Death cult is already an established term that perfectly applies. You're not going to be resurrected when you die, your spirit will go up and meet that magic jew when you die.
>>73604732
>What the final end game agenda is going to be.
stronger white people ruling all the half breeds, this system makes sure the survivors subscribe to a very specific life philosophy
>>73598615
At least he doesn't like Israel either, though he doesn't write about it much at all.
>>73604991
>Christians really have had their time and it's over.
mighty Zoroaster returns triumphant!
>>73606482
>Christianity is a death cult.
it's more similar to a psychedelic sun worship cult
>>73598615
Someone needs to kill this kike
>>73605171
even the dude himself looks like goebbels
>>73607925
That's what it's based off of, but in its current form.
>>73605656
>being this mad
Enjoy your adhering to an ancient Roman myth in 2016. That's totally not crazy or ridiculous.
>>73605656
Oh, and christianity is dying in the US, deal with it.
>>73598615
I agree with his views. Right-Wing Christians are nothing but a hindrance to society, never contributing anything valuable to society since their undead Jewish False Prophet they call a g-d was nailed down like a slave.
These people have accomplished nothing. Those who oppose progress will always be in the wrong side of history. Traditionalists only delay the inevitable progress of human civilization.
While progressives always win in the long run, overturning Dredd Scott, ending slavery, allowing women to vote, promoting workers wrights, ending segregation, giving rights to undocumented aliens, and legalizing homosexual marriage. And they will continue to champion human rights and freedoms while conservatives do nothing but attempt to stop them.
Progressives have always been in the forefront of modernity, towards improving civilization, while you traditionalists only seek to hinder its growth and perpetuate the endless suffering caused by your complacent worldviews.
They always win, while Traditionalists always lose, kicking and screaming each time moral people brings change that benefits humanity, never acknowledging their accomplishments.
I hope gun-loving savage gets shot for trying they fight back, so the government has an excuse to shoot these backwards traditionalists down. Everybody with a shred of empathy and logic will side with the State.
>>73607339
>Death cult is already an established term that perfectly applies.
except it doesn't, just as everyone is pointing out to you. by your logic, life itself is a death cult, because death is common to all. but we humans tend to not make death the focus of our existence. Christianity only exists because of the Resurrection. had Jesus merely died the death of a criminal on a Roman cross, and remained in His grave, Jesus would be a very minor footnote in historical texts. our Faith is based entirely on the Resurrection. in order for a resurrection to occur, a death is obviously prerequisite.
your using the term "death cult" is obviously meant to imply a preoccupation with death. you would be lying if you were to say that Christians are preoccupied with death. and, likewise, you are lying when you say that this term is a fitting description, when it very obviously isn't.
>You're not going to be resurrected when you die, your spirit will go up and meet that magic jew when you die.
and you are apparently as ignorant about our theological claims and beliefs as you are deceptive in your labeling of those you disagree with. yes, be most certainly *do* believe we will be resurrected.
>>73606869
Absolutely this but also: the Allied attempt to control thought through brutality failed utterly and now we all know that the Nazis simply learned to be more careful about what they said in public. Like all cruelty, nothing was accomplished but short-term gratification for sadists in power.
>>73598615
Irreligious person here. Why exactly are they so against Christians in particular?
>>73608510
>had Jesus merely died the death of a criminal on a Roman cross, and remained in His grave, Jesus would be a very minor footnote in historical texts. our Faith is based entirely on the Resurrection. in order for a resurrection to occur, a death is obviously prerequisite.
You know, or the magic parts of the story are made up.
>resurrected
No, your body will stay in the ground unless you believe in rapture or something to do with the end of times. Since the world won't end like that, it's never going to happen and you will never be resurrected. It's made up, like the thousands or millions of other religions that have been made up by people to explain things they couldn't wrap their heads around.
>>73598615
GTKRWN
>>73608304
Right on my nigga
>>73608599
Critical Theory is one hell of a drug.
>>73598615
ok then im going to treat such kikes like... well, kikes
>>73608599
Irreligious
nice spelling/grammar
>>73608736
>You know, or the magic parts of the story are made up.
how is this supposed to be a reply to what i said? maybe you should elaborate.
>No, your body will stay in the ground unless you believe in rapture or something to do with the end of times
so, now you're going to tell a Christian what Christians believe?? we most certainly DO believe that all Believers will have a bodily resurrection. this is not unique to us, either; Judaism taught the same thing. you're ignorant - just own up to it. there's no shame in ignorance. the only shameful thing is pretending you aren't.
>>73598615
>The culture that helped end the war against them in europe, and ended slavery is the culture they call nazis.
Why is it always the most tolerant culture that is treated as the worst by those they tolerate?
Jews hate Christianity, Rome and the Anglo-German civilization because it reminds them of everything negative that has been done to them during history.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tz8pzG02oxU
>>73609618
Screencap'd
>>73609618
THAT, my friend, is an *excellent* question.
>>73609744
>that has been done to them
what continuously amazes me is how all those episodes are treated by Jews as if they were just completely purposeless, unprovoked pogroms that popped out of the vacuum of empty space.
i don't justify ANY atrocities, regardless of whom they are perpetrated against or what the perceived catalyst was, but at least i desire a full understanding of the events leading up to them.
>>73609618
Nonsense statement
>>73598615
>kikes
>>73609618
I'm not surprised you backwards, historically illiterate Americans don't even know your country's history or how slavery ended. It was party the current Democrats are the successors of who ended slavery, not the Republicans. The parties switched.
>>73610468
>The parties switched
That meme again
>>73610601
Read a book
>>73609744
>Everything
Not everything, imagine if Assyrians magically created a new nation with a powerful military, the triggering would be immense.
>>73610468
>the parties switched
retard.
Jews are getting more nervous because they know Jesus is coming back soon. Feels good senpai
>>73610698
>author Schlomo Goldfarbstein
>>73610253
tolerated class
>>73608599
Don't you know how much kikes hate Christians?
>>73610729
i don't think he was speaking literally.
i think he meant that many of the popularly perceived attributes of each party were formerly the traits of the other.
>>73598615
can these american evangelical christians please stop appropriating our culture? thanks
>>73601634
Most of the "racism watchdog" organizations are 100% Jewish, like the ADL and Southern Poverty Law Center. The ADL was literally created by the Jewish mafia
>>73605171
thats not Rahm thats a guy at a Trump rally
>>73598615
I think maybe Hitler was not so unreasonable after all.
>>73610698
>>73610468
ha ha we get it Australians and Canadians shitpost we git it doods
>>73606543
The fuck are you going to do about it?
>>73598615
jews all talk no action on their own , it has been like that since the fight at the pearly gates . im not surprised or shocked . with jews you lose.
http://vocaroo.com/i/s0pk1GgD0dIv
>>73611669
i apologize - i think you're right. that's not Rahm Emmanuel.
but he looks like Anthony Wiener, on second thought.
>>73612065
Bro it's well known. I've never even been to the US and I know about Republicans and Democrats once being virtually opposites to how they are today
>>73602246
H-hello?
>>73604422
Fucking underrated.
Tushnet is an excellent legal scholar, I enjoyed his books in my law classes.
>>73598615
This fucker is EXACTLY what the KGB wanted to come about. Russia is rolling on their asses laughing at anyone applauding him
>>73612328
What's opposite though
Republicans opposed slavery then and we oppose slavery now.
The Democrats still own plantation niggers, they get free housing, free food, free Obama phones, and now they are trying to give them free healthcare, all the slaves have to do, is go vote for Massa (D) every 2-4 year to put him in da big house.
>>73613731
Well if we want to talk semantics, republicans are anti minimum wage. That's not very ideologically conducive with anti slavery. Don't pretend that republicans care about anything other than filling the pockets of billionaires
>>73598615
If he is going to treat us like Nazis then that means that we get to gas the motherfuckers and take their gold teeth, right?
that's what he is literally saying.
Kikes are just terrible.
>>73602578
>Trying to be nice to the losers didn’t work well after the Civil War, nor after Brown. (And taking a hard line seemed to work reasonably well in Germany and Japan after 1945.)
>>73613934
Thomas Sowell proved your plantation owning ass wrong.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6TGkfjaxFWs&channel=UC51_awyLXl2nxCduuzzmw4w
>>73613934
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bb9zJJVdUd8&channel=UC1HdAexvBD9Jbi0TegMjl4Q
Already proved wrong in the 80's, the eighties!!!
>>73614223
stinker fjert rumper er et problem for mange mennesker. korrekt?
>>73613934
Being anti minimum wage is being pro poor people and pro small business, while big business can afford the cost just fine.
I don't believe in any religion, but I'd rather be surrounded by Christians than Muslims or liberals.
>>73598615
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Tushnet
This is his official wiki page???
WHO DID THIS
>>73614974
This.
>>73614974
Same. Christianity became 400x more tolerable when I completely cut the metaphysical element out of the equation and just viewed it as a cultural element.
>>73614801
that's hilarious.
...what does it say?
>>73612240
If your cuck government see this post you'll go to jail for six months and six days. Oy vey anticemites everywhere.
>>73598615
hahaha great artwork
>>73615469
hva er Google oversetter ? du må ha en fjert i hjernen.
>>73603549
The article does mention Orthodox Jews and puts them on the same boat or gas chamber.
>>73615870
of course it does. it's Kikebart. Notice how there's no mention of the professor's JEWISHNESS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qQadT7fC6uM
>>73615469
that google translate is a highly effective tool
HERE IS THE ARTICLE IN QUESTION.
Several generations of law students and their teachers grew up with federal courts dominated by conservatives. Not surprisingly, they found themselves wandering in the wilderness, looking for any sign of hope. The result: Defensive-crouch constitutionalism, with every liberal position asserted nervously, its proponents looking over their shoulders for retaliation by conservatives (in its elevated forms, fear of a backlash against aggressively liberal positions).
It’s time to stop. Right now more than half of the judges sitting on the courts of appeals were appointed by Democratic presidents, and – though I wasn’t able to locate up-to-date numbers – the same appears to be true of the district courts. And, those judges no longer have to be worried about reversal by the Supreme Court if they take aggressively liberal positions. (They might be reversed, but now there’s no guarantee.) And, we shouldn’t focus on the Court’s docket this year, which was shaped by conservative justices thinking that they could count to five on a bunch of cases. The docket will look quite different if they can’t see that path to five votes when they decide which cases to review.
What would abandoning defensive-crouch liberalism mean? (I’ve blogged about some of these points before.)
>>73616368
1 A jurisprudence of “wrong the day it was decided.” Liberals should be compiling lists of cases to be overruled at the first opportunity on the ground that they were wrong the day they were decided. My own list is Bakke (for rejecting all the rationales for affirmative action that really matter), Buckley v. Valeo (for ruling out the possibility that legislatures could develop reasonable campaign finance rules promoting small-r republicanism), Casey (for the “undue burden” test), and Shelby County. (I thought about including Washington v. Davis, but my third agenda item should be enough to deal with it.) Others will have their own candidates. What matters is that overruling key cases also means that a rather large body of doctrine will have to be built from the ground up. Thinking about what that doctrine should look like is important – more important than trying to maneuver to liberal goals through the narrow paths the bad precedents seem to leave open.
>>73616403
2 The culture wars are over; they lost, we won. Remember, they were the ones who characterized constitutional disputes as culture wars (see Justice Scalia in Romer v. Evans, and the Wikipedia entry for culture wars, which describes conservative activists, not liberals, using the term.) And they had opportunities to reach a cease fire, but rejected them in favor of a scorched earth policy. The earth that was scorched, though, was their own. (No conservatives demonstrated any interest in trading off recognition of LGBT rights for “religious liberty” protections. Only now that they’ve lost the battle over LGBT rights, have they made those protections central – seeing them, I suppose, as a new front in the culture wars. But, again, they’ve already lost the war.). For liberals, the question now is how to deal with the losers in the culture wars. That’s mostly a question of tactics. My own judgment is that taking a hard line (“You lost, live with it”) is better than trying to accommodate the losers, who – remember – defended, and are defending, positions that liberals regard as having no normative pull at all. Trying to be nice to the losers didn’t work well after the Civil War, nor after Brown. (And taking a hard line seemed to work reasonably well in Germany and Japan after 1945.) I should note that LGBT activists in particular seem to have settled on the hard-line approach, while some liberal academics defend more accommodating approaches. When specific battles in the culture wars were being fought, it might have made sense to try to be accommodating after a local victory, because other related fights were going on, and a hard line might have stiffened the opposition in those fights. But the war’s over, and we won.
>>73616435
3 Aggressively exploit the ambiguities and loopholes in unfavorable precedents that aren’t worth overruling. Take Wal-Mart: Confine it to its unusual facts (a huge nation-wide class, a questionable theory of liability), and don’t treat it as having any generative power in other cases. Or Washington v. Davis, which said that disparate racial impact wasn’t enough to trigger strict scrutiny, but that sometimes such an impact could support an inference of impermissible motive: Play the “sometimes” for all its worth. Defensive-crouch liberalism was afraid to be aggressive about the precedents because of a fear of reversal by higher courts. That fear can now be put aside. (Judge Reinhardt’s essay on habeas corpus, in the Michigan Law Review, is an exemplary discussion of how liberals can exploit ambiguities and loopholes.)
4 Related: Remember that doctrine is a way to empower our allies and weaken theirs. Conservative decisions on class-action arbitration should be understood as part of a long-term project of defunding the left. Much of the current Court’s voting rights jurisprudence strengthens Republican efforts selectively to shrink the electorate. Similarly with campaign finance jurisprudence. I don’t mean that these doctrines are consciously designed by the justices to have those effects, but outsiders – academics and activists – should understand that that’s what they do. (Nor do I mean that the efforts always succeed – see Evenwel for a failure.)
>>73616467
5 Our models are Justices William Brennan and Thurgood Marshall, not David Souter or John Marshall Harlan. With some ambivalence I’d add Justice ((((((Ruth Bader Ginsburg)))))) to the list, the reluctance arising from the fact that her work as a judge has been shaped more than it should be by defensive crouch constitutionalism, particular in her sensitivity to the possibility of backlash. Still, when the votes are there, she’s been much like Brennan and Marshall (personality aside). Famously, Brennan said that he’d been around long enough to know what it was like to win, and what it was like to lose, implying that “this too shall pass,” though it’s taken a long time. (Or, channeling ((((((Sophie Tucker)))))) [or ((((((Mae West)))))), or Beatrice ((((((Kaufman))))))], he ‘d been a winner and a loser, and winning is better.)
6 Finally (trigger/crudeness alert), fuck Anthony Kennedy. I don’t mean that liberals should treat him with disrespect. But defensive-crouch liberalism meant not only trying to figure out arguments that would get Kennedy’s apparently crucial vote (not so crucial any more), but also trying to milk his opinions – and more generally, obviously conservative opinions – for doctrines that might be awkwardly pressed into the service of liberal goals. (Think here of how liberal constitutional scholars treated Kennedy’s [truly silly] concurring opinion in Parents Involved [“You can deal with the consequences of segregated housing patterns by locating new school construction carefully” – in districts that are closing rather than building schools], or his “views” about affirmative action, or recasting the Court’s federalism cases as actually good for liberals.) There’s a lot of liberal constitutional scholarship taking Anthony Kennedy’s “thought” and other conservative opinions as a guide to potentially liberal outcomes if only the cases are massaged properly. Stop it. (See agenda items 1 and 3 for how to treat those opinions.)
Of course all bets are off if Donald Trump becomes President. But if he does, constitutional doctrine is going to be the least of our worries.
THIS IS WHY WE NEED TRUMP
>>73598615
>Muslims blow up hundreds of people
>not all Muslims!
>Evangelical Christians peacefully push for traditional family values
>fucking Nazis!
>>73608304
Wrong, degeneracy is not progress and it truly is a fucking shame that the degenerates have hijacked the word "progress" this is Orwelian newspeak at it's best.
The end of every great civilization in history has been presaged by the arrival and acceptance of degeneracy combined with the abandonment of the very traditional values that made it great in the first place.
In fact, it's very easy to to confirm this all one has to do is ask this simple question, if the majority were to accept this (insert degeneracy or family values) would it be good for society, in other words if the majority of any given population were homosexual would that population/culture grow and survive against a competing population whose majority is composed of traditional child rearing families?
Sometimes a simple question's equally simple answer can solve big problems.
Today's so-called progressives if left unchecked will lead to the greatest disasters in the history of the human race.
>>73616368
>>73616403
>>73616435
>>73616467
>>73616495
>>73616525
I can't handle this jewery.
>>73616569
Double standards and other maniacl things.
>>73616943
>Of course all bets are off if Donald Trump becomes President. But if he does, constitutional doctrine is going to be the least of our worries.
I love the last line tho.
They are shaking in their boots about Trump getting in.
>>73616569
>Jew attacks Christians
>I MUST ATTACK MUSLIMS
Why are you people so dumb?
>>73617223
Where did he say that?
You need to lay off the aerosols bud.
>>73598615
Serves them right for pushing Zionism, Civil Rights and shitting on everyone else for so long
>>73614966
>>73614792
The minimum wage does not hurt poor people. Everyone outside of US conservative circles understands this. It's not controversial, welcome to the 21st century.
>>73617112
Trump is more important to Canadians than most people think, if he gets elected it will help pave the way for the right Canadian to rise to the challenge of removing Trudeau.
Trudeau has literally no competition from the opposition here, the person most able to stop the liberal bullshit in Canada is not yet known.
>>73612328
That's an extremely over simplistic narrative, the Democrats still had a lot of the pro socialist elements that they do now back when they were the pro segregation party.
>>73617714
I'm in 100% agreeance with you.
>>73610468
Exactly.
>>73610468
>>73610729
The parties switched means the ideology you fucking tards
>>73608304
>g-d
Hello mister Horowitz.
The only reason they're still bashing the dead horse known as "conservative white Christians" is because they still feel threatened like the pathetic beings they are.
That's it. They're scared. They want to get rid of every single white conservative christian whatever so they can sleep better. They're still afraid to be transformed in lampshades.
>>73615206
>(no source provided for controversial claim regarding "homosexual brothel" -- possible trolling)
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
the absolute madman
>>73617500
Let's make minimum wage $100/hr then. Surely that will have no negative ramifications for poor people. Some CEOs make more than that, so it's only fair.
