>Russia’s will deploy its new RS-28 Sarmat intercontinental ballistic missiles to units in Siberia and the southern Urals when the enormous new weapon becomes operational in 2018.
>The Sarmat will weigh at least 100-tons and carry a 10-ton payload. That means the missile could carry as many as 15 independently targeted thermo-nuclear warheads. It has a range of at least 6,000 miles. Once it is operational, it will be the largest ICBM ever built.
http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/russia-building-the-largest-icbm-ever-america-should-be-16122
>Implying size of missile matters in a full nuclear exchange
cluster tsar bomba when???
>>73589174
Let's all join together and welcome Russia to the 1990's.
>>73589174
>loading all your nukes into a giant rocket
I can think of several ways that this would end badly
Meanwhile, in the US... "Do our nukes still even work?" "Is it a big deal if Russia learns that we don't know if our nukes even work?" "Meh. Whatever."
>>73589502
We have land based and sea based equivalents that have a longer range and fly faster.
>>73589542
Mfw DARPA didn't fall for the windows 10 meme and are still running on the winxp bullet train.
>>73589661
>microsoft controls american nukes
we big corp now
>>73589661
>>73589767
Probably controls France nukes too...
>>73589174
Wouldn't that be easy as fuck to just shoot down?
>>73589174
I`m sure it`s only a test site yet.
This thread will define the first 10 test-targets.
Pretty sure that at this point everyone is so afraid of nukes that if based Putin went full madman and nuked someone, no one would retaliate. And i'm not even talking about irrelevant countries.
>>73589893
Pretty sure all the computers linked to our nuclear stuff are purged of anything remotely resembling windows.
>>73591192
Jokes on them if they used the French Linux meme mint
>>73590685
has been described as trying to hit a flying bullet with another bullet
>>73589174
This is why an army doesn't matter. One of these missiles would level a fucking country.
Today's armies are for proxy wars, nothing else.
>>73592735
>nuke
>level an entire country
no
>>73589598
USA! USA! USA!
>>73592735
HHHNNNNNNNGG
>>73592804
You know what I'm hinting at you moron.
>>73592735
Maybe a little European shit hole, but it would take a lot more than one nuclear device to destroy an entire nation...
Come on Sven
>>73593009
One nuclear device in the right place would "destroy" the modern world by crashing the markets.. so that's irrelevant.
I'm talking about the outcome of one of these missiles. 10 heavy nuclear warheads in ONE missile with the power of 2-3MT PER warhead, means the country it would hit would basically collapse instantly.
>>73592958
that you have absorbed enough refugee cum from your wife that you ceased to understand how nuclear weapons work?
>>73589337
>implying it dies not.size = fuel=stronger engine=range.
>>73593844
Take your autism medicine already Pablo, it's not good for you to be this this trigger happy.
>>73589174
The Russians built your mom a dildo, OP.
>10 ton throw-weight for a 100 ton missile, compared to the same but with a 200 ton missile in the Satan
P-pottery!
>in contrast Trident II D-5 has like 2.8 tons for a 59 ton missile.
>>73589337
Throw weight. It can carry more warheads and penetration aids.
>>73592958
He does know what you're talking about as evident by him calling you on your bullshit.
Nukes cannot replace ground armies.
>>73589598
Cute
>>73589598
t. Michael Dudikoff
>>73589542
Trump promissed to modernize American nuclear rocket arsenal but if he will start in 2017 it will take more than 10 years to renew just a portion of the arsenal. And it will cost tens of trillions of dollars while increasing that debt.
>>73594718
Anti missile defense missile?
>>73589174
I don't get Russia. Quality of life is shit but they keep investing in these projects.
I do believe Russia is invincible though. There are way to many of them, they have way too many nukes, rockets and tanks and it's just simply to big to ever conquer.
>>73595010
Why would they need to replace then when they can annihilate them before they become useful?
>>73592912
dem nuke bearing hips.
>>73589174
Doesn't this go against the Non Nuclear Proliferation Treaty?
>15 warhead MIRV
Yeah good luck with that, it will break apart like most Russian junk.
>>73595189
Military isn't even the biggest source of spending in US. Just cutting welfare and pensions would allow to increase army budget by 80% and at the same time repay all debt in less than 25 years. Old people cannot revolt and niggers can be easily rounded up.
>>73589893
Most French critical military equiment runs on linux Solaris, for obvious self-reliance reasons (same reason they developed their own nuclear technology when Americans offered to give them American nukes)
>>73595286
They need to work on satellite frying technology to combat enemy nukes, considering most utilize GPS. Knock out its guidance system and the nuke can't reach its destination, unless it uses our system, inertial guidance. But Americans and Russians aren't smart enough for that.
But from what I gather a ballistic missile is fired toward the nuke and locks onto it when a nuclear missile is fired and its goal is to shoot it out of the sky before it reaches orbit and the MIRV breaks apart and each warhead travels to its designated poop plot.
>>73595540
>niggers can be easily rounded up.
Are you sure you talking about USA in 21 century? After chimpouts niggers get even more attention and pity.
Also, you never noticed those fucking Bernfags? They take everything for granted and want even more free shit imagine their butthurt and resentment if you cut welfare and pensions.
>>73595318
What is quality of life for you? "Economy growth" can mean more tool-making machines, food, cars and weapons, it can also just mean luxury brand/housing bubble getting bigger. The latter is not something to brag about, especially when it's attracting welfare nigs.
>>73595318
"Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not,"
-Thomas Jefferson
>>73595481
t. Bong who has no independent nuke policy whatsoever. Remote det. Tridents anyone?
>>73595010
>>73595364
We should invest in nano technology, swarms of nano bugs that can rip apart things. Like in that movie with Keanu Reeves? Forgot the name of it, but all these things eat away at metal and shit.
Can we invent those? Get on that shit.
>>73595902
a sensible beluarussian
I salute you sir
>>73595189
None of this defense spending cold war nonsense would be necessary if Americans focused on fixing their country which is in terrible shape and stop building military bases around Russia and China
>>73595799
>Knock out its guidance system and the nuke can't reach its destination
rockets for decades use star maps to navigate the path to the target, and today they have precise topographic maps of the terrain and they recognise features to navigate.
>>73595902
How was the Battle of Nations dude u__u
>>73595918
Trident is fully independent though, this myth of it being reliant on US satellites is just that, a myth.
France's nuclear deterrent is actually reliant on USA, we used to be dependent on the USA when we used Polaris.
Trident nukes are altered in the UK.
So don't try it Mr Chinky Chong.
>>73596016
I was watching together with you, remember? It was hosted in Chechia, not here.
>>73595997
>rockets for decades use star maps to navigate the path to the target
Yes, it's called Inertial Guidance. Your missiles don't use that anymore since the revolution of GPS you fucktard.
I already mentioned that, the UK is the only nuclear armed nation that utilizes this means of delivery and isn't reliant on GPS.
DUHHHH BRAIN.
>>73589598
But their submarine fleet is of a similar size and capability to America, and the US hasnt developed any new ICBM technology or given much funding to their strategic missile forces since the end of the cold war.
>>73589542
Our current nukes are fine but they're reaching the end of their lifespan and will need to be replaced soon. The problem is with the total testing ban we can't test new weapons so we'll either have to reuse badly outdated designs or build nukes that can't be tested in any capacity before being deployed. We could also just test them in secret and deny it when seismologists say we were testing nukes but that's pretty Nork tier shit to pull.
>>73589502
Trust me when I say that, the people who developed these things, understand a thing or more about it than you.
>>73596018
>France's nuclear deterrent is actually reliant on USA
French warhead on French vectors carried by French submarines and mirages.
>>73594073
Damage control sven, damage control.
>>73596094
How do you know anything about the guidance systems of Russian or Chinese rockets and rockets that were developed before countries had sufficient sattelite groupings to provide for satellite navigation?
>>73595799
>most utilize GPS. Knock out its guidance system and the nuke can't reach its destination, unless it uses our system, inertial guidance. But Americans and Russians aren't smart enough for that.
Good laugh m8 nicely joked
>>73589174
and they need this why?
>>73596387
So you will die very very surely if needed
>>73596387
To blow things up, I guess.
>>73592735
You talk of proxy wars lightly, as if they're something unimportant. But since everything apart from nuclear annihilation falls into this category, you still need army for occupations, annexations, forcibly changing governments. You know, all the fun.
>>73589502
>all
Dumb burgerposter
>>73596387
Vladimir was tired of fake ITS HAPPENING threads on /pol/, and decided to take matter into his own hands.
>>73589496
The US has none of that, you moron. Get with the times.
>>73596094
I'm pretty sure russian nukes use inertial guidance as well. Since GLONASS came fully operational only a few years ago, and relying on GPS would be strange. Moreover, navigational satellites' signals can easily be suppressed or even falsified.
>>73589174
>Lets build something that we can never use and if we do, It would ensure we would be wiped out also.
Putin again showing what a economic genius he is while is country bankrupts itself.
I like Putin, but he legit is retarded.
>>73596654
Ultrasound rocketry guidance can be based only on hadrons- and quasi- particles detection arrays.
>>73596896
You talking about American off-shore millitary bases? You even have 1 or 2 in Antarctica? What are you afraid there? Pinguins? Tax payers money spent on some bullshit and you try to educate us
>>73596896
>economy after nuclear war
Top kek
>>73589542
>mfw when the activation switch for all american nuclearwarheads was at one point 00000000
>>73596018
>Trident is fully independent
>Without the cooperation of the US, says the report of the independent all-party Trident Commission, the life expectancy of the UK's nuclear capability could be measured in months.
>The commission's high level panel says it agrees that Britain's deterrent is "a hostage to American goodwill".
>"If the United States were to withdraw their cooperation completely, the UK nuclear capability would probably have a life expectancy measured in months rather than years".
eyy.
>"The UK is dependent on the United States for many component parts of the guidance and re-entry vehicle, and for the Trident ballistic missile system itself".
>this myth of it being reliant on US satellites is just that, a myth
deny it all you want/ call it a myth still won't change the fact that UK has no independent nuke policy.
>France's nuclear deterrent is actually reliant on USA, we used to be dependent on the USA when we used Polaris.
Unlike you the Frogs actually have their own missile(M51) and the support structure for it.
>Trident nukes are altered in the UK.
>Not only are Britain's Trident missiles in a common pool shared with the US and maintained in Kings Bay, Georgia, its nuclear warheads are designed and maintained at the Atomic Weapons Establishment at Aldermaston with the help of US know-how, as recently declassified documents on the UK-US Mutual Defence Agreement confirmed.
Given that nuke warheads are complex stuff you can't just hand a couple of dudes a manual to teach em how to tinker with it you'll have a couple US technicians/ specialists working on these warheads alongside their UK counterparts.And since nuke warheads are like precision engineering on steroids its not that hard to futz it up- maybe wire that one bit of the detonator wrong so it doesn't explode at the right moment etc. etc. Then there is the missile itself...
the rest here:http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/defence-and-security-blog/2014/jul/01/trident-nuclear-weapons-uk
>>73589174
>2011+5
>liquid fueled
>>73589174
what town are u in n whats the reason fir the visit?
>>73596896
If Russia will go bankrupt, these missiles will be controlled by locals, that want anglo to pay the debts. For "new deal" aka "stalin industrialization", where 60 million people died, for cooperation with jewish oligarchs after 1991, for founding and funding 3rd international, for founding and funding ISIS, for fabianism, etc.
Putin has just secured his place as the colony ruler as the less demanding force. Or so you should think.
>>73595799
You realize that in the days before satelites Russians had the best maps in the world, right? They had mapped our countries with better accuracy than we had at that time.
>>73597460
Poland spreads aids and lies about the real reason.
>>73597658
You should nuke uk to change the landscape, then we wont be able to attack anyone.
Minuteman iii is still better.
>>73597532
Don't forget the revolution and the WWII. These were anglos too, and I am not joking.
>>73595072
>Michael Dudikoff
kek
>>73589174
Holy shit
>>73597831
>Bush
Out to go Neo-con
>>73593833
You're correct Sven. You're still a cuck. But you're not an incorrect cuck.
>>73592677
>has been described as trying to hit a flying bullet with another bullet
Which isn't all that hard if the bullets are self guided and machine controlled... Future of warfare is autonomous action.
>>73595850
>Are you sure you talking about USA in 21 century? After chimpouts niggers get even more attention and pity.
You place the National Guard in a city with niggers and they behave. Niggers don't tend to be organized well and refuse to cooperate with each other. Most who rioted in the cities just saw it as an opportunity to cause mayhem and steal stuff. They're self serving and will betray each other at the slightest chance of fulfilling their own needs.
>Also, you never noticed those fucking Bernfags?
Most Bernouts are made out of SJW's and progressives. They require safe spaces for their feelings, do you honestly they'll be able to handle firing a gun or having someone fire back at them? I don't the frail little feminine pussy boy has the balls to do it.
>>73599387
I just want to know when it will be time for the leftist to be atrocitied
>>73592912
those down pointing nipples, though
>>73595850
usa, more than 2 centuries of right wing conservative govt., and you blame for the chaos an oldfag that never was or ever be the president and a bunch of sissies that follow him on instagram.
>>73595799
>our system, inertial guidance
You know that technology was invented in the United States and then given to it's allies, including you, right?
>>73597532
>60 million people died
Nice meme.
>>73598747
>Which isn't all that hard if the bullets are self guided and machine controlled
When the 'bullets' are traveling miles per second it is, you basically need a nuclear explosion to have a chance at destroying it
>>73601585
>credibility of ussr statistics
>>73601613
also you don't even know which targets you're supposed to hit. The insane throw weight means that a single rocket puts some nukes, dozens of decoys/penetration aids and jamming equipment on a path towards your important infrastructure. You have a ridiculously small reaction time. And that these things have insane range doesn't make it easier either since it means that they can come from pretty much any direction. I don't know when the soviets started with that, but at some point they started to increase the range of their ICBMs so that they could theoretically hit the US over the south pole, making the missile defense systems on the west coast and in alaska basically useless.
>>73601868
>statistics are only credible when they support my argument
>>73601585
>implying that Stalin regime was killing only in USSR
Nice one Ivan
I would love to see the impact zone of an MIRV test, must look fucking awesome. Also just imagine the 250kT explosions at the end of these rays. If it ever comes to a full blown nuclear exchange we are all fucked.
>>73602034
>implying we cuckupied Poland before the end of industrialization
>>73601585
>the following population figures do not include Finland, Poland, or the Baltic states
Are you even trying ?
>>73601940
Care to explain why was Kiev Institute of demograthics closed in 1938, results of population census was disregarded and those who collected data was killed?
>>73589174
first torpedoes now this
most impressive russbros
>>73597855
Third international is the root of both.
>>73602403
>Finland
Was independent since the fall of the Empire.
>Poland
Wasn't cuckupied until WW2. Industrialization and big purges occurred in 30s.
>Baltics
Got absorbed in 1940, just like Polan. Tiny population, won't change the picture much either way.
>>73601585
Haha, there are Russians that unironically believe this.
Amazing.
>>73602818
blease, resbond>>73602706
>>73602706
Clearly because of 60 millions dead Ukrainians, of course. Which was half of population of the whole USSR.
>>73602853
Triggering balts, priceless.
>>73589174
>russia builds irrelevant weapon they cant even deploy to try to prove something to the real world powers
>economy dies
>>73590685
It has a terminal speed of over Mach 20 (24,500 km/h; 15,220 mph; 6.806 km/s).
Once the warheads leave the ICBM, there is no way to stop it, not even a high powered laser could.
>>73602915
I dont know who created image with 60 gazilions, but number are really high and image implies that were is almost no losses after hardcore commies rule.
Again, tell me what happened to those who collect data for census and why.
>>73602818
>Wasn't cuckupied until WW2. Industrialization and big purges occurred in 30s.
>not knowing that Stalin held power over most of the Eastern Europe countries
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish_People%27s_Republic
>"The 1947 election marked the beginning of undisguised Communist rule in Poland, though it was not officially transformed into the Polish People's Republic until the adoption of the 1952 Constitution. However, Gomułka never supported Stalin's control over the Polish Communists, and was soon replaced as party leader by the more pliable Bierut"
>>73589174
>every time I remember that MIRVs exist
One missile, all big population centers of a nation gone.
Abject terror, but also an erection.
>>73602915
You are not triggering anyone.
You are the meme.
This is more of a point and laugh situation than anything else.
>>73603364
this
>>73589174
>ohwowit'sfuckingnothing.jpg
>>73589174
Nice. I hope I see them fly in my life time.
Germany... looking at you you fagots.
>>73589337
RANGE you fuckwit.
New caribbean crisis? Maybe we finally start a nuclear war? I wan't2die.
Who killed Boris Nemstov?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assassination_of_Boris_Nemtsov
>>73603440
At the gay bar-sweden ofc.
>>73594718
Its nice the publish maps of where to find the anti-missile sites.
Easy to take them out just before launch.
>>73602955
>thinking that russia would let their economy die instead of fueling it with a war machine
>>73603451
Some churka. Maybe Kadyrov order.
>>73589174
And this is why Clinton's tough talk bullshit on Russia makes me prefer Trump.
>>73603171
Losses were high because of forced quick industrialization, famine that it caused and political purges. Several million people of many nationalities died and there's no denying that. But nowhere near 60 gazillion or even higher figure.
>>73603183
Damn, I could have sworn your people told me that you fought off communist hordes and saved Europe in 20s. Were they lying? I guess it was Stalin who ordered you to hold joint maneuvers with nazis.
France, the UK and America already can wreck Russian population centers the same way they can do it to us. Why are people focusing on updating missiles for nukes?
>>73596387
>need
SHALL
>>73603711
Nuke us pls.
>>73593833
At that point just make sure the country your nuking doesnt have slbms and your golden.
>>73603364
You're not even a real country.
>>73603711
>Why are people focusing on updating missiles for nukes?
ABM systems evolve, so you need fancy new rockets with updated payload to counter them
>>73592912
HIGH TEST
>>73603792
What attributes of a real country do we lack friend?
>>73594039
>>73603427
>Enemy is certain distance away
>Thinking range beyond that distance matters
Russia could hit everywhere in the US before they had this missile. Its fucking pointless you morons.
>>73603654
definitely it was higher than 60 gazillion
pic related is one of the ay lmao russians that died
>>73592912
>tfw sombody would hit that missile
>tfw you see a giant erection over a naked woman
>>73596620
dammit, germany's intense anal hurt in these past few weeks has really caused him to become a little bitch about the US
>>73604021
No culture, no science, no viable military force, no self-sustainable agriculture or energy sector, rapidly declining population, subservient position to US and EU at the same time, most of history is history of being someone's bitch, etc.
Hell, my backwards city is more of a country than your meme village.
>>73589174
If that's really an ICBM why does it have windows?? Russians secretly creating Mars bases confirmed
Checkmate, atheists
>>73604269
the earth is a big ball, you know? A higher range enables you to hit your enemy from different directions, mainly over the south pole. Since the US doesn't really have missile defense systems on the mexican border but on the west coast and in alaska taking this route makes them either completly useless or significantly reduces their reaction time.
Also russia is ridiculously big. Of course they could hit the US with missiles from places like kamtchatka since probably about half a century, but developing standard missiles with higher range enables them to use the same kind of missile in silos in the west of the country while still having the option to use more than one flight path.
>>73596110
Nah we'll just keep testing them in space like we have been since the ban senpai
>>73596620
that's because we have missiles that carry multiple payloads on Fucking submarines hidden in the oceans.
ballistic missiles carrying multiple nuclear payloads is nothing new
>>73603654
At least you are not denying heavy losses caused by commies. Again, image you posted does not shows census of 39 year because it was not accepted by stalin and co, scientists who worked on it was killed. If i add his quote
>He вaжнo, кaк пpoгoлocyют, вaжнo кaк пocчитaют
then i guess credibility of afterwar census questionable.
And again if not commies, were probably wont be war at all, no millions of dead and so on, for half of century Russia was governed by jews.
>>73602990
>>It has a terminal speed of over Mach 20 (24,500 km/h; 15,220 mph; 6.806 km/s).
24,500 km/h; 15,220 mph; 6.806 km/s).
>>73604787
we dead
It's a little too big.
>>73603451
Some Ukrainian Security Service's member by Putin's order. Duritskaya was used like a bite.
They wanted to give some money for Nemtsov's protest's campaign. But Putin decided otherwise.
And, as it always was, they blamed churkas.
Let aside that they hired a couple of internet bot's from Olgino(some propaganda agency).
It is how russian politic works.
>>73603610
Don't forget make a screenshot, buddy.
>>73605109
This picture looks like it was taken in 1960
>>73597831
LGM-30 Minuteman... this animation only has 1 MIRV (the conical re-entry vehicle)
https://youtu.be/S-V6MZlyCqE
>>73604482
>No culture
False. All around silly statement, distinctive people with their own language and history.
>no science
False. Pretty sure if you compare with Russia we do more research per capita. At least when oil is this cheap.
>no viable military force
Agreed, but according to this criteria there are around 20 countries in the world. Things like NATO were made for scrubs like us. It's all good.
>no self-sustainable agriculture or energy sector
False x2. Agriculture is our biggest export sector, we have a large surplus. We have enough powerplants for our energy needs.
Where do you get this stuff man?
> rapidly declining population
No more rapidly than any white population (except Israel) on the planet. Don't try to argue that the fact we don't breed millions of shitskins like they do in western Europe is somehow a negative.
>subservient position to US and EU at the same time
Don't see how. Not like we can do or have anything they need.
>most of history is history of being someone's bitch
Pretty funny to hear something like that form a Russian. Pic related. The Polish-Lithuanian commonwealth was dissolved in 1795. Given that we've been here for thousands of years I don't think that some 100+ years under Russian occupation constitutes "most of our history".
Well that was fun. Let me know if you would like to learn more!
>>73591037
Hey, but thanks for mentioning!
>>73602915
https://youtu.be/waOrFAokoY0
not 60 million, nobody believes that number, significant though.
ALL RUSSIAN FUN TOYS IN ONE POST
Status-6
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_torpedo#Status-6
>In 2015, rumors emerged that Russia may be developing a new nuclear torpedo, the Status-6 Ocean Multipurpose System,[17][18][19] codenamed “Kanyon” by Pentagon officials.[20][21] This weapon is designed to radioactively contaminate a wide area on an enemy coasts with cobalt-60, and to be immune to anti-missile defense systems that might disable an ICBM.[18][19][21][22][23] Two potential carrier submarines, the Project 09852 Belgorod, and the Project 09851 Khabarovsk, are new boats laid down in 2012 and 2014 respectively.[20][21][24][25] Status 6 appears to be a deterrent weapon of last resort.[23][24][25] It appears to be a torpedo-shaped robotic mini-submarine, that can travel at speeds of 100 knots.[23][24] This underwater drone is cloaked by stealth technology to elude acoustic tracking devices
Dead Hand System or "Perimetr"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dead_Hand_%28nuclear_war%29
>An example of fail-deadly deterrence, it can automatically trigger the launch of the Russian intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) if a nuclear strike is detected by seismic, light, radioactivity and overpressure sensors. By most accounts, it is normally switched off and is supposed to be activated during dangerous crises only; however, it is said to remain fully functional and able to serve its purpose whenever needed.
>Mount Yamantaw is near one of Russia's last remaining nuclear labs, Chelyabinsk-70, raising speculation that it already houses nuclear weapons. Russian newspapers reported in 1996 that it is a part of the "Dead Hand" nuclear retaliatory command structure.
And plus all of those mobile platforms, trains n shit.
>>73604559
from when Germany is mighty Russian Defender?
>>73605109
For you!
>>73605960
has nothing to do with "defending russians", it works in both ways.
>>73606125
sure, like Nordstream was to improve our security
you know, the European solidaritaet
>>73589174
FINALLY
They built the replacement for the SS-18 Satan.
>>73606574
what the heck has that to do with why ICBMs can make use of higher range?
>>73606574
If we were the eternal Molotov-Ribbentrop pact, why did we (have to) sanction Russia while the USA, in fact, increased their trade with Russia?
We are a client state of the USA - like you.
>>73606641
Heh, I was wondering when someone would finally post this. People losing their shit over the size and throw-weight when the Russians have had the Satans for years.
Just a generational update, no big deal.
>>73602188
the re-entry vehicles would explode at optimal air burst height of half a click ... like a bowling pin arrangement to maximize the 5psi kill zone... with the 10psi over hardened targets like hospitals.
Eyjafjallajökull, you may remember, erupted and put about 0.5 teragrams of particulate in the air blocking the sun and halting air traffic... a nuclear exchange of a few hundred nukes could put as much as 50 Tg ... no more eurasian/american midwest grain for a decade. growing season of iowa shortened to july-august --- billions starve.
>>73606886
Well, only that the satans were the worst thermonuclear WMDs of all time. No big deal indeed.
>russia can't into minimisation
Their fighter jets are fucking huge as well.
>>73607009
Yeah they were so bad that the US was going apeshit how they have the gommies first-strike capability vs hardened places like NORAD when they came out.
The Russians have done plenty of retiring for their strategic platforms. The fact that they kept this one and kept it up do date seems to imply that you are wrong.
>>73604559
>A higher range enables you to hit your enemy from different directions, mainly over the south pole.
So they're putting them in Siberia and the Urals?
>>73603654
>joint maneuvers with nazis
>being this delusional
Daily reminder that first you wanted to help Germans to conquer the Europe then after being ass-raped by them you suddenly realized that you want the opposite. And at the end you took back everything that they helped you get and even more. USSR was the worst kind of shit
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molotov%E2%80%93Ribbentrop_Pact
>>73603557
Each of those icons is overlayed over a couple hundred thousand square kilometers. If Iran can find them and take them out simultaneously, then they deserve to nuke Europe (even though I doubt Iran would ever want to nuke Europe)
>>73606816
I hope you are under the US control, like we, also under your. But things got a bit hazy recently.
>>73607184
This is not an issue of minimisation, the warheads are not larger than their western counterparts.
This is an issue of MOAR. Which is not an issue at all. And hey, when there is world peace and everyone are friends we can rework them into satellite carriers. Can't do that with the puny Minutemen.
F-15's and F-18's are pretty big. Mig-29 is pretty small. Russia is a large place, so they needed fast long range interceptors to cover all of that ground which gave birth to sexy breasts like the Mig-31
tl;dr: this is the result of doctrinal differences rather than technological inferiority.
>>73591037
Except that a total retaliation is the only option if Russia attacks a nuclear country.
Same reason NATO has to go to war if one of its members is attacked.
If Russia nukes non-nuclear weapon country it only means a permament economic and political blockade against russia by the rest of the world
>>73607492
>Polan iz gud boy, dindu nuffin
http://orientalreview.org/2015/02/05/what-is-lost-in-poles-memories/
>putin is a size queen
what a fag
>>73605696
>1 MIRV
>1
Are you aware that M stands for in that acronym?
The I doesn't work with 1 either.
>>73607472
No.
One version of the SS-18 Satan ICBM (that this RS-28 Sarmat replaces) was specifically banned in a nuclear treaty since it was capable of shunting a nuke carrier into orbit.
This allowed the Soviets to launch a nuke the other way (towards India / Australia / Antarctica) and have it orbit around all the NATO early detection radars and strike from a South America direction.
The USA would spot a rocket launch on satellite, but then no other detection system would go off, meaning "lol, false alarm".. then BOOM a city / military complex gets blown to hell.
And the worst part is, that they could have built many, and staggered the launches / hidden the launches with coupled missile tests from the neighboring silo and the USSR would then have a few of these nuke trolleys orbiting up there waiting for the computer to say "drop".
They banned that model of the SS-18 in return for the USA doing their own nuke reductions.
They kept the standard SS-18 in service though, which carried either one BIG FUCKING NUKE or a MIRV of many small nukes.. but no orbiters, still technically banned.
>>73608690
you can still have a suborbital trajectory over the south pole
>>73609285
Not with current ICBMs (except these two) you don't, they don't have the throw weight.
For example the next most powerful ICBM, the RS-24 Yars, is incapable of doing such an attack, as it would end it's trajectory on the south pole.
>>73604650
There's a space test ban treaty m8.
>>73610372
I was talking about Satan and Sarmat though
Also how does the throw weight play into it? Can't you just exchange throw weight for range?
>>73608429
>broken english
that is why i pointed out that the animation i posted only had one reentry vehicle... i assumed anyone reading would see my annotation before watching the video with 1 warhead.
it is still MIRV technology just armed with 1 instead of 3... it is the same concept and deployment method.
also, the cuts of real video at the end has multiple rv streaking through sky.
i realize you dont speak english well, so i wont make fun of you for it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGM-30_Minuteman#Minuteman-III_.28LGM-30G.29:_the_current_model
>>73605350
Used like a bite?
You mean bait?
