Cuckerburg exposed, again. Next time some faggot tells you that you're paranoid or overreacting, remember that their reality is being engineered by shady you-know-who's.
I can't even...
>>73585578
oh yeah,
>inb4 Hurr infowars
This is confirmed by former facebook contractors or "consultants" aka the ministry of truth
>>73585578
free enterprise..... he can do what he wants with his company infofaggot
I always suspected something was afoot with all that pro leftist bullshit trending, they should rename it leftbook
also..
>2016
>using facebook
they were never that bright to begin with
>>73585668
This is the truth.
>>73585578
>infowars
>>73585578
I deleted my fb account today. I should have done that sooner considering that they act as the stasi here in germany.
Is it just me or does wallberg seems like he's completly NOT in control? It seems like he's in charge of something that went way over his head. Like a child owning a massive corp.
>>73585668
So a bakery cant refuse to bake a cake for a gay wedding, but by all means you can be censored and silenced for your views because "muh free enterprise".
>>73585578
How will /pol/ recover from this?
>pro tip: they can't
>>73586234
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/may/09/facebook-newsfeed-censor-conservative-news
that good enough?
>all these shills
>>73585668
Doesn't make it any less censorship and blatant social engineering, you corporate whore.
>>73585578
This has been known. I wish I still had the screen shot of the bernout that got taken down a peg or two only to have the comment removed and the poster suspended. Settle for this instead .
>>73586523
But it's HIS thing.
>using someones invention
>claiming they have no right to it
It's his right to add or not add censorship. He fucking invented facebook
>>73586371
>>73586523
someone has hurted their butts
>>73585578
Zuckerberg is like 33 but he always looks like a little bitch
>>73585578
Soros is probably paying him tens of millions to do it.
>>73586388
>not an argument
>>73586629
>But it's HIS thing.
And no one denied that. It's his right to do whatever he wants with his invention, but what he does is called social engineering and he is being called out for it. Why is that so hard for libshits to understand? You can do morally very questionable things without breaking the law.
>>73585578
All this media exposure about Trump just means one thing. If they dont want someone in the white house, they simply dont show any images of him anywhere ever.
>>73586782
>Germany
>>73585578
Notice the rise in anti-trump threads?
Go figure.
Trump has jewed them.
>>73586800
I have this dreadful feeling you might be right.
Ron Paul talked about auditing the fed and was literally erased from MSM, the hope is Trump is too loud to ignore so they went the opposite tactic.
>>73586910
The irony here is that you liberal retards don't even realize that YOU are the ones making excuses for what is a key instrument of fascism. Suppressing opposing viewpoints and opinions.
>(((Zuckerberg)))
So this explains why this happened then.
http://fortune.com/2016/05/07/facebook-confirms-it-will-sponsor-trumps-republican-national-convention/
>>73585578
>getting news from a kike
I deleted my facebook when 5 years ago because I heard about abuse of power and abuse/selling your info and censorship. and I was young and dumb. if you're still using it in 2016 you're doing it willingly, I have to assume you know how their site works.
>>73585578
info CRAP dot com with tin foil hat host Alex "buy my filter" Jones.
a soon as I am starting to accept trump for president I am reminder that this people will be set loose to spread their bullshit
>>73587107
honestly i think they just hushed ron because he made republicans look like the warhawks they are except not in an entertaining way that would get good ratings on TV
trump gets views, and even better the MSM are basically inciting riots because of their story spinning - getting even more events for ratings
libertarians are a fuckin joke tho, any ideology with no allegiance to their home country is weak. Small government and "just leave me alone" is great and all but without strong nationalism you're asking to compromise your nation to either mega corporations, unchecked immigration, or some kind of coup at the federal level
>>73587683
Didn't come from infowars though did it you clown?
http://gizmodo.com/former-facebook-workers-we-routinely-suppressed-conser-1775461006
>>73587597
since i was in the military i already gave up all my info to the gubbment, especially utilizing my vet benefits even after i'm out. Anything they want to know about me they already have. I don't give a shit if google knows i like traps. Plus I look at more left wing media than I do right wing, so they probably think i'm some kind of liberal anyway. I get nothing but bernie sanders "suggested posts" on facebook even though I hate that fucker.
4chan monitors everything you do too, don't kid yourself. Unless you are using linux, proxies, noscripts, and trust your ISP if they want your info they will get it
>>73585578
I really don't see the issue. Do you have a problem with a company being able to choose who they want to serve? It's the free market. People can choose to not use fakebook if they dislike what is being shown. There are many social media outlets, or you can make one yourself.
Would you agree with the idea of a business not serving gays, lesbians, or trans people? If so, then welcome to the free market as well! No business should be forced to do said business with anyone or any group they may dislike, and these disliked individuals can then boycott said company.
Again. Welcome to the FREE MARKET!
You don't have to like it, but you have to respect the choice of an owner to do what they will with their product!
>>73587881
I didn't say not to use it, I just said you should know how it works by now and how they censor things
>>73587881
The real point is to stop traffic and ad revenue. Also the social engineering that comes with use. Likes shares and comments are the new cigarette. Instant gratification.
>>73587942
I'm not sure if you're sincere or you think you're being funny, le /pol/ is free-marketeers meme.
Either way, read the article. Stories deemed 'conservative', despite having as many views organically on FB were blocked from appearing in people's feeds. Given that you only have to be 13 to get on facebook, in what way is this not political indoctrination?
>>73585578
>nostradumbass
"I'm not bragging, but I can dead-lift 400 pounds, six, seven or eight times... ever more, but my hands tear open."
https://youtu.be/QU9lHZ4hymY?t=2950
>>73587942
The problem is a business can't refuse service do to transhomofurryism the market isn't free it's being dragged to the left.
>>73587969
u rite senpai
although facebook (or whatever the dominate social media at the time) is somewhat a monopoly. It's never a split userbase since the population switched from emailing each other to using a platform like this to keep in contact. Either you have the majority of the population or you're a niche site for some specific purpose. Regulating it is wrong, but there should be some kind of fair advertising law. If one group wants to spend more money pushing a message then fine, but giving free advertising to specific groups is straight propaganda
>>73585578
This is completely legal.
Zuckerberg is a liberal.
Zuckerberg hates conservatives.
Zuckerberg owns Facebook.
Ergo, Zuckerberg promotes liberalism and censors conservatism on Facebook.
It's a private firm.
>>73587942
That's not necessarily the issue though. You're right, he has absolute free agency when it comes to his company. The issue is he's blatantly using the largest social media network in the world to perform social engineering biased towards left wing balony. This is following the IRS targeting conservatives, and those useful idiots actively suppressing right wingers. The issue is the left wing is real life evil, trying to take over the world and crush dissidents. Leftisim unchecked apparently always leads to a dictatorship. That's the issue here.
>>73588400
Facebook is their own company. They have the right to choose how they want to run it. I will always be on the side of the business, left leaning or right.
>>73588459
Which is sad. I agree that both sides should be allowed to do as they wish when it comes to their businesses.
>>73588493
Then why was FB so quick to deny it was happening? When will leftist pricks learn, censorship leads to backlash.
>>73587689
Well in a libertarian society a coup is meaningless because federal goverment has no power.
Corporations would have to compete without government regulated monopolies.
Population and groups are the problem, people would unite to gain advantage over other groups, then we end up back with representative democracy with all it's corruption, mass immigration only exacerbates it.
I am for ethnonationalism but the programming has really taken with my generation(1992) and it looks set to continue with the next, I think when the generations after that grow up hearing how their countries used to be white and theirs we will see white tribalism again.
>>73588493
100% agree m8. Nice to see more pro free market here.
>>73588586
Why do they deny it then? You don't have an issue with companies misleading their customers?
>>73588258
only retards don't run adblock, but that won't stop "suggested posts". I don't like or share shit thats not from my family members. When people peddle these bullshit "i fukin luv science" posts with flawed studies, or regurgitate the same debunked stories that circulated only 6 months ago it makes me want to unfriend them instantly.
Or even better when you see 1m+ people that fell for a basic bitch bait thread that you would see on 4chan of a random image and a made up story next to it, that takes 3 seconds of reverse searching to figure out its fake
>>73587942
All we are saying is that they shouldn't lie and say they're pro free speech. If they all openly admitted that they were silencing right-leaning opinions, then we'd be ok with it (since their user base would dwindle down to nothing then go bankrupt)
>>73588672
They have the right to do as they want. If the people (you) have an issue with it, then boycott the company and no longer use their product. It's that simple. Facebook is not at all wrong in this, as a business should be allowed to run as they see fit. You, as a consumer, are also allowed to no longer use their product. That's how these things should work.
>>73585668
wew lad, so when a government contracts facebook to censor "problematic" posts, it's okay because of "free enterprise"
i'm looking at you, germany :^)
>>73585578
Of course it is. Jews are afraid of Trump. He really is Hitler, and he's going to gas the fuck out of them. What a beautiful world it will be once they are gone. Vote Trump!
>>73586245
You didnt delete shit, hans. The only thing thats changed is that you wont be using it. All that tasty, tasty data youbleft behind lives on.
On behalf of mr n mrs zuckerberg,
>danke
>>73588776
So just to be clear you don't believe companies should be truthful about their products?
>You, as a consumer
>2016
>NSAbook
you people don't actually do this do you?
>>73588822
Yes. because the consumers are the reason why facebook is powerful. If you dislike it then start a boycott. Be loud about it, try and get the consumers on your side. Once facebook loses revenue they will be forced to rethink their position.
>>73588887
They shouldn't. It's why tobacco products shouldn't be forced to have a health warning on them as well.
>>73588936
Facebook is to big that really it should be turned into a public facility and administered by the government. Something that big can have adverse effects if misused.
>>73585668
This is not entirely true.
It's a foolish company that gets involved with political advertising as its a murky grey business.
There are laws which state you must stipulate to the public if an ad is political in nature in Australia.
Here's where it gets really tricky, if the content is political in nature by law you must provide equal access to broadcast under Australian law meaning private media companies CAN'T veto media they own.
I'm sure the USA has similar rules.
By allowing political 'adverts' and content to happen via his platform he has essentially become a broadcaster and pre election media laws should apply to him and his company.
As everyone on facebook's opinion can't match his own the content cannot be dismissed as zuckerbergs personal opinion.
>>73588936
Read
>>73588887
>>73588746
Or
>>73588616
Really it isn't a difficult concept. We Are Tired Of Being Lied To! At this point I'm starting to believe you are either a troll or a shill
>>73588633
>Well in a libertarian society a coup is meaningless because federal goverment has no power.
are you suggesting not having a centralized government to handle foreign and military affairs? Or a supreme court? That's the bare minimum (and what the constitution regulated) for a federal government and yet that alone would be enough to coup or subvert a country. Either slowly through the courts, or quickly with the military.
In that world you would need a heavily armed (easy) AND highly motivated population (not easy) to stop that from happening. Who's going to stop them if 95% of your population is obese and weak from all that freedom?
I love the idea of libertarianism, but it's too easy to take advantage of. I agree with the rest of your post. When people look at these nordic "democrat socialist" countries they exclude the fact that they are mostly homogeneous small countries. As if that applies to such a massive continent of the united states. The sheer amount of bureaucracy involved to make sure everyone is following the rules alone would bankrupt us.
>>73588836
>George Soros gave drumpf $160 million because he hates him
>>73586371
Oy vey! That is racist and xenophobic goyim! You will be arrested for hate speech!
>>73589014
They should tho. Anyone offering a product or service should be honest with what they are offering, else it is false advertising.
>>73589150
source?
>>73585668
Then why can't I make a business that doesn't cater to races and religions I don't like? Why does free enterprise apply to fuck-huge leftist corporations but not traditional, conservative small businesses?
>>73589150
>I'm a broke virgin NEET who's never had dealings with banks and other systems of money-lending
Top kuk.
>>73589150
That was a business investment in Chicago. Nothing to do with politics. That is how business works.
>>73589077
No thank you. I'm not for communism.
>>73589115
I still don't see the issue, and I'm not saying they aren't in the wrong when it comes to some consumer complaints. The fact is that if you, as a consumer, dislike it, then you should boycott them to the point where it hurts their revenue. Crying about it won't get you anywhere unless you're willing to put in work.
But I still feel that from a company standpoint - facebook did nothing wrong. They are catering to their chosen clientele.
Sorry, but freemarket is freemarket. I won't hate facebook for their actions. It is the same as not hating Target for their choice to allow transgenders to use their bathroom of choice, or for any business to have the right to not cater to gays/lesbian weddings. It's all under the pro-business umbrella.
>>73589267
Soros invested in the Chicago Trump Tower
>On October 16, 2004, Donald Trump and Hollinger International, the parent company of the Chicago Sun-Times, completed the $73 million sale of the former home of the newspaper a week after it relocated. On October 28, 2004, Trump held a ceremony to begin the demolition of the former Sun-Times Building. The demolition and construction were financed by a 650-million-dollar loan from Deutsche Bank and a trio of hedge fund investors who represented George Soros as one of their sources of funds.
unfortunately our australian friend can't tell the difference between an "investment" and a "gift"
>>73586388
Do they not realize the huge fucking irony when they talk about suppressing other people's views as if it's some sort of benign thing to do? They sound like dictators in the making.
>>73589300
You should be allowed to.
>>73589226
No. The effects of tobacco are easily read from the deaths that happen due to it. Why should a business advertise something that can easily harm their revenue?
>>73589414
Most likely it's just another Jew trying to smear Trump.
>>73585668
Nope. Zuckershit is waging war, not psychological warfare or practicing free speech, but as the arm of a concerted effort of a 'faction' whose goal is genocide.
Arrest for espionage, seize all assets.
>>73585668
the comment i am replying to is entirely irrelevant.
>>73585578
Flood Facebook with pro Trump memes and see what happens
>>73589420
Is this advocacy of censorship relatively new? Where did it come from?
>>73589397
I am boycotting it. I never have had a Facebook, MySpace, et cetera, because my private info is my own.
But on to the point. The problem with Facebook is that they are doing their damnedest to hide the fact that they are silencing opinions. If a mom and pop bakery is forced to bake for a gay wedding, Facebook should be forced to allow people with different opinions to be heard. Why do conservatives have less right to their beliefs than gays?
>>73586288
It's zuckerberg and yeah I know what you mean. It's because of his autism. Look at any picture of him and focus on his eyes, he looks like a disabled child in every one. He's glassy eyed and vacant looking which is one of the strongest initial detectors of autism in children
>>73586288
Vanilla ice doesn't own facebook leafy
>>73589722
I find it troubling as well. Both companies should be allowed to run their businesses as they wish. I won't disagree that there is a bias when it comes to lawmaking in the Untied States.
>>73587689
ron was anti war though.
You might disagree with the law, but I believe there is a law saying that TV networks have to give equal time to candidates. It seems the same would apply in the case of something like Facebook.
>>73585578
we had a thread about this last night and the same three or four anons kept spamming about how the article wasnt real but if it is real it is no big deal.
>>73589119
yep small communities were destroyed by masses so we expand our in-group to a whole nation, but now that's not good enough and globalism is forced on us.
Interesting times
>>73589317
So who is that girl and where are the nudes?
>>73589817
I agree with that, your company should be yours to run as you see fit. My complaint is that companies should not be allowed to lie about the services they provide
>>73589836
That's what he said leaf, Paul made other republicans look like warhawks comparatively
>having a FaceJew, post-2010
Isn't the point of fads that you're supposed to grow out of them?
>>73590121
Sadly it's a cheaper investment for a business to work over facebook than a normal website.
Everybody is going to find an excuse to whatever their opinions are being appealed to. People are going to say that zuckerberg has his rights to do whatever he wants with his company, while those people would get their panties in a knot if he were censoring materials that appealed to their beliefs.
>>73586629
And it's my right to not use facefuck. So I don't.
I recommend that people drop facefuck like a hot rock.
But then again if you still use facebook you're just as bad as a myspace user. But im posting on /pol/ so..
>>73590614
facebook is a monopoly though
now that people don't use email anymore good luck trying to get everyone you know to switch to another platform to keep contact
>>73586388
>fights "bigotry" with bigotry
>sees nothing wrong with this
I would kill myself if I was this deluded
>>73585578
Even with the entire liberal media machine against him he managed to get the nomination with record numbers. Just imagine what he might do next.
My body is ready.
>>73590023
jejjed
>>73589760
I thought he was just Anglo
Facebook also censors conservative pages with politics similar to Trump, like right wing pages with Bolsonaro (a Brazilian Trump).
I know a lot of people that got their pages down for their conservative expressions.
Facebook is a progressive liberal shit hole. Commies and socialists post their hate speech freely every fucking damn time and nothing happens. A conservative page posts a nigga slapping a white girl in the face and the page goes down in hours.
I didn't know this shit happened in other countries too.
>>73586371
Globalist Jewry has imposed equality as religion and all speaking against it as heresy for the purpose creating a world of mongrels who only have allegiance to money, and are thus easily manipulable slaves.
We live in the time of the greatest empire the world has ever seen. The global Jewish empire of capital makes Ancient Rome look like some ludicrous municipality in comparison, even more-so in the division between our new "aristocrats" in one of their countless penthouses or boats, and the slaves who don't even know they are slaves.
It is an empire where the masters remain hidden because they've learned that being more visible can only be a liability, and thanks to technology, they don't need to parade themselves around for public approval, they can just use surrogate politicians to keep stoking the hope of people and absorbing the blame of their never-improving lives.
holy shit do you retards really get news from facebook? What a joke
