>We all know George Bush signed NAFTA
>>73537287
Right wing retards don't know it.
abcnews.go.com/Archives/video/dec-17-1992-pres-bush-signs-nafta-15205420
>IT'S BECAUSE WE'RE ON THE PHONE!
>>73537421
But Bill Clinton negotiated it.
>>73537421
Hey Chris
http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/nafta-signed-into-law
>>73537577
George HW Bush did.
>>73537421
>>73537287
>Clinton signed it into law on December 8, 1993; the agreement went into effect on January 1, 1994.[7][8] Clinton, while signing the NAFTA bill, stated that "NAFTA means jobs. American jobs, and good-paying American jobs. If I didn't believe that, I wouldn't support this agreement."[9]
you lying kike
>>73537612
abcnews.go.com/Archives/video/dec-17-1992-pres-bush-signs-nafta-15205420
Watch
>>73537287
Facts don't matter to this Italian Kike.
>>73537612
The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) is signed into law by President Bill Clinton.
NAFTA YES!
>>73537664
So not only did the Clintons love NAFTA they agreed with a Bush. Remind me why anyone on either side should support Hillary Clinton again?
>>73537287
We all know you are a troll.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=arvU2hFgQvk
>>73537675
Back row, left to right: Mexican President Carlos Salinas de Gortari, U.S. President George H. W. Bush, and Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney, at the initialing of the draft North American Free Trade Agreement in October 1992. In front are Mexican Secretary of Commerce and Industrial Development Jaime Serra Puche, United States Trade Representative Carla Hills, and Canadian Minister of International Trade Michael Wilson.
http://abcnews.go.com/Archives/video/dec-17-1992-pres-bush-signs-nafta-15205420
>>73537287
The problem with NAFTA are other laws.
Anon! :D
If you meme it hard enough! :D
It will change even facts! :D
Nobody in history was more butthurt than Trump was about NAFTA. You're damn right Trump isn't going to be wrong on this one.
Bush signed an "agreement" which meant absolutely nothing and was for PR only, while Bill Clinton actually signed the thing into law. CNN is banking on you retards not understanding how government works.
Even Obongo and the left-wing kikes know Hillary supported NAFTA.
>>73537911
Because nobody wants Republicans to crash the economy again. That's what they do everytime they're in charge.
>>73537287
>We apologize for that error, goyim. You understand and will keep watching CNN, right?
>>73537686
Hi Chris
http://www.aflcio.org/Issues/Trade/NAFTA
>>73538200
12/17/1992: Pres. Bush Signs NAFTA
http://abcnews.go.com/Archives/video/dec-17-1992-pres-bush-signs-nafta-15205420
An agreement called NAFTA.
>>73538200
This, and we also hate the fucking Bush family. Does the lugenpresse forget we hate Jeb?
>>73538325
You fags are not worth the million the kikes paid you.
>>73538200
This is exactly how Democrats keep their power...See Jonathan Gruber stating how ignorant the Democrat party voting block is.
>>73538523
He was talking about /pol/
>>73538215
No-body likes democrats. They expand the national debt.
>>73538591
Keep bumping shill. This is another chance for Trump to fuck over the lying kike media.
Free Trade is a good thing, the problem is national debt. However Trump's Tariffs are a good thing because they will reduce taxes on american internal trade. TRUMP 2016
>>73538714
Republicans do a lot more actually.
>>73538720
Gruber said the American people were stupid and Fox news was OUTRAGED because they knew he was talking about them.
Liberals didn't care.
>>73538218
I need the original source for that vid... Classic!!
>>73538812
>% debt increase
Worthless graph.
>>73539141
That's how you measure debt increase by president. What are you a moron?
>>73539277
You're not fooling anyone.
>>73539277
I'm pretty sure he wants a graph with raw figures in USD adjusted for inflation.
My only complaint is that the graph doesn't extend to the beginning of the 20th century.
>>73539374
So then would you agree that Barack HUSSEIN Obama is the most beloved president in American history? After all, he got more votes than any other president. Even George Washington!
REMEMBER - I'm using YOUR logic.
>>73539486
http://useconomy.about.com/od/usdebtanddeficit/p/US-Debt-by-President.htm
Percentages when it comes to debt is a common method of obfuscation.
>>73539734
Not really. Try again.
>>73537477
Kek, is he an autist?
That sounds like something an autist would say in a fight with their s.o.
>>73539939
Obama's the slowest spender since Eisenhower. He's reduced the budget deficit by 2/3. The reason why the debt went up so much is because Bush left him a $1.4 TRILLION deficit and a tire fire for an economy.
>>73540073
Are you still on graphleaf?
What do you do that gives you the free time to shitpost all day?
>>73537421
Obama cutting spending negatively affects the economy
http://money.cnn.com/2014/01/27/news/economy/spending-obama/
retirees do not account for labor exodus
you do not have to retire to get medicare or social security
http://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2014/01/15/u-s-unemployment-retirees-are-not-the-labor-exodus-problem/#4a1aefcacb61
wages are stagnant
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/8/14/1411883/-Behind-the-Numbers-The-Anatomy-of-a-Low-Wage-Recovery
http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2015/09/16/poverty-wages-remain-stagnant-despite-economic-recovery
http://www.unz.com/mwhitney/the-chart-that-explains-everything/
http://reverbpress.com/politics/economics/low-wage-recovery-really-myth/
inb4 inevitably going back to Reagan who continued reforms from Carter
https://www.jacobinmag.com/2016/04/chait-neoliberal-new-inquiry-democrats-socialism/
http://cepr.net/documents/publications/dereg-timeline-2009-07.pdf
job cuts since 2016 highest since 2009
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-05-05/recovery-paradox-job-cuts-2016-are-highest-2009-initial-jobless-claims-tumble
>Obama's administration would never manipulate stats
>>73537287
Why does this guy always acts so smug?
>Acting like he is much more knowledgeable
>Repeating the answers, the interviewed person gave
And now blaming George Bush for what Bill Clinton did.
>>73539939
>>73538523
>This is exactly how Democrats keep their power.
... well, that and millions of niggers and deceased voters.
>>73540073
>slowest spender since Eisenhower
But that's wrong. In six FY, Obama has raised the debt by 56%
Eisenhower only did it by a 9%.
>Bush left him a $1.4 TRILLION deficit and a tire fire for an economy.
Only $253 billion was added to FY2009 from the Stimulus package put up by the previous FY.
Obama spending for his first 5 years, two of which with dem controlled congress:
FY 2015 - $327 billion
FY 2014 - $1.086 trillion.
FY 2013 - $672 billion.
FY 2012 - $1.276 trillion.
FY 2011 - $1.229 trillion.
FY 2010 - $1.652 trillion.
Why do you lie? This is boring. I've seen you post in many threads and you're not even good at using talking points I've seen hundreds of times before.
>>73540857
Also, if we're going to do 'slowest spender by %' Obama isn't even close to being the slowest.
Presidents with lower % growth:
Clinton
H. W. Bush
Carter
Ford
Nixon
Johnson
Kennedy
Eisenhower
Truman
Hoover
Coolidge
Harding
etc
etc
etc
The only ones in the 20th century to spend more than he has in his first 6 years alone are:
Bush
Reagan
FDR
Wilson
So, y'know.
You're wrong.
>>73540857
FY 2015 - $327 billion
FY 2014 - $1.086 trillion.
FY 2013 - $672 billion.
FY 2012 - $1.276 trillion.
FY 2011 - $1.229 trillion.
FY 2010 - $1.652 trillion.
Your own info here shows a massive drop in spending. Is this expenditures?
>Only $253 billion was added to FY2009 from the Stimulus package put up by the previous FY.
So you're saying Bush left him a $1.2 TRILLION deficit? Did you forget that Bush never put the wars in the budget and Obama did.
You have to learn to differentiate between Obama's spending and what he inherited.
Here's an article to help you understand.
Obama spending binge never happened
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/obama-spending-binge-never-happened-2012-05-22?pagenumber=1
>
Why do you lie? This is boring. I've seen you post in many threads and you're not even good at using talking points I've seen hundreds of times before.
Except I'm not lying. You're taking Obama's deficits that he inherited and calling it his spending. It isn't.
You're the liar.
>>73538218
thats pretty gross
>>73541289
>So you're saying Bush left him a $1.2 TRILLION deficit?
How could he when only 253 billion (something Obama voted for BTW) was put on his FY?
Again, why do you feel the need to lie? That was the only part of the stimulus that was not part of Bush's FY.
You're not very good at this. Simply regurgitating talking points never works.
>>73541173
>>73540857
>>73541289
So are you right wing retards telling me you don't know what spending is?
Spending is the expenditure side of the budget. Not the deficit.
Expenditures have only grown about 1% under Obama. By far the lowest of any president since Eisenhower. That's just a fact.
Says Mitt Romney is wrong to claim that spending under Obama has "accelerated at a pace without precedent in recent history," because it's actually risen "slower than at any time in nearly 60 years."
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/may/23/facebook-posts/viral-facebook-post-says-barack-obama-has-lowest-s/
>inb4 facts dont matter
>>73541575
>politifact
Wew lad
E
W
L
A
D
>>73541529
wew lad
I don't think you understand how the US budget process works.
Bush left him a $1.2 TRILLION budget deficit. Not including the wars.
Here's the CBO report from before Obama even took office
Please admit you're a right wing retard.
>CBO projects that the deficit this year will total $1.2 trillion, or 8.3 percent of GDP. Enactment of an economic stimulus package would add to that deficit
https://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/111th-congress-2009-2010/reports/01-07-outlook.pdf
Even the CATO institute is on my side on this one.
Don’t Blame Obama for Bush’s 2009 Deficit
http://www.cato.org/blog/dont-blame-obama-bushs-2009-deficit
You right wingers need to stop lying. Or get a better grasp of how your country actually works.
>>73538928
>Liberals didn't care.
Liberals don't but the low IQ blacks and spics do.
>>73541689
But its totally a completely unbiased source of truth you right wing retard.
>>73541689
You're right. Right wing retards don't believe in facts.
>>73541844
Why use facts and sources when I can pull shit out of my assburgers with a right wing blog. zerobrain and shadowsharts told me so!
>>73541824
Show me liberal outrage about Gruber's statements. Go ahead I'll wait. We were all laughing at you right wing retards making fools out of yourselves getting all worked up about Gruber calling you stupid.
>>73541856
I'm off to Chipotle. Don't cry retards.
YOU FAGGOTS JUST GOT BTFO.
You don't even know wtf spending is. It's the EXPENDITURES SIDE OF THE BUDGET MORONS.
>>73541998
Why would I care if retards call me stupid? In fact the left has been calling me stupid for the past 50 years. Its how they indoctrinate people. "don't even acknowledge that side of the argument goy, they're stupid"
>>73541844
>>73541935
>switching proxies
>being this much of an autistic perma-virgin NEET
>>73541998
The blacks and spics who vote democrat are low IQ/low information voters. Much much more so than republican voters.
>>73537421
Again?
HEY YOU GUYS
RIGHT WING RETARDS
OBAMA
BUSH
REAGAN
YEAH I'M A FUCKING LEAF
>>73537421
This is just desperate.
>>73538812
http://www.craigsteiner.us/articles/16
Learn something today.
He backs everything up, and is ready for the counters.
Can someone give me a good rundown of what happened?
I've been working a 12 and I'm tired as fuck.
I know trump btfo of cnn. I've seen some jokes. That's it.
>>73541289
>line graph for deficit
>>73542410
He proved Cuomocuck wrong, who said Bush signed NAFTA when Clinton did, and enthusiastically also.
>>73542410
>CNN lies about NAFTA
>Trump Calls them out
>desperate Canadian who needs to prove himself denies reality and tries to blame it on republicans yet again.
>>73538215
>implying
>>73542747
>while his arguments and house burn around him
>>73542410
Trump assblasts Cuomo on CNN over NAFTA. Canadacuck derails thread (Same shill that makes the Obama made millions of jobs threads every day). This shill has got to go.
>>73542410
>>73542747
>>73543152
>>73542979
Right wing retards claim Cuomo is wrong that Bush signed NAFTA.
OP's statement is clear.
>We all know George Bush signed NAFTA
Well what's this?
12/17/1992: Pres. Bush Signs NAFTA
http://abcnews.go.com/Archives/video/dec-17-1992-pres-bush-signs-nafta-15205420
A news report from 1992 of Bush signing NAFTA?!
LOOKS LIKE YOU GOT BTFO AGAIN.
>>73543361
I seriously gotta go. Tend to your asses.
I'll be back later. You know how to find me. Just look for the triggered right wing retards.
>>73542410
>Salaried shill is interviewing Trump
>NAFTA comes up, Trump says it's a terrible deal that Bill Clinton got us into
>Salaried shill forgets he lives in an age of information
>Salaried shill denies well-documented fact, says "nuh uh, that wuz Bush 41"
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=who+signed+NAFTA%3F
>>73538958
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HN3qR2H4jGY
free trade is good.
big government and high taxes, which makes the noncompetitive, are bad.
>>73541793
Oy Vey! Not the (((CATO Institute)))
>>73543361
Oh good your back.
Wow one article that may or may not be true. While Bush did some preliminary work on NAFTA none of it was formal. Bill Clinton could have easily rejected NAFTA and it would have been off the table. But, no, he not went along with it, he wanted NAFTA.
Article that state Clinton or Bush informally signed and Clinton formally signed NAFTA:
http://www.cfr.org/trade/naftas-economic-impact/p15790
https://www.cbp.gov/trade/nafta
http://www.citizen.org/nafta
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/vincent-intondi/nafta-immigration_b_4209250.html
>>73537287
He kept saying it over and over again.
>>73538023
This is probably bush signing the north American union agreement that is completely secret.
>>73548017
That must be it.
Amero when
