The british are light years ahead of Americans in education, that's why the correct answer to this 2nd grade math problem in the UK is 46.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3580699/Can-solve-children-s-maths-puzzle-s-leaving-adults-baffled.html
63 - 17 + 19 = 66
63 - 19 = 44
>>73521700
Achmed please. It's 82
>>73521700
Wait no the answer is 60.
Or is it
Fuck
I'm not aware of the mathematical value of some. Could someone explain this to me?
>>73521341
63 + 3
wew
>>73521875
I'm retarded, it's 65.
>>73521341
Yall niggas retarded. You had a net loss of two passengers. You have 63 now, so you started with 65.
Idiots will refute this.
>>73521341
So X - 19 + 17 = 63
X = 65
What am I doing wrong here?
>>73522080
this is what I did
It's 65
>>73522080
Nothing the answer is 65. It even says in the article.
>>73522080
Nothing. It's probably a case of people not wanting to believe that the textbook has a misprint.
I have literally no idea how you come up with an answer other than 65. Am I being rused?
>>73522080
Quite easy leaf brother, some people are born dumb
>>73522017
+2 m8, 19 is only 2 more than 17
>>73522080
Yeah, idk what is confusing about this. I have always done math in my head (since I was 15-16) like the US common core tries to teach it (but I couldn't have done it in 2nd fucking grade).
I just took the difference of who got on and off, which is -2, and subtracted from the amt you have left.
You have 63 now, you had a net loss of two (19-17) so you started with 65.
It's a just a misprint relax it happens all the time, especially in books that are somewhat complicated to create like math textbooks
0
Fucking. Modern. Niggerkids.
Add the fuckin negative to the positive, all math is addition
X+17+(-19)=63
X+(-2)=63
X=63
>>73521341
63+19
because it wants to know who was on the train at the start
>>73522467
65* mybad
Why is that considered hard?
>>73522406
This nigger got it right.
Reading comprehension fail:
>19 passengers will get off at the first stop
>No mention that this stop has been reached
>17 people get on
>Presently 63 are on the train, referring to the 17 that just got on
>Before, there were 46 people on the train because 63 - the 17 who just got on is 46
Now go to sleep you sub-100 IQ faggots.
>>73521700
>>73521826
>>73521875
>>73521916
>>73522017
wew didn't realise pol was this retarded
>>73522473
What?
WHAT?
63 is end result
Priorto end result, 19 get off and 17 get on
You have only a net loss of two
Therefore the priginal number was 65
>19 people get off
>17 people get on
That's a loss of 2 passengers.
>63+2=65
no?
>>73522467
>X+(-2)=63
>X=63
good job nigger
>>73521341
>ITT: we find out who is able to solve year 2 maths problems
>>73521341
It's really simple:
2 less people are now on the train, so 65 were originally.
>>73521341
Why is this a thread? It's always been a fact that Britain especially England is way above America in terms of freedom, human rights, education, health, etc.
>>73522559
Because people think maths is scary.
>>73522611
How do people get on if not at the first stop, you dumb shit? Do they get on mid transit?
>>73521341
How many of them are black? You need to determine that and multiply the number of black passengers by 3/5.
>>73522611
It doesn't say it will, you dumb ukrainian monkey. It says get off, that is in present time, it means the point of time of this sentence is at that stop, just after 19 got off and 17 got on.
>>73522559
>>73522830
Because not everyone is obsessed with math like nerds.
The math in this thread is embarrassing.
63-19=46
How fucking stupid are you guys?
>>73521341
Where does Poland stand?
x-19+17=63
x=63+19-17
x=65
What is so hard about it?
Its 63-17+19
Math problem wants to know who was on at the start.
19 got off and 17 got on thus making 63. You remove the 17 and add 19. Thus the amount of people at the start is 65.
>>73522829
>freedom, human rights
nice bait senpai
>>73523066
LOL
Okay first up, assuming that it really is a trick question with the 'at the first stop 19 people get off' is a "trick question" and the answer is 46, the real question is, WHY THE FUCK IS THERE A TRICK QUESTION ON A MATH TEST?
OH MAN, WHY THE FUCK WOULD YOU PUT SOMETHING SO FUCKING VAGUE IN A FUCKING MATH TEST?
OH SO APPARENTLY THIS ISN'T A TEST FOR BASIC ARITHMETIC SKILLS, ITS A TEST ON SEEING THOUGH THE BULLSHIT OF THE TEST WRITER, AWESOME, GOTTA LOVE HOW MUCH MORE ADVANCE THE BRITISH ARE WITH EDUCATION. THAT'S WHY THEY HAVE A BETTER SPACE PRO- Oh wait that's right, THEY DON'T HAVE A SPACE PROGRAM.
19 people leave, 17 people get on. This means 2 people of the total have left. If there are 63 now, then it was 65 before. How can anyone possibly have trouble with this?
>>73521341
>first stop
>to begin with?
There is 0% chance of misinterpretation. Anyone who thinks it's 46 because muh ambiguity should be fucking shot.
>>73522900
>first stop
>departing station
Two different things.
are you guys retarded on purpose or can't you do a simple 63+2 ?
>>73523311
>How can anyone possibly have trouble with this?
Lower education standards.
Common Core, etc.
New World Order.
>>73521341
63 people at the end
17 people got on at station
that means 63-17 people were just on the train
19 people got off at the station
that means 63-17+19 people were just on the train
how many people were on the train to begin with:
63-17+19 = 65
>65 people were on the train to begin with
What the fuck is so hard about this?
>>73522964
I fucking suck at maths; it's really just simple logic.
I wonder why people go to college if they are so dumb...
>>73523399
It's all over
>>73523258
There is zero chance of it being a trick. Read the actual language of the question. It even says first stop and the question asks how many to begin with, implying before the first stop...
>>73523258
ALSO 'at the first stop' implies that at the first stop, as in, at the next spot that the bus stops to let people in and out, so does that mean that the 17 people just jumped into the bus as it was moving? Did they just stand in the road and force the bus to stop for them? WHY THE FUCK AM I HAVING TO FIGURE OUT HOW THE BUS SYSTEM WORKS IN THIS THEORETICAL MATH QUESTION?
>how many people were on the train to begin with?
one, the conductor
>>73521341
How many people got off the train is irevelant.
63-17=46
>>73522704
Words are hard. Almost as hard as maths.
so /pol/ ? are you really bad at maths ?
BE LOGICAL
THERE'S A TRAIN
19 GET OUT
17 GET IN
THAT MEANS THERE'S 2 LESS THAN THERE WERE ORIGINALLY
CURRENT NUMBER + 2 = ORIGINAL NUMBER
63 + 2 = 65
>>73523239
GTFO troll. Or enjoy ban.
>>73523534
>How many people got off the train is irevelant.
>>73523502
Well first of all it's a train lol. Maybe it's a shariah train and the muslims give birth while the train is moving.
>>73523381
>that cheeky factorial
>>73522931
The first stop has yet to happen. "To begin with" is one stop from the first stop.
>>73523698
well now no one will fall for it.
thanks achmed
>>73523350
If both sentences are in present, you assume that the events went in the order they are written, and that's real reading comprehension.
>>73523698
>mfw I'm going to teach my son to answer all of his homework with factorials kek
I'm the only person who got the right answer. Even the autists on r9k couldnt figure it out.
Answer is 16.41421356237
>How many people were on the train to begin with?
0
Does the people live there or why was there people at the beginning?
>>73522053
that's what I got too.
Seig Heil brother. Kill the degenerates who can't do math
Gee, why would someone even argue about that simple question.
19 people get off so it's a subtraction
17 get on so it's addition
63-19+17=61
/thread
>>73523191
This.
>>73521341
19x2+17-65=0
>>73523677
got work the system if you ever want to get anywhere in life
Only 46 of the people of the 63 on the train currently were on it at the start.
63-17=46
The 19 is a trap.
>>73523872
Autism
>>73523872
it's 26 you stupid leaf
>>73522559
>Why is that considered hard?
I can see it being hard for most 6 year olds, since it's a word problem, in addition to basic arithmetic.
>>73523915
There's a reason why your country is worthless
>>73522611
actually you forgot the "were"
So the train had X people already when leaving, not X+17 as it says "were on the train"
I'm so sorry
but that's the reason
Russia fucks you.
>>73523903
Depends how you define beginning:
>When it was booted up for the day
1, the conductor
>When construction finished
Propably 0, as usually paint is done last
>First stop
1 again, as you start with an empty train before passengers get on
>>73524049
41?
>>73521341
36?
>>73523915
KEK thius is the reason why you are ruled by jews.
Correct answer is 65 you retard.
>>73523066
"x passengers get off at the first stop. x+2 passengers (or whatever get on) vs "x passengers will get off at the first stop."
>>73523915
Is this the same math you use when counting Russian troops?
>>73523799
>You assume
If you're a fucking idiot, sure. However, these tests are designed to see if you are paying attention. If you are from the UK your English and cultural awareness of train scheduling is good enough to understand that the departing station is not a stop. The announcer will often say "The train departing from X to Y is stops at Z1, Z2, Z3... and Y". The first stop is Z1, not X.
>>73524049
OK, you win this round
>>73524149
No, it's 26, I didn't even notice there were 2 chillis.
>>73524040
weak bait, faggot
>>73524091
The conductor doesn't count, he's turkish.
>>73524049
You can't know.
You know 2 chilli figure is 2
but you don't know that one chilli is 1
So the last answer is unknown.
>>73521341
>Doesn't say when "now" is
>Doesn't say when the 17 got on the train
Obviously 17 pregnant mothers got on the train, had 65 babies and left 63 of them on the train.
>>73524049
only one pepper so it equals 1 making the answer 26
>>73521341
answer is 65
>>73521341
anywhere from 48 to 65 cuz som can get off but then get back on
>>73523872
>26
It's simple.
There are 63 people on the train, after 17 people just got on the train.
So before those 17 people got on the train, there was 46 people on the train.
At the first stop 19 people got off the train.
So, to begin with there was 46 people on the train, plus the 19 that got off at the first stop.
This means there were 65 people on the train to begin with.
>>73521341
It's 19 because those people were on the train at one point and got of the train. The question "is "how many people were on the train to begin with?" so its 19 because that is the number of people who began on the train and ended some where else.
>>73521341
>Now
This problem is unsolvable because you don't know when now is
>>73523872
The answer is 26
taco=20
burrito=5
pepper=1
do the math retard
63 - 62.999999999999 =/= 0
>>73521341
wouldn't you just do the opposite of what they said?
19 people got off, so add 19, then 17 got on, so subtract 17, and there's the answer
>>73524418
ARE YOU KIDDING ME?
IT'S 2016
>>73524263
Think about it literally. Those 17 who got on were not there "at the start" .
There were 65 on at the start, however, 19 left. That only left 46 people on the train who were there at the start.
Its a dumb as fuck answer, but I see their asshole logic.
>>73524057
Meant to say 26.41421356237
lol my mistake.
If T + T + T = 60, that means that each taco or T is 20.
If 20 + B + B = 30, then B must equal 5
If B - C^2 = 3, then C^2 must equal 2
So, Square root of 2 + 20 + 5 = 26.41421356237
>>73522042
YOU ARE ALL RETARDED
ITS 65 REEEEEEEEE
YOU'RE KILLING MEE!
>>73521341
17-19 = -2
63+2 =65
>>73524262
Are you retarded? Half 8 isn't 0
Twitter users confirmed for dumb fucks
>>73521341
The answer is 0. There were no people on the train when it was first created.
>>73521341
this makes my brain hurt i don't want to invest the mental capital and annoyance of trying to solve the problem, I could be using that brain power elsewhere (which i wont)
I hated school.
>>73521341
Why would there be people on the train before the first stop?
Depends, do otherkin and attack helicopters count as people?
>>73523872
x + x + x = 60
3x = 60
x = 20
--
20 + 2y = 30
2y = 10
y = 5
--
5 - z = 3
z = 2
--
2 + 20 + 5 =
27
>>73524539
1/2 1/2
1/3 1/3 1/3
>>73521341
>Neil Hughes
>"Yes, there's no way it's anything but 65. Tough question, but not ambiguous"
>Tough
kek you britbongs. Let me put this in a language you understand: if it's ten bong and then after a while you hear two bong, how many bong passed?
>>73521341
net change was -2.
X-2 = 63
>>73524579
no need square root the pepper when there is nothing to the second power
>>73524727
16 bongs.
>>73524539
fuck, I have autism
>>73524227
Ukrainians are idiots.
>>73524263
your a bad troll.
>>73524724
wtf are you on about ?
>>73524539
>>73524874
you're supposed to draw a line that goes through each "door" without going twice through a door and without that line eating itself.
this is a troll picture as a "door" was added which makes it impossible.
>>73524418
To clarify there is no tense set to the action of people getting off the train
You could be at the beginning of the line before the first stop and just so happen to know that x people get off the train on the first stop, it could also be after the first stop because either the amount of people who get off the train on the first stop is a constant and can be presented in a tense less way or you know how many people got off because you witnessed it.
Also don't forget to count yourself.
>>73524600
>Half 8 isn't 0
What?
>>73524709
it's 5-2z=3
z=1
cuz there are two peppers
>>73521341
ALright, the answer is clearly 65, right?
the fist two sentences conclude that there are now two less people on the train.
>now there are 63 people on the train
okay, so there used to be 65.
>>73524539
I see non-continuous lines, am I autistic?
>>73524539
start on the middle
At what point does a train "begin"? Was there a builder at the time of the construction of the engine? Was there an engineer and/or conductor when the traincars were attached to the engine? We cannot arrive at a clear answer.
This is way too funny.
I think this thread explains very well why you don't leave your basement lol
>>73524074
The 'were' asks you take how many were before the 17 get on at the departing station.
You assume that this changes something when it doesn't. You misread the question and my post. You're a spic and this is why Umayyad fucks you.
>>73522080
right, but you made it harder than necessary
>>73525123
nice added door
>>73521341
63-17=46
It's a brain teaser because they got off at the "first stop" so the to begin with is supposedly after that. Stupid as shit, even if it wasn't, what in the name of fuck does that have to do with learning math?
65,
If including driver, 66
>>73524964
Half 2chillis aren't the value of 1chilli, so 2chillis equal 2 but 1chilli doesn't equal 1.
It's like saying hurrrr 2 0 one on top of another equals 8
>>73524539
easy
>>73521341
depends, are non-white considered people ?
>>73524227
You would be correct if the wording was 19 WILL GET OFF at the first stop. How could you know that 19 people would get off the train at the first stop before you knew that 17 people would get on the departing station?
Stop embarrassing yourself.
>>73524994
I didn't see that. I'd assume if there was a 2(pepper) it would have been written as (pepper) * (pepper)
shyet
Its 65 you mongs.
>>73521341
63 = X - 19 + 17
63 - 17 = X - 19
46 = X - 19
46 + 19 = X
X = 65
Bruh it aint that hard
>>73524910
Yet I explained the answer that you did not understand. Nobody likes Canada.
>>73521341
>19 people get off at the first stop
>get off
>first stop
Lolwut?
Also the confusion stems from retard teachers still insisting on using PEMDAS/BODMAS/WHATEVERMAS which leads to this ambigious bullshit.
Teach people you can freely switch operants around in an equation if you follow the order of operation. There is no "LEFT TO RIGHT" priority. You think there is one, but there isn't.
This left to right requirement was added because PEMDAS/etc. DOESN'T FUCKING WORK WITHOUT IT.
All substraction is negative addition, you can switch that shit around if you obey the actual rules.
Besides, for the chucklefucks who are still gonna be like "bb-but it's the actual system", there are equations that you are not even able to solve with pemdas, for example -|1-2|
And then there's all the crap that people think is part of pemdas, but it isn't. The left to right rule is nowhere in pemdas, they just teach it as an intrinsic property of math which is wrong,
And then you get shit like this: a*b/c at which point the last retard can understand that pemdas is just bullshit.
Use fractions you dumb niggers, and teach them in place of divisions and don't ever use that stupid pemdas shit again.
65
>>73525149
So you mean before the starting point on the problem (the station)?
Well then, at the begining it had 0 as the "were" references to a looong time before, when it was crafted.
nice try though
>>73521341
The actual math isn't hard, but the way the problem is explained is confusing as fuck desu
>>73522080
Your answer is fine but I kind of feel your method is wrong. If the problem were more complex you'd have issues.
The 19 people you subtracted were part of the original number, which you are seeking. So, no need to remove them. Keep them on the train and just remove the 17 newcomers.
>>73525390
>Its 65 you mongs.
*It's
>>73521341
won't matter when Muhammad detonates the suicide vest he has on, on that train.
>>73521341
>American education is slow
That's because due to "No Child Left Behind" and other legislation, the schools move at the pace of the slowest student.
Learning standards are dumbed down significantly to accommodate the large minority population groups. Remember the High School Exit Exam? That shit was a fucking joke, I literally laughed my way through it. The reason it's like that though is to make it passable by inner city blacks
>>73525279
2 chilli = 2
1 chilli = 1
If this is the case, then it's 26.
If the chilli regardless of how many there are = 2, then it's 27.
If a single chilli is an unknown value, then the answer is unknowable.
Right?
I don't have a clue what you're talking about with "8". Nevermind.
>>73525568
this is absolutely retarded and not how you make worded problems... what the fuck.
also it's the D :^)
>>73521341
>There were some people on the train
Starting point: If "were" means before the first stop, while on the way to the first stop, the answer is 63. Either, that "were" can mean when the train was crafted, so the answer is 0.
>>73525695
fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck
>>73521341
Don't the turnstile computers calculate this information automatically?
>>73521341
obviously the answer is 6,000,063
>>73525189
Except that his method is analytically correct and in my opinion the best and easiest.
Many people can't solve a word problem the way he did.
>Anyone who cannot cope with mathematics is not fully human. At best, he is a tolerable subhuman who has learned to wear his shoes, bathe, and not make messes in the house.
>>73523779
you added the word "will" when it doesn't appear and you said other people lack reading comprehension skills. Fuck you.
>>73521341
19 - 17 = 2
63 + 2 = 65
Ans= 65
silly europes.. why wait for a train, just drive your 6.2 liter v8 car to wherever you want to go.
>>73525706
That's what I meant, 2chilli and 1chilli have nothing to do as 8 has nothing to do with two zeros (which, when joined, are 8 -> 2 balls)
>>73525568
When I was in school the question would have been: "Which equation best expresses this situation?"
Kids are illiterate.
>>73521341
there's a net loss of 2 passengers.
63 + 2 = 65
>>73525568
10+4 duh
>>73525695
Can't be done. Unless you break unstated implicit rules, such as the inability to cross the heavy black lines.
Think about it this way, if there's an odd number of holes in each container, the line will have to dead end inside that container, assuming you can only go through each hole once
>>73521341
Please tell me people are trolling in this thread?!
Look at it this way, only 2 people are missing off the train, so if there's 63 people and 2 missing then the answer is?!!
Don't bother troll answering me.
For anybody who didn't know you better be on drugs or extremely drunk.
>>73525568
The answer is D
8+6=14
Ever been taught to think you stupid taco nigger?
>>73525897
Exactly
Just pay $2 for a gallon to put in your earth destroyer and go for a burger around the corner.
>>73521700
This rustles my jimmies
>>73525695
>>73521341
63+2=65
ez
>>73521341
if 19 get off and 17 get on, there are only 2 less, so its 63+2
>>73521341
x-19+17=63
x-2=63
x=65
>>73525123
You added a hole
>>73522247
Is there more to this pepe?
>>73526047
that's not the problem you retard, the issue is, this is not how you make worded problems.
it does not teach how to use maths to resolve situations, it only checks if you can add numbers up to 14.
It's utterly stupid and inane
>>73525999
nice trips achmed
>>73524384
>It's simple
>Proceeds to make it complicated for no reason
I don't think this haram problem will be allowed in London pretty soon...
>>73521341
-17+19=2
63+2=65
I wonder if people can't do math or just trolling in these threads...
>>73522766
>less
It's fewer, fuckbucket.
>>73526333
that's why it's ment for children to see if they can use abstract thinking.
>>73524910
how am i a troll? you know what? get the fuck out, it's 2016, shouldnt you be balancing sexes in your office?
600 million
>>73525360
How? Well in this dimension we're assuming time is linear (that's what we call a fair assumption, not one based on given knowledge we can't actually know which way to interpret).
Here are all of the changes by intervals:
Departing station at point A1 (+0):
>46
Departing station at point A2 (+17)
>63
Train departs at point A3 (+0)
>63
Train arrives at First Stop at point A3 (-19)
>44
Point A3 is logically redundant, but it shows how there is a change from one station to another. The question is concerned with point A1, which we reach from the facts given to us about point A2 and using arithmetic.
Of course, it took me a couple of seconds to see this, seeing that I see things in multiple realities.
>>73524949
what the fuck? why would you count yourself? nowhere does it say that YOU are on the train? You people are making it so complicated
>>73526192
>>73526777
nice lucky sevens
also wtf is that pic, am i retarded or is it just a random scribbling ?
>>73526192
no autism here
>This entire thread
>>73526777
what is there to get
have these people never seen a cowboy?
For all the retarted niggers in this thread:
63-(17+19)
=27
Now just have to add the 19 back and you get 46
>>73526192
yawn
>>73527110
>>73527025
you crossed lines, idiot
>>73527126
except it's all yuropoors who don't understand it
>worded math problems
>>73527110
look away then look back and see the 'bigger picture'
>>73527153
please be fucking trolling
>>73521341
63+17+19=98
I can't believe nobody on pol got the right fucking answer, you've all lost literally all credibility that was left here
>>73525493
That's making an assumption.
See >>73526759. To begin with means 46 even if we're being robotically logical. Assuming people once did not occupy this train is common sense, not an infallible fact.
In both the context of the question (wording-based maths problems) and the most asinine and over-bearing extension of this argument into the literal interpretation of language (retarded), the answer is till 46 and can never be anything else.
65 is what you get with just the numbers, but remember that London is only 45% white so only 29/65 can be considered people.
>>73526759
You make no sense.
Why would you count 17 people as being randomly different from the 46 that were already on the train at the departing station?
Also, you're adding in TWO points at the departing station to make you convoluted point even more pointless. Nowhere in the math problem is this ever addressed. Making a math problem appear harder doesn't make you smarter, it makes you more retarded for not being able to answer it in a simple way.
IN THE MATH QUESTION the 17 people that get on the train comes after the 19 that get off, in linear time, as I said some posts ago.
For telling other people that they have low IQ, you're pretty dumb yourself.
>>73525695
am i autistic. This is literally the answer. Also, check em
>>73521341
Why would it leave adults baffled?
>>73527501
99* but point still stands
>>73527328
No I didn't.
Any relevant STEM would agree.
>>73527433
im dead serious
There's no way what he did is easier than simply concluding there are now two less people on the train, remembering that, reading how may are now on the train, then adding two to that number.
>>73527519
>impliying
Train departs at point A1 (x)
Train stops at FIRST stop (-19, +17)
not third neither second as you assumed
>all these plebs saying 65
You forgot the driver of the train.
>mfw there is some new level of metatrollin goin on in this thread
>>73527806
>You forgot the driver of the train.
I have been owned.
>>73527625
(you)
>>73527806
The driver was always there
>>73527806
>the driver isn't a people
literally retarded tbqh
>>73527806
>all these plebs saying 66
They forgot the 2 conductors on the train
>all these plebs saying 68
They forgot the non-paying rapefugees
Answer is 99
>>73527918
>hur he made a typo so he must be trolling looking for (yous)
>>73527986
You should make an impossible puzzle, but say it's possible in the description so people waste hours on it
>>73521341
Isn't that a simple find X question unless you go full witch mode with the meaning of the words?
At first glance it's simply X-19+17=63. So going backward gives you X.
>>73522611
Overthinking simple problems is a sign of stupidity
>>73527806
>driver
>not people
hans pls l2 read m8
>>73528152
(you)
>>73528333
(You)
>>73521341
>0
> Mohammad blew it up
>>73524313
2 chilli = 2
1 chilli = ?
Really spain?
>>73528333
>>73528392
(you)s
>>73521341
Answer is 65
>>73526582
Except there are two ways to read the question and you're autistic
This isnt so much a "logic puzzle" as it is a fucking badly designed question
>>73521700
Fucking retards, the answer is
63-17-19=63-(-2)=65.
Obviously the answer is 0. When trains are purchased they do not come with staff or passengers. The numbers are just distractors.
Well, to begin with there were 0 people on the train because trains don't start out with people in them.
>>73527535
>Why would you count 17 people as being randomly different
Because the distinction is made in the question. A lot of trains run on split lines where the departing train has to reach a destination and double back on itself in order to split the track and arrive at another destination. The original people could be there waiting for that. In any case, the question is clear what is happening.
>Also, you're adding in TWO points at the departing station
I'm expressing the existence of two states based on the information given to me. That is the "to begin with" state of passengers unknown and the change of 17 passengers.
> Making a math problem appear harder doesn't make you smarter,
I'm aware of this, I'm providing exposition because you didn't understand my very simple explanation, originally.
>17 people that get on the train comes after the 19 that get off
There's no indication of this. The question indicates that 17 made up the total of 63. The 19 getting off happens at a future state.
>>73524539
>>73524964
>>73525123
>>73525695
>>73527606
For all you autistic fags
>>73528647
this is true autism
>>73527606
But that is multiple lines. Like the one anon said, it never says you can't draw over the walls
>>73528690
Missed the middle one
pol will never figure this out
>>73521341
MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOODS
DELETE THIS THREAD
SAAAAAGGE SAGE
