Anybody view it as a viable system? What about primitive anarachism and anarcho-collectivism?
>>73513183
What does anarchism offer for a better life?
Capitalism took USA from 13 piddly colonies to the largest superpower in history.
Not anarchism. Not socialism.
Capitalism. You're living in proof.
/thread
Works in small numbers
Falters with more than 200+ people
>>73513405
/thread
Its more like getting sick of working for pittance when boomers worked the same amount, got infinitely more pay, could provide for a family and have a house deposit with just one parent working.
If it gets worse the citizens will revolt, its only a matter of time.
Anarchism is idealogical aids. Open borders??? Smh
>>73513183
Anarchism isn't exactly a system, but the absence of the typical sort of system.
"Viable" is very situational. Anarchy is viable as long as everyone involved can show each other basic respect, and no one has both the desire and the will to set himself up as an Archon.
Preventing the formation of a new Archy is the hard part, but anarchy doesn't imply a particular system to preserve itself, so it's incomplete in that sense.
>>73513405
This. Primitive communism is the best kind of government there is. You know everyone and everyone know you. Try being a deadbeat and see what happen.
Edgy ignorant kids: the ideology
>>73513304
>>73513339
>>73513405
>>73513504
>>73513532
>>73513612
>>73513709
>>73513755
>>73513805
What am I going to say next?
Anarchism as an alternative to capitalism is nonsense, because anarchism isn't an economic system. That's like saying atheism should replace hydraulics. It's a meaningless statement because they aren't necessarily related.
America's primary innovation is the institution of negative rights and the reliance on self-governance. Anarchism is just pushing this idea to it's next logical conclusion, that is, a stateless society. As the last 200 years have shown, a society based in self-governance is the most effective economically and in terms of individual liberty.
Government is the monopoly of force. The monopoly of force will always attract negative elements -- just look at the crisis of regulatory capture int he US. Look at the failure of the financial sector in 2008 where bankers wearing regulatory hats created legislation to benefit private-sector bankers, subsidizing financial products, manipulating interest rates, playing fast and loose with credit evaluations, and then creating protective exit schemes and bailouts to mitigate any risk exposure. These market failures was in one of the most regulated sectors of trade that exists. P.S., you want to know where the next one is? The next-most regulated market, healthcare. The bubble continues to grow as consumers are abstracted from costs, captured regulators subsidize unwise market decisions. You will see your healthcare dollar buy less and less until the market completely collapses.
Decentralizing coercive power by bringing self-governance to the next level, in a stateless society, is the only moral choice.
tl;dr: anarchocapitalism. anti-capitalists are jokes.
>>73515228
>because anarchism isn't an economic system
Most of the people pushing this bullshit want anarcho-communism.
>Anarcho-primitivism
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LhKla4MEstY
What is the point?
>>73513183
>Anarchism
>System
