Taking away women's rights to vote is uncivilized and not an acceptable realistic solution. At the same time, you know that women are statistically more likely to vote left, which inevitably leads to neoliberal policies which are currently destroying Europe.
So how does one actually deal with this issue? Aside from completely dismissing democracy, is there anything that can be done?
>>73418167
only people who pay more than X amount of taxes can vote
Crash the economy
>>73418167
>he doesn't know what the word neoliberal means
>completely dismissing democracy
Just answered your own question.
Hey, the way the founders originally set up the system was probably a decent way to really slow liberal policies. They only allowed white male landowners to vote. In other words, men who had long-term interests in the nation. They would presumably be very resistant to liberal short-term policies.
But at this point can you just take voting rights away from certain people? Nope.
>>73418167
Only let people who have served in the military vote. Its not ideal, but its better than nothing.
>>73418167
>is there anything that can be done?
Restore Christianity to the west. Women will become obedient wives and good mothers, who yearn for tradition again.
IQ testing.
105 minimum IQ to vote.
Problems solved.
>>73418430
>Yes he does
>>73418492
Sounds like a soft form of fascism. I assume there'd be an outcry if something like that were to be attempted, due to disproportional ratio of men vs women in military, and also
>hurr what about the physically handicapped
>>73418430
It has several meanings. In this context I'm not referring to an economic system but the group of degenerate leftist social policies.
If women didnt have the vote, fuck western societies would be amazing. They go off "feels" and emotions rather than logic.
>>73418167
Go back to allowing only landowners to vote.
Raise the min voting age to 21 or even 25.
There, no racial/gender discrimination and you have a much higher chance of voters being more responsible because they're older and have skin in the game (taxpayers).
Results of women becoming independent:
>obesity
Women no longer stay home and cook healthy meals causing people to eat quick and unhealthy meals
>failure of our schools and universities
Now that women have become the vast majority of teachers, our schools are failing. Kids aren't learning and we are falling behind other countries. Women teachers follow all the teaching methods exactly. They can't teach, they just repeat. That's one reason common core is so widespread and disastrous.
Women going to college has destroyed the learning envirement. Created tons of useless degrees. And sacrifice facts for safe spaces
>job market and money
Women flooded the market. Taking all the easy jobs and allowing companies to pay workers less. What once was afordable for just one working man is now unaffordable for everyone
>marriage
Women initiate the vast majority of all divorces. Causing childhood depression and broken adults
>mental stability
Childhood stability see above. Suicide, medication, and late life depression are caused by women because they have made themselves worthless. They aren't reliable and men can no longer control them. Women ruin everyone's lives including their own just so they can feel good for a few minutes
>low birth rate
Women don't want to have kids or not very many. This leads to:
>immigration and population replacement
If women had children we wouldn't have so many immigrants because there would be tons of angry jobless citizens that would riot. And if there weren't immigrants wages wouldn't be lowered.
>>73418167
Women should have the freedom to vote.
>>73418354
with no survivors
>>73418483
>But at this point can you just take voting rights away from certain people? Nope
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
If we don't we are writing the destruction of the west in stone
>>73418167
It's simple. Allow women to have their own parallel government structure,services and economy run entirely by women.
>>73419374
Hello non white immigrant
>>73419732
>Women should have the freedom to vote.
That's some good virtue signaling.
Unfortunately not an argument.
>>73418167
>anon, you don't hate women, do you?
>>73418167
>Taking away women's rights to vote is uncivilized and not an acceptable realistic solution.
Explain.
>>73420039
NOT AN ARGUMENT
O
T
A
N
A
R
G
U
M
E
N
T
>>73419732
You realize women destroyed the west. Don't you?
See>>73419567
>>73418167
Opt out of society and live like a neet. Stop worshiping the vaginal jew. Go on some social welfare program and become a net negative to the state.
>>73418918
neoliberal means free market. What you mean is social liberalism.
>>73418167
We need to overcome the myth that the left cares about women, and the right doesn't.
>>73418918
You don't have to go to the front lines to serve in the military.
>>73420225
Because men allowed it.
We should've never made prostitution illegal. At least there would be competition.
>it is uncivilized to prevent that which is destroying civilization
>>73420765
>Because men allowed it.
Who? Did you? I didn't.
That's an easy reply and one women use on here all the time.
The truth is "men" didn't do it. A very select, few individuals did it. Who just happened to be men.
So while I understand what you mean. It's still not a very good argument
>>73421202
>Not understanding (general) female psychology.
>>73418283
> this
or a meritocracy
