"it's possible" that Hillary will be a better choice than a Republican
>Saying amid the GOP primaries that it’s “possible” he could support Hillary was a Kochian shot across the bow of the Republicans.
http://www.wsj.com/articles/charles-kochs-warning-1462400425
>Exclusive: Koch-Soros Insiders Attempt to Take Over Trump Campaign
>Establishment in last ditch effort to co-opt New York billionaire
>Yesterday it was revealed that Steven Mnuchin would become the Trump campaign’s national finance chair. Mnuchin was an Investment Professional with Soros Fund Management LLC and spent 17 years at Goldman Sachs. He also has innumerable other affiliations with establishment financial institutions and corporations.
>A press release was posted on the official Trump campaign website today confirming that appointment.
>Questions are swirling as to whether the move was engineered by Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski, who himself has close ties with and has worked for the Koch brothers, having overseen the New Hampshire chapter of Americans for Prosperity, the advocacy group founded by the Koch brothers.
http://www.infowars.com/exclusive-koch-soros-insiders-attempt-to-take-over-trump-campaign/
http://www.cnn.com/2016/04/24/politics/charles-koch-hillary-clinton-2016/
>Oil tycoon and conservative mega-donor Charles Koch had kind words for both Bill and Hillary Clinton in an interview Sunday,
>Asked if it was possible another Clinton could be better than a Republican, Koch said: "It's possible."
>Charles Koch has blasted Republican front-runner Donald Trump throughout the Republican contest.
>Top GOP officials are warming to the party's presumptive nominee, but the donor class remains unconvinced that he will be their puppet.
>Republican donors want nothing to do with Donald Trump.
>In interviews with more than a dozen major GOP funders, not one on Wednesday would commit to donating to Trump.
>Representatives of Charles and David Koch warned the brothers may back Hillary Clinton.
Representatives of Charles and David Koch, the billionaire industrialists who helped to bankroll the rise of the tea party, warned the brothers could sit out the presidential campaign entirely — or even back Hillary Clinton.
Representatives of Charles and David Koch, the billionaire industrialists who helped to bankroll the rise of the tea party, warned the brothers could sit out the presidential campaign entirely — or even back Hillary Clinton.
>Last month, Charles Koch told ABC News that it’s “possible” Clinton would make a better president than Trump. On Wednesday, a spokesman for the brothers declined to rule out the possibility of backing the former secretary of state.
>>73219742
the Koch-Soros connection is so delicious
the tears of the partisan smokescreen
>>73221906
.1% elite will appoint Clinton.
the sham has been exposed
the men behind the curtain are grinning
>Kochs Still Mull Hillary Support
>billionaire industrialists and conservative GOP donors Charles and David Koch are weighing supporting Hillary Clinton in her battle with Donald Trump for the White House.
>Billionaire bribers leaving GOP in limbo
>The GOP has a money problem — in that too many of its billionaires have remained on the sidelines this election cycle.
>To run in the general election, experts predict a candidate and their outside groups will have to spend at least $1 billion. Hillary Clinton has raised more money than any presidential contender so far this cycle, according to tallies by the Campaign Finance Institute.
>Hewlett-Packard CEO Meg Whitman, Chicago Cubs owner Todd Ricketts and hedge fund manager Paul Singer have reportedly joined forces in recruiting others to given to an anti-Trump political action committee.
>>73219597
Guess they're the Cuck brothers now
>When asked during an ABC News interview whether Clinton might be preferable as president to either Donald Trump or Ted Cruz, Koch said, “Let me put it that way: It’s possible.”
>Even by Kochian mind-control standards, that was a mini-masterstroke, sowing terror and confusion in all directions. Who were the Koch brothers seeking to undermine with this seemingly bizarre pronouncement, and who were they trying to help?
>Another interpretation is that they were simply reminding us that they remain in power no matter who wins, and no matter what that person may have said to get elected.
>One payoff arrived almost immediately, when Clinton felt compelled to issue a statement assuring us she had no intention of riding into town on a Koch-fueled dragon.
>To begin with, spurning the support of any super-rich people can only be painful, and runs deeply counter to the Clinton Way of Knowledge.
>Clinton had no choice, of course, but the cloudy strangeness of that tweet, a non-sentence with no clear subject or object, is the result of Kochian black magic at work. Some unspecified person does not want the endorsement of unspecified others, for these specific reasons.
>That indirect and terrified Clinton tweet is like a million unforced errors in one; phrased more honestly, and perhaps more effectively, it would say, “Get thee behind me, Satan.” It should serve notice that even when it looks like the Kochs have lost their ability to control political outcomes, they still have the power to cloud minds, like the mysterious hero of the old radio serial “The Shadow.”
>>73225174
Salon.com's writers think they're clever but they're trying to make this more interesting than it is. It is about the Koch's getting whatever politicians under their thumbs they can so they can get more money with less regulation.
All that "masterstroke" stuff is fanciful English major bleating.
>>73224785
the cucks are all the people who don't want their tap water to catch on fire
