Daily Stirner thread until you filthy faggots read him and discover that you were actually BTFO'ing yourself this entire time!
>morality
>religion
>nationalism
>white pride
>legality
>ought to
All get BTFO, yet you choose to dilude yourselves into chasing spooks.
POL ABSOLUTLEY BTFO FOR GOOD HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHHAAH
>>73206601
Stirner is an interesting read and non-conventional philosopher but by attempting to force his teachings onto people you're going against his overall philosophy.
>>73206601
Is leftypol here?
>>73207244
Shh. He just wants to post his silly doodle man in peace.
>le everything is a social construct XDXDXD
>>73207322
Stirner is basically an ancap, or even a lolbertarian, so I doubt it
Gonna dump some spooks
Literally the kind of shit you think up when you're 14 and think it'll like totally blow everyone's minds
>>73207357
Fair enough, Stirner does have some dank memes.
>>73207405
Stirner would laugh at ancaps
>why should I obey the NAP you fucking retard
#woke
Freedom is a spook
Spook is a spook
Spook spook spook spook
>>73206601
What if the labeling of things as spooks is it's own spook?
>>73207719
now you understand why he's relegated to meme philosophy
Genderbent Maxine Steiner
>What are you saying gender norms mean I have to take the dick
>Feminism is a spook, I do what I want, retard
>hurr I'm so intellectual and so smart and I have a lot of philosophical knowledge because I know some old German dude via a shitty internet forum and there's this hilarious picture of him which I use for memes oh btw i can do what i want and its all just an illusion lol u r dumb and i am so smar!!!!!!!
reminder to s*ge all reddit threds
>>73206601
this is my kind of thread
Why are leftypol memes so shitty?
>>73207405
Stirner doesnt subscribe to those spooks, he is the unique one, one which there is no articulatable defintion for
>>73208275
Stirner isn't even a leftist (or an anarchist for that matter, but try telling that to the retards at leftypol) I have no idea why those faggots co-opted him.
>>73208141
jajaja
this
>>73208420
is he an autocrat?
>>73208540
He's an individual, simple as that. If autocracy would benefit him he would be an autocrat.
>>73207719
Stirner adresses that actually. I cant find the passage but he argues that the spook itself cant be a spook
>>73208420
This post gave me cancer
>>73208736
Only the best for a Mexican intellectual like yourself eh?
>>73208141
Spooky post my property
>>73208141
Basically this. He's the Camus for posers who don't want to appear too lefty.
>>73208420
I assume leftycucks (ab)use him because he's an easy way to BTFO ancap autists.
Nevermind the fact that Marx hated him so much he literally unironically wrote 500 pages of ad hominem against him.
I don't agree with a lot of things Stirner said or thought, but I was thinking about something the other day
What about using spooks - knowing what they are - to fight spooks ?
I get that there is no reason to fight spooks because fighting spooks would mean fighting them in "the name of your ideas", which is a spook in and of itself and something Stirner would probably laugh at, but for the sake of this idea let us keep going
So, using spooks to fight spooks. Why ? For a better society. A culturally homogeneous society would have it easy because if it stayed culturally homogeneous without being influenced by outside forces, it would feed on himself and progress over time. Such a society would be in a constant state of revolutions, going deeper in deeper into progress but without having to care about some spooks like political correctness, because it wouldn't be judged by outside forces or new migrants.
This constant state of cultural revolution would lead to Stirner's philosophy to shine in such a society.
So why aren't egoists using more of the system to gain something from it ? If everything you do is for the good of your own ego, why can't egoists use spooks in the name of his ego ? To be remembered, even when he is dead, is a nice gift to your own ego, even if you are in a spook, you profit from it
Can't egoists also contribute to the spook that is society ?
>>73206601
>"spooks" meaning anything other than two or more niggers
The leftist reveals himself.
>>73209765
>why can't egoists use spooks in the name of his ego
They can, try actually reading his book some time not just internet meme posts.
Stirner never said you SHOULDN'T believe in spooks (that in itself is a spook), what he's saying is you can be as spooky as you like as long as it's for your own ends. You can even believe in God if you understand it's just to make yourself happy.
The idea of "spooks" is that the idea/ideology/belief prevents you from serving yourself because you replace your egotism with this external ideals. If you understand it's just a means to server yourself, then you're not really being spooked.
oh look, another nihilistic cynical German philosopher that fedora tippers love
>>73207549
>>73207549
because you will die
>>73209765
>why can't egoists use spooks in the name of his ego
They can, the egoist does whatever they want. If fooling someone into believing in a spook serves your own ego then it would be a pretty good idea to do it. If choosing to believe in a spook brings you comfort, go ahead and believe in it, just know that it's a spook (or not, but if you're reading Stirner and have no interest in identifying spooks then I don't really know what you're objective is).
Stirner never proposed any "oughts", he never said "one ought not delude others", he never said "one ought not deny others freedom", be it mental or even physical freedom. These "oughts", if adopted, would all transform into fixed ideas that exist beyond the interest of the self, which is contradictory to what Stirner was proposing - individualism.
