makes you think doesn't it?
>>73164408
>common theevery and delinquency didn't create Australia
>prohibition did
>>73164715
Fuck off, you spick.
>>73164841
nice double standards mate
The addicts I know are almost all thieves. If it's easier to get them on possession charges than locating the stuff they stole so be it.
Most drug runners are shitskins let's ban them too.
>>73164408
I'd honestly make drugs in general legal. I mean fuck it, you can do whatever you want and inject yourself with heroin, cocaine, whatever... Just get rid of welfare and shit like that so I don't have to pay for your sorry ass when you overdose yourself.
>>73164715
>wants to legalise cp
>flag checks out
BUILD WALL NOW
>>73164910
Isnt that bitch in an aussie tv show?
No, it doesn't.
Because banning them just makes them an economically viable option for these groups. Making drugs legal will not make violent crime go down, because the fuckos who perputated it will still be around.
And hopped on legal cocaine while they're doing it.
>>73164408
>vagina didn't give rise to violent feminism in america
>prohibition of rape did
Been saying it for years, legalize it all, let god sort them out.
So what would happen when you tried prohibition of guns?
>>73165182
If you had a meth junkie neighbour, you might've changed your mind.
>>73164927
Good one. Got me there.
>>73164408
no it doesn't make me think
you could literally prohibit toilet paper and shit won't all of the sudden get crazy
it will be the same, it will just be illegal to obtain toilet paper and thus people end up in jail for wiping their asses
idiots like you think stuff like this is a big deep thinking revelation when it's not, you could outlaw anything and the people doing what you just outlawed are criminals and they use guns to do crime
>>73165182
Think you'd realize you dun fucked up long before that...
>>73164910
Great comeback. Stumped me, memelord.
>>73164715
Hopefully some cartel member with a child is going to find you and behead you
>>73165346
Some of us dont live in the ghetto.
>>73165394
Drugs are hell of a drug.
>>73165320
>methhead stabs your son on his way home from school for the 10$ in his wallet
>emt doesn't make it there in time
yeah drugs are so great mate
>>73164408
>Nicolay II prohibits vodka before ww1
>Russian Empire collapses
>Gorbachev prohibits vodka
>Soviet union collapses
Vodka, it's important
>>73165346
Meth junkies are going to use it no matter if its legal or not, if they want to dig their own graves, give them shovels. Actually this is america, sell the shovels. Maybe you should have to buy a permit to do hard drugs. Easy way to tax stupid people.
>>73164408
Search up 'Portugal drug policy' It was done 10 years ago and at first it was controversial, yet it helped addicts take control over their lives and actually decreased addicts and drug related crimes
Can someone explain how in Singapore, they have banned drugs and yet.... No violent crime?
Oh wait, they don't jail traffickers, they execute them like any good nation would.
>>73165559
and prohibition stops this how exactly?
>>73165675
Yet it led them to have a 70% unemployment rate.
>>73164408
actually dispite what the pic says prohibition was successful in reducing alcohol related deaths. less drinking and less public drunkeness and disorderly conduct
yes organized crime became more visible but there was no impact on the crime rate
http://www.nytimes.com/1989/10/16/opinion/actually-prohibition-was-a-success.html
(yes I know it's the Jew york times but the stats check out)
Once again libertarians are BTFO
>>73165718
You think it was not caused by the average EU Policies and the crap decisions by the parties? Just like yours truly, and ESPECIALLY you Canacuck. Look it up, and then try and find an argument please
>>73165822
>yes organized crime became more visible but there was no impact on the crime rate
Except everyone getting drunk illegally, right?
>>73164408
Alcohol didn't give rise to violent crime and the mafia.
Italians did.
Drugs didn't give rise to violent crime and the cartels.
Mexicans did.
Case in point: Ban shitskins, not drugs or alcohol.
>>73164408
> Alcohol didn't give rise to violent crime
....yes it did.
So does crack.
It was also pushed by feminists looking to control society. Feminist never = liberal.
The flaw was implementation by government imposed law rather than implementation through promoting a culture of abstinence.
But i guess you made me think.
>>73165683
learn to read leaf
>why persecute a victimless crime
>>73165659
just proves my point, drugs are bad, people who do drugs make bad decisions and ultimately drag other people down with them to further their habit
>>73165940
>they only count those who are looking for work
>>73164715
I don't think that makes sense or is even comparable in any way.
>>73166271
You must be retarded to think that the unemployment rate its 70%
>>73166271
You're being a little short sighted. Things do not happen in a flash.. It took 10 entire years for Portugal's drug problem to sort itself better, and to say that all of a sudden that the public will be instantly good to go is very short sighted
>Guns didn't start the Second American Civil War
>Prohibition of guns did!
>>73166313
Yeah, but I don't think child pornography is a substitute for child rape and abuse. If anything, simply creating child porn is abuse already. There is no reason to ever legalize CP.
>>73164408
>tfw there were no lawbreakers until laws were invented
The whole system needs to burn baka desu onii-senpai
/pol/ is too contrarian and "enlightened" to understand that this is correct. Pro tip, dick heads, Rockefeller was behind prohibition because he didn't want people to be able to get their cars to run on ethanol.
>>73166583
Mate, for some reason things like that don't drill in
>>73166583
>/pol/ is too contrarian and "enlightened" to understand that this is correct.
some of us understand what the war on drugs is really about and don't give a damn.
>>73164408
the only downside i can think of regarding full drug legalization is having tax dollars go to addict life support or something. but i guess that would beat financing the war on drugs. the whole degeneracy concept is so gay, plenty of CEOs can responsibly engage in vice
The only thing preventing legalisation of drugs is the United States government and the DEA. Everyone else is openly or secretly pro-legalisation. Even former DEA agents and US government employees are.
Yeah, let's legalize everything. Screw boundaries, let's let our children have access to everything. Nothing is wrong, nothing is off-limits in this Brave New World. God hates us.
