Is he the worst monarch you Britcucks have ever have?
She's basically handing the country over to the Muslims.
Why doesn't she just order the army to round them all up and ship them out?
I thought the whole point of having a Monarchy was so that they could do nessasary but hard shit like this?
>>73073966
She doesn't control the country, retard.
The prime minister does that.
God save the Queen.
>>73073966
YES. You get it.
But you're way too kind.
In her own lifetime she lost the whole fucking Briish Empire! Now shes letting England lose the homeland. She is worse than the backstabbing scottish lords from braveheart.
>>73074211
Don't worry, I'm sure their future Muslim King will start making efforts to reunite the empire under the name of Allah.
>>73073966
I have been wondering the same thing
>>73073966
SHE HOLDS NO REAL POWER YOU FUCKING RETARD
>ITT perfect examples of prime American education.
>>73073966
>She's basically handing the country over to the Muslims.
She doesn't have any say. The royal family are no more than a tourist attraction & a kind of foreign ambassador, but with no power what so ever.
>>73073966
Fun fact: shes not even the queen. Shes the queen regent. Why no one has unseated her I cant fathom.
>>73073966
Republican scum shall pay with their blood.
>>73074178
>>73075186
she does have the power. she can dissolve parliament and rule if she wasnt a decrepit sand nigger loving old hag.
>>73075186
It's her army and her navy why doesn't she use them? This why you guys lost your empire.
>>73073966
Her real power comes in the even shit truly goes south.
i.e. a fucking coup attempt
>>73075483
The Prime Meridian doesn't belong to you Brittain!
Any monarch is as bad as another, royalist cucks literally don't understand that this woman deserves their money and attention and subjugation because ________
Absolute retards
>>73076278
Are all americans this retarded?
>>73075992
the day she does that is the day we stop being a monarchy, grow up
ONE NATION UNDER CCTV
>>73076567
no thats the day you return to it, britbong geez learn about your own country
>>73076521
Do you even need to ask?
Obligatory
>>73076521
Go suck Dracula's Dickinson man that is the only cool thing that came out of your country.
>>73073966
>>73076278
>>73075992
If she ever used her powers it'd be so controversial she'd be booted out in weeks. The monarchy's neutrality since the 1900's is why we're not a republic.
>>73076567
You really shouldn't at all.
You're paying her family to live lavishly, 'just cuz'.
Either be a real monarchy, or take your hands out of the pockets of the people.
It amazes me that you all pay some royalty tax for a family just because they exist.
>>73076749
She has Knights of the British Empire sworn to her protection. Along with the house of lords oh and the fucking military. You owe her your allegiance.
>>73076622
Rare Estonian Vivian, congrats, dude
>>73073966
She's one of the best Monarchs we've ever had.
And Monarchs aren't suppose to get involved in Politics, it would lead to her being ousted.
The Crown sits and watches, till it is called upon to defend it's subjects.
>>73076954
A few high elites wouldn't be able to stop half the lefties in country rioting.
I can't stand the retarded "God Save the Queen" jingoist "British values" kind of "patriotism". It's like our special English version of the Jeb-style cuckservativism.
The Queen is immensely wealthy and the best connected person on the planet. Only complete fools fall for the "just a figurehead" meme. She could have done SO much to prevent what's happened to us over the last sixty years, but she's done precisely FUCK ALL. I hate the old bitch, I really do. Nobody could speak out against the madness the political class have done with the authority she could have. The masses would have thronged around her, and the armed services without batting an eyelid. But she's a totally implicated collaborator in it all.
>>73073966
It does not matter who is in charge, the UK is still going to get shafted.
>>73076954
None of those mean anything.
The Tsar had a military and subjects too. The Shah had a military and subjects too. Guess what happened?
The British way is to not push the issue, that way nobody realizes how much of your power is made up of paper tigers. [and in a serious pinch, "muh-monarchy" is a convenient excuse for the army to actually refuse to join in with a coup if the circumstances are undesirable - alternatively if the coup is necessary the queen can offer her support. if she's using it for something pissy like changing policy the government of the day should be handling then she'll just court controversy and encourage people to test just how loyal people really are.]
>>73077168
Why would the Monarch act against the democratic wishes of the people and not expect to get ousted? This isn't Spain.
>>73073966
Does she even have any real influence ?
>>73076567
can't wait for that day
you lot can keep paying for wee george's golden rattles and the queen's platinum strap on, i'll keep trying to get scotland out of this union of shitebags
The entire royal family, aside from Philip, is cucked.
>>73077337
Yeah she has absolute consitutional power.
But the British isles have been governed for the last 800 years by established conventions, she is an impartial head of state in which all power is vested.
If the Monarch medles in Politics then she's no longer above it and as bad as having a President.
>>73073966
because acting on her powers would probably start a civil war between royalists and republicans. that would be worse than some nigger gehttos.
>>73077330
The Queen can't get ousted and we are not a democracy
We are a monarchy and our constitution is purely a matter of convention
>>73077602
Yes the Queen can be ousted, it was established in Rex v Rex (1649) That the Crown isn't a single person it's an office.
Hence why we executed King Charles, learn you conventions fgt.
>>73077330
You honestly think what's happened over the last sixty years has been democratically approved of? The system is easily manipulated by the wealthy and connected, and I'm astounded I have to spell this out.
She could very easily have refused assent to the most insane things, and made enough personal public statements to change the political agenda to FORCE certain taboo issues to be actually debated and voted upon, instead of sneaking them in by the back door as she allowed it to be in real life.
Even aside from such drastic actions, there's a lot more she could have done behind the scenes. Anyone who understands how the "donation" system works can see how this could happen.
>>73077330
>Why would the Monarch act against the democratic wishes of the people
majority of Britons want Muslim invasion?
>>73077543
>as bad as having a President.
These are idiotic empty catchphrases for those who have eyes open to see exactly HOW bad things really are! Few presidents could have done worse, honestly.
When you think about it, the king ruled so much of the world, then what happened... Did someone say affirmative action?
>>73073966
Literally having some bony old biddy that walks around in special snowflake jewels because??
>>73077782
Fuck the conventions mate. They have as much legitimacy as an appeal to tradition
If she doesn't do anything about our country she and her clique of ingrates should be removed from office
>>73077801
>You honestly think what's happened over the last sixty years has been democratically approved of?
yes, yes and yes. germany elected left/green cucks FOR OVER 30 YEARS OVER and OVER again. same with Sweden or France. you must be fucking retarded to not see that what is happening is the will of the people.
>>73077801
A monarch hasn't blocked a bill from Royal assent since the 1706 Scottish militia bill.
She could do very much behind the scenes but she doesn't, a Monarchs fundemental position is not to take sides in Politics and allow the Commons to rule themselves, this has been established since the Bill of Rights 1689
>>73077821
Sadly yes, as has most of the West, are you seriously ignorant to how many cucks there are about?
>>73076751
it's because she owns the fucking land retard
>>73078203
>>73078081
>If she doesn't do anything about our country she and her clique of ingrates should be removed from office
It's literally her job not to do anything, we made that choice in 1689; if you want to be ruled by an absolute Monarchy fuck off to Saudi Arabia.
>>73078328
>the British monarchy
>shall allow its nation to oust itself
What a useless fucking institution. I'll be celebrating when the Queen finally ends her life
>>73078106
The Germans were spiritually annihilated after losing WWII. We were exhausted, but nowhere near as badly hit by it as they were. Main point is, STOP calling "democracy" that which is actually carefully managed oligarchy. The mass media are owned and controlled by a clique who set the "agenda", ignoring for decades the real concerns of real people, who have been so atomised that their voice dissipates into nothing. The vast majority even of leftists would never have approved mass immigration if they'd ever been directly consulted on the matter. Hierarchical power structures always distort the voice of the mass they are based on.
>>73078309
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions?state=open
The fact any politician in this country can't suggest that the open border policy is a bad idea without being shouted down as a racist is a solid indication.
The democratically elected government made this descion.
>>73073966
>I thought the whole point of having a Monarchy was so that they could do nessasary but hard shit like this?
lol
LOL! Wut? Where in fuck did you get a stupid idea like that? From American TV?
>>73077961
>These are idiotic empty catchphrases for those who have eyes open to see exactly HOW bad things really are!
A President is a Politically bias head of state, the whole point of retianing the Monarchy is retaining the impartial Sovreign above Politics.
>>73078564
>implying
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/661872/Poll-migration-EU-referendum-Boris-Cameron-Brexit
>>73075992
>>73076278
damn you guys are stupid
>>73075483
So much this.
>>73073966
>the eternal anglo is ruled by the eternal kraut
all my wut
>>73078488
>What a useless fucking institution.
Well it's maintained peace and stability here for 330 years lad while the rest of Europe was plunged into rebellion.
>>73078522
you are in denial and can't accept that a huge majority is simply a bunch of cucks. all your mental gymnastics and tinfoil hattery is wasted on those who don't deserve or want any defense. and remember this: you only become a slave when you allow it. dont think for a second that everything that happened since ww2 wasn't the will of the people.
>>73078684
>impartial
>sovereign
Sovereign over what? Her estates?
>>73078684
Where did you imbibe this nonsense, and how were you so naive to accept it as anything but? This is drivel. What good does it serve?! It's madness. Stupid mantra for idiots to repeat to themselves while marching inanely to annihilation. The level of political discourse in England is so depressing.
>>73073966
>Is he the worst monarch you Britcucks have ever have?
>he
The USA: 24th in education and showing it.
Also
>nessasary
>>73076622
Why does she have brown hair? Don't you guys have blonde?
>>73073966
>Why doesn't she just order the army to round them all up and ship them out?
Because she's Dutch just like the rest of her line
This is revenge thats long over due
>>73078688
I hope this is true.
Regardless it's the democratically elected Government responsible for these polices, and it's Her Majesties Government as much as it is a Government of the British people.
>>73078308
This all makes sens now! It doesn't matter what happens on her land as long as she gets paid. So immigrants, wars, doesn't really matter. They're in the land rental business.
>>73078827
>>73078309
>creating a false narrative
She's secretly plotting to retake Britain and make it it a dictatorship again. No more fucking around.
Prince Harry is getting his royal robot exoskeleton built to lead the robot army for his brother.
>>73078488
>loses argument multiple times
>replies with FuG dA SysTem
Didn't your kind go extinct in 2005?
>>73078784
>19th century
>stable
You know a nation has gone to shit when q foreigner knows more about it than its own native populace
>>73078784
And yet we're soon to have a civil war in spite of having this castrated monarchy
>>73078837
Sovereign of the nation; she acts as an impartial head of state in which all power is devoted in favour of and practiced on behalf of.
>>73079151
>false narrative
must be a hard pill to swallow that the last two generations actively and deliberately destroyed the western world and we have now to deal with their shit.
>>73075992
>>The Queen
>>Decrepit
>90yo
>in full control of her faculties
>walks around unaided and stands for hours at a time
>still rides horses
>still drives her own car
yeah...
Funny thing is she'll probably out live you, still the best part of 30 years in the old girl yet.
>>73078892
>>73079183
In what way? We both agree the monarchy, at this moment, is useless to stop civil strife along ethnic and religious grounds
Haven't you been paying attention?
When is Britain gonna go Jap.
Elizabethan Restoration?
Banzai, foru ra kaweeno.
>>73078784
>it's maintained peace and stability here for 330 years
You call the last sixty years in all our major cities "stability"? You're a fool.
>>73078827
>a huge majority is simply a bunch of cucks.
This is a very recent development. Wilfull self-destruction was NOT a common tendency in the generation of our parents or grandparents. The indoctrination had not had time to be as effective then. The OLDER indoctrination of imperial superiority was still lingering. It was at this point that the (younger and fitter) Queen could have done something. Even NOW I have slightly more faith in the proles than you seem to.
"Will of the people" you say? HOW on Earth was this expressed and channelled? It was diverted and allowed to piss away into the sand, that's what. You are right: most people are followers, not leaders, but that is precisely why we should be apportioning most blame to those who lead society. Churchill's a good example, and Thatcher. Privately, they knew what seemed likely to happen, and even mused on making some political capital out of it, but ultimately they sat on their hands. Pure cowardice. Backed up by a monarch, imagine what a braver PM could have done.
>>73079188
>You know a nation has gone to shit when q foreigner knows more about it than its own native populace
Lol beyond a few riots there has been no major movement to overthrow the government in the home nations and hasn't been since 1689.
>>73079221
There won't be a civil war anytime soon.
>>73079246
Parliament is fully sovereign from what I've heard
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitution_of_the_United_Kingdom#Parliamentary_supremacy
I don't know what teachers you have, but the old hag is sovereign over nothing
>>73075992
>implying there wouldn't be a rebellion or a coup
>implying she'd be monarch anymore after a week of the happening
>implying she could even do it anyway
Aussie education, everyone.
The Shoguns of Britain are cucks. The Empress is not amused.
Soon the invaders from Asia will conquer the Island. Divine wind hold the invaders back.
>>73078900
Not an argument
Pllz explqin how the fug does the uk work
Is the queen just a meme or not?
>>3079567
Don't be so sure
I'm not native here but you guys will soon to erode to bellow 50% across what remains of the whole country - assuming Scotland leaves
You think you'll just give up everything so easily?
Even I'm frustrated that you'd give it all up so easily
>>73079673
Parliamentary supremacy exists because all power is exercised through the Crown in Parliament and given royal assent.
>>73079721
There hasn't been a popular Coup here or a rebellion since 1649; why the fuck do you think now, of all times, will change that?
>>73079817
>Pllz explqin how the fug does the uk work
The official brainwashing system indoctrinates idiots to think that it works to the benefit of various abstract ideals, while the real engine behind it makes the rich richer and smothers any and all discussion of this. You know, same as in Mexico and almost anywhere else on this godforsaken planet.
>>73078308
So what exactly is the final fucking decision? You guys say she does not hold power but then you say you'd gladly dish money to her because she owns the land? C'mon lads
>>73079517
>Wilfull self-destruction was NOT a common tendency in the generation of our parents or grandparents.
then why did they vote leftist and even worse green hippies into power? and kept electing them over and over again even after they slowly turned western countries into shitholes full of niggers?
you underestimate the feel-good idiocy that started to build. they simply forgot that our wealth/culture and freedoms and everything else didnt fall down from the sky but were fought for tooth and nail. or did you miss all the cucks celebrating islam and questioning free speech?
> HOW on Earth was this expressed and channelled?
votes. when cuck politicians get elected into office for decades then it is the will of the people. and to quote Sowell:
>Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good.
>>73079926
Ergo, the Queen has de facto 0 sovereignty to exercise
All she has is sovereignty to give and none to ever retake
Although she theoretically could
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reserve_power#United_Kingdom
>>73079183
>The Queen can't get ousted
>yes it can
>she doesn't do anything
>it's her job
>What a useless fucking institution
>It's maintained peace and stability here for 330 years lad while the rest of Europe was plunged into rebellion.
I don't know, have you?
>>73073966
We are all cucks and we do not have a God Emperor to look after us. We will soon all be butchered by our Muslim overlords for meat to feed their goats.
Pray for us as our, once great, civilisation slowly slides down the toilet of history.
>>73079817
The Crown has absolute power, all actions in the court and Parliament are done on behalf of the Crown.
The Crown appoints the [Prime] Ministers
The Crown must give assent to all laws past by Parliament
The Crown has supreme power over the armed forces and is the sole office to declare war.
Her Majesty is the physical embodiment of the Crown.
>>73075838
She's Queen Regnant, you illiterate.
>>73079498
uops, read here >>73080202
>>73080193
Yeah, she has absolute power; it's just an established convention it isn't exercised against the democratic wishes of the people.
Like I said this isn't France or Spain, our Monarchs are autocrats bred to be impartial heads of state.
>>73080202
Read the whole thing :^)
>>73080049
She upholds what little tradition and culture we have left.
>God save you ma'am
Jesus Christ I fucking hate republicanism.
The Queen can't do shit because centuries of degenerate 'democracy' have utterly destroyed the institution of Monarchy.
>>73078077
Don't you do the same?
>>73080559
This
And by democracy you do mean the Jewish version not the Greek version?
>>73080415
Well I'm saying we're reaching the point where mere convention (something which garners its legitimacy from the mere act of repetition) should become reassessed in light of these recent developments
>>73078990
>Tudors die out
>Stuarts inherit
>line goes to William (Dutch) and Mary after James's "abdication"
>Line goes to Anne (Stuart)
>Line goes to George the 1st (Mother is a Stuart)
>Line goes to George the fourths granddaughter.
Always stayed Stuarts lad, only one Dutchman ever took the Throne.
Even if she has no power she has influence and she could at least say something.
The truth is, she doesn't feel british, she couldn't care less.
>>73080698
Well yeah, but have an autocrat bred for the position of de jure head of state is better than a Presidency, elected or appointed.
In which power is constantly used against the wishes of the people
>>73081024
>de jure
Meaningless and useless to prevent the dismantling of this country and kingdom
Mark my words
>>73081024
>better than a Presidency, elected or appointed. In which power is constantly used against the wishes of the people
What fucking world do you people live in where you think things have gone so wonderfully over the last few generations?!? Robert Mufuckingabe couldn't have done to us as our president what has been done to us in the name of Elizabeth II.
>>73081225
>Meaningless and useless to prevent the dismantling of this country and kingdom
She most likely won't act no. That isn't to say she is powerless to.
>>73081658
As a matter of fact, she is - de facto
In purely theoretically abstract official ways - she can do whatever she likes
But I'd rather we not live in lalaland
>>73081861
>But I'd rather we not live in lalaland
De jure she has absolute power
de facto she doesn't use it.
that doesn't mean she is powerless, not that she couldn't use the powers if she tried, I just doubt she will.
>>73080415
if by impartial you mean doing fuck all and watch the country go to shit , then being impartial sucks
>>73082109
She has her theoretical powers gagged. As a matter of fact she is powerless
Do you understand now? It doesn't matter what she officially may or may not be able to do
At all. Zero. Nada
She will watch the natives turn themselves into a minority, and probably crack a joke while she's at it
>>73073966
She is 90 years old her biggest concerns are what time coronation street is on, not meddling in politics.
>>73082248
>if by impartial you mean doing fuck all and watch the country go to shit , then being impartial sucks
Yeah because Holland is doing well for you.
What is this .... your fifth republic now?
>>73082582
>It doesn't matter what she officially may or may not be able to do
>It doesn't matter what consitutional powers are afforded to a Monarch, she has none because I say so.
She has absolute consitutional power; just because she won't dowhat you want her to do with them doesn't mean they don't exist.
>>73082866
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tu_quoque
Don't pretend your troubles away.
You people are literally dying out while your monarchy is doing fuck all to prevent it
>>73079721
I support our queen you treasonous faggot.
>>73082976
It won't matter. She won't do anything to help you
She serves no real purpose for the benefit of the British people
>>73083050
>asserts that having an impartial head of state s bad
>bias heads of states are at the same fault.
>therefore it is not a product of having an impartial head of state.
Actually read the argument and understand fallacies before you desperatley google one.
>>73083163
>It won't matter. She won't do anything to help you
I've asserted numerous times this is the case, I don't want the Monarch to intervene I think the indigenous politicians can handle it.
>>73076673
I never need to fap to anything else again if that's really her
>>73083359
Fuck off child. I'd rather us be a completely parliamentary republic
No heads of state required. Both are redundant to the matter at hand
>>73081349
Not the guy you are responding to but could you tell me more about this?
I'm very curious.
>>73074211
This. Whether she officially holds power or not, she can easily take it back because she's the god damned queen. But she won't, she wants to die and her country to go with her.
>>73083560
>Fuck off child. I'd rather us be a completely parliamentary republic
>No heads of state required
Then you're a dribbling retard whodoesn't understand the last 800 years of British consitutional law.
>>73076673
Seriously Is that really her?
She's a cunt but its nice how it was under her rule that Shitain basically gave up and let the mudkips win for good. I hope she lives another 20 yrs tbfh.
>>73083561
He made a load of declarative statements that don't mean anything.
>>73083656
You take solace in the last 800 years of constitutional law
No need to adapt to what's happening nowadays
Everything is fine (repeat however much you need it)
>>73083842
>No need to adapt to what's happening nowadays
>Hasn't provided any evidence to suggest a parliamentary republic would work for the nation.
It physically can't function under the current legal system and would require a complete revamp, at which point we'd be at the behest of an inferior system.
Also name a nation without a head of state.
>>73083989
>Also name a nation without a head of state.
I guess you're right, there are none
To be honest, I just hate the Queen for being a useless sack of shit (purely in practice of course)
Theoretically she can interfere and help this country but she never will if she hasn't said anything thus far
I guess the best thing to do at the moment is just to ignore the cunt until we she dies and until we get a better parliament
>>73073966
Is she the worst?
http://www.redstate.com/diary/scipio62/2011/10/04/10-worst-kings-and-queens-of-england-and-the-united-kingdom/
No
Compared to most she's been quite good.
>>73075992
Holy kek
>>73085352
>Is she the worst?
>http://www.redstate.com/diary/scipio62/2011/10/04/10-worst-kings-and-queens-of-england-and-the-united-kingdom/
You fuckwit. Not a single person in that stupid list presided over the ethnic replacement of our very nation in its own cities. Exactly HOW bad does it have to get for you to see what's gone on? Do you live on a fucking rock in the Shetlands or summat? Christ...
>>73085857
>Spain
>>73086553
If you didn't live on a rock encrusted with gannet shit and limpets, you might know that there are such things as expats in the world, as well as that Her Majesty doesn't give two fucks about our nation.
>>73086553
Spain's king is a corrupt piece of shit, sure, but I think the refugee situation is better there?
>>73086950
Spanish politics has been a bad joke since around 1550, but yes, few fuckers want to hang around here when there are Swedish and German girls queuing up to take Moro cock.
