Why is nobody talking about the fact that Based Dilbert man has a 100% accuracy rate when it comes to Trump predictions?
http://blog.dilbert.com/post/131749156346/the-case-for-a-trump-landslide-part-1
Work of the Devil!
Not interesting is why
>>72980202
Scott Adams is quite based indeed. Read all his articles and of course Dilbert, though it has gotten a little stale.
>>72980202
>http://blog.dilbert.com/post/131749156346/the-case-for-a-trump-landslide-part-1
The greatest part is that this man has predicted that Trump is going to win it all.
Trump = 45th POTUS
>MGTOW
>Muh biotrufs
>Muh cartoon about sad men
He's a nobody.
>>72980202
>Why is nobody talking about the fact that Based Dilbert man has a 100% accuracy rate when it comes to Trump predictions?
Because nobody reads Dilbert, faggot.
>>72980202
He's smarter than I thought. I always pegged him as a hardcore liberal.
I like the guy. Quaint teeth and glasses.
>>72980202
he turned on the God-Emperor then tried to pass it off as a 'lesson', fuck him
You have been spamming your site here since august.
He only talks what we all know
>>72980202
He's a genius and most people here are useful faggots. He predicted trump wins and is probably right, but doesn't blindly believe he'll fix America like the cucks here
I thought he said Trump would win Iowa
>>72981581
He did say Trump would win Iowa. OP confirmed for not checking his own sources.
>muh gun control