Is it because of the patriarchy holding them down like everyone says it is?
>>72637339
Because women are vapless cunt who only care about riding dick.
>>72637554
> t. An edgy neckbeard
Any substance to your argument?
>>72638058
My mom.
>>72637339
Its time to start burning white women at the stake again
>>72637339
>Why can't women run Nations/Civilizations or Leadership Positions?
Because they are children.
>>72638058
Oh look, the fud appears.
>>72638672
You're an emasculated virgin who will never find someone from the opposite sex because you lack the social skills to attract real women. You're probably gay anyway.
You live in a fantasy world, fatty. Nobody here takes you seriously. And I bet you wear a fedora, you neckbearded loser. As if walking around in idiotic clothes to impress others is a substitute for real charisma.
>>72637339
because they don't want to. they'd rather maintain their own family as that is more important to them
>>72638934
What would you say to those women that want to actually do something to better civilization as a whole instead?
>>72639070
raise strong, disciplined children, as her fore-mothers did for thousands of years. you don't need overt power to change the world
>>72639161
But wouldn't you say strong, disciplined children come from their fathers and not their mothers? Take a look at black people who don't have fathers and see how they grow up to be
>>72638619
Also, explain
>>72639701
They can't even run companies, let alone countries.
>>72639809
Oh wait, they can...
>>72639887
Hey, a company is a company
>>72639887
i doubt the people pictured are actually women
What part is difficult to understand?
1 Timothy 2:12
“But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.”
>>72639337
You need both. A mother to love you always and a father to hit you with tough love/reality. Black women are usually atrocious parents so that confounds it.
>>72642703
why are black women atrocious parents
They can but only in Britain
>>72637339
>biologically speakin men are better suit to be leaders.
>women have different priorities than men.
If jackasses like you would stop saying shit like women are inferior to men, there wont even be all this feminazis.
>>72637339
Because women are useless. They have no sense of responsibility and loyalty. They just do whatever their fee fees tell them to do.
Pic related, a few of Europe's "defense" ministers.
>>72637339
Because then they ruin them like with Germany
>>72645470
And heres another one
Some of Britain's greatest leaders were women.
>>72645470
Is there not one single woman who has made their nation better? Surely some of them have a sense of responsibility and loyalty right?
>>72646155
>Is there not one single woman who has made their nation better?
There's probably a few but I just cant think of one :/
Hey maybe Hilary gets a shot this year :^)?
>>72646155
Thatcher
inb4 muh coal mines
>>72646572
>Hillary
>Making our Nation better
pick one
>>72644412
This image highlights why women can never be effective leaders of nations
>there is no such thing as society, there are individual men and women and there are families
They view society as a big family.
>>72637339
"It's queer how out of touch with reality women are. They live in a world of their own, and there has never been anything like it, and never can be. It is too beautiful altogether, and if they were to set it up it would go to pieces before the first sunset. Some confounded fact that we men have been living contentedly with ever since the day of creation would start up and knock the whole thing over." - Joseph Conrad
>>72637339
It's strange with women leaders, most are completely inept but 20% of them are national heroes or extremely exceptional rulers.
>>72647665
Like who? Besides Thatcher
