>Adam and Eve (first humans) were created 6000 years ago
>there is concrete evidence of human existence coming from older than that date
Abrahamics BTFO?
It was a catholic bishop named James Usher that theorized how old the earth was in the 1600's.
What does this have to do with politics??
>>72616188
Actually I was talking about Adam & Eve's lineage. If you do the math, you can figure out that they were created 6000 years ago. Calculate the age - century correlation of Adam's lineage.
waut for lre figurative maymay
>>72616048
>Retarded Abrahamics
FTFY
Can you explain the git of basic proof you speak of? I'm genuinely interested being that I consider myself a Christian... Thanks much.
>>72616487
Gist..**
>>72616048
>using buzzwords without knowing it's meaning
Turkroach - islam is an abrahamic fairytail too
>>72616048
>Implying carbondating would be legit if god was real
http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/1996/december9/6te072.html
It's been 20 years since the Pope supported evolution. How can christian people in developed countries really think otherwise?
Can somebody tell me how you're supposed to believe in evolution and the correct age of the Earth and still hold onto Christian dogma about Jesus Christ?
If Adam and Eve is bullshit then all the genealogies that extend to Noah and then to Jesus are also bullshit right? Then clearly Jesus wasn't descended straight from David, which was one of his main claims to being Messiah right?
So once you realize the earth is billions of years old and that humans follow an evolutionary lineage going back millions of years of primate evolution, how on earth do you still believe in Jesus or any other myth?
>>72616582
>islam is an abrahamic fairytail too
Thanks for enlightening me Captain Sweden, you rock.
>>72616591
pope is lame as fuck evolution is true , does not explain how this works with a 6 day creation
>>72616048
>>72616048
Maybe he meant 60,000
>>72616741
its basicly in the bible
3Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts, 4And saying, Where is the promise of his coming? for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation. 5For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water: 6Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished: 7But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.
8But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day. 9The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
>but, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.
>that by the word of God the heavens were of old
>>72616048
Le fedora meme. Also you mudslime sand niggers are abrahamic too.
>>72617010
>Also you mudslime sand niggers are abrahamic too.
Thanks for enlightening me you mongol subhuman
>can see stars in the sky millions of light years away
>that light needs to have existed millions of years ago to be visible to us now
It's pretty clear that the word used in the bible that's translated to english as 'day' is actually just a nondescript period of time
>>72617103
no its not
n the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. 2And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.
The First Day: Light
3And God said, Let there be light:
>God created the heaven=universe
this was before the first day
>>72616970
>>that by the word of God the heavens were of old
The heavens are not the earth. The Bible is very clear about how old the authors believed the earth to be since it is very clear concerning the genealogies of its characters stretching from the first people, Adam and Eve to Jesus.
>>but, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.
one day with the lord is speaking of a day in heaven is it not?
>>72617071
>Muslim calling a europoor subhuman
THIS CANNOT BE FAKED
>>72616048
babbys first thread?
>>72617886
Kek
>>72616278
Not even a christfag but they've theorized for a while now that the days referenced are not actually days
Tip your fedora in a circle jerk where people give a shit
>>72616516
Thanks niggers.. :(
>>72617806
This coming from yet another muslim, kek
>>72616048
Be careful what you say, Erdogan might put you in prison
>>72618038
Only 15%,5% less than biblebros my roach friend.
DEUS VULT
>>72617668
>one day with the lord is speaking of a day in heaven is it not?
no it is a complete verse and its about what is writen in the last verse, why would we be ignorant about what happens in heaven
>The heavens are not the earth. The Bible is very clear about how old the authors believed the earth to be since it is very clear concerning the genealogies of its characters stretching from the first people, Adam and Eve to Jesus.
the earth is in the heavens but indeed the register might be a clue about the age of the earth and then it is a young earth
>>72618188
>literally a star and crescent on the flag
>>72618545
Jeez man jeez no need to go that far jeez man
>>72618545
>literally a satanic star on his flag
>>72616048
I'll just tack on the evidence here for you.
Homo sapiens idaltu (picrelated skull of) lived as far back as 160,000 years ago (Lower paleolithic Pleistocene).
>>72619043
how do you know its 160.000 years ?
>>72616741
>>72619162
I hate atheists,but this is too cringy
>>72619035
Jesus Christ is lord, no one comes to the father but through him.
>>72619126
>The fossilized remains of H. s. idaltu were discovered at Herto Bouri near the Middle Awash site of Ethiopia's Afar Triangle in 1997 by Tim White, but were first unveiled in 2003.[1] Herto Bouri is a region of Ethiopia under volcanic layers. According to radioisotope dating, the layers are between 154,000 and 160,000 years old.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homo_sapiens_idaltu
>inb4 wikipedia isn't a source!!!11
>>72619325
>Lets believe shit that they changed every few years 1111!!!111
>>72619401
Explain to me why it isn't viable.
Fossil evidence shows changes in species; they change as they adapt to different environments.
>>72619325
Why would it be true have you carbondated anything your self , or is it just faith ?
>>72619519
>cherry picking
>>72616048
A) Where is this "concrete proof"?
B) see A.
>>72619518
Firstly,stop putting putin reactions if you are an athiest.
Secondly,I'm talking about how these brilliant 'scientists' change their statements and revoke their research every once in a while.
>>72619580
its not i just mention that there is a lot of fraud in science, to me you just have blind faith
>>72619725
>>72619791
You have shown proof of one scientist who has done this.
Also fuck you, I can post putins if I want.
>>72618288
>no it is a complete verse and its about what is writen in the last verse, why would we be ignorant about what happens in heaven
Isn't heaven described in scripture as being "with the lord"?
>the earth is in the heavens but indeed the register might be a clue about the age of the earth and then it is a young earth
Even if perhaps one day is a thousand years and this accurately describes a billion-year old Earth, the timeline is still completely fucked up. Human beings have been here for less than a million years (according to most biologists) and animals/dinosaurs have only been around a few hundred million years, yet the Bible says humans were created at the same time as all other animals.
Once you accept biology you pretty much have to reject the entire foundation of Scripture
>>72619725
So your argument is that religious dogma is more palatable because it's set in stone? What kind of bullshit is that?
>>72619967
I'm talking about the scientists you autistic fuck.
Pic related,stupid /pol/acks like you
>>72619894
>Isn't heaven described in scripture as being "with the lord"?
but it does not say that does it?christfags already know that they have a eternity in heaven with god they dont have to be ignorant about that
now where could we be ignorant of
>For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old,
>>72619843
you should research haeckels drawings using faked embryo pictures in books over 100 years
>>72616048
>Abrahamics BTFO
They have been for the last century.
They gotta be in a state of eternal mental backflip to avoid the simple realisation that the strict biblical creation myth is just utterly bullshit.
I assume even like 90% of christians consider them lunatics for beliving this shit
>>72619843
but you wont because you have faith in the proffesors telling the trruth
>>72619894
>Once you accept biology you pretty much have to reject the entire foundation of Scripture
Why if god is all powerfull and it is all about faith why the hell would he be found in science
>>72621102
And the great dragon was cast out, that old >serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.
god is laughing his ass of because of the dragon// dinosaurs we find in the earth while it iis literally in the fucking bible
>>72620163
The scientists correct their wrong steps. Religion doesn't. I'd rather believe the people who change their beliefs when they are disproven
>>72620736
>>72620853
What makes these fake all of a sudden?
>>72621102
>Why if god is all powerfull and it is all about faith why the hell would he be found in science
if God is all powerful and it's all about faith then your god can never be disproven, so congratulations.
>>72621908
research i said the below one of the black and white is real
