>liberals hell bent on the destruction of Christianity
>get triggered at criticisms of Islam
Can someone explain this assbackwards logic to me?
>liberals
>using logic
Pick one
>want to champion women's rights
>want to champion a culture that has exactly zero women's rights.
It's almost like they don't think anything through, isn't it?
>>72601942
Muslims are usually brown.
Islam is anti-western.
That's it.
>>72601942
Liberals thinks their progressive ideology is just what everyone in the universe is supposed to believe or else. Or else.
It's just the shitty opinion a person who's sole source of energy is attention , usually this is someone who lives a way too comfortable, privileged life and does not know anything outside of their social clique.
Same shit when people who have NEVER lived around blacks will tell you you're racist and a bigot for not wanting to live around them, despite them living in a 99% white community and the only blacks they engage with are the BLM cronies they hang out with at their shitty colleges.
So it's no different here, they don't have exposure to the real thing and never will. I bet they would be begging the Christian God to save them under Islam rule.
Dad wasn't a Muslim.
>>72601942
It's basically
>Out with the old, in with the new
Regardless of whether or not one is better than the other
>>72601942
Catholics/Christians/Whites have been bred to have white guilt and be fair. Christianity has been used to cause the crusades, spanish inquisition but most importantly the colonization of america. Despite christianity having overwhelming evidence against it, it is still practiced/enforced in predominantly low income areas of plenty of degeneracy. SJWs believe they are in the right to destroy what is holding back the white man.
As for islam, the white guilt is so overwhelming that they are looking for any opportunity to satisfy it. They should go to an indian reservation and gamble their life ssvings away, but instead they open up their asshole inorder to get a big load of islam rammed inside.
They will only learn to regret it once theyve taken down america and even then they will believe "it is fair for what we did to the natives and blacks".
I'd rather see islam spread to the west than let feminists take over.
ashalam alaikum or whatever
>>72602572
This. It's attention craving and virtue signaling.
They were stripped from their western believes and their natural set of ideals was replaced by a bunch of holes to fill. They find theirselves with meaningless lifes so they follow the guidelines given to them so they can get a pat in the head, no matter how contradictory these believes are.
"I will have in an undergraduate class, let’s say, a young, white, male student, politically-correct, who will say: “I am only a bourgeois white male, I can’t speak.” In that situation – it’s peculiar, because I am in the position of power and their teacher and, on the other hand, I am not a bourgeois white male – I say to them: “Why not develop a certain degree of rage against the history that has written such an abject script for you that you are silenced?” Then you begin to investigate what it is that silences you, rather than take this very deterministic position – since my skin colour is this, since my sex is this, I cannot speak. I call these things, as you know, somewhat derisively, chromatism: basing everything on skin colour – “I am white, I can’t speak” – and genitalism: depending on what genitals you have, you can or cannot speak in certain situations. From this position, then, I say you will of course not speak in the same way about the Third World material, but if you make it your task not only to learn what is going on there through language, through specific programmes of study, but also at the same time through a historical critique of your position as the investigating person, then you will see that you have earned the right to criticize, and you will be heard. When you take the position of not doing your homework – “I will not criticize because of my accident of birth, the historical accident” – that is a much more pernicious position. In one way you take a risk to criticize, of criticizing something which is Other – something which you used to dominate. I say that you have to take a certain risk: to say “I won’t criticize” is salving your conscience, and allowing you not to do any homework. On the other hand, if you criticize having earned the right to do so, then you are indeed taking a risk and you will probably be made welcome, and can hope to be judged with respect."
>>72601942
They've been taught that white Christians are evil and Muslims dindu nuffin
>faggot anti-pope is top cuck kissing refugee feet
>islam is iron age cult the believes in killing non-believers
guess which one faggot liberal yuppies like more
Liberalism is cultural marxism, and it is hell-bent on subversion of western culture. That is it's purpose. Christianity IS western culture, so it must be UNDERMINED. Islam is NOT western culture so it is SPARED. Liberals, LGBT's, SJW's, marxists, communists, feminists, they are ALL THE SAME. Call them whatever you want. They want to bring down the west through cultural undermining, look up "Critical Theory", it is being teached in our universities right now, it is NOT a conspiracy theory, it is clearly out there for you to read about. Do you not know this already /pol/? I expected more of you by now. Did you not listen to Yuri Bezmenov? If not, you should do it now:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3qkf3bajd4
They want to replace Christianity with Islam, the media has always hated them and portrayed them as child molesters and nut jobs. Athiests are to be blamed for the invasion of Europe, Christianity would've been the backbone of their country but people left it and now Islam is taking over.
>>72601942
Liberals aren't hell bent on the destruction of Christianity, they're hell bent on the transformation of the West and the removal of the people who built capitalistic societies that made the West great, namely white Christians. Erosion of Christian values fits right in with their left wing ideology and their promotion of Islam and Eastern cultures fits right in with their totalitarian views.
The left is intentionally killing western society for their personal benefit.
>>72603169
Yes i agree mostly, see my post here: >>72603009
>>72603239
The maddening aspect of this is we know what the problem is, yet no one is interested in countering it in any meaningful way. /pol/ has become a circlejerk of rage porn addicts and meme spouting redditors seeing shills behind every post that doesn't agree with their shitty viewpoint.
>>72603771
Yes but porn viewing and meme spouting is what 4chan has always been about, has it not? The basic behaviour of young men remains un-changed, and 4chan represents the special blend of this hedonism as well as more legitimate discussions that pop up every now and then. If one wants to make real change happen then one has to get off their ass and start doing so. I see no reason to be upset over what other people aren't doing, all we can do is affect our own behaviour and do our best to inform others about the situation.
>>72604061
>porn viewing and meme spouting is what 4chan has always been about
Rage porn, as in they post feminist hate threads or nigger hate threads just to enjoy their anger at a certain group or person. Rage porn and memes are like rocking in a rocking chair. It'll give you something to do but you won't get anywhere doing it. You can't change anything by sitting back and looking at it. The left were successful because they embraced being the counter culture and worked until they now own the culture. If the right wants to stem the leftist tide they better learn to fight back and embrace their role as the modern counter culture before it's too late.
>>72604475
Yes of course that type of "Rage porn" that you describe is fruitless and useless. I like to think of this dichotomy as "positive" and "negative" actions. A negative action would be to participate in feminist hate threads. A positive action would be to write an article about your own political viewpoint, or to come with something constructive that can replace the current decadent system. Obviously /pol/ focuses a lot on these "negative" aspects which is why i don't like this board very much. I am myself making efforts in my life to focus more on the "positive" stuff, like self-improvement for example. But i consider that it's important to have a balance between the two, go ahead and laugh at marxists, but also remember to fight actively for an alternative. Don't get stuck just doing one of the two.
