Who will her VP pick be?
a hard working non American woman
bill
>>72557624
Monica Lewinsky lel
Warren to pick up Bernie supporters.
>>72557624
Elizabeth Warren or that castro faggot
>>72557624
A cuck.
>>72557624
$100 on
>someone that is allied with here that needs immunity from the DOJ for some reason and knows enough about her dirty laundry to BTFO her campaign for good.
>>72557624
Hopefully Bernie.
>>72557624
HUD Secretary Julian Castro
>>72557624
pic related is my guess.
She needs to win VA to become president and he is super popular here. Even I like him, and I've never voted for a democrat before.
Also the democrats are hemorrhaging white male voters and he might be able to stop the bleeding a little bit.
>>72558205
>This will probably happen
>>72557624
Trump
>>72558251
You make a good argument. But I think VA is already in the bag for the Democrats. The senate didn't even flip in the 2014 massacre. Lots of government workers who remember the GOP shutdowns. Plus there's a Dem governor so the GOP can't pull their voter suppression bullshit like they will in Ohio, NC, FL, etc.
>>72558394
>The senate didn't even flip in the 2014 massacre.
senate SEAT
>>72558251
I dont know why so many people mention the Castros. Itd be pandering to the highest degree and its not needed because Trump is doing so poorly with hispanics anyways.
Warner is a great choice, will secure Virginia for the democrats.
>>72558394
>>72558443
The argument about the senate seat is a bad one tbqh.
Like I said Mark Warner is EXTREMELY popular here. It was a huge surprise to everyone that Gillespie came so close to actually beating him. The democratic nature of VA is exaggerated. Democratic victories have mostly been because of horrible candidates put forth by the GOP (Cuccinelli, Gillespie, George Allen again.)
Also, Warner is someone who would actually make a good VP/future presidential candidate.
>>72558569
If Clinton wins, I'm sure they will give a cabinet position to Castro and groom him for future runs.
VP is a bad position for future presidential hopefuls because you have to be linked to EVERY action of the administration. If you are just a cabinet secretary (usually for just one term) you can strategically distance yourself from certain scandals. Hillary has done this during this election cycle.
Luis Gutiérrez
$ exec maximum-pandering.cfg
>>72557624
Probably Warren. It'll placate the Bernie faggots plus you get the novelty of a ticket with two women.
>>72557624
Donald Trump
>>72558870
Nah, Warren is too much to the left for Hillary and they have serious differences.
>>72558629
Like I said, you do make a good argument. I'm not saying VA isn't a swing state. It will be. But it's one that leans blue. It's been a pretty big shift considering Bush carried VA in 2000 and 2004.
Hopefully the Dems will do well enough that they don't have to focus so much on VA and can look towards Ohio and Florida, the 2 big enchiladas.
Also, how does VA work? Does the governor appoint the senator or would there be a special election? Because keep in mind that the senate may be very close so the Dems may not want to risk that. I don't think that's something you've considered.
The senate could very well go 50-50 with Dems picking up WI, IL, PA, and FL/OH/NH.
They may need that swing state senate seat to remain blue until 2020.
>>72559094
We have our gubernatorial elections in off-off years. By that I mean, some states have them in off-years (non presidential years, midterm years) we have them in odd numbered years.
So our next gubernatorial election is in Nov 2017, meaning McCarpetbagger won't be out of office until January 2018. So even if a republican wins the Gov's election next year, McAuliffe will be in office to appoint a democrat to Warner's vacant seat, assuming he is picked and wins.
So no real risk of senate control for the democrats.
>>72559074
Such as? I'm not saying you're wrong, but I don't think she'd turn down the opportunity (if it was even offered to her.)
>>72559364
I know how your gubernatorial system works. 1 term limit. I remember the last guberrace. The Libertarian party had a pretty decent % as I recall.
I was asking how does it work for a vacant senate seat. Each state has its own rules in terms of how long until a special election, can the governor appoint for the remainder of the term, etc.
If there had to be a special senate election in an off year like 2017 let's say, would the Dems want to risk that?
