https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uEr0GQ7TZY4
http://michael-hudson.com/2016/03/smart-parasites/
Post economic redpills
>>72514068
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIaXVntqlUE
from 1912
>>72514990
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oUHS7TVVgww
>>72515050
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IproGNK_cfQ
>>72515086
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wtJUVEPaF44
>>72515114
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6PgilZn7eZU
>>72515150
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_WS0rpNHzT0
>>72514991
I like this one
>Bakunin on Marx and Rothschild
>“Himself a Jew, Marx has around him, in London and France, but especially in Germany, a multitude of more or less clever, intriguing, mobile, speculating Jews, such as Jews are every where: commercial or banking agents, writers, politicians, correspondents for newspapers of all shades, with one foot in the bank, the other in the socialist movement, and with their behinds sitting on the German daily press — they have taken possession of all the newspapers — and you can imagine what kind of sickening literature they produce. Now, this entire Jewish world, which forms a single profiteering sect, a people of blooksuckers, a single gluttonnous parasite, closely and intimately united not only across national borders but across all differences of political opinion — this Jewish world today stands for the most part at the disposal of Marx and at the same time at the disposal of Rothschild. I am certain that Rothschild for his part greatly values the merits of Marx, and that Marx for his part feels instinctive attraction and great respect for Rothschild.
>This may seem strange. What can there be in common between Communism and the large banks? Oh! The Communism of Marx seeks enormous centralization in the state, and where such exists, there must inevitably be a central state bank, and where such a bank exists, the parasitic Jewish nation, which. speculates on the work of the people, will always find a way to prevail ....”
http://www.connexions.org/RedMenace/Docs/RM4-BakuninonMarxRothschild.htm
>>72514991
http://theredpillnetwork.tumblr.com/post/100396921795/the-octopus-aldrich-plan
from https://twitter.com/RudyHavenstein
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2013/09/09/how-the-cult-of-shareholder-value-wrecked-american-business/
http://money.cnn.com/2015/10/27/investing/stocks-dividends-buybacks-high-2016/
I think they simply arrange for banks to fail and be bailed out
not even hard to do
> not lending to this black drug user enough money to purchase a house is just Raycis
https://theintercept.com/2015/08/13/sec-admits-monitoring-stock-buybacks-prevent-market-manipulation/
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/oral-history/financial-crisis/tags/deregulation/
FED handouts to banks responsible for 93%
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/the-fed-caused-93--of-the-entire-stock-market-s-move-since-2008--analysis-194426366.html
http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2015/09/16/poverty-wages-remain-stagnant-despite-economic-recovery
>>72515690
basically they get free money from the FED if they fail
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/8/14/1411883/-Behind-the-Numbers-The-Anatomy-of-a-Low-Wage-Recovery
from https://twitter.com/nanexllc/
>>72515907
stock market stuff
>>72515965
>>72516045
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f9EjJoCNtoo
"Each frame is 1 millionth of a second of time (microsecond).
Animation of how HFT front runs orders at the speed of light. This video shows 277 millionths of a second of time."
>>72515809
FREE MONEY
Why is there a lack of economic threads on /pol/ in the last few months or maybe even years?
>>72516849
>last few months
Trumpmania
>>72516909
Trump is pretty good on economics
>anti outsourcing
>anti mass immigration
>at least said some things against wall street
>fine with spending money on defense and public infrastructure
>>72517038
>Against free trade
>Good on economics
Are you fucking retarded?
>>72517038
>>72517118
Is he going to make significant changes as president?
>>72517567
>>72517118
Outsourcing is a cancer that has destroyed US wages, exported millions of jobs, and impoverished millions of people.
The US historically maintained high wages and high production through protectionism
http://www.amazon.com/Americas-Protectionist-Takeoff-1815-1914-Michael/dp/3980846687
http://www.amazon.com/Free-Trade-Doesnt-Work-Replace/dp/0578079674
If you think otherwise you're a globalist shill.
>>72517743
Due to outsourcing and mass immigration wages have stagnated in the US
>>72517771
also thanks to outsourcing and mass immigration wages no longer rise with productivity.
>>72517743
>Apply protectionism to raw materials
>Manufacturing has higher costs and has to outsource
>Apply protectionism to manufacturing
>Not enough demand of raw materials
>A big deal of raw material producers close
>Apply protectionism to transportation
>Raise costs in pretty much every industry
>Industries with low profit margin either close or outsource
Protectionists are truly retarded people.
>>72517808
What changed in 1973?
>>72517743
I'm not going to bother arguing with someone who clearly has no economic background. I'll just leave you with this:
http://www.igmchicago.org/igm-economic-experts-panel/poll-results?SurveyID=SV_0dfr9yjnDcLh17m
>>72518003
higher costs mean higher wages for labor which means consumers (workers) have more buying power resulting in more investment in the economy and overall more production
this is the basis of the high wage doctrine that built the US economy in the 19th and 20th century.
>>72518196
mass immigration and outsourcing
>>72518232
economists today are also the ones that said "the housing bubble is a great thing"
you shouldn't trust the idiots who exist to shill for globalists who like outsourcing and mass immigration.
>>72518232
You should read this if you want to understand economics from an economist that actually predicted the bubble
http://michael-hudson.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/RoadToSerfdom.pdf
>>72518196
I'd say that maybe it's because 1971 was the year the entire world jumped into an entirely fiat-based monetary system.
>>72518377
>higher costs mean higher wages
>higher costs mean higher wages
>higher costs mean higher wages
Seriously, stop smoking whatever the fuck you're smoking. It's not good for you head.
>>72514792
>literal Austrian
>>72518493
Yes that's the basis of high wage doctrine
When workers are paid more they can afford the products that are being produced
see: Henry Ford paying his workers higher wages so they can afford Model T Fords
If you are against the high wage doctrine you are siding with the international jewish globalism.
>>72515244
It's like being on /pol/ in the 1870s
>>72518711
>>72518489
>Insinuating I haven't already
Free trade was a key theory of Adam Smith's, the father of classical liberalism.
Also, Hayek's thoughts free trade:
"He thought that free trade and economic relationships would be a tremendous force for peace and better international relations as goods and services united foreigners in a common goal of satisfying each others wants and needs via trade."
>>72518711
So... the only way to Rolls Royce to sell their cars was to pay so much to their workers until they could afford one?
This makes no sense at all.
>>72518377
You forget that labor costs is also a factor of production that increases prices as well. Jesus.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGDKkIEYQkw
http://www.christianidentityministries.com/kennedy/Biblical_Economics.pdf
>>72518788
>Adam Smith
nope that's a myth that not even Austrians believe
Smith was in fact a customs official that worked full time
>Smith worked full-time at his post, often chairing the daily meetings of the board of customs commissioners. Moreover, Smith sought the appointment and apparently found the position enjoyable and relaxing. It is true that Smith spent little time or energy on scholarship and writing after his appointment; but there were leaves of absence available which Smith showed no interest in pursuing. Furthermore the groundwork for Smith's quest for the appointment was not so much his intellectual attainments as a reward for his advice as consultant on taxes and the budget to the British government since the mid-1760s
https://mises.org/library/adam-smith-myth
>Smith also supported tariffs on imported goods to counteract an internal tax on the same good. Smith also fell to pressure in supporting some tariffs in support for national defence
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Smith
>>72518866
that's a rare luxury good so it's irrelevant
>>72519001
productivity and wages rise together as long as consumers can afford more businesses will invest more
If consumers can't afford anything then the economy will be shit (modern Europe)
by your "low wage" logic the poorest countries on earth should be the best because people are paid so little.
>work as a broker
>someone calls me to complain that HFT is ruining trading for the small traders like him
Anyone who thinks this is an idiot. HFT front runs trades on large orders from fkrms, not your little shit 50 share order.
>>72519528
What's the sum you're talking about, 100k, 1 million, 10k (USD),..?
>>72519309
and again it's fairly easy to see when the high wage doctrine was ended (late 60s ironically the exact time as the cultural revolution)
>>72518866
They target the luxury market, pulling the same trick would be insanely difficult for them, but just imagine how much larger the luxury market would become if they did. Not every employee would buy a Rolls, and they certainly wouldn't buy several in a short time.
http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2015/09/16/poverty-wages-remain-stagnant-despite-economic-recovery
http://dianawest.net/Home/tabid/36/EntryId/3202/What-Is-a-Conservative-What-Defines-the-GOP.aspx
>This is in not an exageration. The program Continetti describes as quintessentially Republican happens to intersect or mesh perfectly with the global systems helmed into existence, literally, by American Communist agents of the Kremlin at the time of or after World War II
> I have long believed that bottom-line free trade which, for example, turned Americans into enablers of slave or quasi-slave labor in such dictatorships as Communist China, and bankrupters of our own manufacturing base in the USA, was a disaster. Not until I recently picked up Toward Soviet America, the 1932 book by Communist Pary USA Chairman William Z. Foster, did I realize global free trade was also in sync with Communism's assault on our nation's character as well.
>In his predictions for Soviet America, many of which have come true as Marxist ideology has subverted our institutions, Foster writes: A Communist world will be a unified, organized world. Remember Soviet agent Alger Hiss acted as the first UN secretary general in 1945. The economic system will be one great organization, based upon the principle of planning now dawning in the U.S.S.R. Remember that Soviet agent Harry Dexter White was the first executive director of the IMF in 1946.
>The American Soviet government will be an important section in this world organization. In such a society there will be no tariffs or the many other barriers erected by capitalism against a free world interchange of goods. The raw material supplies of the world will be at the disposition of the peoples of the world.
I can't believe I'm actually reading all these articles O_o
It's actually pretty educational though. I always hear about buybacks on CNBC but never what it actually entails.
.
...
This is the only redpill you need
anyone posted this yet?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UrJGlXEs8nI
>>72518003
oh look, a globalist faggot who prefers his people to have to work for slave wages
probably a kike
>>72518196
>>72520027
Generally were talking in the millions
Thanks
