Is James Woods clinically retarded?
Well what he's saying is true.
>>72509006
He's fucking based.
>>72509006
>Clinically retarded
Is that how they say "based" in Russian?
ANTI CHINA PROPAGANDA FROM AMERICAN PIG SCUM
AMERICA IS FAT PIG
>>72509006
but he's right.
>>>>heres your (you)
China male-female ratio is somewhere around 1.17 for under 18.
Peasants would kill female children because males are worth more. They had to choose due to one child policy.
>>72509006
His IQ is estimated something close to 170 if I recall.
Yea yea I know, IQ....
But it proves he's not a retard
>>72509082
Yup, cold pass out means patriot in Russia also. Its a wierd place.
Bernie got BTFO again? What's new
>>72509006
He is based, one of the few americans i follow on twitter.
>>72509137
>one child policy
Nigger its 2016, rural China can have as many children as they want.
>>72509006
No worries Bernie will apologise and offer up his wife for woods to wood.
>>72509040
>>72509055
>>72509082
>>72509129
No, It hasn't.
The public do and its strictly illegal.
The public kill female babies as Chinese tradition dictates sons stay and provide for parents, while women leave to live with their husband and their husband's parents.
Blame subhuman chinks.
>>72509006
No, but (you) might be if that's the conclusion you drew.
>>72509006
When McCarthy wanted to blacklist all of the Jews in Hollywood for communism, James Woods said good idea, make that happen.
Yeah free speech and freedom of religion are also things in china. Oh wait...
>>72509145
>His IQ is estimated something close to 170 if I recall.
Do a bit of research. There's not basis for that. Then, all estimated IQs without a test are complete BS.
>>72509006
Maybe. Bernie is no genius either.
>>72509006
Sander btfo and in ICU
>good actor
>best Simpsons guest star
>smart as fuck
>massive dick
>LONG LIVE THE NEW FLESH
Based James Woods
>>72509225
youre still wrong.
QUESTION:
does china kill female infants for population control
>china is forced to only have one child
>tradition dictates that males are worth more
>ergo, government "nudging" and indirectly forcing parents to kill female infants
based james woods.
>>72509006
He's right, this happened and keeps happening, how does this make him a retarded ?
>>72509308
>china's created a system where people commit crime out of a need to! It must be because china likes crime!
Actually, both you and James are retarded.
>>72509040
What he's saying is true but its a bit of a non sequitur. That is to say his statement is related at all to bernies original premise and its beside Bernie's point.
In fact, it only strengthens Bernie's argument here. Because Bernie is conceding that China has terrible human rights and yet they STILL manage to give maternity lesve, paid.
Mr woods statement does the opposite of what he intended. He would have been better of approaching it as such:
"China allows 14 months paid maternity leave so that the mother can dispose of her newborn daughter you utter moron"
>>72509424
you must just be trolling at this point
even inbred britcucks arent this stupid, are they?
>>72509006
Isn't he just proving Sanders right? China does have a bad human rights record.
>>72509459
Not related*
>>72509516
Yes. That's why it is being implied that he is stupid.
>>72509472
great argument fattie
>>72509225
but then what he's saying is still right. What's your point?
>>72509040
>>72509055
>>72509082
>>72509129
>>72509155
>>72509215
>>72509376
Look at the OP pic again you morons
>>72509424
Social edicts somehow create a population crisis. No problem here, the proletariat just didn't know how to avoid local authorities from taxing the shit out of them for having more than 1 the because that's how they fund themselves. Disregard the lack of industrialized farming in rural areas and a need for larger families
>>72509308
That's like saying the US is "nudging" people to kill each other because people sometimes try to murder and they let them have guns.
>>72509459
Do you believe PEOPLE ACTUALLY USE IT? China, technically, has every right Americans do and is basically capitalist. According to the Communist party.
It is propaganda.
>>72509585
almost had a relevant argument in there you pseudo intellectual cunt
>>72509615
you dont actually see either of those things as similar do you?
>>72509546
You are retarded for thinking 14 weeks paid is some kind of good shit. Sanders tried to be a smart ass and ended up a punk bitch communist again.
https://mobile.twitter.com/RealJamesWoods/status/667320774521323521
>>72509714
tell us how it isn't a fair analogy and stop dodging the argument
>>72509742
I never said that. But ok.
>>72509678
What would have made it relevant?
>>72509714
And what's the difference?
>guns are allowed because of a greater need to guarantee the second amendment even though deaths are caused by it
>one child policy necessary to prevent the greater threat of overpopulation even though people will kill girls
Considering that overpopulation would kill far more people than children, it's actually less morally ambiguous than the second amendment.
We do have pregnate leave in usa though. It's just not payed for by the government and it doesnt need to be. Nobody makes you take a job that does or doesn't have it. You can switch jobs if you feel strongly about it. Not every job pays for your healthcare but we dont need the govt for that either. All we really need the govt for is just to make a few rules so we can function more smoothly in our lives and a military so we can defend ourselves from other countries and groups. The government isnt some parent we need to give everything to and get less than we payed into it.
>>72509804
if you explained why its the chinese governments intention that people commit crime
>>72509424
It's because China viewed the crime as preferable to population expansion. Preferable to providing for the aging to avoid this unwanted scenario. And they've all but admitted they shit the bed as they unwind those one-child policies.
China's female abortion/murder crisis developed directly from government intervention.
Anyway paid maternity leave is retarded. Children raised by school and nanny instead of actual parents are not a desirable goal. If a company wants to offer it its their choice, not the government's.
>>72509663
I don't care moron.
I'm simply explaining the jpg from the op and how it makes zero sense. They could have been arguing about animal crackers for all I care.
I don't care about chinamen and america is the greatest country on earth. This is known. MAGA
>>72509006
no, he's right
They abandon female babies in the street and hope for a boy next time
it's the one child rule
if your first dies you can have another
>>72509299
>massive dick
not compared to Liam Neesson. Dude is hung like an Evian bottle
>>72510030
The Chinese government doesn't do it for population control. Chines citizens do it because males carry the surname.
>one child policy
>this leads to preferential treatment for boys since they are culturally seen as more thrifty and industrious
I mean, he's being hyperbolic, but it would surprise me if female children have been thrown in the dumpster.
>>72509006
This dumb jew just cant stop cherrypicking. North korea gives its children free food i guese we should applaud north korea too huh? All he ever does is complain about the expenses that life bills you god i hate this kike so much
>>72510162
wouldn't*
>>72509459
>China has terrible human rights and yet they STILL manage to give maternity lesve, paid.
Something about having a negative birth rate along with a vast overpopulation of men to women would have something to do with it. Long term there was going to be a decline in the fiscal output of companies toward maternity leave as opposed to the US which has a higher rate as well as more balanced male/female ratio.
>>72510162
mass abortions nigga
China today has significantly more males than females because of that, but I think they've eased up on one child policy because of this problem in recent years
>>72510162
China has one of the highest gender imbalances in the world. One year had 20% more recorded male births. It's given women a massive dating advantage and left a lot of men single and restless.
>>72509570
its super old?
>>72509145
>>72509137
>>72509129
>>72509118
>>72509082
>>72509055
>>72509145
>>72509219
>>72509223
>>72509225
Whole point of the tweet was that China sucks but still pay maternity leave. So yea, James woods is retarded. He proved Bernies point.
>>72510309
Tough shit. Anyone who marries a 21st century woman is a retarded idiot anyway.
>>72509006
Twitter shows the name of the person posting the tweet, not the person they're replying to. James Woods is correcting the retard. Glad we could clear that up.
>>72509006
America FUCK YEAH!
>>72510168
first argument in this thread good god what a board, But james didnt make an argument.
Reporting the 911 hijackers during their dry run allows him leeway to say whatever he wants.
>>72510416
Surprised how nearly everyone is completely missing this.
>>72509459
Agreed, it's not particularly what he's saying that's retarded, but the fact that it isn't really related to what Bernie said and he calls him an "utter moron" as if he just destroyed Bernie's point that the US should have maternity leave
>>72509006
China not a model of human rights, pays woman 14 weeks of maternity leave.
USA, a model of human rights, does not.
Therefore, maternity leave not a human right. Liberals: feefees > logic
>>72510416
>>72510599
>China sucks
Now think about why that is. Or you can stay uninformed.
>>72510516
Saying we shouldn't follow China's example isn't an argument, it's a statement of fact. Argument implies Bernie made sort of coherent point to be disputed.
>>72509557
Aside from other issues with Wood's statement, Bernie was clearly talking about the respective Governments of the US and China, not the people. The comment you replied to is saying that the people do this, not the Government, so Wood's point was kinda moot
>>72509776
come on we can't do all the thinking for you
>>72509851
So... would you see the Government providing roads as another example of this? Schools too? Do you not have any nuance in your views and everything is black and white - either Government policies are killing people or they're not?
>>72510416
>>72510599
Sanders' argument doesn't make any sense. It's like whenever North Korea comes out and chastises the US for using riot police or something and retarded leftists go "See, even North Korea sees how fucked up this is!" It doesn't make any sense, it's not an argument.
>A horrible person/group supports this thing that I support!
>That means it's double good because a bad person/group supports it!
It has no bearing on Sanders' argument that maternity leave is good and useful. It's like arguing for vegetarianism by saying that Hitler was bad, but he supported it, so clearly it's good.
Woods is just pointing out how ludicrous it is that Sanders' is using a country that knowingly has policies in place, for decades, that cause mass infanticide as a basis for a moral argument.
You two and the OP are fucking morons.
>>72509006
James wood is fucking based.
>>72509857
>You can switch jobs if you feel strongly about it.
Yeah, because that is easy when you're a pregnant woman having to work the types of jobs that hasn't got paid maternity leave.
>>72509857
Well that's the role that you would like the Government to take, but a lot of people would disagree - the Government must promote income, health, education and social equality as well.
>>72510416
>>72510599
I guess it's ok if I hate niggers then, since China is very pro-active in that regard
>>72510932
Not considering the effects is just stupid. Whether or not the policies are good depends on the net effect. Nothing is completely only positive.
>>72510780
Bernie made a bad argument: china is bad but still does x.
to this james replied: china is bad.
how is this not retarded?
an example of an actual argument is:
>North korea gives its children free food depsite being even worse than china, that doesn't mean we should do it.
>>72510030
How on Earth does that counter Bernie's point though? It's so unrelated
>>72510089
hmm don't think that's it, try again though
>>72509006
It doesn't matter if it's not a logical progression, for all intents and purposes he just rekt Bernie to hell and back according to the standards of USA """debate"""
>>72511008
Then don't have a fucking child?
I'd support government benefits like this if abortion was outlawed. But it's not, so there's MULTIPLE steps at which you can prevent a pregnancy, meaning it's entirely within your control.
>Don't have sex
>If you have sex, use contraceptives
>If you have sex with no contraceptives, get an abortion
If you fail each and every one of these simple preventative measures, then fuck you, you chose to have the child, you fucking deal with it.
>>72510255
please don't say nigga on the internet when you're obviously white. I'm not even black but I want to vomit when I see some 15 y/o white kid say that on the internet like they're cool
>>72509006
James woods has an IQ of 185 you dipshit. Plus he's right, the king of cucks made a ridiculous comparison while willfully ignoring the grave abuses of people, women specifically in this case, who live in China.
Its like saying the nazis may have killed all those Jews but at least they treated them for lice first. The US doesn't have mass lice treatments therefore is worse then nazi Germany!
So if he's retarded you must be brain dead
>>72510089
>>72511085
>two chinamen arguing about Chinese culture
>>72509225
The CCP can kill foetuses if people have more thqn one kid
>>72511160
>15 y/o white kid
>white kid
Look at the flag again idiot
>>72511180
But james didn't say that, he said something entirely unrelated.
>>72509006
>IQ 195
>clinically retarded
choose one, retard
>>72510168
How do you so ridiculously miss the point that Bernie was making? How much does he need to spoon feed you that he's not praising China, he's using them as contrast to make the point that America needs maternity leave. Seriously no wonder your country is going downhill when there's retards like you voting. You're probably not even voting for the candidate that's best for you (never mind who's best for America as a whole) if you can't even understand their policies and ideas.
>>72510223
>decline in the fiscal output of companies toward maternity leave as opposed to the US
wat.jpeg
>>72509006
Nah he's definitely right that's why there is such a huge gender imbalance in China. Plus they were grounding up fetuses and using them for stamina pills so they definitely shouldn't be held up as an example of progressive human rights.
http://knowledgenuts.com/2013/09/27/chinas-horrifying-fetus-pills/
>>72510462
I think you just reached unprecedented levels of edginess
seriously this has to be a record
>>72509145
>>72511180
>>72511375
His IQ rises as we speak the madman
>>72511377
what's retarded is trying to turn the USA into a communist shit hole.
>>72510487
what did Bernie say wrong though?
and how is Woods correcting him, his point is barely on the same subject
>>72510779
coz they made trade agreements? /s
>>72511481
Not possible. I'd have to move to Australia to be able to reach that.
>>72510943
You aren't getting it kid.
Its not who's right and who's wrong. That's not what I'm arguing at least. I can't speak for op or the other person you quoted but I assume OP is in the same boat as me here.
Get out of debate mode for a second you cuck and look at bow the exchange unfolds. Remove faggot bernie for a second. Replace both guys with random men. This is how the exchange basically goes.
Guy 1: "even the idiots on mars are building new schools"
Guy 2: "martians can't even count to 3 you utter moron"
Guy 2 is calling guy 1 a moron by arguing in a way that STRENGHTENS guy 2's original argument.
Back to Bernie. Not saying Bernie is right and that his argument is sound. You brought up very clearly how stupid his argument isin your example.
The issue here is james wood accepting Bernie's premise, and then issuing a statement that strengthens Bernie's faulty position while calling Bernie a moron.
Do you get it now?
>>72511139
This, considering chinese aren't white bernie just got fucking #REKT
China also outlaws abortion.
>>72511377
>he's not praising China, he's using them as contrast to make the point that America needs maternity leave.
That's a horrible argument, you inbred convict. How does it show that America needs maternity leave? The only reason he can point to it and say that "even they do this" is because he views government mandated maternity leave as a 100% good thing. He hasn't made the argument that it IS, he just says it is, then contrasts us with China for no fucking reason. He needs to prove that government mandated maternity leave is a boon first.
I could just as easily, and with a better argument, point out that we could assume almost all social policies used by China are bad given their horrible track record on human rights.
>>72511377
>he's using them as contrast to make the point that America needs maternity leave
And in doing so he's setting up the notion that America is worse than a country that codifies infanticide into its laws.
I mean heck Cuntstraya, even Hitler, whose not known as a nice guy in the history books believed in a Living Wage. :^)
>>72509055
he's accepted his fate. he was in the business too long
>>72510780
>Saying we shouldn't follow China's example isn't an argument, it's a statement of fact.
you know just coz you agree with something doesn't make it a fact? A fact is like 5 * 3 = 15, not "we shouldn't aim to have equal or higher standards to China in a particular area because China is different to us and what applies to them doesn't necessarily apply to us"
>>72510982
I'm glad Australia's political views don't align with 4chan unlike the USA's. Also I'm glad that people like you aren't old enough to vote so hopefully you have time to mature before you make important decisions. Seriously voters like you will lead us to an idiocracy where the "coolest" or most "based" candidate wins.
One's IQ needs to be around 70 (we typically diagnose below 76) to be clinically retarded.
>>72511636
yeah people get that Sanders is a fucking retard that makes Chain seem like the worst thing they did was spill some milk.
>>72511845
He can have an insane IQ and still make utterly retarded statements, which he did. IQ doesn't win an argument.
>>72511308
Ok I looked again and saw an Eastern European country, now what?
>>72511912
One can make misguided or incorrect statements, but with a high IQ one can only knowingly falsify a retarded statement.
>>72511845
>didn't even finish his degree
Anyway OP probably knows he isn't retarded, but he this exchange makes him look like one
>>72511912
>which he did
All this shilling in a China thread for an old kike who uses people's Student Loan money to buy a brand new $175k sports car. Never change Lefty faggots.
>>72511987
High IQ does not stop stupid arguments. IQ is irrelevant to how "correct" your opinions are. This is provable simply by the fact that people with polar opposite views can both maintain the same IQ.
IQ has nothing to do with anything and I'm not sure why you even brought it up. He made stupid statements and make a provably retarded point. He can have a 90 foot cock, billions of dollars, a 290 IQ, and he's still wrong.
>>72511636
>Guy 2 is calling guy 1 a moron by arguing in a way that STRENGHTENS guy 2's original argument.
How does it strengthen his original argument? Using your example, it underlines the fact that the martians are fucking idiots and are a poor example of anything regarding intelligent decision making, so making an argument that "even they" do something is useless - by association you should be suspicious of anything a retard like that would do.
>james wood accepting Bernie's premise
He didn't accept Bernie's premise. Woods' implicit argument is, rather obviously, that using such a morally bankrupt society and government like China's as a positive example of any social policy is patently ridiculous.
It'd be like saying something like:
>Even this serial killer thinks industrial farming is cruel!
And someone responding:
>That guy FUCKING KILLS PEOPLE, YOU IDIOT!
They're not accepting the premise at all, they're underlining how fucking ridiculous the argument is in the first place by highlighting something that most people would fine completely objectionable and would cast doubt on any moral observations or opinions held by the serial killer being used as an example.
>Do you get it now?
You pretentious faggot.
>kid.
nothin personnel kid
heh
*sheathes sword*
His IQ is like 160-170 mate. look it up.
>>72512100
ask me how i know you are james
>>72512100
I'm not a lefty. Am I supposed to defend stupid fucking statements because James Woods are in some vague way closer on the political spectrum than I am with left wing people or else I'm a filthy communist traitor?
Get the fuck out of here, you simpering faggot. Go jerk off in a Donald Trump thread if you're addicted to pack mentality.
>>72511700
good job, just proved my point again. If you didn't just see red and charge you might notice that I never said if Bernie's statement is intelligent/right or not, just that the other guy misunderstood it and is arguing against a strawman. But nope, you haven't really passed 5th grade reading comprehension, maybe soon you can answer "how" and "why" questions, but stick to "what" questions until you have more practice :)
>>72511707
:^)
>>72512104
You're doing what James Woods did now, you're arguing something completely unrelated to what I said. I simply stated the fact that his IQ is not "clinically retarded" like OP asked, and that only a clinical retard can make true clinically retarded statements due to their status. You just keep going off about how James was incorrect and mislead in his reasoning (which he was), but it's not arguing my point at all.
>>72511501
hmm wonder which one I'd pick
> Sweden
> North Korea
Think I'll take socialism over fascism
>>72512216
>I never said if Bernie's statement is intelligent/right or not
That has absolutely no bearing on my argument. Bernie could be completely correct or 100% wrong - it doesn't matter. His argument is shit in the first place and Woods' response is just underlining that initially ridiculous statement.
The guy you originally argued against was pointing out that the contrast argument is absurd. Your response was that the guy didn't understand that Bernie was making an argument by using a contrasting example - even though that's EXACTLY what the guy was pointing out was retarded.
It's like you read something, decide what you think you want it to mean, then response. Like you're in your own little bubble.
Do they not teach you Australians how to read? Are you self taught?
>>72512302
Congratulations on taking OPs post literally and being a complete fucking autist, you god damn moron. He was saying that he was being retarded. No, I OP wasn't genuinely inquiring whether James Woods would be considered mentally retarded were he to be personally evaluated.
Why do you guys need stupid shit like this spelled out for you? His IQ is irrelevant. Fuck yourself.
>>72509459
You are making the mistake of thinking that forcing other people to pay unproductive people and encouraging the poor to have children they can't afford, is a good thing. Subsidising poor decisions is not a good thing.
>>72512113
> it underlines the fact that the martians are fucking idiots
Exactly. That's guy 1's stance. Then guy 2 further proves this stance correct, all the while calling the other guy a moron.
>he doesn't accept the premise
He does. Arguing against Bernie's faulty original premise is James conceding.
Had he said something even remotely similar to what have said then we would have a different case. See YOU didn't accept Bernie's argument and instead you countered his original premise by pointing out Bernie's logical error. Woods doesn't do this for whatever reason. He instead tries to argue against Bernie's bad logic instead of calling out the entire premise before engaging.
You're a half idiot. You know you are wron but you are still trying to save face here on an anonymous image board as if people really care. I see that you get it finally, however.
You understand Mr woods approach was wrong in this instance. Human error it happens.
In this exchange he came out looking the dumber. It happens. You're learning that tonight with our own exchange. Bye
>>72512571
Who's the angry retard now? :^)
>>72509006
Based as fuck. It's the senator who has it wrong.
>>72510061
>ywn cum on natalie's itty bitty titties in her prime
;_;
>>72512637
Epic meme face. And you're the retard, as you have been from the start. Now fuck off to some other thread so you can frogpost and annoy someone else with your irrelevant half baked bullshit.
>>72512113
your example is more of an argument because when you read it in you hear the anger of the second guy which makes the argument make sense, but what james said more like this:
>Even stalin thinks industrial farming is cruel!
>Stalin was a bad leader , YOU IDIOT!
>>72512755
That's some prime tush travesty you're giving me. I'll move on with the world and from this thread, but not from your heart.
>>72512615
You'ré a fucking retard and your argument is wrong.
To be honest I think you are a slant eyed chink with the amount of retardation in your statement. Do you like living in a country that doesn't grind up their aborted fetuses for stamina pills you sneaky chink bastard?
>>72512615
>He instead tries to argue against Bernie's bad logic instead of calling out the entire premise before engaging.
You're a fucking idiot, so let me spell this out: Woods IS calling out the entire premise with his response. It's implicit and pretty fucking easy to grasp. By highlighting that the Chinese abuse human rights, he's pointing out that they can't make proper judgments on human rights so using them as an example or contrast in this situation doesn't logically follow.
Does he need to spell it out with a bulleted list like a fucking Buzzfeed article? Do I before you get it?
>You understand Mr woods approach was wrong in this instance.
It wasn't, though.
>trying to save face here on an anonymous image board as if people really care.
>I don't care but I keep responding and claiming that I've "won" even though I just pointed out that it's meaningless and no one cares
wew lad
>>72509006
Judging from that tweet, yes he is retarded.
>>72513107
You already lost. Stop trying.
Bernie all but points out the Chinese cannot make proper judgments I regards to human rights. But as he says. EVEN THEY can get it right with maternity leave.
Woods engages by saying exactly what Bernie said, and gives a specific example that shows how correct Bernie is (infant killing)
This only strengthens Bernie's original argument.
Bad tactic by woods. Plain and simple. Argue tell your cuck face turns blue but you can't change reality.
>>72511845
Then that means the majority of Africa is clinically retarded.
>>72513580
>being this dense
Holy shit you're actually a moron.
Stop posting, go outside and put a bullet in your brain you waste of oxygen.
Just fucking kill yourself you worthless puke, you are a malfunction to our species.
Your parents should have been shot when they copulated your existence.
>>72512549
>Do they not teach you Australians how to read? Are you self taught?
> implying we don't have the highest education index of any country
>>72511012
>the Government must promote income, health, education and social equality as well.
Well that's the role that you would like the Government to take, but a lot of people would disagree.
