Public bathrooms should all be unisex. And it's not about the trannies. Fuck trannies.
>parents with young kids of the opposite gender can go into the bathroom with them
>in sketchy areas, fathers and boyfriends can go into the bathroom with their daughters/girlfriends to make sure they're safe (no, rapists don't obey "women's bathroom" signs just like shooters don't obey "no guns" signs)
>if one bathroom is being cleaned, you can use the other bathroom
>more efficient when building new buildings to not separate male and female bathrooms
>there is literally no reason for gender-segregated bathrooms, it is literally the same as having separate water fountains for whites and niggers
It's not even about the trannies, it just makes sense. Of course private establishments should be free to continue to have gender-segregated bathrooms if they choose, but there should be a strong push for public bathrooms to move towards being unisex.
Women will still have a winge. They dont like to be equal, they like to complain
>>72480629
The point isn't to appease women though. It's to make things more convenient, safe, and logical for everyone.
>>72480066
If you want to share a public restroom with women then you've never lived with a woman or been in a woman's bathroom/restroom or been to any venue with short intermissions.
This sjw hubub is a small price to pay for segregated bathrooms.
>>72482787
>you've never lived with a woman
I have almost all my life.
>been in a woman's bathroom/restroom
I have been in many unisex bathrooms.
>been to any venue with short intermissions.
What?
Wow.
Our economy must be fucking roaring if all we can find to concern ourselves with is fucking bathrooms.
How many fucking bathroom threads do we need on /pol/?
>>72482890
I suppose the other option is that you are a girl, or at least larp as one, and thus are wholly unaware of the damage left in your wake.
>What?
lines.
>>72480066
That image is hilarious but its not like its 'unsolvable' like people are saying it is.
>>72482890
Women's bathroom lines are long as fuck because they take forever in the bathroom.
In a venue with short bathroom breaks, a unisex bathroom line would stretch for miles. Dudes' bathroom lines... Well, there usually aren't any lines.
>>72483142
The side lengths dont add up to a trapezoid. You have to use inverse trig functions to find the actual area. I asked about it on sci and some guy constructed this diagram on matlab showing how ridiculous this shape should actually look like, given the values.
>>72483142
check the numbers, it doesn't work very well in euclidean space as drawn and labelled.
>>72483295
Even back when I was in school they had similar types of drawings, they just said "figure not drawn to scale". This isn't common core, just a poor drawing.
The answer's 70 by the way, right?
makes sense? whats the point? all its going to do is make it easier for rapists. having a gun and being ready to shoot up a aplace is totally different from segregated bathrooms. its called morals. things are just as fine as they are anyways.
>>72483559
the line 5 units long isn't perpendicular to anything, so no.
but you're right, it doesn't have anything to do with common core though, it's just a shitty diagram.
>>72483142
Are people pretending this isn't easy as fuck?
That's such a simple problem. If Boomers can't solve it, they have absolutely no place in deciding how education works in this country.
To start off, you subtract 16-12 and divide by two, giving 2 for the base of each triangle. Thus, the area of each of the triangles is 5, so 10 combined. Then, we just find the area of the rectangle, 12*5, or 60. So, the area is 70. It's basic.
>>72483559
(16 + 12) * (5 / 2) = 70 yeah
>>72483914
>base of triangle is 2
>2^2 + 5^2 = 8^2
>4+25 = 64
>29 = 64
congratulations, you've done it m8, you solved the problem.
wtf
Height * median, shitty sides don't matter and are made to catch autists who find the area of the triangle, multiply it by 2, and then find the area of the rectangle.
>>72484219
what height would that be?
>>72483237
you dont have to use inverse trig functions to find the area, you just split it into 4 triangles and solve for each side.
and for people complaining the side of 8 is larger than the top of 12 so its not to scale, it's just identified as a 4 sided polygon with those parameters
Its like people have never gone to college
>>72480066
sqrt(8^2-5^2)=6.25
6.25+12=18.25>16
I won't even try to take this geometric abomination any further. If it's hyperbolic, then why is it in K12 geometry?
>>72480066
I have no problem with pissing in front of womawomenn as long as they don't make a scene when I pull my pants down to pee
I know I'm wrong but I'll post it anyway.
All these fucking Womens Studies majors trying to argue that 8 5 2 triangles can exist...
Day of the Rope cant happen soon enough...
A = 70
>>72484423
urinals will be a thing of the past in the bathroom of the future. they're sexist after all, wait in line for a stall like they have to.
>>72484517
No shit faggot
>>72480066
Women are secret disgusting faggots. I cringe everytime I catch a whiff of what's inside the women's bathroom.
Keep men and women separated when they're shitting and bleeding.
>>72480066
No dude. Let me break down why this is a real issue
It's not about trannies
It's not about parents taking their kids into the bathroom
It's not about possible rapists.
It's all about women and the fact that they take for-fucking-ever in the bathrooms. You know what's going to fucking happen if bathrooms become unisex? All the women will flood into the men's bathroom and use our toilets when the women's bathroom has a line. You ever been to a popular venue and gone to the bathroom? Men's room is clear, while the women are waiting in a line because they all take their sweet time. Now imagine all those women rushing into the men's bathroom for convenience, making US suffer as a consequence of their bullshit as well.
>>72480066
Fucking easy. 12 X 5=60
60=Center square.
Now we have the 2 side triangles left.
16-12=4
4=Base of the 2 triangles (Put together)
(b*h)/2= Area of the 2 triangles (Put together)
4*5=20
20/2=10
Triangles+Center square= Total.
10+60=70
70 unity square
>>72485043
>>72484741
>>72484517
this shitposting has to stop.
>>72485043
The shape isn't drawn to scale. And the angles are completely unknown. The only way to solve is if you assume the 5 is perpindicular to the base, and the answer is different even then.
>>72485186
It has to continue, We're talking bathroom problems right here.
It's definitely 80 you fucking shitposters.
>>72485218
Post your calculation (Assuming 5 is perpendicular to base.)
Absolutely not, this would weaken the patriarchy; next thing you know, women want to get out of the kitchen and gain voting rights... Oh shit, look at how we've regressed
>>72484483
Why can't a 8 5 2 triangle exist?
>>72485579
Because 29 does not equal 64, reeeeeeee.
>>72484060
If bathrooms are made unisex I'm going start cross dressing and pretend to be a girl so I can catch ladies in there alone and grape the shit out of them. Then we'll see how long unisex bathrooms stick around.
>>72485722
That hurts my head
Math got hard after 5th grade.
>>72486014
The Pythagorean Theorem (Only works with right triangles)
(a^2)+(b^2)=c^2
(5^2)+(2^2)=8^2
25+4=64
29=64
The statement above is not true; therefore, the triangle is impossible to make
>>72484392
>sqrt(8^2-5^2)=6.25
That equality is wrong faggot.
>>72486255
Yeah, basically it would only be solvable (as in a possible polygon) if the 16 wasn't given as the length of the lower side.
But then it would require the use of the Pythagorean theorem and (unsimplified/unrounded square roots to be a true equality) to solve it, which is probably above the difficulty level for the intended audience of the problem.
Whoever created the problem should be crucified.
>>72486386
Are you really giving somebody shit for rounding 6.24499 to 6.25?
And I thought I was being autistic.
>>72480066
>>72484392
>>72485218
>autism
the area is (12+16)/2 * sqrt (8^2 - 2^2) = 108.44
Even a monkey can solve that. This is an extremely easy question in the SAT. Have you faggots even graduated from HS yet?
This is a unisex bathroom thread not a trapezium thread faggots
>>72485475
No it's not you fucktard
You can stop posting now
>>72483140
>>72483188
I am a man and I have a beard.
>lines
Two bathrooms and you can use either one, no more issue. And for new establishments, one bathroom that's twice the size is far cheaper than two bathrooms, so for the same cost you can make one bathroom that's 3x, maybe 4x the size of the old ones, reducing the lines. And you could stop being selfish fucks and realize that it would be beneficial to women to not have these long fucking lines.
>>72483142
Except it is unsolvable.
>>72484334
>it's just identified as a 4 sided polygon with those parameters
Then give me a formula for solving a 4 sided polygon faggot
>>72487033
It rounds to 6.24 fucktard
>>72485919
Unisex bathrooms would prevent this you fucking moron. Gender-specific bathrooms you can still crossdress and do that and no guys will be there to stop you, unisex bathrooms and there will be men in there to stop you.
>inb4 you're a feminist who cries women don't need men to protect them
>>72485579
Because we're talking about Euclidian space fucktard
A=[(a+b)/2]•h
A=[(16+12)/2]•5
A=[28/2]•5
A=14•5
A=70
That is a relatively easy problem.
Common Core is advancing our nation's intellectual capabilities.
>>72489190
>formula
nigga mathematics is about deduction
>>72484426
shows how to solve it
My professors always gave problems like this to break our habit of assuming.
However, if this is actually a gradeschool question, its rather unfair. i'd totally give it as a *bonus* question though, just to keep my eyes on the smart kids. them nigga's always up to no good
>>72489362
>our nation's intellectual capabilities.
>United States
>intellectual capabilities
>United
>States
>intellectual
>capabilities
>>72485710
a^2 + b^2 = c^2
4+25 = 64???
>>72487033
No, I'm giving him shit for rounding an irrational number at all. 6.24499 is not the square root of 39. The square root of 39 is the square root of 39.
You can't round an irrational number into a rational number and then still use it in an equality.
>>72489574
>Blames own nation for one's own intellectual faults.
Good job, m8.
You found a great scapegoat.
>>72480066
the lines could be curved i guess, the shape just isn't drawn to scale :D`
Not even like you need the length of the hypotenuse to solve this kind of problem.
Its just a terrible diagram.
>>72490128
they're both 8
