Why do people pretend there're absolutely no laws that guarantees equal pay for equal labor?
To pander for stupid women's votes.
hernie knows all the intelligent women are already voting trump, so he had to counteract shillary's >muh vaginal cavity argument that appeals to feminazis
Heh
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wJsW0-qw3Us
>>72377625
because liberals and women are stupid and will believe anything
>>72377625
How the fuck would you even accomplish what he is saying. Are they going to establish a static wage per occupation where you can't make more or less than that wage?
>>72377625
In higher up positions, a lot of the women don't get equal pay, like political spots/acting/sports etc.
That being said, I do agree that women get equal pay everywhere else. They just pick careers that make less so their average is less. Bernie knows all of this, but to come out against equal pay legislation in ANY form, would lose him a lot of votes. So yeah, it's pandering on a certain level but he's got to do it. Just like Trump pretends he's a good Christian.
>>72378189
That's the basics of soviet style communism.
>>72377625
They invent a problem which doesn't exist so that they can perpetually attract voters looking for a solution.
>>72378241
>In higher up positions, a lot of the women don't get equal pay, like political spots/acting/sports etc.
I am sure those men are paid more even if they don't pull audiences or are more renown actors, right? It's just because they are men, right?
>>72378472
Exactly.
The NBA has much larger audiences than the WNBA. So of course male basketball players get paid more than female basketball players. This is just common sense.
>>72378241
actually studies have shown that women will statistically make more than men assuming they start the same job at the same time
and the reason the "wage gap" exists is because 2/3 of minimum wage workers are women
>>72378853
>and the reason the "wage gap" exists is because 2/3 of minimum wage workers are women
also not to mention that most waiters are women, and they dont claim tips on their taxes
>>72377625
Lefties. They are just like that.
>>72378472
Regardless of audience turnout, work is work. ScarJo in the Avengers shouldn't get paid less than what Robert Downy Jr. got when they had the same screen time and put in the same effort, might be a bad example but you get the point. I understand the whole audience thing, but still, it is a problem when it doesn't have to be, Scarjo can't choose to be someone-else so she can get paid more. I'm not saying it's because of sexism among the producers, but the pay gap does exist and that should be acknowledged in some way. Just pay all the leads the same, simple.
>>72378853
right but they will always make less because they don't go into the STEM field as frequently as men, because of how they're wired. They pick careers that are more intuitive(psychology, politics) and less mechanical(math, science).
All people like to externalize their failures. Most women dont suceed what they want in both career and family so they blame the patriarchy. Minorities will blame white supremacy. Whites blame the jews.
>>72379182
that's not how it works though. hypothetically speaking, you're saying the single best actor in the world and the worst actor in the world should get paid the same because they're both actors
you are retarded
>>72379182
i hope no one takes the time to seriously reply to this
>>72379182
>RDJ and some random guy should get paid the same if they have same screen time and put in same effort
>problem when it doesn't have to be
there isn't a problem, the people are paid how much they are worth. RDJ gets paid more because he sells more tickets, not because he is a man you imbecile
just like scarjo would get paid more than a random guy for the same work
how fucking dense r u?
>>72379182
>Regardless of audience turnout, work is work.
No. You're paid what you're worth. Don't like the pay? Don't agree to the job. It's that simple. ScarJo is paid less than RBJ because the amount the studio is willing to pay is higher for RBJ. Now if that reason is because ScarJo is replaceable and RBJ isn't or because ScarJo's agent sucks, either way there are valid reasons.
And for sports, if you force sports teams to pay female athletes the same as men, when the women don't bring in as much of an audience, then you're going to see less women's sports across the board.
>>72379182
People are not paid by how hard/much you work.
They are paid accordingly to the economical value they can make/provide.
This is high school economy for god's sake.
>>72377625
>what the fuck is the equal pay act of 1963?
>>72379537
>next 3 posts
>>72379584
>>72379782
>>72379832
>>72378295
>something even moderately touched by the govt.
>M-m-muh communism
Keep crying wolf and it'll catch up to you some day. People are starting to care about that word a lot less and when it actually happens it might be a problem because you fucking retards don't know what a communist is and kept labeling anything to do with government communism.
>>72379485
Acting takes very little skill for the most part, especially in comic book movies.
> you're saying the single best actor in the world and the worst actor in the world should get paid the same because they're both actors.
No, I'm saying the leads should get paid the same if they have the same screen-time/put in the same effort. They all generally bring in the same amount of people regardless, Ghost in the Shell is ONLY getting made because they got ScarJo. They're all worth around the same, it makes no sense to gyp someone out of pay to give RDJ a few more cars.
>>72379584
>RDJ and some random guy should get paid the same if they have same screen time and put in same effort
yeah, if they're both leads and they're in the same movie. RDJ is a hack.
>there isn't a problem, the people are paid how much they are worth. RDJ gets paid more because he sells more tickets, not because he is a man you imbecile
lol, RDJ gets paid more because he is a little princess and can't settle for less, the Avengers would get massive audience goers regardless. It's the Avengers.
>>72379832
They provide more or less the same, ScarJo is very popular among women, see Lucy, see Ghost in the Shell. That aside, these producers agree to how much they'll pay them REGARDLESS of who brings in the most people. They settle on the pay BEFORE people pay to see the movie.
>>72379999
that's his point.
>>72377625
been wondering this for a long time, its illegal to discriminate against someone based on their ethnicity/religion/gender etc like its already a thing, if you have the same position/job title, same responsibilities, and work the same hours as a man with and still make less than him, you should go and find the nearest lawyer ASAP so you can cash in on a huge paycheck
>>72377625
Because they have entire political moments and massive organizations that only exist if this narrative continues. It's literally a fight for survival for these folks.
HOLY SHIT, MY BAIT WORKED SO FUCK WELL
LOLL DUMB-ASS TEENAGERS.
; ^ )
>>72380229
>RDJ gets paid more because he is a little princess and can't settle for less
So he values his time and the studio agrees with him, this is bad?
>>72378241
Didn't women in white house earn more by average than men do?
Also, when it comes to determining your average wage based on the level of competition you face, women are making far more money than men are, since men who do as well as the best female athletes generally get paid almost nothing.
When it comes to acting, your entire pay is based on your popularity and ability draw a crowd. This is why Emma Watson made a fuckload of more money than the other actors of her age generally do in movies.
>>72377625
Because their existence is inconvenient for the liberal narrative. Though I have to wonder why they don't just go the BLM route and blame everything on "Systematic racism". Then they don't have the preexisting laws getting in the way and they can have a phantom enemy that they can use to constantly get more.
>>72379182
>scarjo leaves
>is immediately replaced by bimbo with a bod #1047210
>barely anybody notices
>absolutely nobody cares
>RDJ leaves
>any movie with a "new" iron man absolutely tanks because RDJ is so amazingly good at playing the part that it's part of his personality now
It's almost like one has actual talent and the other is just on cruise control until her body falls apart and she's utterly worthless.
Pic very related.
>>72379182
cant use acting as an example, some actors have more screenplays competing for their attention giving them and their agents more bargaining power purely because they are popular, though scarJo is at the top of the game so she probs should be compensated similarly for her work but the real reason is that you can have a Avengers movie without black widow, you cant have one without iron man so in that case it has something to do with the established roles in the universe that their perspective character plays
>>72379182
>Regardless of audience turnout, work is work. ScarJo in the Avengers shouldn't get paid less than what Robert Downy Jr. got when they had the same screen time and put in the same effort, might be a bad example but you get the point. I understand the whole audience thing, but still, it is a problem when it doesn't have to be, Scarjo can't choose to be someone-else so she can get paid more. I'm not saying it's because of sexism among the producers, but the pay gap does exist and that should be acknowledged in some way. Just pay all the leads the same, simple.
>>72378853
And because women take more sick days, do less overtime, and produce less per hour in average. This holds no matter if they have a kid or not.
>>72380229
>They provide more or less the same, ScarJo is very popular among women, see Lucy, see Ghost in the Shell. That aside, these producers agree to how much they'll pay them REGARDLESS of who brings in the most people. They settle on the pay BEFORE people pay to see the movie.
Those damn PATRIARCHY amirite
>>72379182
This might work on lower skill required jobs that are easily replaceable. But a person's personality can rake in more money. Just give woman paid time off during child birth and call it a day.
>>72379182
>Used actors as an example
Actors only get paid that much because of their name you fuggin' fug
>>72380229
>>72380875
Also how do you plan to explain that ScarJo gets almost 4 times as much as the 4 other casts eventhough she have the same screen-time/put in the same effort?
Pro-tip: because you're wrong.
>>72380126
No, it's literally communism
>>72380774
>RDJ is in higher demand than ScarJo
>RDJ is a better actor, hands down
>RDJ has done more than just superhero movies
ScarJo doesn't deserve to get paid more, she signed a contract. And there's no way they had the same screen time.
>>72380341
Oh I know, was more in reply to bernie and the faggots who are unaware of the equal pay act. Should have been more clear
>>72380229
>I have literally no idea how the real world works
>>72377625
But the pay gap disappears when you compare like jobs to to like.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BDj_bN0L8XM
Is he suggesting that his government would mandate that management, workers, cleaners, and owners would all be paid exactly the same?
Is Sanders from the DDR?
Why the fuck should people get payed the same? It's absolutely pants on head retarded.
>>72380229
>one guy brings in $500 million in ticket sales
>one guy brings in $200k in ticket sales
>they should be paid the same
so when the first guy leaves for another production and you're out $500 million? was that your plan all along?
>lol, RDJ gets paid more because he is a little princess and can't settle for less, the Avengers would get massive audience goers regardless. It's the Avengers.
so you're saying that RDJ would not have impacted their sales at all? wow, that $4b marvel studio is really stupid then, just burning hundreds of millions like that! you should totally get over there and turn that ship around with your impeccable business acumen!
>They settle on the pay BEFORE people pay to see the movie.
its almost as if they know how much draw each actor has!
>allow women to choose their own profession
>women distribute themselves into the workforce according to their liking
>complain that they don't 'earn' as much as men
>>72381558
>payed
>>72381574
BURGER FLIPPERS SHOULD BE PAID AS MUCH AS SURGEONS IF THEY WORK THE SAME AMOUNT OF HOURS YOU SHITLORD
DELETE YOUR POST NOW
>>72381764
Whatever nigger.
>>72377625
Because it dose not fit the narrative.
>>72377625
notice how he says "pay equity". They are supposed to get the same "share" of the means of production as the men, even if they are contributing less effectively.
After all, the outcome is what leftists optimize, and the goal is to get the outcome equal (-ly low) for everyone.
>>72377625
It's about equality of outcome not equality of opportunity.
>>72377625
No, no, no. This kind of law is like
Male: 2 degrees, five years of experience, interned during college, work overtime, never calls off sick
Female: Feminist dance theory degree, vagina, call off a week of work each month for her period, constantly getting others to cover her shift.
They would be payed the same amount. That is what equality he wants.
>>72379182
If Scarlett Johansson was someone like Angelina Jolie I'm sure she would have been paid the same, if not more than Robert Downy Jr.
Different actors have different rates based on how well they sell tickets.
>>72377625
>equity
Does he mean he wants women to get payed more for the same job to "balance" average wages ? That's retarded on so many levels.
That would be the nail to the coffin of women on the job market cause employers would pick men that they have to pay less.
>>72378038
Heh I know this and say it often but sometimes reading it makes me laugh more
>>72382356
It's not about equal anything. It's about just making things better, you fucking marxist.
>>72383984
the proposed bill is supposed to make it easier for women to sue when their paycheck is lower than that of their male counterpart. not sure about the details.
>>72377625
Equal pay for equal work is gonna fuck women so bad. Mothers who took years out of the workforce can't compete with men who worked their whole lives for the same jobs because the mother's can't offer to do the job for cheaper anymore.
The overall gender pay gap in absolute terms is gonna grow even more, the gender employment gap will grow. "Sexism" will be blamed, justifying laws and quotas to handicap men.
The pay gap exists because women are worse at negotiating a wage. It has nothing to do with politics.
