what does /pol Think of GMO's
i dont give a fuck
>>72311176
it's fine as long as you don't modify them 'wrongly'
>>72311176
will eventually end up with (due to geoengineering ruining the atmosphere) making it impossible for anything other than GMOs to bare fruit, forcing everyone on earth to consume them, and i think you know what happens next.
na u don't hav a clue.
>>72311239
I must add, wrongly is not making a mouse with an ear, wrongly is engineer some super dangerous bacteria as a weapon or something like that
>>72311176
> El Rato's NSA
>>72311317
what happens next?
>>72311176
Depends on how you define GMOs. Farmers have cross pollinated plants with specific traits to get the yields they desire for a very long time. Technically, that is GMO.
>>72311438
Genetic engineering is not the same as cross pollination
As long as they're assessed on a case by case basis and it's clear on the packaging what's been done I think it's fine. Knocking out a gene for over ripening is one thing but inserting foreign genes (e.g. BT toxin in corn) is another.
This is the latest thing in the field (CRISPR Cas9). The video gets interesting at 0.50
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2pp17E4E-O8
>>72311438
you're not this retarded
>>72311569
> clear on the packaging
Oops, I though OP meant GM foods. Anyway, a bag of mouse 'ears' might be good for the dogs to chew on.
>>72311176
I think you should read about CRISPR/CAS9, and prepare for the next generation of GMO, raptorchicken breast meat. :^)
The future's so bright, I don't even need eyes to see it.
